s, anecdotes, reflections and memorable instances in his practice to provide a number of usefu l practical tips to the budding lawyers who desire to enter the profession. He persuasively argues a bout the need to do away with certain commonly prevalent vices and pitfalls and at the same time inculcate good habits which will form the recipe of success. The personal integrity and dedication to the profession rather than the client i s his foremost lesson. He recounts as to how one should not fall in the ‘sporting chap syndrome’ of filing a case just because the client wishes to, despite having full knowledge that the re are little chances of success. He also cautions us to not fall prey to the madness of citin g case laws without understanding the facts and gravity of the issues first, a condition he refers to as ‘case law diarrhea’. At the same time, he impresses upon the need to have knowledge of t he reputed judgments up to the date because these form the armory of the lawyer. He beautif ully explains the importance of being clear and succinct. One should be simple and methodical in his approach and think logically like a lawyer and not like a philosopher. The anecdotes which he shares form an endearing reading as they are informative and very educative in nature. He gives us the practical advice of arguing the worst argum ent first and then moving on to the less worse of the two, as the court would be more sympathe tic in that case having already cornered the lawyer before. The importance of erudite scholarship through the incident between Justice Bachawat and advocate Vishwanath Shastri as well as the experience Page | 2 of Blanco while writing Halsbury’s Law of England is marvelous and even Mr. Narima n feels envious of such scholarship which he finds is rarely on display these days. He attributes the success ladder of a young advocate in the legal to the phenome non of Parkinson’s Law which means the amount of work available is directly proportional to the better application of mind, more experience and greater sharpening of the mental facult ies and vice versa. He takes pains to distinguish the difference between ‘work’ and ‘monetary rewar d’ and calls a fixed monetary reward as the worst enemy of hard work since there is no incentive to work in that case. Then he moves on to underscore the point that it is the duty of the client to state a case on the point that is being argued in the court even if it is can be distinguished on facts but cautions an advocate to never cite an overruled case. In his opinion , it is also always better to understate a case rather than overstate it because of the natural urge of the judge to cut down the lawyer to his size if the advocate professes that the law is ‘watertight’ a nd immediately demands a judgment in his favour. This may be counterproductive. Another learned advice which comes from Mr. Nariman is to not ‘count your chicken before they hatch’ meaning thereby that one should never be too cocksure about winning cases. He explains as to how the unfortunate death of Chief Justice Chainani of the Bombay HC in 19 60s led to a reversal of fortune for him as he lost his case, through the presiding judge (Ju stice Tarkunde) was kind enough to let him know that the notes on the files of Justice Chainani showed that he was ready to deliver the judgment in his favour. Mr. Nariman, having a wealth of experience from his long practice in the court a lso refers to certain phrases that must be avoided as they risk the danger of offending the ju dge like ‘I have never heard of such a thing’, and ‘Your Lordship will bear with me’. He also points ou t the fallacy of exaggerating arguments, use of rhetoric, over smartness, the folly of being funny or cracking jokes and putting absurd arguments by referring to interesting incident s. Anger and vitriol can be the nemesis of any lawyer as is evident from Mr. Nariman’s personal experience as well his narrations of Lord Eldon and Judge Ruth Ginsberg. Another golden les son is to have a pleasant demeanour and resist from quarreling with the opponents or being nast y with them as the major part of any advocate’s life will be spent with the colleagues at the bar and a ‘sense of Page | 3 camaraderie’ at the bar is must for preservation of the continued sanctity. Another important message that we draw is to address the court in a correct mann er befitting the stature of the judicial hierarchy. He also gives a stern warning against mak ing an incorrect statement consciously as this might lead to the judge ‘mentally blackballing’ the la wyer which is practicing lawyer’s ‘greatest occupational hazard’ as his statements are not truste d on their face value. A judge should never be criticized in public or the Bar or before cl ients. If a lawyer is truly aggrieved and unhappy he should take the advice of a balanced non-opini onated senior lawyer and go in appeal if necessary but not resort to cheap gimmicks. Patience, gravity, dignified silence and the art of learning to lose with dignity as only one side can win a case are essential qualities of a legal professional. As the media has become very important these days, Mr. Nariman points the folly and idiocy in giving interviews or talking to the media in cases where a lawyer has appeared. This not only smacks of despicable publicity but is also unfair to the judge as well as the op ponent as they cannot retaliate and refute. A criticism of the judgment is best appreciated if it comes from third parties who are disinterested and can take an objective view. Mr. Nariman allude s to the instance of the great legal luminary, Mr. H.M. Seervai who, in his leading Volumes of Con stitutional of India severely criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in Escort’s case where Mr. Nariman had lost the case in the Supreme Court in appeal after winning the same in the H igh Court. The happiness he felt on reading those passages was immense and fulfilling as hi s stand was vindicated even though he had lost the case in a court of law. The same would no t have been true, if he as an interested party went around criticizing the judgment which wo uld have looked bizarre, absurd and devoid of respect for the judiciary. Finally, the art of time management is one of the key traits any lawyers need to master. The inadequacy of time should never be an excuse especially when it’s pre-set. Further more, the true skill of a lawyer lies in hard work and forensic skill rather forensic eloquence , flamboyance or verbosity especially in the modern times where time is scarce. Also, according t o Mr. Nariman, the notion that great cases are won or lost because of their inherent strength o r weakness is fallacious because advocacy plays a vital role as a judge is also human. He quot es the example Page | 4 of the great lawyer Mr. Kanhaiya Lal Misra, the formed Advocate General of Uttar Pradesh. A lawyer should also have an outstanding memory as the great lawyers like Bhulabha i Desai have exhibited this trait. Other attributes are good sight and food hearing, good ind icators that age has taken the better of an advocate and its time to gracefully retire. Mr. Nariman has given important practical instructions to the students of law. T he treatise forms a must-read for anyone who wants to practice in a Court and make his own way. Th e author is courteous, modest, witty and very humble in his approach and the beauty of his a pproach lies in the fact that he authoritatively delivers his message successfully without being too prophetic or preachy about the same and yet wins the heart and head of the reader in terms of sound logic and behavioural sagacity.