Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microscopic Analysis
Are the two terms 'competence' and 'competency the same? On the face of it,
these two terms sound like synonyms. However, that is a common
misinterpretation. Often these two terms are used interchangeably. Very often, managers
make erroneous evaluations because of the lack of conceptual understanding of these two
terms. So let us study these two terms with an example, say, an accounts manager.
• Competence would refer to skills that are required to do the job well.
• Competency refers to special attributes that enable a person to perform his job.
While doing competency analysis, the expert must take into account the various
behavioral dimensions that clearly demarcate the high performer from the others.
Competencies that correspond to superior performance should be isolated for assessment.
All other behaviors which mildly affect performance should be ignored to make the task
of assessment simpler. For example, in the case of a sales rep, competencies like
negotiation skills, and confidence, would qualify as important for the success of a
salesman.
For instance, management competency includes the traits of systems thinking and
emotional intelligence, and skills in influence and negotiation. A person possesses a
competence as long as the skills, abilities, and knowledge that constitute that competence
are a part of them, enabling the person to perform effective action within a certain
workplace environment. Therefore, one might not lose knowledge, a skill, or an ability,
but still lose a competence if what is needed to do a job well changes.
Competence is also used to work with more general descriptions of the requirements of
human beings in organizations and communities. Examples are educations and other
organizations who want to have a general language to tell what a graduate of an
education must be able to do in order to graduate or what a member of an organization is
required to be able to do in order to be considered competent. An important detail of this
approach is that all competences have to be action competences, which means you show
in action, that you are competent. In the military the training systems for this kind of
competence is called artificial experience, which is the basis for all simulators.
Dreyfus and Dreyfus[citation needed] has introduced a language of the levels of competence in
competence development. The causative reasoning of such a language of levels of
competence may be seen in their paper on Calculative Rationality titled, "From Socrates
to Expert Systems: The Limits and Dangers of Calculative Rationality." The five levels
proposed by Dreyfus and Dreyfus were: