Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Capella University
Introduction
The article under evaluation is titled Using Action Research to Navigate An Unfamiliar Teaching
Assignment by M. Dicker. The purpose of this evaluation is to assess how accurately the author,
a certified teacher asked to instruct out of her field, used qualitative writing to recount the action
research process she used to familiarize herself with her new curriculum.
The title does not reflect the central phenomenon being studied nor does it specifically reflect the
people or site being studied. All of this information is found later in the article. In addition, the
title only vaguely implies that students and teachers are being studied in a school setting.
Problem Statement
The central issue is identified as proper training and preparation for unfamiliar or unexpected
teaching assignments. The author uses her personal experience as evidence that this is an
important issue, noted in paragraphs 1-3. She cites similar experiences if other teachers in
paragraph 4. The author wishes to investigate how teachers cope and prepare themselves for
impromptu situations where they must teach a subject in which they have no training or are not
properly qualified to instruct. The author also wants to investigate how such teachers use their
The author’s action research approach appears to have been focused on the effects of action
research on a teacher’s ability to instruct in an out-of-field situation. While she does provide
some brief background information on action research, there is no distinct review of literature.
The study follows APA style in the crediting or citing of the references consulted.
The author specifies using action research to investigate how teachers who are asked to instruct
an area that is out of their field can use their prior knowledge and experience The central
question is how do such teachers organize their lessons? The purpose statement indicates that
the author, herself a teacher, will undertake an action research project with herself and her
students as the participants and her classroom as the main research site. The main question is
really the only one posed and it is narrowed to the problem address in this study.
Data Collection
The author uses steps of action research cited from another source (Kemmis and McTaggert,
1982, p.7) which consist of planning, acting, monitoring, and reflecting. Since the author was
already a practicing teacher, the steps to obtain access to the cite and students were not listed but
would likely be the same steps necessary to become certified in the required field of instruction.
The author’s sampling was limited to the students under her tutelage. She took no specific or
special steps for data sampling apart from having her students keep an ongoing journal of their
work. The data collection is nonetheless extensive and involves herself and her students. The
data was specifically identified as coming from four sources; her own reflective journal, journals
recorded and kept by the students, consultation from a former English teacher; and a tape
Evaluation of a Qualitative Study 4
recording of the first and last lessons of the studied class period. There is evidence that the
author has used a protocol for recording data in that she included the four sources mentioned
above.
Text analysis was used to perform qualitative data analysis. In the case of the tape recording, it
served as a method to check the accuracy of the text analyses. These analyses were used to
categorize the author’s teaching styles, which she stated in her writing, were reflective of her
teaching philosophy in math and drama. Through the data recorded in her journal and the
journals of the students, she derived that the theme for math was to find the right answer to a
perceived problem while the theme for drama was the encouragement of creative thinking by
such problem solving. This information, in turn, allowed the author to combine a teacher
directed style of instruction with cooperative student learning. The author’s findings did answer
her central research question: a teacher can call upon prior knowledge of familiar subject areas
and apply this information to teaching an unfamiliar or out-of-field class. These findings by the
author, while based on teacher observations and teacher and student perception, are realistic and
note the methods and results encountered in applying knowledge from teaching math and dram
to instructing a newly created Communications I class. The findings were represented in themes
that showed more than one perspective which could be deciphered by an experienced reader.
These themes were accomplished through the author’s description of her original class
Writing
The author’s writing is informative and written in a convincing manner. It is written totally in a
narrative style that encompasses much detail about the progress of her action research. A first
person point of view is employed. Overall, the article is suitable written for its intended
audience of teachers who find themselves in situations where they must teach out of their field or
knowledge area.
Conclusion
The overall purpose of this article was to chronicle the author’s self-conducted action research on
how prior teaching experience can be applied when teaching out of field. The article is mainly
written to inform other teachers of a way to prepare themselves for situations that are similar to
the author’s. The article is written in a scholarly manner and cites the resources consulted using
the APA bibliography style. The article itself is written in an APA writing style. The article is
detailed and easy to follow, and it thoroughly explains the author’s research methods and the
References