Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• The above
equation
(σ ′xf − σ ′zf ) 2 (90 + φ)
(90 – φ)
can be θp
rearranged O C σ’xf
O
to obtain an
expression
σ’x σ’zf σ’ σ’zf σ’
for the Pole for
passive
θa Pole for
earth
(σ ′zf + σ ′xf ) 2 active passive
failure failure
pressure
coefficient σ ′xf 1 + sinφ 1 φ
(Kp) as:
= = Kp = θa = 45 + [w.r.t. horizontal]
σ′ zf 1 - sinφ Ka 9 2 10
• The expression for lateral force due to active earth • On the other hand, an analysis from the
pressure is the same as that obtained earlier using consideration of static equilibrium of stresses
stress equilibrium considerations (Mohr’s circle). usually results in a failure load smaller than the
• The solution obtained using a limit equilibrium true failure load. Such a solution is called a
analysis always results in a failure load that is lower bound or safe solution.
greater than the true failure load. This solution • For the fortuitous case when both these analyses
is called an upper bound or an unsafe solution. give the same solution, we have a true solution.
• The main reason for this is that the soil will always • In general, Coulomb’s earth pressure theory gives
be able to choose a failure mechanism that is more an upper bound estimate and Rankine’s theory
efficient than the assumed failure mechanism gives a lower bound estimate of lateral earth
(shape and location of slip plane). pressure.
• The accuracy of a limit equilibrium analysis • For a vertical, frictionless, rigid wall retaining a
depends on how realistic the chosen mechanism is. horizontal homogenous soil mass, both these
theories give the same solution.
21 22
Rough Wall and Sloping Backfill Rough Wall and Sloping Backfill (Continued..)
• Poncelet (1840) used • Following expressions for active and passive earth
Coulomb’s limit equilibrium pressure coefficients were obtained by Poncelet:
approach to obtain the
active and passive earth cos2 (φ − η)
K aC =
pressure coefficients for 2
sin(φ + δ )sin(φ − β )
cases where cos2ηcos(η + δ )1 +
– wall friction δ is present cos(η + δ )cos(η − β )
– wall face inclined at an angle
η to the vertical, and cos2 (φ + η)
KpC =
– the backfill is sloping at an 2
sin(φ + δ )sin(φ + β )
angle β to the horizontal cos ηcos(η − δ )1 +
2
cos(η − δ )cos(η − β )
• Following Coulomb’s approach, Poncelet also used a
linear slip plane inclined at an angle θ with respect • Unlike the Rankine earth pressure coefficients, KaC
to the horizontal. is not equal to 1/KpC.
23 24
Rough Wall and Sloping Backfill (Continued..) Error due to Curvature of Slip Plane
• The critical inclination of the slip plane w.r.t. the • The curvature of the slip
horizontal is given by: surface for the active state is
small in comparison with that Pa
1 sinφ ⋅ cosδ
θ = tan
−1
± tanφ for the passive state as shown
cosφ sin(φ + δ ) δ
in the figure.
• In the above expression, positive sign refers to the • For the active condition, the
active condition (θa) and the negative sign refers to error is negligibly small. Active Condition
the passive condition (θp). • However, the value of the
• Please note that the presence of wall friction passive earth pressure
results in a curved slip plane for both the active coefficient is overestimated.
and the passive condition and therefore, Poncelet’s δ Pp
• For the passive condition, the
coefficients are not 100% accurate. error is small only if δ<φ/3. In
practice, however, δ is
Passive Condition
generally greater than φ/3.
25 26