Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S. C. HALDER
The Gamma nail was designed to treat unstable interfrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures. The
device was developed after cadaver studies and has been used clinically since February 1985 in a total of 421
patients. The results in 123 patients freated by the third version of this design are reported.
The Gamma nail transmits weight closer to the calcar than does the dynamic hip screw and it has greater
mechanical sfrength. A semi-closed operative technique is used, with an average duration of operation of 35
minutes and liftie blood loss. Distal locking screws can be used to maintain rotational stabifity, and can be
inserted without the use of an image intensifier.
Results showed satisfactory fracture union with little loss of position, even in comminuted fractures.
Operative complications were few, but included fractures of the base of the greater trochanter. The most
important postoperative complication, seen in one case, was fracture of the shaft of the femur at the distal
end of the nail, but this healed well after re-nailing.
Unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures part of the rod and inserted into the head, and a set screw
are difficult to fix and can present problems in manage- which prevents rotation of the main screw. It was
ment (Esser, Kassab and Jones 1986; Bergman et al designed for semi-closed insertion.
1987 Chang; et al 1987). The most common current A prototype was produced after wax studies had
method of fixation uses a large screw in the femoral head been made of the shape of the femoral canal in eight
secured to a plate on the lateral aspect ofthe upper femur. cadavers, and was tested on other cadavers.
This has the disadvantage that the plate is lateral to the Mark-i design. After some modifications the mark-l
line of load-bearing. Any defect in the medial cortex of version (Fig. la) was used in 100 patients. The results
the femur, due to imperfect reduction, comminution or a were, in general, satisfactory but there were three main
metastasis, means that a varus stress will be applied to complications:
the fixation with every weight-bearing step. This may 1) fracture of the greater trochanter, caused by excessive
cause cutting-out of the screw from the head of the femur medial curvature of the implant;
(Davis et al 1990) or failure at the nail-plate junction or 2) late coxa vara deformity due to disengagement of the
of the screws securing the plate to the bone (Waddell shoulder of the hip screw ; and
1979; Amis, Bromage and Larvin 1987). 3) external rotation deformity caused by rotation of the
The use of the Zickel nail meets some of these rod within the femoral shaft.
objections, but it is difficult to insert and has its own Mark-2 design. The implant was accordingly modified:
complications, such as fracture of the base of the greater 1) the medial curvature of the nail was reduced;
trochanter. The Gamma nail was accordingly developed 2) the shoulder ofthe hip screw was extended proximally;
in an attempt to overcome some of these problems. and
3) the facility to use distal locking screws was added (Fig.
lb).
DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
The distal locking screw was used for spiral
The Gamma nail has three main components : an subtrochanteric fractures, to control the length and
intramedullary rod passed down the upper shaft of the rotation of comminuted fractures, and for disparity
femur, a screw passed through a hole in the proximal between the diameter of the nail and femur producing
poor control of rotation. Another modification to the hip
screw allowed an increase in fracture compression,
helping to prevent its penetration through the head of
S. C. Halder, MB BS, Associate Specialist in Orthopaedics the femur. This second-generation nail was used in 19
The Royal Halifax Infirmary, Free School Lane, Halifax, West
Yorkshire HXI 2YP, England.
pilot centres throughout Europe (Bridle et al 1991).
Mark-3 design. The results of these clinical studies led to
© 1992 British Editorial Society ofBone and Joint Surgery
030l-620X/92/3398 $2.00 further modifications : the nail was shortened by 20 mm,
J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992; 74-B : 340-4. to 200 mm, and nails ofthree distal diameters, 12, 14 and
1 -
11
v:-
engaged.
with porotic
as the lesser
Care
bone.
is required
trochanter
The
not
proximal
is reamed
to over-ream
end of the
to 17 mm
in patients
femur
to accom-
as far
and 23 men with a follow-up of at least one year. STABLE 1 & 2. UNSTABLE 3, 4, 5.
Intertrochanteric fractures were classified according to
Fig. 2a
Jensen (1980), and had the distribution shown in Figure
2. Two intertrochanteric fractures were pathological and The Jensen (1980) classification of intertrochanteric fractures. Types 1
and 2 are stable ; types 3, 4 and 5 are unstable. The numbers in brackets
one subtrochanteric fracture was in Pagetic bone. Details are those of each type of fracture in the most recent I 23 cases.
of all patients were recorded prospectively including
blood loss, drainage and transfusion required. The
SPIRAL # TRANSVERSE #
duration ofimage intensification was monitored. Patients
were reviewed at six weeks, three months, six months
and one year after injury, with clinical and radiographic
assessment of the progress of healing and of complica-
tions.
Operative technique (Halder et al 199 1 ). The fracture is
reduced on an orthopaedic table by traction and internal
rotation of 10#{176}
to 15#{176},
with the limb in a neutral or a
slightly adducted position to allow access to the greater
trochanter. A small incision is made over the tip of the
greater trochanter which is broached at the correct site, Fig. 2b
using a double-action drill over a 3.2 mm guide wire
The Zickel (1980) classification of subtrochanteric fractures into spiral
passed as far as the lesser trochanter. The femoral shaft (short and long) and transverse (proximal and distal) types.
for adjustment of rotation and re-insertion. When the failures. Thirty-eight fractures healed with no loss of
position of the guide wire is satisfactory a cannulated position. In 22 patients there was axial as well as lateral
drill is passed over it to reach the subchondral bone of compression at the fracture site, but no subtrochanteric
the femoral head. A hip screw of appropriate length is fracture showed shortening of more than 4 mm. Apart
then introduced and locked by a set screw. from one case of nonunion, there was satisfactory healing
When distal locking screws are required they are in all cases, including those with severely comminuted
introduced in a similar manner. fractures (Fig. 3).
A spiral subtrochanteric fracture which cannot be The main intra-operative complications were small
reduced by a closed technique is managed by open iatrogenic fractures of the base of the greater trochanter
reduction and circumferential wiring before a Gamma
Table I. Details of 123 patients treated by Gamma nailing
nail is inserted in the usual way. Provided that the
postoperative radiograph shows adequate reduction and Fracture
a satisfactory nail position, patients are allowed to walk
Intertrochanteric Subfrochanteric
with full weight-bearing as soon as comfort permits.
Age (years ±5D) 80.10± 10.57 77.96 ± 13.22
Male 19 5
Female 79 20
RESULTS
Mental status
The mean follow-up of 123 patients was 21 .7 months (12 Normal 66 19
to 31), and details of these are shown in Table I. The Impaired 32 6
image intensifier time and bled more than intertrochan- Source of admission
teric fractures. Own home 48 (49.0%) 14 (56.0%)
Old people’s home 23 (23.5%) 5 (20.0%)
The radiological results in 71 cases are shown in Nursing home 9 (9.2%) 3(12.0%)
Hospital 18 (18.4%) 3(12.0%)
Table III. There were no fatigue fractures or implant
Table II. Operative details for 123 patients treated by Gamma nailing
Intertrochanteric
Age (years±sD) 79.2± 1 1.6 80.4± 10.2 78.0± 13.2 79.7± 11.2
Duration ofoperation 28.0± 8.9 30.6± 13.9 57.6 ± 32.8 35.6 ± 21.8
(mins ± an)
Distalscrews 1 ii ii 23
(number of cases)
Table III. Radiological results in the 71 patients who survived and were available for
review at 18 months
Intertrochanteric
No change in position ii 17 10 38
Compressionbyito4mm 5 15 2 22
Varus angulation 1 2 0 3
Screw cut-out 0 1 1 2
Nonunion 0 1 0 1
Fig. 3
Comminuted combined intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fracture, showing fixation by a Gamma nail using a closed
technique and distal locking screws to maintain rotation and length.
DISCUSSION
Intramedullary devices such as the Enders nail (Kuok- during the learning phase and in patients with porotic
kanen, Korkala and Lauttamus 1986 ; Waddell, Czitrom bone, the following considerations are important (Bridle
and Simmons 1987; Sernbo et al 1988) and the Zickel etal l99l;Halderetal 1991):
nail (Ashby and Anderson 1977 ; Bergman et al 1987) 1) Exact placement of the guide wire. It must enter the
have been tried but technical difficulties make their use greater trochanter at the junction of its anterior third and
uncommon (Waddell 1979; Ross and Kurtz 1980). posterior two-thirds, just lateral to its tip.
The Gamma nail allows semi-closed fixation of these 2) Special care in the presence of abnormal or excessive
fractures, facilitating union without major changes in curvature of the femoral shaft.
proximal femoral anatomy. Some comminuted fractures 3) No attempt to correct malaligned drill holes before
(Jensen types 4 and 5) showed an increased tendency to inserting distal screws.
varus deformity, but in most cases there was no 4) Selection of a nail 2 mm narrower than the reamer.
subsequent displacement even in very porotic bone. In 5) Correction ofrotational alignment ofthe nail by partial
some cases, marked comminution and poor bone quality withdrawal and re-introduction, not by twisting it in the
resulted in excessive compression at the fracture and engaged position.
mild varus deformity. The author is grateful to Mr J. G. Gill, Mr B. M. Flood, Mr J. K.
Stability can be achieved without anatomical reduc- Oyston, Mr W. J. Nicol, Mr J. A. Chapman and Mr C. J. Chadwick,
the consultant orthopaedic surgeons who allowed me to treat their
tion of the posteromedial comminuted fragment, and patients, and to the surgeons at 19 European centres who undertook
distal locking provides control of rotation in unstable clinical trials.
REFERENCES
Amis AA, Bromage JD, Larvin M. Fatigue fracture of a femoral sliding FriedI W, Schult W, Manner M, Ruf W, Mlschkowsky T. Belastbarkeit
compression screw-plate device after bone union. Biomaterials und verformung instabiler pertrochanterer osteotomien nach 145
1987; 8:153-7. degrees : winkel-plattenosteosynthese und endernagelung. Unfall-
chirurgie 1987; 13:1-7.
Asbby ME, Anderson JC. The use of the Zickel device for a malunited
subtrochanteric femur fracture. J Nail Med Assoc 1977 ; 69:623-4. Halder SC, Radioed P, Grosse A, Boriana 5, Leung KS. Operative
technique. Gamma locking nail. Howmedica International, 1991.
Bannister GC, Gibson AGF. Jewett nail plate or AO dynamic hip screw
for trochanteric fractures ? : a randomised prospective controlled Jensen JS. Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Ortliop Scand
trial. JBoneJoint Surg[Br] 1983; 65-B:2l8. 1980; 51 :803-10.
Bergman GD, WinqUiSt RA, Mayo KA, Hansen ST. Subtrochantenc Kuokkanen H, Korkala 0, Lauttamus L. Ender nailing of trochanteric
fracture of the femur : fixation using the Zickel nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1986;
Surg[Am] 1987; 69-A:l032-40.
J Bone Joint fractures
105:46-8.
: a review of 73 cases.
I
I
Bridle SH, Patel AD, Bircher M, Calvert FT. Fixation of intertrochan- Ross PM, Kurtz N. Subcapital fracture subsequent to Zickel nail
teric fractures of the femur : a randomised prospective comparison fixation: acase report. C/in Orthop 1980; 147:131-3.
of the Gamma Nail and the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg
Sernbo I, Johnell 0, Gentz CF, Nilsson JA. Unstable intertrochanteric
[Br] 1991 ; 73-B:330-4.
fractures of the hip : treatment with Ender pins compared with a
Chang WS, Zuckerman JD, Kummer FJ, Fraukel VH. Biomechanial compression hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1988 ; 70-A:
evaluation of anatomic reduction versus medial displacement 1297-303.
osteotomy in unstable intertrochanteric fractures. C/in Orthop
Templeton iS, Saunders EA. A review of fractures in the proximal
1987; 225:141-6.
femur treated with the Zickel nail. C/in Orthop 1979; 141 :213-6.
Davis TRC, Sher JL, Horaman A, et a]. Intertrochanteric femoral Waddell JP. Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur : a review of 130
fractures : mechanical failure after internal fixation. J Bone Joint
patients. J Trauma 1979; 19:582-92.
Surg[Br] 1990; 72-B :26-31.
Waddell JP, Czitrom A, Simmons EH. Ender nailing in fractures of the
Easer MP, Kassab JY, Jones DHA. Trochanteric fractures ofthe femur: proximal femur. J Trauma 1987; 27:911-6.
a randomised prospective trial comparing the Jewett nail-plate
with the dynamic hip screw. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1986; 68- Zickel RE. Subtrochanteric femoral fractures. Orthop C/in North Am
B :557-60. 1980; 11:555-68.