Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The work presented in this thesis is done under the supervision of Associate
Professor Kevin Wong, Kai Fai. During the course of it, Dr. Wong has given the
author utmost guidance, assistance and encouragement. For this, the author wishes
to express sincere gratitude to Dr. Wong.
The acknowledgements of the author are also given to the School of Civil
and Environmental Engineering of Nanyang Technological University for the good
research environment it provides.
In addition, the help and suggestion of all friends are highly appreciated.
Finally, a special gratitude of the author goes to her family members, her
parents, Wang Shijie and Zang Quantong, especially to her husband, Dr. Liu
Xianbin and her pretty daughter, Liu Siming. Only with the great assistance and
constant support of them, the fulfillment of this work becomes possible.
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………….. I
TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………. II
SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………. VI
LIST OF SYMBOLS…………………………………………………………….XV
CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………...1
II
CHAPTER 3 SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF INELASTIC STRUCTURES
WITH FORCE ANALOGY METHOD……………………..35
III
5.4 Summary…………………………………………………………... 121
IV
7.6 Summary…………………………………………………………... 204
REFERENCES………………………………………………………………..…211
V
SUMMARY
VI
This type of significant effect is further verified by investigating the probability of
failure of individual plastic hinge location based on the concept of the plastic
energy dissipated at individual plastic hinge location.
Finally, a new stochastic dynamic analysis method for inelastic structures
based on the force analogy method is proposed for the first time. The force analogy
method combined with the state space method has been proven to be efficient in
solving the equation of motion in inelastic dynamic analysis, since in the recursive
process only initial stiffness is involved, while the inelastic property of structures is
reflected by the inelastic displacement. This advantage of the force analogy method
is also evident in stochastic inelastic dynamic analysis. The proposed stochastic
force analogy method can produce the covariance functions of displacement,
velocity, inelastic displacement, and plastic rotation at individual plastic hinge
location. The reasonability of the proposed method is demonstrated by means of the
agreement of results of the proposed method with those of the Monte Carlo
simulation method.
VII
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 4.4 Derivation of Element Stiffness Matrix with Two Ends Being
Rigid……………………………………………………………….. 60
Figure 4.7 Acceleration, Velocity, and Displacement Spectra for 1940 El-
Centro Earthquake………………………………………………….64
Figure 4.9 Structural Global Responses of One-Story One-Bay Frame for Cases
NEO and REO……………………………………………………... 68
Figure 4.10 Some Local Responses of One-Story One-Bay Frame for Cases NEO
and REO…………………………………………………………… 69
Figure 4.14 Structural Global Responses of MDOF Structure for Cases NEO and
REO………………………………………………………………... 75
Figure 4.15 Energy Dissipation of MDOF Structure for Cases NEO and REO.. 76
Figure 4.16 Plastic Rotation of MDOF Structure at Selected PHLs for Cases
NEO and REO ……………………………………………………...78
VIII
Figure 4.17 Plastic Energy Dissipation of MDOF Structure at Selected PHLs for
Cases NEO and REO……………………………………………… 79
Figure 5.5 Some Local Responses of One-Story One-Bay Frame for Different
Rigidities in Panel Zones………………………………………….. 89
Figure 5.10 Plastic Rotation of MDOF Structure at Selected PHLs with Different
Rotational Spring Stiffness………………………………………... 99
Figure 5.12 Maximum Plastic Rotation and Plastic Energy at Each PHL with
Softer Rotational Spring k s1 = 4.80 × 105 kN-m/rad………………103
Figure 5.13 Maximum Plastic Rotation and Plastic Energy at Each PHL with
Soft Rotational Spring ks 2 = 5.55 ×105 kN-m/rad……………….. 105
Figure 5.14 Maximum Plastic Rotation and Plastic Energy at Each PHL with
Stiff Rotational Spring ks 3 = 1.55 × 106 kN-m/rad……………….. 107
Figure 5.15 Maximum Plastic Rotation and Plastic Energy at Each PHL with
Stiffer Rotational Spring ks 4 = 3.40 ×106 kN-m/rad……………... 109
Figure 5.16 Maximum Plastic Rotation and Plastic Energy at Each PHL with
Fully Rigid Spring ks 5 = ∞ kN-m/rad…………………………… 111
IX
Figure 5.17 Comparison of Maximum Global Responses between Models with
Different Stiffness and Yield Moment of Rotational Springs…….113
Figure 6.1 Single degree of freedom of System with PHL at the Base of the
Column…………………………………………………………… 147
Figure 6.2 Time Histories of Response Statistics of SDOF System under Non-
Stationary Excitation……………………………………………... 149
Figure 7.8 Standard Deviation of Velocity per Floor of MDOF Structure for
Cases NEO and REO…………………………………………….. 169
Figure 7.9 Standard Deviation of Acceleration per Floor of MDOF Structure for
Cases NEO and REO…………………………………………….. 170
X
Figure 7.11 Standard Deviation of Plastic Rotation of MDOF Structure at
Selected PHLs for Cases NEO and REO………………………… 173
Figure 7.13 Maximum Mean and Standard Deviation of Global Response and
Energy Dissipation of MDOF Structure with Different Yield
Moments of Rotational Springs with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-
m/rad……………………………………………………………... 179
Figure 7.17 Maximum STD of Plastic Rotation and Maximum Mean and STD of
Plastic Energy at each PHL with Different Yield Moments of
Rotational Springs with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-m/rad………... 183
Figure 7.18 Maximum STD of Plastic Rotation at each PHL with Different Yield
Moments of Rotational Springs with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-
m/rad……………………………………………………………... 184
Figure 7.19 Maximum Mean of Plastic Energy at each PHL with Different Yield
Moments of Rotational Springs with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-
m/rad……………………………………………………………... 185
Figure 7.20 Maximum STD of Plastic Energy at each PHL with Different Yield
Moments of Rotational Springs with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-
m/rad……………………………………………………………... 186
XI
Figure 7.23 Standard Deviation of Plastic Energy Dissipation of MDOF
Structure at Selected PHLs with Different Yield Moments of
Rotational Springs with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-m/rad………... 189
Figure 7.25 Histograms of Plastic Energy at Some Selected PHLs for Case
NEO……………………………………………………………… 194
Figure 7.26 Histograms of Plastic Energy at Some Selected PHLs for Case
REO…………………………………………………………….…195
Figure 7.27 Probability of Failure at Individual PHL for Cases NEO and
REO……………………………………………………………….196
Figure 7.28 Histograms of Plastic Energy at Selected PHLs for M s = 1695 kN-
m with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-m/rad…………………………..199
Figure 7.29 Histograms of Plastic Energy at Selected PHLs for M s = 3050 kN-
m with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-m/rad…………………………. 200
Figure 7.30 Histograms of Plastic Energy at Selected PHLs for M s = 5875 kN-
m with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-m/rad…………………………. 201
Figure 7.31 Histograms of Plastic Energy at Selected PHLs for M s = 11000 kN-
m with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-m/rad…………………………. 202
XII
LIST OF TABLES
Table 4.1 Rigid End and Offset Properties of Each Member ...........................66
Table 4.2 Maximum Structural Global and Local Responses of One-Story One-
Bay Frame for Cases NEO and REO................................................67
Table 5.1 Maximum Structural Global and Local Responses of One-Story One-
Bay Frame with Different Rotational Spring Stiffness.....................87
Table 7.1 Maximum Mean and Standard Deviation of Global Response and
Energy Dissipation of MDOF Structure for Cases NEO and REO 167
XIII
Table 7.2 Maximum Mean and Standard Deviation of Local Response and
Energy Dissipation of MDOF Structure for Cases NEO and REO 172
Table 7.3 Maximum Mean and Standard Deviation of Global Response and
Energy Dissipation of MDOF Structure with Different Yield
Moments of Rotational Springs with Stiffness = 1.55 × 10 6 kN-m/rad
........................................................................................................178
XIV
LIST OF SYMBOLS
Fy Yield strength
XV
g Gravity acceleration
GXX (ω ) One-sided power spectral density function
H Earthquake transition matrix
Ib Moment of inertia of the beam
kt Post-yield stiffness
K Stiffness
KE Kinetic energy
K Stiffness matrix
K nn Stiffness matrix after static condensation
Lc Length of column
XVI
Mc Yield moment of the column
PE Plastic energy
PEcapacity Capacity of plastic energy dissipation at individual PHL
S (t ) Stationary process
SE Strain energy
S [ x(t ) ] Standard deviation of samples
t Time
t0 Initial time
tk Time at step k
XVII
x(t ) (1) Relative displacement
(2) Displacement
xk Discrete form of relative displacement
xy Yield displacement
x (t ) Relative velocity
x k Discrete form of relative velocity
(t )
X Relative velocity vector
x(t ) Relative acceleration
(t )
X Relative acceleration vector
x ′(t ) Elastic displacement
X′(t ) Elastic displacement vector
x ′′(t ) Inelastic displacement
x k′′ Discrete form of inelastic displacement
XVIII
σy Yield stress
σ a2 k
Variance of ground acceleration
σ x2 k
Variance of relative displacement
σ x2 k
Variance of relative velocity
σ θ2′′ k
Variance of plastic rotation
µa k
Mean of ground acceleration
µx k
Mean of relative displacement
µ x k
Mean of relative velocity
µθ ′′k
Mean of plastic rotation
εµ Ultimate strain
ζ Damping ratio
ζg Damping ratio of ground
XIX