Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A realistic job preview (RJP) is a recruiting approach designed to communicate the positive and
negative aspects of the job and the organizational climate before the applicant has accepted the
offer. We often asked if the candidate is right for the job, but on the flipside do we care if the job
is right for the candidate? The answer is yes because research has shown that when newly hired
employees¶ expectations are not met, they become so unhappy with the job that they quit. An
accurate and well placed RJP provides applicants the opportunity to evaluate if they like the job
and will fit in with the organization¶s culture which in turn will reduce turnover. Reduction in
turnover rate also translates to lower hiring and training cost.
Research on turnover has shown that the erosion of satisfaction levels and turnover are highest
during the first six months to one year. This suggests that new workers were perhaps misled by
organizations¶ attempt to ³sell themselves´ or that job applicants often times misinterpreted the
nature and type of work/organizations (Harvey 1990). Therefore, it is also important that RJP are
designed for the right reasons.
RJPs can be found in a variety of formats such as job brochures, videos, presentations, facility
tours. The different kinds of RJP method have their own set of pros and cons. Certain formats
may be more successful or suitable towards particular kind of jobs or with a particular audience.
The use of multiple formats however is likely to be most effective.
For our purpose, we adapt the following table from Susan O¶Nell et al. from the University of
Minnesota, Institute of Community Integration as a guideline to select the best type of RJP for
our purpose:
Structured Observations Structured observations ƒ Observations Structured ƒ Inexpensive to ƒ Potentially invasive to
should have set criteria should be in the observations require develop/implement consumers and current
These are observations rather than being an exact site the person thorough planning ƒ Easy to update employees
at a work site that are informal process where would work if (i.e. time) to make ƒ Easy to customize to ƒ Experience will vary each
structured by the the person merely shows possible. them effective and individual visit.
employer to give the up and watches what ƒ Observations comprehensive. sites/consumers ƒ Difficult to hit all areas
person a comprehensive happens. The person should be at times or ƒ Can provide consumers that might be an issue for
overview of job should have a checklist in situations that They are the least and direct support staff new employees (i.e., pay
expectations. In a that guides them or some help the person get a expensive method to opportunities to be and benefits, all job duties,
structured observation other way of knowing realistic expectation implement because directly involved in the etc.)
existing employees may what information they of what their job extra staff time is not hiring process ƒ Might be difficult for
spend some time talking should gather during the responsibilities will required during the ƒ Provides direct people to ³act naturally´
with the observer but to visit, as well as feeling beƒ Observations observation and information to the during observations.
be most effective the free to seek additional should be followed materials (checklists, potential hire from the ƒ Can be difficult to
observer should take information. by a debriefing to etc.) are cheap to people who understand schedule.
responsibility for answer questions and produce and update. the job best. ƒ Not portable
gathering the Employees and people to provide ƒ Offers easy access to
information s/he needs receiving services should information about people to ask questions
so that working staff are be asked about this job components not that may not be covered
focused on performing component prior to observed. in the structured RJP.
duties in their usual way. implementation -- ƒ Observations ƒ Sets the expectation
Scheduling Structured although they may find should be scheduled that the direct support
Observations during the opportunity to with employees and staff role includes
busy but routine ³prescreen´ prospective consumers in supporting and informing
activities such as meals employees appealing. advance. new and potential staff.
or recreations is one ƒ Observations
strategy for ensuring Development of should be scheduled
staff and consumers are Structured observations so that the observer
more likely to act should not be sees other direct
naturally during the shortchanged. They support staff not
observation. require a similar planning frontline supervisor
process as other methods doing their job.
including direct support
staff and identification of
critical components.
Meetings with current Current workers, families Prospective Development cost are ƒ Portable (if people are ƒ Requires staff time away
workers, consumers and consumers who are employees should be similar to Structured willing) from their regular job
and/or parents going to be part of an given a set of Observation ƒ Can provide duties.
RJP process should be suggested questions opportunities for parents, ƒ Can be difficult to
trained about the purpose they may wish to ask Implementing this consumers and direct schedule.
In RJP meetings, current of RJPs. during the meeting. method requires staff support staff to be ƒ Experience can be highly
workers, consumers time, making this directly involved in the variable.
and/or parents explain in It is important to clarify These meetings method relatively hiring process ƒ Prospective employees
their own words, in to all involved whether should occur in the expensive to maintain ƒ Provides direct may be uncomfortable and
person, what the job is the interview/meeting actual work setting long term. information to the less inclined to ask
like, what the benefits will be used solely for but in a private potential hire from the important questions in this
and draw backs are, and the purpose of an RJP or location whenever people who understand form of RJP.
what their hopes, needs whether they will also be possible. the job best. ƒ May be a burden on
and expectations for new making ƒ Offers easy access to current direct support staff,
hires are. recommendations about These meetings can people to ask questions parents and consumers.
whether this person may be scheduled to that may not be covered ƒ May be unable to find
be a good match for the precede a job in the structured RJP. direct support staff, parents,
setting. interview on the ƒ Adaptable to the unique and consumers willing to
same day or on characteristics, benefits participate.
Like a Structured another day, but the and difficulties involved ƒ Have to pay the direct
Observation, there should person should have in working at each site. support staff, parents and
be guidelines for the opportunity to consumers, even if the
information to be shared gracefully opt out of prospective employee
during these meetings the interview. doesn¶t show up.
and planning time is
required to make sure Parents and
that the company has consumers may be
identified what that offered a stipend for
criteria is. their participation.
For our selection process, we select the types of RJP that complements our interview process.
The different RJPs shall be incorporated strategically in all three stages of the interview process
so that the applicants have the opportunity to reconsider their decision based on their evaluation
of the job and the organization.
Based on the table above, it can be seen that our proposed phone screening is also a type of RJP
if the right questions are asked.The objective of this RJP is to give applicants basic information
such as generic responsibilities, location and pay scale and benefits.
We must also ensure that both electronic and printed job advertisements are available and they
contain the right information such as the specific daily task and the positive and negative aspects
of the job.
During this stage, the RJP shall also be done in a group format to complement the case interview.
Based on the methods discussed in the table above, we proposed to use a combination of group
and video RJP.
A professional RJP videotape depicting the general tasks required by the job and testimonials
from real employees shall be shown to the group of applicants before the case interview. The
applicants will be given the opportunity to take notes and discuss the any questions they may
have with the interviewers.
The overall relative cost of implementing RJP at this stage is high. A nominal investment must
be made to produce a professional RJP videotape that paints an accurate and realistic picture of
the mechanical engineer job in today¶s context. An archived RJP videotape produced in the
1980s may not be relevant anymore!
Finally at this stage, we proposed to use a structured observation RJP in the form of a facility
tour to provide the shortlisted applicants an opportunity to observe other mechanical engineers at
work and what may be potentially their future work environment.
The overall relative cost of implementing RJP at this stage is low because only minimal staff
time is required during observation and the process can be easily change and updated.