Professional Documents
Culture Documents
by this section or who violates any of the knowledge of insufficient funds when the
provisions of the rules and regulations check was presented within 90 days from the
promulgated thereunder shall upon conviction date appearing on the check and was
XPN:
1. When the check was presented after
B.P. 22 Bouncing Checks Law 90 days from date;
2. When the maker or drawer:
Q: Who are liable under B.P. 22?
a. pays the holder of the check
the amount due within five banking
A:
days after receiving notice that such
check has not been paid by the penalty but to lay down a rule of preference in
drawee; the application of the penalties provided for in
b. makes arrangements for B.P. 22.
payment in full by the drawee of Administrative Circular No. 12-2000
such check within five banking establishes a rule of preference in the
days after notice of non-payment. application of the penal provisions of B.P. 22
(Sec.2) such that where the circumstances of both the
Q: What penalty may be imposed by the offense and the offender clearly indicates good
judge for violation of B. P. 22? faith or a clear mistake of fact without taint of
A: SC-AC No. 12-2000, as clarified by SC-AC negligence, the imposition of fine alone should
No. 13-2001, established a rule on preference be considered as the more appropriate penalty.
in imposing the penalties. When the Needless to say, the determination of whether
circumstances of the case clearly indicate good the circumstances warrant the imposition of
faith or clear mistake of fact alone may be fine alone rests solely upon the judge. Should
considered as the preferred penalty. The the judge decide that imprisonment is the more
determination of the circumstances that appropriate penalty, Administrative Circular
warrant the imposition of fine rests upon trial No. 12-2000 ought not to be deemed a
judge only. Should the judge deem that hindrance.
imprisonment is appropriate, such penalty may
be imposed. Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act
of 2009(R.A. 9995)
Q: How is the preference for imposition of
fine applied? Q: What are the prohibited acts under R.A.
9995
A: In the case of Eduardo Vaca v. CA, (G.R.
No. 131714, Nov. 16, 1998), and Rosa Lim v. A:
People of the Philippines, (G.R. No. 130038,
Sept. 18, 2000) as well as in Administrative (a) To take photo or video coverage of a person
Circular No. 12-2000, the Supreme Court or group of persons performing sexual act or
modified the sentence imposed for violation of any similar activity or to capture an image of
B.P. 22 by deleting the penalty of the private area of a person/s such as the naked
imprisonment and imposing only the penalty or undergarment clad genitals, public area,
of fine in an amount double the amount of the buttocks or female breast without the consent
check. However, by virtue of the passage of of the person/s involved and under
Administrative Circular No. 13-2001, the circumstances in which the person/s has/have a
Supreme Court explained that the clear tenor reasonable expectation of privacy;
of Administrative Circular No. 12-2000 is not
to remove imprisonment as an alternative
(b) To copy or reproduce, or to cause to be
copied or reproduced, such photo or video or A:
recording of sexual act or any similar activity 1. The use of an unlicensed firearm to
with or without consideration; commit murder or homicide is an
aggravating circumstance. Hence,
(c) To sell or distribute, or cause to be sold or illegal possession or use of unlicensed
distributed, such photo or video or recording of firearm is no longer punished as a
sexual act, whether it be the original copy or separate offense.
reproduction thereof; or
same was given by such person/s. Any person firearms with expired license; or
who violates this provision shall be liable for unauthorized use of licensed firearm
photo or video voyeurism as defined herein. in the commission of the crime.
Q: What changes were brought about by Q: When is the use of unlicensed firearm
R.A. 8294 on P.D. 1866? considered an aggravating circumstance?
A: In the crimes of homicide and murder closely related to him in accordance with
(Sec.1) Section 47 of this Act.
The New Public Bidding Law(R.A. When any of the foregoing acts is done in
9184?
(b) Private individuals who commit any of the
A: Public officers who commit any of the following acts, including any public officer,
1. Open any sealed Bid including but not 1. When two or more bidders agree and submit
limited to Bids that may have been submitted different Bids as if they were bona fide, when
through the electronic system and any and all they knew that one or more of them was so
documents required to be sealed or divulging much higher than the other that it could not be
their contents, prior to the appointed time for honestly accepted and that the contract will
the public opening of Bids or other documents. surely be awarded to the pre-arranged lowest
Bid.
2. Delaying, without justifiable cause, the
screening for eligibility, opening of bids, 2. When a bidder maliciously submits different
evaluation and post evaluation of bids, and Bids through two or more persons,
Bid, or to accept and award, without just cause public or private, or any edifice
or for the purpose of forcing the Procuring devoted to culture, education or social
official proceedings.
A: 1. If committed with intent to gain;