ANFIS Approach for TCSC-based Controller Design

for Power System Stability Improvement

Authors
Swasti R. Khuntia
National Institute of Science & Technology,
Berhampur,
Orissa, India-761008
E-mail: swastigunu@gmail.com
 Brief
• Problem: TCSC-based ANFIS controller design

• System Investigated: SMIB with TCSC

• Design Objective: Improve the power system stability with

rotor angle stability and system voltage profile

• Technique Employed: ANFIS approach

• Other Results: Compared the ANFIS and lead-lag

controller results

• Justification: Simulation results

[2]
 Outline of Presentation

• Modeling the Power System with TCSC

• Proposed Approach

• Application of ANFIS approach

• Compare the lead-lag and ANFIS controller results

• Simulation Results

[3]
 Modeling the Power System with TCSC
• System Investigated:
Vt Eb
jXTH
jXL TCSC
jXT
Generator Infinite Bus

SMIB power system with TCSC

T1

L
T2

Basic Module of a TCSC

[4]
Proposed SIMULINK Model

SMIB with TCSC controller

[5]
Proposed SIMULINK Model

Model for calculation of id, iq, V, I, Pe

[6]
 ANFIS Approach

ANFIS
Approach

Fuzzification Fuzzy Rule

Defuzzification
Layer Layer

[7]
 Proposed ANFIS Approach
• Proposed ANFIS approach utilizes Sugeno FIS
• 7 x 7 Rule base for FLC

w wprime NL NM NS ZE PS PM PL

NL NL NL NL NL NM NS ZE

NM NL NL NL NM NS ZE PS

NS NL NL NM NS ZE PS PM

ZE NL NM NS ZE PS PM PL

PS NM NS ZE PS PM PL PL

PM NS ZE PS PM PL PL PL

PL ZE PS PM PL PL PL PL
[8]
 Proposed ANFIS Approach (cont.)
• Data Generation
– A set of two-dimensional input vectors and the associated set of
one-dimensional output vectors are required
– The training data has been generated by sampling input
variables speed deviation (w) & acceleration (wprime) and
output variable TCSC reactance (xtcsc)
• Rule Extraction & Membership Functions
– After generation of data, the next step is to estimate the initial
rules
– Rules are extracted
– These rules are not so close to the identified system. Hence,
there is a need of optimization of these rules
– The training is continued until the error measure becomes
constant

[9]
 Proposed ANFIS Approach (cont.)
• Results
– Effectiveness of the proposed approach is demonstrated
– The results are reported for system with 25 rules and system
with optimized rule base
– The computation becomes fast and also consumes less memory
• ANFIS Structure for TCSC

0.45
xtcsc

0.4

0.35

0.1
0 0.01
0
-0.1 -0.01 [10]
wprime w
 Proposed ANFIS Approach (cont.)
• Steps to design ANFIS Controller
– Draw the Simulink model with FLC and simulate it with the given
7 x 7 rule base
– The first step to design the ANFIS controller is collecting the
training data while simulating with FLC
– The two inputs, i.e., w and wprime and the output signal, i.e.,
xtcsc gives the training data
– Use anfisedit to create the ANFIS .fis file
– Load the training data collected in Step.1 and generate the FIS
with gbell MF’s
– Train the collected data with generated FIS up to a particular no.
of Epochs

[11]
 Simulation Results
1. Nominal Loading
0.015 140
Uncontrolled
Uncontrolled
Lead - Lag
0.01 120 Lead - Lag

Power Angle (degrees)

ANFIS
Speed Deviation (p.u.)

ANFIS
0.005 100

0 80

-0.005
60

40
-0.01

20
-0.015 0 2 4 6 8 10
0 2 4 6 8 10
time (sec)
time (sec.)
2
Uncontrolled
Lead - Lag
1.5 ANFIS
I (p.u.)

0.5

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 [12]
time (sec.)
 Simulation Results
1. Nominal Loading (cont.)
0.25
2
Uncontrolled
Uncontrolled 0.2 Lead - Lag
Electrical Power (p.u.)

Lead - Lag
1.5 ANFIS
ANFIS 0.15

V (p.u.)
0.1
1
0.05

0
0.5
-0.05

0 -0.1
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
time (sec.) time (sec.)
0.5

0.4
Xtcsc (p.u.)

0.3

0.2
Uncontrolled
0.1 Lead - Lag
ANFIS

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
time (sec.) [13]
 Simulation Results
2. Light Loading
0.01 70
Uncontrolled Uncontrolled
60 Lead - Lag

Power Angle (degrees)

Lead - Lag
Speed Deviation (p.u.)

0.005 ANFIS ANFIS

50

0 40

30
-0.005
20

-0.01 10
0 2 4 6 8 10
0 2 4 6 8 10
time (sec.)
time (sec.)
1
Uncontrolled
Lead - Lag
0.8
ANFIS
I (p.u.)

0.6

0.4

0.2
0 2 4 6 8 10 [14]
time (sec.)
 Simulation Results
2. Light Loading (cont.)
0.04
1
Uncontrolled
Uncontrolled
0.03 Lead - Lag
Electrical Power (p.u.)

Lead - Lag
0.8 ANFIS
ANFIS
0.02

V (p.u.)
0.6
0.01

0.4
0

0.2 -0.01
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
time (sec.) time (sec.)
0.5

0.4
Xtcsc (p.u.)

0.3

0.2
Uncontrolled
0.1 Lead - Lag
ANFIS

0
0 2 4 6 8 10
time (sec.) [15]
 Simulation Results
3. Heavy Loading
100
0.015
90 Lead - Lag
Lead - Lag

Power Angle (degrees)

0.01 ANFIS
Speed Deviation (p.u.)

ANFIS
80
0.005
70
0
60
-0.005 50

-0.01 40

-0.015 30
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
time (sec.) time (sec.)

2.5

Lead - Lag
2 ANFIS
I (p.u.)

1.5

0.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 [16]
time (sec.)
 Simulation Results
3. Heavy Loading (cont.)
2 0.15

1.8 Lead - Lag Lead - Lag

Electrical Power (degree)

ANFIS 0.1 ANFIS

1.6

V (p.u.)
1.4
0.05
1.2

1 0
0.8

-0.05
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
time (sec.) time (sec.)

0.5

0.4
Xtcsc (p.u.)

0.3

0.2

0.1 Lead - Lag

ANFIS

0
0 2 4 6 8 10 [17]
time (sec.)
 Conclusions
• FACTS based controllers are very effective in improving
transient stability and damping power system oscillations

• Research work is intended to find the most suitable

configurations of the ANFIS controller for TCSC

• Proposed ANFIS controller for TCSC is more superior in

the improvement of dynamic stability of the system than
the compared lead-lag controller

• Proposed ANFIS controller is found to be robust to fault

location and change in operating conditions
[18]
Thank You

[19]