Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Report Description:
This report highlights the differences in broadband availability in rural vs. urban areas. The metrics used to illustrate these differences include speed,
technology and provider availability.
- “Rural” and “Urban” definitions: Census bureau (2000).
- Data as of June 2011, Report published February 2011
Speed Availability
This section illustrates the differences in download, upload, and combination
download/ upload speed availability in rural vs. urban areas.
Map
The map illustrates the difference in speed availability,
in terms of percent of population, for the download > 3
mbps, upload > 768 kbps speed tier. This is calculated
by subtracting the percent of the population with
access to this speed in rural areas from the percent of
the population with access to this speed in urban areas.
100%
Chart 90%
This chart displays the 80%
percent of urban and
Percent of Population
70%
rural populations within
60%
each state with reported
50%
broadband speeds of 3
40%
mbps download and 768
kbps upload. 30%
20%
10%
0%
State Abbreviation
______________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________ __
-1-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
Download Speed Availability Upload Speed Availability
This graph displays the percent of rural and urban populations with This graph displays the percent of rural and urban populations with reported
reported availability for various download speed tiers. availability of various download speed tiers.
Percent of Population
70% 70%
60% 60%
50% 50%
40% 40%
30% 30%
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
> 786 kbps > 1.5 mbps > 3 mbps > 6 mbps > 10 mbps > 25 mbps > 50 mbps > 100 mbps > 1 gbps > 200 kbps > 768 kbps > 1.5 mbps > 3 mbps > 6 mbps > 10 mbps > 25 mbps > 50 mbps > 100 mbps > 1 gbps
Download Speed Upload Speed
80% Speed Combination
80%
Percent of Population
70% 70%
Difference
60% 60%
50% 50%
40% 40%
30% 30%
20% 20%
10% 10%
0% 0%
DL > 768 kbps, UL > 200 kbps DL > 3 mbps, UL > 768 kbps DL > 768 DL > 768 > 200 kbps > 768 kbps > 1.5 mbps > 3 mbps > 6 mbps > 10 mbps > 25 mbps > 50 mbps > 100 > 1 gbps
kbps, UL > kbps, UL > mbps
Speed Combination 200 kbps 200 kbps Speed
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-2-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
Technology Availability
This section illustrates the differences in any (wireline or wireless) technology
availability in rural vs. urban areas.
Map
The map illustrates the difference in technology
availability, in terms of percent of population, for any
(wireline or wireless) technology. This is calculated by
subtracting the percent of the population with access
to any technology in rural areas from the percent of the
population with access to any technology in urban
areas.
100%
90%
80%
Chart
Percent of Population
State Abbreviation
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-3-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
Technology Availability ‐ Rural vs. Urban Areas
100%
Urban
90%
Rural
80%
Technology Availability
Percent of Population
70%
The chart to the right displays the percent of population in rural 60%
vs. urban areas with reported access to various broadband 50%
technology types. Wireline technologies (DSL, Copper, Cable, 40%
Optical/Fiber) are shown in the center, while Wireless 30%
technologies (Terrestrial Fixed and Terrestrial Mobile) are 20%
displayed on the right. 10%
0%
Any Tech. Any Wireline DSL Copper Cable Optical/ Any Wireless Terrestrial Terrestrial
Tech. Modem Fiber Tech. Fixed Mobile
Wireline Technology Wireless Technology
Technology Type
Difference in Technology Availability ‐ Rural vs. Urban Areas
100%
90%
80%
Difference in Technology Availability
70%
The graph to the right compares the percent difference of reported
Difference
60%
technology types in rural vs. urban areas. This is calculated by 50%
subtracting the percent of the population with access to a given 40%
technology in rural areas from the percent of the population with 30%
access to that technology in urban areas. 20%
10%
0%
Any Tech. Any Wireline DSL Copper Cable Optical/ Any Wireless Terrestrial Terrestrial
Tech. Modem Fiber Tech. Fixed Mobile
Wireline Technology Wireless Technology
Technology Type
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-4-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
Provider Availability
This section illustrates the differences in provider availability (in terms of access
to a given number of providers) in rural vs. urban areas.
Map
The map illustrates the difference in provider
availability, in terms of percent of population, of three
or more providers (wireline or wireless). This is
calculated by subtracting the percent of the population
with access to three or more providers in rural areas
from the percent of the population with access to three
or more providers in urban areas.
100%
90%
80%
Percent of Population
Chart 70%
This chart displays the 60%
percent of urban and 50%
rural populations within 40%
each state with access to 30%
three or more providers 20%
(wireline or wireless). 10%
0%
State Abbreviation
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-5-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
Percent of Population
Percent of Population
70% 70% 70%
60% 60% 60%
50% 50% 50%
40% 40% 40%
30% 30% 30%
20% 20% 20%
10% 10% 10%
0% 0% 0%
≥ 1 ≥ 2 ≥ 3 ≥ 4 ≥ 5 ≥ 6 ≥ 7 ≥ 8 ≥ 1… ≥ 2 ≥ 3 ≥ 4 ≥ 5 ≥ 6 ≥ 7 ≥ 8 ≥ 1 ≥ 2 ≥ 3 ≥ 4 ≥ 5 ≥ 6 ≥ 7 ≥ 8
Number of Providers Number of Providers Number of Providers
Difference in Provider Availability ‐ Rural vs. Urban Areas
100% Any Provider
90% Wireline Provider
Wireless Provider
80%
70%
Provider Availability
Difference
60%
The chart to the right displays the difference in the 50%
reported number of providers in rural and urban areas.
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
≥ 1 ≥ 2 ≥ 3 ≥ 4 ≥ 5 ≥ 6 ≥ 7 ≥ 8
Number of Providers
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-6-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-7-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-8-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
-9-
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
Geography Information Any Technology Wireline Technologies Wireless Technologies Other
Any Asym Cable Cable Cable‐ Optical/ Electric Any Wireless (No Terestrial Fixed Terrestrial Fixed Terrestrial Terestrial
State Name State Abbr Urban/ Rural Population Any Technology Wireline DSL DSL Sym DSL Copper Modem DOCSIS Other Fiber Pwr Line Satellite) Wireless (Unlic.) Fixed(Lic.) Mobile Other
North Carolina NC Rural 3,628,287 96.9% 89.4% 68.0% 66.6% 1.5% 6.1% 73.5% 0.3% 73.3% 1.1% 0.0% 88.8% 10.6% 10.7% 0.0% 88.6% 0.0%
North Carolina NC Urban 5,630,139 100.0% 99.7% 86.5% 86.3% 16.7% 42.0% 96.6% 0.0% 96.6% 1.0% 0.0% 99.9% 5.7% 5.7% 0.0% 99.9% 0.0%
North Dakota ND Rural 278,969 98.6% 75.4% 61.1% 61.1% 4.5% 0.0% 31.9% 7.4% 28.0% 16.6% 0.0% 95.8% 46.5% 26.9% 28.2% 94.8% 0.0%
North Dakota ND Urban 355,458 100.0% 99.9% 96.1% 96.1% 1.9% 0.0% 99.7% 6.6% 99.6% 3.5% 0.0% 99.6% 78.5% 41.8% 52.9% 99.6% 0.0%
Nebraska NE Rural 511,684 96.8% 68.0% 56.4% 56.4% 0.1% 0.1% 25.1% 0.6% 25.1% 1.4% 0.0% 91.4% 31.7% 29.3% 13.9% 90.0% 25.6%
Nebraska NE Urban 1,271,699 100.0% 95.1% 32.6% 32.5% 0.1% 0.9% 92.1% 9.2% 92.1% 1.7% 0.0% 99.9% 17.4% 16.5% 10.0% 99.9% 70.6%
New Hampshire NH Rural 551,929 97.6% 92.1% 70.1% 70.0% 2.5% 9.0% 83.2% 38.4% 45.2% 0.0% 0.0% 91.3% 10.2% 10.2% 0.1% 91.2% 0.0%
New Hampshire NH Urban 784,283 100.0% 99.8% 97.0% 97.0% 31.0% 53.4% 98.6% 82.4% 16.2% 0.0% 0.0% 99.8% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 99.8% 0.0%
New Jersey NJ Rural 510,398 99.9% 97.2% 87.5% 87.5% 2.1% 19.2% 94.9% 66.3% 35.6% 24.8% 0.0% 99.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.5% 0.0%
New Jersey NJ Urban 8,253,905 100.0% 99.7% 95.3% 95.3% 50.4% 76.4% 98.7% 53.6% 51.9% 58.2% 0.0% 100.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
New Mexico NM Rural 486,517 89.0% 56.5% 51.2% 51.2% 0.4% 8.4% 24.9% 2.0% 22.9% 0.6% 0.0% 81.0% 9.1% 4.2% 5.8% 77.3% 0.0%
New Mexico NM Urban 1,511,411 100.0% 97.1% 93.6% 93.6% 27.5% 58.3% 88.9% 6.2% 82.8% 1.0% 0.0% 99.6% 12.2% 4.9% 8.6% 97.3% 0.0%
Nevada NV Rural 221,726 94.3% 70.2% 59.7% 59.7% 0.0% 0.0% 34.3% 1.5% 32.8% 5.3% 0.0% 89.6% 58.1% 57.6% 6.8% 87.3% 0.0%
Nevada NV Urban 2,499,412 100.0% 99.5% 97.8% 97.8% 0.0% 0.0% 94.2% 1.7% 93.2% 0.9% 0.0% 100.0% 96.0% 95.8% 74.6% 100.0% 0.0%
New York NY Rural 2,422,450 98.5% 90.3% 79.3% 79.3% 0.4% 0.8% 71.3% 10.2% 70.7% 4.9% 0.0% 93.1% 3.0% 3.0% 0.0% 93.1% 0.0%
New York NY Urban 16,945,181 100.0% 99.7% 97.4% 97.4% 58.7% 68.8% 98.4% 48.8% 98.2% 46.5% 0.0% 99.9% 2.2% 2.2% 0.0% 99.9% 0.0%
Ohio OH Rural 2,679,058 97.5% 87.9% 75.0% 74.8% 0.1% 0.0% 71.1% 7.1% 65.2% 2.1% 0.0% 92.9% 35.3% 30.4% 10.2% 92.1% 0.0%
Ohio OH Urban 8,799,083 100.0% 99.6% 97.9% 97.9% 0.1% 0.0% 95.8% 5.2% 91.3% 6.4% 0.0% 99.8% 38.8% 31.5% 13.2% 99.7% 0.0%
Oklahoma OK Rural 1,274,377 96.7% 58.6% 52.8% 52.8% 0.3% 0.0% 19.6% 1.2% 18.5% 5.2% 0.0% 93.8% 25.5% 21.0% 5.8% 91.3% 0.1%
Oklahoma OK Urban 2,363,957 100.0% 97.7% 95.2% 95.2% 0.0% 0.7% 90.5% 4.4% 86.4% 0.9% 0.0% 99.1% 35.4% 35.0% 0.4% 98.7% 0.1%
Oregon OR Rural 792,530 96.2% 82.9% 76.6% 67.2% 28.0% 13.7% 42.9% 25.8% 19.0% 5.8% 0.0% 87.0% 48.7% 39.3% 9.4% 84.7% 0.0%
Oregon OR Urban 3,015,524 100.0% 98.8% 96.1% 92.1% 54.8% 73.9% 83.5% 74.4% 9.3% 41.1% 0.0% 100.0% 81.1% 76.8% 4.3% 100.0% 0.0%
Pennsylvania PA Rural 2,966,746 98.1% 91.6% 71.8% 71.4% 0.8% 5.4% 73.6% 40.4% 36.7% 10.0% 0.0% 88.5% 8.1% 2.0% 6.1% 87.8% 0.0%
Pennsylvania PA Urban 9,469,216 100.0% 99.0% 86.2% 86.2% 36.4% 53.1% 95.5% 72.3% 27.4% 35.9% 0.0% 99.8% 18.8% 15.9% 11.7% 99.8% 0.0%
Puerto Rico PR Rural 2,666,671 50.2% 35.9% 32.1% 32.1% 0.0% 0.0% 9.5% 0.0% 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 41.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 41.3% 0.0%
Puerto Rico PR Urban 1,300,658 99.0% 94.1% 92.3% 92.3% 0.0% 0.0% 35.2% 0.0% 35.2% 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 0.0%
Rhode Island RI Rural 97,711 99.9% 97.4% 77.5% 77.5% 1.5% 8.9% 92.8% 0.0% 92.8% 51.2% 0.0% 99.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.2% 93.1%
Rhode Island RI Urban 965,903 100.0% 99.9% 95.4% 95.4% 47.0% 71.9% 99.4% 0.1% 99.4% 77.2% 0.0% 99.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.8% 98.9%
South Carolina SC Rural 1,761,489 98.2% 82.2% 72.0% 72.0% 0.0% 0.0% 56.7% 5.8% 52.2% 3.2% 0.0% 94.4% 6.7% 6.7% 0.0% 94.2% 0.0%
South Carolina SC Urban 2,717,142 100.0% 98.8% 92.3% 92.3% 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 6.7% 88.9% 2.3% 0.0% 99.4% 4.7% 4.7% 0.0% 99.4% 0.0%
South Dakota SD Rural 376,414 98.5% 86.5% 73.2% 73.2% 1.1% 1.5% 34.2% 23.6% 10.7% 27.7% 0.0% 95.6% 36.2% 34.1% 2.1% 95.4% 0.0%
South Dakota SD Urban 426,069 100.0% 100.0% 97.9% 97.9% 27.6% 49.5% 92.2% 89.2% 3.0% 83.3% 0.0% 99.9% 63.0% 58.8% 4.2% 99.9% 0.0%
Tennessee TN Rural 2,289,197 97.4% 83.7% 72.5% 72.5% 0.0% 0.0% 59.8% 0.0% 59.8% 3.6% 0.0% 92.6% 15.5% 14.7% 0.8% 92.6% 0.0%
Tennessee TN Urban 3,957,214 100.0% 99.5% 97.5% 97.5% 0.0% 0.0% 97.2% 0.0% 97.2% 9.4% 0.0% 99.9% 30.3% 11.2% 19.1% 99.9% 0.0%
Texas TX Rural 4,326,067 97.6% 65.3% 57.1% 57.1% 0.1% 0.0% 29.2% 2.4% 27.4% 1.9% 0.0% 95.0% 58.7% 53.6% 40.5% 93.1% 0.0%
Texas TX Urban 20,216,340 100.0% 98.0% 94.1% 94.1% 0.0% 0.0% 84.5% 7.2% 77.6% 0.7% 0.0% 99.8% 88.5% 56.8% 84.2% 99.7% 0.0%
Utah UT Rural 307,271 95.8% 79.6% 65.6% 64.7% 2.2% 17.0% 28.6% 18.1% 10.6% 9.4% 0.0% 90.8% 38.6% 34.7% 6.7% 90.3% 0.0%
Utah UT Urban 2,425,015 100.0% 99.3% 92.2% 91.9% 39.5% 73.5% 94.2% 87.7% 7.3% 48.2% 0.0% 99.9% 91.7% 89.9% 3.5% 99.9% 0.0%
Virginia VA Rural 2,159,349 88.1% 80.3% 70.8% 70.8% 0.0% 4.8% 57.1% 14.8% 45.0% 2.8% 0.0% 61.1% 3.1% 2.1% 1.0% 58.8% 0.1%
Virginia VA Urban 5,724,695 99.9% 99.3% 91.2% 91.2% 0.0% 17.0% 97.0% 57.9% 40.0% 12.5% 0.0% 98.0% 0.4% 0.1% 0.3% 97.9% 1.2%
Virgin Islands of the Un VI Rural 35,400 72.9% 51.0% 51.0% 51.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 61.7% 61.7% 44.9% 50.4% 0.0% 0.0%
Virgin Islands of the Un VI Urban 73,199 100.0% 99.0% 99.0% 99.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 97.9% 97.9% 94.9% 94.7% 0.0% 0.0%
Vermont VT Rural 384,377 97.8% 90.7% 85.7% 85.7% 0.0% 0.0% 73.8% 0.0% 73.8% 2.2% 0.0% 80.7% 31.7% 31.7% 0.0% 71.9% 0.0%
Vermont VT Urban 237,143 100.0% 99.0% 97.6% 97.6% 0.0% 0.0% 99.0% 0.0% 99.0% 25.5% 0.0% 99.6% 26.8% 26.8% 0.0% 99.5% 0.0%
Washington WA Rural 1,208,918 97.4% 79.4% 67.7% 67.5% 0.8% 9.6% 50.8% 29.0% 24.4% 7.1% 0.0% 93.2% 44.1% 44.0% 0.9% 88.5% 0.0%
Washington WA Urban 5,381,330 100.0% 99.2% 95.1% 95.1% 32.4% 65.2% 96.3% 76.7% 28.2% 15.5% 0.0% 99.8% 29.3% 29.3% 0.2% 99.8% 0.2%
Wisconsin WI Rural 1,825,953 98.9% 77.7% 66.3% 66.3% 0.0% 0.1% 38.7% 0.6% 38.0% 2.9% 0.0% 96.1% 6.6% 6.5% 0.1% 96.1% 0.0%
Wisconsin WI Urban 3,825,905 100.0% 96.1% 92.5% 92.5% 0.0% 0.4% 92.4% 1.1% 91.4% 1.0% 0.0% 100.0% 6.9% 6.5% 0.3% 100.0% 0.0%
West Virginia WV Rural 993,323 74.8% 61.8% 47.4% 47.4% 0.0% 0.0% 47.9% 22.9% 27.8% 0.2% 0.0% 51.7% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 51.7% 0.0%
West Virginia WV Urban 810,400 99.5% 95.1% 87.8% 87.8% 0.0% 0.2% 90.9% 60.9% 40.7% 0.1% 0.0% 95.9% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 95.9% 0.0%
Wyoming WY Rural 187,106 93.1% 57.6% 53.4% 48.7% 8.8% 0.0% 20.6% 0.0% 20.6% 3.3% 0.0% 87.7% 21.2% 21.2% 0.0% 87.4% 0.0%
Wyoming WY Urban 335,095 100.0% 97.3% 93.5% 93.5% 3.5% 0.0% 93.7% 0.0% 93.7% 5.4% 0.0% 100.0% 35.5% 35.5% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 10 -
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 11 -
Broadband Statistics Report
Broadband Availability in Urban vs. Rural Areas
Geography Information Wireline or Wireless Provider Wireline Provider Wireless Provider
State Name State Abbr Urban/ Rural Population ≥ 1 ≥ 2 ≥ 3 ≥ 4 ≥ 5 ≥ 6 ≥ 7 ≥ 8 ≥ 1 ≥ 2 ≥ 3 ≥ 4 ≥ 5 ≥ 6 ≥ 7 ≥ 8 ≥ 1 ≥ 2 ≥ 3 ≥ 4 ≥ 5 ≥ 6 ≥ 7 ≥ 8
NATIONWIDE Rural 67,224,943 97.1% 91.4% 79.1% 62.0% 42.7% 26.3% 15.2% 7.9% 81.9% 46.5% 11.6% 2.6% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 93.9% 74.6% 49.1% 28.0% 13.6% 6.2% 3.0% 1.7%
NATIONWIDE Urban 243,181,422 100.0% 99.8% 99.0% 96.3% 88.9% 69.0% 46.0% 26.1% 98.9% 89.2% 37.2% 11.8% 2.4% 0.9% 0.5% 0.2% 99.8% 97.7% 91.2% 77.6% 46.4% 25.1% 11.1% 6.0%
Nevada NV Rural 221,726 97.4% 88.5% 76.9% 55.9% 44.4% 28.9% 21.2% 15.7% 74.0% 29.9% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 93.8% 85.0% 59.5% 45.4% 29.2% 21.8% 14.9% 9.6%
Nevada NV Urban 2,499,412 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 97.9% 96.1% 93.5% 91.6% 88.9% 99.5% 92.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 99.9% 97.8% 95.0% 92.5% 91.7% 89.1% 75.2%
New Hampshire NH Rural 551,929 99.3% 97.7% 93.3% 81.6% 59.1% 29.5% 12.2% 3.3% 93.7% 67.1% 11.8% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.0% 95.4% 75.6% 33.4% 7.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%
New Hampshire NH Urban 784,283 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 95.5% 84.3% 58.4% 37.4% 99.8% 97.3% 56.8% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 99.9% 96.6% 84.0% 37.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
New Jersey NJ Rural 510,398 100.0% 99.9% 99.8% 97.6% 83.7% 44.1% 12.1% 0.6% 98.5% 91.8% 31.8% 6.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 99.8% 88.8% 69.8% 18.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
New Jersey NJ Urban 8,253,905 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.1% 96.5% 83.9% 21.2% 1.6% 99.8% 98.7% 77.1% 8.1% 0.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.4% 95.9% 20.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
New Mexico NM Rural 486,517 93.6% 69.8% 44.5% 28.3% 12.6% 7.2% 2.2% 0.0% 63.8% 28.8% 5.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 86.4% 48.3% 18.8% 7.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
New Mexico NM Urban 1,511,411 100.0% 98.5% 95.4% 86.3% 69.0% 61.4% 46.8% 0.4% 97.1% 88.7% 55.3% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.6% 88.9% 70.9% 55.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
New York NY Rural 2,422,450 99.7% 93.6% 78.2% 55.4% 26.9% 9.6% 3.6% 1.5% 93.0% 65.3% 6.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 97.9% 77.4% 49.6% 19.0% 4.7% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0%
New York NY Urban 16,945,181 100.0% 100.0% 99.4% 97.8% 93.1% 82.5% 29.3% 9.1% 99.7% 98.4% 72.8% 22.4% 4.2% 0.9% 0.4% 0.2% 100.0% 99.4% 96.7% 91.2% 14.2% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0%
North Carolina NC Rural 3,628,287 99.4% 94.8% 84.3% 64.8% 37.5% 19.8% 8.4% 1.0% 92.9% 67.3% 13.7% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.9% 76.2% 40.7% 23.0% 10.3% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0%
North Carolina NC Urban 5,630,139 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 96.8% 84.5% 69.2% 48.8% 1.3% 99.7% 92.7% 43.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 98.2% 85.5% 74.3% 55.8% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0%
North Dakota ND Rural 278,969 99.9% 98.3% 86.6% 45.8% 18.1% 8.9% 2.9% 0.7% 77.4% 31.0% 2.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.3% 95.5% 49.7% 19.8% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
North Dakota ND Urban 355,458 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.7% 76.8% 50.8% 41.9% 6.9% 100.0% 96.0% 34.6% 6.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 100.0% 79.3% 50.2% 41.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Ohio OH Rural 2,679,058 99.2% 95.1% 86.5% 73.4% 50.8% 30.5% 15.4% 5.4% 89.8% 61.1% 6.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.0% 87.1% 68.5% 45.5% 24.3% 10.7% 3.0% 0.7%
Ohio OH Urban 8,799,083 100.0% 100.0% 99.5% 97.6% 88.5% 68.0% 40.3% 12.5% 99.7% 95.3% 29.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 98.8% 95.1% 86.3% 52.6% 25.3% 9.1% 4.8%
Oklahoma OK Rural 1,274,377 98.7% 87.5% 71.2% 55.6% 38.3% 22.2% 8.6% 1.2% 61.4% 16.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.7% 80.3% 61.8% 46.6% 29.2% 13.9% 2.3% 0.0%
Oklahoma OK Urban 2,363,957 100.0% 99.3% 97.6% 94.2% 87.3% 78.3% 65.4% 29.5% 98.0% 88.8% 1.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.1% 96.6% 90.6% 84.8% 74.8% 66.7% 25.0% 0.0%
Oregon OR Rural 792,530 100.0% 100.0% 99.0% 93.0% 82.8% 72.3% 63.0% 50.8% 87.5% 58.3% 29.6% 11.0% 3.7% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 97.3% 82.9% 69.5% 52.0% 37.5% 25.9% 17.4% 8.1%
Oregon OR Urban 3,015,524 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.2% 97.2% 95.2% 91.4% 98.8% 92.9% 82.0% 66.3% 48.6% 34.5% 20.7% 2.3% 100.0% 98.7% 96.9% 90.4% 84.3% 76.3% 69.3% 22.1%
Pennsylvania PA Rural 2,966,746 99.3% 91.3% 75.0% 53.1% 35.8% 17.5% 6.1% 1.4% 93.4% 62.9% 15.2% 2.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 95.0% 65.3% 48.3% 23.9% 8.7% 1.9% 0.1% 0.0%
Pennsylvania PA Urban 9,469,216 100.0% 99.2% 95.1% 90.8% 84.8% 72.5% 58.5% 33.9% 99.0% 89.5% 49.7% 5.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.9% 93.3% 89.3% 80.3% 67.7% 36.1% 9.3% 0.0%
Rhode Island RI Rural 97,711 100.0% 100.0% 99.3% 94.2% 70.1% 7.7% 0.9% 0.1% 99.3% 88.5% 9.2% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 96.8% 69.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Rhode Island RI Urban 965,903 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.6% 96.6% 76.3% 52.9% 3.8% 99.9% 99.4% 76.4% 55.9% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 99.6% 92.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
South Carolina SC Rural 1,761,489 99.7% 96.6% 82.0% 57.0% 20.0% 2.7% 0.7% 0.2% 85.7% 50.0% 5.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.4% 82.5% 46.2% 12.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
South Carolina SC Urban 2,717,142 100.0% 100.0% 99.3% 94.4% 42.0% 8.6% 4.8% 0.0% 98.8% 88.1% 5.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 98.0% 87.4% 34.5% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
South Dakota SD Rural 376,414 99.5% 97.3% 82.9% 44.8% 23.8% 12.7% 8.3% 4.8% 89.5% 25.5% 9.2% 2.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.6% 86.5% 38.7% 16.5% 8.6% 5.3% 0.0% 0.0%
South Dakota SD Urban 426,069 100.0% 100.0% 99.2% 97.5% 92.0% 66.8% 48.5% 39.2% 100.0% 89.8% 79.7% 45.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 99.2% 65.9% 51.9% 37.8% 36.3% 8.9% 0.0%
Tennessee TN Rural 2,289,197 99.7% 94.6% 78.4% 54.5% 28.9% 13.8% 4.2% 0.7% 89.8% 56.9% 7.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.0% 70.8% 39.3% 20.6% 8.5% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0%
Tennessee TN Urban 3,957,214 100.0% 99.9% 99.7% 97.0% 87.0% 76.4% 50.6% 2.6% 99.6% 96.0% 12.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 97.6% 90.0% 79.6% 65.5% 44.6% 0.0% 0.0%
Texas TX Rural 4,326,067 99.0% 94.5% 85.7% 74.7% 62.7% 48.8% 36.9% 26.0% 72.8% 29.0% 4.1% 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 97.8% 89.4% 78.2% 66.6% 51.7% 39.0% 27.4% 18.6%
Texas TX Urban 20,216,340 100.0% 99.9% 99.3% 97.6% 94.2% 89.1% 78.9% 46.6% 98.1% 83.1% 7.6% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.9% 99.2% 97.6% 94.1% 90.8% 80.2% 44.6% 29.6%
Utah UT Rural 307,271 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.2% 88.7% 63.9% 49.1% 38.4% 82.3% 32.4% 11.2% 5.8% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 95.2% 66.3% 46.8% 35.7% 25.7% 15.6% 12.0% 6.5%
Utah UT Urban 2,425,015 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 98.6% 96.5% 93.8% 99.3% 95.0% 77.6% 58.6% 7.8% 1.2% 0.2% 0.0% 99.9% 97.9% 94.8% 92.2% 87.6% 82.5% 79.2% 65.6%
Vermont VT Rural 384,377 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 98.8% 95.1% 87.6% 77.3% 59.4% 90.7% 79.5% 55.5% 6.8% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.1% 77.5% 51.4% 24.1% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Vermont VT Urban 237,143 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 99.1% 96.2% 99.0% 98.0% 94.1% 40.0% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 99.2% 88.1% 69.2% 7.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%
Virginia VA Rural 2,159,349 93.9% 80.5% 57.9% 37.4% 12.2% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 88.3% 59.0% 11.7% 1.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 73.2% 47.3% 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Virginia VA Urban 5,724,695 99.9% 99.7% 97.9% 93.8% 78.6% 20.7% 0.1% 0.0% 99.4% 96.9% 54.4% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 98.5% 95.3% 47.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Washington WA Rural 1,208,918 99.3% 95.6% 89.5% 76.9% 58.5% 43.4% 28.2% 14.8% 85.9% 51.0% 15.7% 3.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 98.5% 90.3% 77.0% 52.4% 31.8% 13.1% 8.0% 3.7%
Washington WA Urban 5,381,330 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.0% 95.1% 91.5% 84.4% 63.0% 99.5% 95.3% 67.1% 17.4% 2.7% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 100.0% 99.7% 98.8% 92.6% 83.7% 20.7% 13.1% 10.3%
West Virginia WV Rural 993,323 83.1% 64.9% 47.9% 33.4% 15.9% 4.5% 0.4% 0.0% 68.6% 43.9% 13.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 65.0% 47.0% 25.3% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
West Virginia WV Urban 810,400 99.6% 97.5% 91.8% 84.6% 53.2% 9.5% 0.8% 0.1% 95.2% 84.5% 19.6% 2.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.6% 91.4% 71.6% 32.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Wisconsin WI Rural 1,825,953 99.9% 96.9% 82.7% 61.8% 41.6% 24.1% 8.5% 1.2% 80.8% 33.3% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.2% 85.7% 58.9% 40.0% 25.9% 5.8% 0.6% 0.0%
Wisconsin WI Urban 3,825,905 100.0% 100.0% 99.9% 99.0% 92.7% 77.5% 47.9% 4.6% 96.1% 89.3% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 99.6% 94.8% 80.8% 73.3% 46.8% 3.4% 0.0%
Wyoming WY Rural 187,106 97.7% 71.9% 32.7% 9.3% 4.7% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 65.1% 20.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 93.5% 31.0% 8.2% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Wyoming WY Urban 335,095 100.0% 97.8% 92.9% 38.9% 22.9% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 97.4% 90.2% 6.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 38.4% 24.5% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
American Samoa AS Rural 54,009 26.0% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
American Samoa AS Urban 3,282 99.7% 90.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.3% 53.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 96.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Puerto Rico PR Rural 2,666,671 57.8% 46.2% 25.7% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 38.4% 6.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 56.6% 32.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Puerto Rico PR Urban 1,300,658 99.7% 96.7% 84.9% 27.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 94.4% 33.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.2% 81.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Virgin Islands of the U.S. VI Rural 35,400 90.0% 63.7% 51.0% 39.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 51.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 90.0% 59.8% 43.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Virgin Islands of the U.S. VI Urban 73,199 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 96.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 99.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 99.8% 97.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
- 12 -