You are on page 1of 2

Case3:10-cv-03647-WHA Document10 Filed10/04/10 Page1 of 2

1 D. GILL SPERLEIN (172887)


2 THE LAW OFFICE OF D. GILL SPERLEIN
584 Castro Street, Suite 879
3 San Francisco, California 94114
4
Telephone: (415) 404-6615
Facsimile: (415) 404-6616
5

6
gill@sperleinlaw.com

7 Attorney for Plaintiff


8
IO GROUP, INC.

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
)
13 ) CASE NO.: 10-3647 (MEJ)
IO GROUP, INC. d/b/a TITAN
)
14 MEDIA, a California corporation, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
)
15 ) PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO TAKE EARLY
Plaintiff, ) DISCOVERY
16
)
vs. )
17
DOES 1-244, individuals, )
18
)
19 Defendants. )
)
20
________________________________ )
21
[PROPOSED] ORDER
22
Having considered Plaintiff’s Miscellaneous Administrative Request Pursuant to Local
23
Rule 7-11 for Leave to Take Discovery Prior to Rule 26 Conference and finding good cause
24
therefore,
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Plaintiff is granted leave to take early discovery.
26

27
Plaintiff may immediately serve on AT&T Internet a subpoena or subpoenas to obtain subscriber

28 information for subscribers assigned IP addresses identified by Media Protector. Plaintiff’s

-1-
[PROPOSSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
LEAVE TO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY
10-3647 (MEJ)
Case3:10-cv-03647-WHA Document10 Filed10/04/10 Page2 of 2

1 counsel shall issue the subpoena(s) in substantially in the same form as the example attached as
2
Exhibit A to Plaintiff’s Miscellaneous Administrative Request for Leave to Take Discovery Prior
3
to Rule 26 Conference;
4

5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that subpoenas authorized by this order and issued

6 pursuant thereto shall be deemed appropriate court orders under 47 U.S.C. §551;
7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that AT&T Internet, Inc. shall have twenty-one (21) days
8
from the date they are served a copy of this order to respond to the subpoena in order that it may
9
have sufficient time to provide notice to the subscribers whose subscriber information Plaintiff
10

11 seeks to obtain thereby; and

12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that good faith attempts by AT&T, Internet, Inc. to notify
13
the subscribers shall constitute compliance with this order.
14

15

16 October 4, 2010
Dated:_________________________ _______________________________________
17 CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARIA-ELENA JAMES,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-
[PROPOSSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF
LEAVE TO TAKE EARLY DISCOVERY
10-3647 (MEJ)

You might also like