Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Al
3+
In all oI the demos below we scaled ions similar to their hydrated radii in aqueous environments.
The hydrated radii oI the cations used to scale the ions are listed below:
Ion
nydrated
rad|| |n nm*
Al
3+
090
Ca
2+
060
k
+
030
Cl
030
P
+
090
*lrom Llndsav
6
(1979)
When you click on the demo make sure that you observe the cations and anions that are
inIluenced by the negatively charged clay particle. Also, notice that in the bulk solution there are
an equal amount oI cations and anions -- this is the concept oI electroneutrality which must
occur in soil environments.
Cation Exchange Capacity
So Iar we have talked about charge development in soil colloids and the distribution oI ions
around these charged surIaces. Since cations adsorbed to mineral surIaces are held via weak
electrostatic interactions they are available to plants and microorganisms through exchange
reactions. For example, plants can secrete protons (H
enters the aqueous environment which can be absorbed by the plant via mass
Ilow. The are several important characteristics oI cation exchange:
1. The exchange reaction is rapid
2. The exchange reaction is diIIusion controlled
3. The exchange reaction is reversible
4. The exchange reaction is stoichiometric
5. Selectivity oI one ion over another
The Iirst three points are pretty straight Iorward and we will discuss the IiIth pooint in the next
section. The Iorth point is important and merits Iurther explanation. The negative charge
generated on a soil colloid via isomorphic substitution can be satisIied by mono-, di-, or trivalent
cations. In the case oI trivalent cations such as Al
3
, 1 cmol can satisIy 3 cmolc on the colloid
surIace. Similarly 1 cmol oI Ca
2
can satisIy 2 cmolc while 1 cmol oI K
and Al
3
. Al
3
is
considered an acid cation because it can generate protons through hydrolysis reactions:
[Al(H
2
O)
6
]
3+
+ H
2
O [Al(OH)(H
2
O)
5
]
2+
+ H
3
O
+
When you view the CEC demos pay particular attention to the nature oI the exchange complex.
II you want to calculate base saturation add up the molc oI base cations adsorbed in the
interlayers by the molc oI acid cations and multiply by 100 -- you should come up with about
22. This is typical Ior highly weathered Southeastern soils that have not been managed (i.e.
lime additions). We will discuss ion selectivity and the nature oI the exchange complex aIter we
view our Iirst 2 models. The Iirst model (monovalent exchange) demonstrates a proton
displacing potassium Irom the exchange complex -- a 1 cation exchanging Ior a 1 cation. In
the second model (monovalent-Divalent exchange) Ca
2
is exchanged by 2 1 protons
illustrating point number 4 above (stoichiometry).
Nature of the Lxchange Comp|ex
now leLs flnlsh bv Lalklna abouL polnL #3 above Some caLlons wlll have a preference over oLhers for Lhe
neaaLlve surface charae of a soll collold ln aeneral Lhls wlll be relaLed Lo Lhe charge of Lhe caLlon and lLs
hydrated rad|| lor example Lhe followlna order of preference ls observed for caLlons wlLh a dlfferenL
valence (mlxed serles)
Al
3
~ Ca
2
Mg
2
~ K
NH
4
~ Na
In the case oI cations with the same charge or valence the order oI preIerence Iollows the order
oI decreasing hydrated radii:
8
Cs
~ Rb
~ K
~ Na
~ Li
The above orders oI preIerence can be summed up using Coulombs law which states "The Iorce
oI attraction between opposite charges is directly proportional to the charges on the ions and
inversly proportional to the square oI the distance between the charges". In other words the
greater the charge the greater the Iorce oI attraction and the greater the distance between the
charges the lesser the Iorce oI attraction. In highly weathered soils such as the Southeastern USA
and the tropics the high rainIall leaches monovalent and divalent cations and the exchange
complex becomes dominated by Al
3
(low base saturation). In arid and semi-arid climates base
cations are conserved and the exchange complex will be dominated by mono and di-valent
cations (high base saturation). ThereIore, in order Ior many highly weathered soils to be
productive Irom an agricultural standpoint we must lime them to increase their base saturation.
The Iirst Iarmer in the USA to recognize the importance oI lime was a Virginia Farmer named
Edmond RuIIin who used oyster shells on his Iields. Today there are a variety oI liming sources
available to Iarmers. When lime is applied to soils it dissolves releasing a cation (usually Ca
2
)
that displces Al
3
Irom the exchange complex. Although Al
3
is preIerred the concentration oI
Ca
2
in the soil solution is so great that it can overwhelm or displace the Al
3
by mass action.
Once the Al
3
enters the soil solution it can hydrolyze (see above reaction) releasing protons that
are neutralized by the carbonate and bicarbonate ions generated Irom the lime.
The demo below demonstrates how Ca
2
can displace Al
3
Irom the exchange complex. Pay
careIul attention to the stoichiometry oI the reaction.
That's it!! -- a relatively simple introduction to charge development and CEC on soil colloids.
Remember that the actual reactions represented in the above demos are much more complex in
natural environments. Understanding charge development and CEC oI soils allows us to better
manage our soils Ior crop production and understand the bioavailability and mobility oI
contaminants in the subsurIace.
How ar tb cation xcbang capacity {CEC) and prcnt bas saturation
calculatd for tb soil tst rport?
To dtrmin tb cation xcbang capacity {CEC), calculat tb milliquivalnts of H, K, Mg,
and Ca pr g of soil {mq]g soil) by using tb following formulas:
P meq/100a soll 8 (800 buffer pP)
k meq/100a soll lbs/acre exLracLed k 782
Ma meq/100a soll lbs/acre exLracLed Ma 240
Ca meq/100a soll lbs/acre exLracLed Ca 400
na meq/100a soll lbs/acre exLracLed na 460
9
The total CEC will be the sum oI the calculations Irom the 5 previous equations.
LkAMLL
LA8
NC
5AMLL
NC
5CIL
CCDL
5CIL
n
8UI
n
k Mg Ca Na
113282 3 4 31 770 168
vP
221
P+
28
L+
400
L+
12
P meq/100a soll 8 (800 770) 240
k meq/100a soll 221 782 028
Ma meq/100a soll 28 240 012
Ca meq/100a soll 400 400 100
na meq/100a soll 12 460 003
1ota| CLC 383 meq/100g so||
To calculat tb prcnt bas saturation, divid tb sum of tb K, Mg, Ca, and Na {tb
bass) in mq]g soil by tb CEC {all tbs valus wr calculatd abov). Multiply
tb rsult by .
xAML
k 028 meq/100a soll
Ma 012 meq/100a soll
Ca 100 meq/100a soll
na 003 meq/100a soll
CC 383 meq/100a soll
1oLal for bases k + Ma + Ca + na 143 meq/100a soll
ercent base saturat|on (143 383)(100) 37
10
'clay Determination- The Concept
finitions:
Vclay Vs Vshale
These two terms can have diIIerent meaning with diIIerent users.
In PETROLOG we consider:
Vclay Clay bound water plus dry clay solids. (Vclay Vmatrix PHIE 1.0)
A sand is a Iormation that contains less than 30 clay.
A Shale is any clay that has less than 30 sand.
V dry clay Vclay - VBW
VBW PHIT - PHIE
Concpt
The determination oI Vclay is probably the most diIIicult part oI any interpretation as all clay
indicators tend to be pessimistic.
Most users use only the GR as a clay indicator however the GR is oIten a very poor clay
indicator particularly in thin laminated sand shale sequences, in the presence oI glauconite and
where the Iormation Iluid is hot (Uranium rich)
Using GR only as a clay indicator can result in lost pay and/or missed reservoirs.
To avoid missed reservoirs Petrolog, by deIault, will compute all clay indicators and it is up to
the users to disallow some oI them should the Iinal Vclay be not to their satisIaction.
MPORTANT: This approach has the additional advantage to show iI the clay points Irom
diIIerent indicators are consistent since the same clay points are used in the computation oI PHIE
and PHIT.
11
Petrolog has a build-in logic to turn oII any clay indicators that have insuIIicient resolution to be
meaningIul.
The clay indicators uses are:
O Gamma Ray
O Spontaneous Potential
O Sonic
O Neutron
O RT
O Density Neutron
O Sonic Density
O Neutron Sonic
O M / N
O External EVCLAY
The Iinal Vclay can be computed using any oI the Iollowing options:
O Minimum
O Functioned
O Hodges-Lehman
O ModiIied Hodges Lehman
O Weighed
Petrolog v10.2 Help Manual
'R Determination
gr Logging tools
Input curvs:
O GR
utput curvs:
O 'R:
12
The computed VGR is unlimited and can be either negative or greater than 1.0. This is to allow
users to Iinely adiust the parameters to Iit the results between 0 and 1.0.
Input paramtrs:
O GR clean
O GR clay
O Vclay GR type
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
VGR is not computed iI (GR clay - GR clean) 20 API.
Many users conIuse GRmin with GR clean and GRmax with GRclay.
II a sand contains a minimum oI (say) 10 clays, then GRclean should be lower than
GRmin.(e.g. Gas sands oI Queensland)
(e.g. some GR logs recorded in the Middle East will show intervals with GR 5 API, others with
20 API and others reading 45 API. GRmin is none oI these since the lower value represent Salts
or Anhydrite, The middle value are clean limestone and the high GR values are clean dolomites.
There is no clay in any oI these Iormations and GRmax is never seen.)
13
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the 8 zone parameters that can be used Ior VGR determination. For most cases,
only the Iirst two entries are needed. The last 5 entries are needed Ior some oI the special
Iunctions. (e.g. GR50 is used on the user deIined Steiber equation)
All entries except Ior Vclay GR type can be interactively selected Irom the GR vs RWA X-Plot
shown in Figure 2
Calculations:
IGR (GR - GR clean)/(GR clay - GR clean)
O L|near
VGR IGR
14
F&RE 2
Figure 2 shows the GR vs RWA Z-Plot.
The lower point represent the GR clean and RW values Ior this zones. Moving this point will
automatically update the zone parameters and modiIying the zone parameter will alternatively
move the point on the screen.
The upper point represent both GR clay and RWB Ior this zone.
The line ioining the two point represent the equation used. (Here Linear.)
O Asymmetr|c
13
This equation requires 4 sets oI points as shown in Iigure 3 namely: (GR clean, 0.0), (GR1,
Vcl1), GR2, Vcl2), (GR clay, 1.0)
Vclay is computed as Iollows:
II (GR GR clean) then VGR 0.01
else iI (GR 0.5*Gr1) then VGR 0.5*Vgr1*(GR-GR clean)
else iI (GR Gr1) then VGR 0.5Vgr1 (GR - 0.5*Gr1)/(0.5*Gr1) * (0.5*VGr1)
else it (GR Gr2) then VGR VGr1 ((GR- GR1)/(Gr2-Gr1)) * (VGr2-VGr1)
else iI (GR (GR2 0.5*(GrClay - Gr2))) then VGR Vgr2 ((GR-Gr2)/(0.5*(GR clay-Gr2))
* (0.5*(1.0 - Vgr2)
Else iI (GR GR clay) then VGR (0.5 * (1.0-Vgr2) * Vgr2) (GR-0.5*(GR clay - Gr2))/(GR
clay - 0.5*(GR clay - Gr2))
else VGR 1.0
16
FIGURE 3
Figure 3 shows GR Vs VGR Z-Plot and the shape oI the asymmetric equation beIore processing.
The Asymmetric equation is a variant oI the Steiber equation, Larinov and Clavier equation that
is both more Ilexible and more accurate in the high Vclay range where all other equations tend to
read too high a Vclay.
The Lower part oI the asymmetric equation is ideal to handle Glauconitic equation to make the
VGR match the core results.
The upper section works best in the Far Eats where thick beds oI shales with diIIerent GR
readings overlay each other. (Say 200 m with GR clay 150 API Iollowed by 150 m GR reading
180 API.
Both 150 and 180 values can be made to read near 95 clay in the same zone using the
asymmetric equation.
The same equation can be used to give the low volume oI clays in the sand a completely diIIerent
property to the adiacent shales.
O 5te|ber 1 2 5 and user def|ned equat|ons
17
F&RE 4
Figure 4 shows the curvature oI the Steiber 2 equation compared with the Vclay computed with
the Asymmetric equation.
The Steiber equation is as Iollows:
IGR (GR - GR clean)/(GR clay - GR clean)
VGR IGR / (IGR A * (1.0 - IGR))
Where:
A 1 Ior Steiber 1
18
A 2 Ior Steiber 2
A 3 Ior Steiber 25
The Steiber 50 is the value oI A which can be interactively and graphically selected using Z-
Plot shown in Figure 4.
O Lar|nov C|d kock
VGR (2`(2*IGR) - 1.0) / 3.0
1hls equaLlon ls verv slmllar Lo Lhe SLelber 1 quaLlon
O Lar|nov 1ert|ary
VGR 0.083 * ( 2.0` (3.7058 * IGR) - 1.0)
1hls equaLlon ls verv slmllar Lo Lhe SLelber 3 equaLlon
O C|av|er
II IGR 1.0) then
VGR 1.7 - SQRT(3.38 - (IGR 0.7)`2)
else
VGR IGR
EndiI
1hls equaLlon ls verv slmllar Lo a SLelber 1 equaLlon
'SP Determination
19
logging tools
Input curvs:
O SP
utput curvs:
O 'SP
Input paramtrs:
O SSP
O SP clay
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
vS ls noL compuLed lf A8S (SS) 20 mv
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the 2 zone parameters that can be used Ior VSP determination. II the SP log has
been normalized properly SP clay should be 0.
SSP is the diIIerence between the SP log values in shales and in sand.
It is recommended to normalize the SP log using the SP driIt corrections graphically when
viewing the Composite log plot.
The SSP is reduced in the presence oI hydrocarbons
SSP is not Iully developed in thin laminated sand/shale sequences.
SSP is unreliable in tight Iormation.
20
Calculations:
VSP 1.0 - (SP - zSPclay)/zSSP
Cther App||cat|on for 55
The SSP value is also used to compute RW(SP).
'S Determination
dt logging tool
Input curvs:
O DT
utput curvs:
O 'S:
Input paramtrs:
O Dt Matrix min
O Dt clay
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
VS is not computed iI (Dt clay - Dt Matrix min) 30 us/It.
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the 2 zone parameters that a used Ior VS determination. These values can either
be entered interactively Irom the Sonic-Density or Sonic-Neutron Z-Plots or manually entered in
the zone control Iile.
IMPORTANT: DT clay is used Ior other clay indicators using the sonic log and Ior other
computations like the pseudo DTc and DTSc.
21
DT clay is also used to compute the M clay in the M - N clay indicator.
Calculations:
O L|near
VS (DT - Dt Matrix min)/(DT clay - Dt Matrix min)
Petrolog v10.2 Help Manual
'SD Determination
is tb clay from tb onic nsity X-lot.
Input curvs
O RHO (g/cc)
O DT (us/ft)
utput curvs
O 'SD:
Input paramtrs
O RHOMA (deIault 2.65 Ior sandstone) (MPORTANT: Also used Ior SSS and TWA
models and to set the lithology when RHOB is missing or iI the PEF is bad or missing)
O DT Matrix Min. (Dt matrix minimum Dtm)
O DTclean m RHO 2.2 g/cc ( or DT2)
O RHO clay (Also used to compute PHIT and PHIE aIter clay corrections).
O DT clay
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
vSu ls noL compuLed lf Vsdd 80
where Vsdd ( D1 c|ay D1 Matr|x m|n ) * ( 22 knCMA )
( knC8 c|ay knCMA ) * ( D122 D1 Matr|x m|n)
22
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the 6 zone parameters that can be used Ior VDN determination.
A clean line Ior VSD 0.0 is traced between the Iollowing pair oI points: (RHOMA, DT matrix
min) and (2.2, DT ( 2.2)
The 100 clay line passes through a parallel line to the clean line and through the RHOB clay and
DT clay point as shown in Iigure 2
Calculations:
x ( u1 u1 mln ) * ( 22 8PCMA )
( 8PC8 8PCMA ) * ( u122 u1 maLrlx mln)
VDN k / Vdnd
23
F&RE 2
Figure 2 shows the Sonic Density Z-Plot with Vclay in the Z axis.
The Clean line passes through (DT matrix min, RHOMA) and (DT2, 2.2) and is plotted as a
continuous orange line in Figure 2.
Rhobc is also known as the wet clay points. It is critical in the calculation oI PHIE and PHIT, to
determine the M and N clay points and to compute RHOMA clay used in the reconstructed
RHOB.
DTc is the Sonic clay point also used to compute VS Sonic. It is also used to reconstruct the a
pseudo sonic and pseudo DT shear.
24
RHOMA: DeIault 2.65 is used Ior the clean line and also as the matrix density to compute
porosity in the shaly - sand models. CA&TON: Lead RHOMA at 2.65 Ior sandstone as it is the
parameter that will be used in the porosity determination.
uality Control:
II both the RHOB and DT clay points are correct, the M and N clay points will also be correct.
Check the VSD curve on the right oI the X-Plot to see iI VSD reads 100 over shale beds. II
negative Vs and VSD are measured then readiust your clean line.
Where the density is aIIected by bad hole eIIects, the VSD will show Negative values. II the
Density is bad Ior Vclay determination it is also bad Ior PHIE and PHIT and the cut-oII values
Ior DRHO, CALI and RUGOS
Petrolog v10.2 Help Manual
'RT Determination
ild lld logging tools
Input curvs:
O RT
utput curvs:
O 'RT:
Input paramtrs:
O RT clean
O RT clay
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
VRT is not computed iI ABS (Log10(RT clean) - Log10(RT clay)) 0.7.
FIGURE 1
23
Figure 1 shows the 2 zone parameters that a used Ior VRT determination. These values can either
be entered interactively Irom the GR Vs RWA Z-Plot or directly Irom a composite log plot with
RT plotted as a curve.
MPORTANT: RT clay is also used in the resistivity saturation equations and is thereIore
critical Ior both VRT and SW.
Calculations:
O Linear:
VRT (Log10(RT) - Log10(RT clay) / (Log10(RT clean) - Log10(RT clay))
Intractiv lction of RT clay:
26
FIGURE 2
Figure 2 is a typical Z-Plot oI the GR-VS RWA with Vclay plotted in the Z axis and all Vclay
curves traced on the right.
The upper circle will determine the Iollowing zone parameters:
O GR Clay as used in the Gamma Ray clay indicator
O Rwb as used in the ModiIied Waxman Smits equation
O RT clay. (Computed using PHICP clay, RWB and the Archie equation.) This value oI RT
should be equal to RT measured.
uality Control:
Plot all the Vclay indicator next to the Z-Plot and check the VRT.
27
In Figure 2 VRT is the dark green trace. It is Ialling on the Vclay 100 line which conIirms the
good selection oI RT clay.
VRT matches the cleanest sand in the water bearing sands.
Note that in the above example, VRT 100 in the hydrocarbon bearing interval above the
shale bed. This is because, in this reservoir, RT oil RT clay 12 Ohmms.
The deIault Ior RT clean 1000 Ohmms and this should be adiusted to Iit the interval.
'DN Determination
VDN is the Vclay Irom the Density Neutron X-Plot.
Input curvs
O RHO (g/cc)
O NPH (v/v)
utput curvs
O 'DN:
Input paramtrs
O RHOMA (deIault 2.65 Ior sandstone) (MPORTANT: Also used Ior SSS and TWA
models and to set the lithology when RHOB is missing or iI the PEF is bad or missing)
O PHN min.
O NPH m RHO 2.2 g/cc ( or PHIN2.2)
O RHO clay (Also used to compute PHIT and PHIE aIter clay corrections).
O PHN clay
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
vun ls noL compuLed lf Vdnd 006
where Vdnd ( nIN c|ay nIN m|n ) * ( 22 knCMA )
( knC8 c|ay knCMA ) * ( nIN22 nIN m|n)
28
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the 6 zone parameters that can be used Ior VDN determination.
A clean line Ior VDN 0.0 is traced between the Iollowing pair oI points: (RHOMA, PHIN min)
and (2.2, PHIN ( 2.2)
The 100 clay line passes through a parallel line to the clean line and through the RHOB clay and
PHIN clay point as shown in Iigure 2
Calculations:
x ( Pln Pln mln ) * ( 22 8PCMA )
( 8PC8 8PCMA ) * ( Pln22 Pln mln)
VDN k / Vdnd
29
F&RE 2
Figure 2 shows the Density Neutron Z-Plot with Vclay in the Z axis.
The Clean line passes through (Phinmin, RHOMA) and (PHIN2, 2.2) and is plotted as a
continuous orange line in Figure 2. In the presence oI Gas, PHIN2 should be moved to the leIt oI
the gas points.
Rhobc is also known as the wet clay points. It is critical in the calculation oI PHIE and PHIT, to
determine the M and N clay points and to compute RHOMA clay used in the reconstructed
RHOB.
NPHc is the neutron clay point also used to compute VN Neutron
30
RHOMA: DeIault 2.65 is used Ior the clean line and also as the matrix density to compute
porosity in the shaly - sand models.
uality Control:
II both the RHOB and NPHI clay points are correct, the M and N clay points will also be correct.
Check the VDN curve on the right oI the X-Plot to see iI VDN reads 100 over shale beds.
Where the density is aIIected by bad hole eIIects, the VDN will show Negative values. II the
Density is bad Ior Vclay determination it is also bad Ior PHIE and PHIT and the cut-oII values
Ior DRHO, CALI and RUGOS should be altered accordingly. see Bad Hole Logic
'SD Determination
is tb clay from tb onic nsity X-lot.
Input curvs
O RHO (g/cc)
O DT (us/ft)
utput curvs
O 'SD:
Input paramtrs
O RHOMA (deIault 2.65 Ior sandstone) (MPORTANT: Also used Ior SSS and TWA
models and to set the lithology when RHOB is missing or iI the PEF is bad or missing)
O DT Matrix Min. (Dt matrix minimum Dtm)
O DTclean m RHO 2.2 g/cc ( or DT2)
O RHO clay (Also used to compute PHIT and PHIE aIter clay corrections).
O DT clay
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
vSu ls noL compuLed lf Vsdd 80
where Vsdd ( D1 c|ay D1 Matr|x m|n ) * ( 22 knCMA )
( knC8 c|ay knCMA ) * ( D122 D1 Matr|x m|n)
31
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the 6 zone parameters that can be used Ior VDN determination.
A clean line Ior VSD 0.0 is traced between the Iollowing pair oI points: (RHOMA, DT matrix
min) and (2.2, DT ( 2.2)
The 100 clay line passes through a parallel line to the clean line and through the RHOB clay and
DT clay point as shown in Iigure 2
Calculations:
x ( u1 u1 mln ) * ( 22 8PCMA )
( 8PC8 8PCMA ) * ( u122 u1 maLrlx mln)
VDN k / Vdnd
32
F&RE 2
Figure 2 shows the Sonic Density Z-Plot with Vclay in the Z axis.
The Clean line passes through (DT matrix min, RHOMA) and (DT2, 2.2) and is plotted as a
continuous orange line in Figure 2.
Rhobc is also known as the wet clay points. It is critical in the calculation oI PHIE and PHIT, to
determine the M and N clay points and to compute RHOMA clay used in the reconstructed
RHOB.
DTc is the Sonic clay point also used to compute VS Sonic. It is also used to reconstruct the a
pseudo sonic and pseudo DT shear.
33
RHOMA: DeIault 2.65 is used Ior the clean line and also as the matrix density to compute
porosity in the shaly - sand models. CA&TON: Lead RHOMA at 2.65 Ior sandstone as it is the
parameter that will be used in the porosity determination.
uality Control:
II both the RHOB and DT clay points are correct, the M and N clay points will also be correct.
Check the VSD curve on the right oI the X-Plot to see iI VSD reads 100 over shale beds. II
negative Vs and VSD are measured then readiust your clean line.
Where the density is aIIected by bad hole eIIects, the VSD will show Negative values. II the
Density is bad Ior Vclay determination it is also bad Ior PHIE and PHIT and the cut-oII values
Ior DRHO, CALI and RUGOS
'NS Determination
VSD is the Vclay Irom the Sonic Density X-Plot.
Input curvs
O NPH (v/v)
O DT (us/ft)
utput curvs
O 'NS:
Input paramtrs
O DT Matrix Min. (Dt matrix minimum Dtm)
O DTclean m RHO 2.2 g/cc ( or DT2)
O DT clay
O PHN min.
O NPH m RHO 2.2 g/cc ( or PHIN2.2)
O PHN clay
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
vSu ls noL compuLed lf Vnsd 50
where Vnsd ( nIN c|ay nIN m|n ) * ( D122 D1 Matr|x m|n)
( D1 c|ay D1 Matr|x M|n ) * ( nIN22 nIN m|n)
34
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the 6 zone parameters that can be used Ior VDN determination.
A clean line Ior VSD 0.0 is traced between the Iollowing pair oI points: (RHOMA, DT matrix
min) and (2.2, DT ( 2.2)
The 100 clay line passes through a parallel line to the clean line and through the RHOB clay and
DT clay point as shown in Iigure 2
Calculations:
x ( nIN nIN m|n ) * ( D122 D1 Matr|x m|n)
( D1 D1 Matr|x M|n ) * ( nIN22 nIN m|n)
VN5 k / Vnsd
33
F&RE 2
Figure 2 shows the Neutron Sonic Z-Plot with Vclay in the Z axis.
The Clean line passes through (PHIN min,DT matrix min) and (PHIN2.2, DT2.2) and is plotted
as a continuous orange line in Figure 2.
DTc is the Sonic clay point also used to compute VS Sonic. It is also used to reconstruct the a
pseudo sonic and pseudo DT shear.
NPHc is the neutron clay point also used to compute VN Neutron
PHN2.2 and DT2.2 are the same clean points as used in the D-N and S-D X-plots
36
uality Control:
II both the PHIN and DT clay points are correct, the M and N clay points will also be correct.
Check the VNS curve on the right oI the X-Plot to see iI VNS reads 100 over shale beds. II
negative Vs and VSD are measured then readiust your clean line.
In the above example, the clay point is too close to the clean line and VNS would automatically
be reiected as a clay indicator.
'MN Determination
Input curvs
O RHO (g/cc)
O NPH (v/v)
O DT (us/ft)
O MFACT
O NFACT
Tb MFACT {M factor) and NFACT {N factor) outputs ar computd automatically and savd
as curvs in tb -pro.logdata fil.
MFACT 0.01 * (DTI - DT) / (RHOB - RHOF)
NFACT (1.0 - NPHI) / (RHOB - RHOF)
with RHOB in g/cc. NPHI in V/V and Dt in us/I
utput curvs
O VMN
Input paramtrs:
O M50
O RHO clay
O NPH clay
O DT clay
O M clay
O N clay
M clay 0.01 * (DTI - DT Clay) / (RHOB clay - RHOF)
37
N clay (1.0 - NPHI clay) / (RHOB clay - RHOF)
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
vMn ls noL compuLed lf Vmnd 0085
where Vmnd M50 011 M c|ay + (022 * N c|ay)
M30 M aL n03 on Lhe Mn ZloL
1he clean llne ls a llne LhaL passed Lhrouah Lhe M30 polnL and ls parallel Lo Lhe averaae Sand LS and uCL
maLrlx polnLs
FIGURE 1
1 llaure 1 shows Lhe 3 zone parameLers LhaL a used for vMn deLermlnaLlon 1hese values can
elLher be enLered lnLeracLlvelv from Lhe M vs n ZloL as shown ln llaure 2
MPORTANT: M clay and N clay are automatically calculated whenever the clay points Ior
RHOB, NPHI and DT are changed in the previous Z-Plots. This is to make sure that there is a
balance between all clay points.
The M and N clay points can be used Ior quality control oI the RHOB, NPHI and DT clay points
since all three should compute the M and N clay point to Iall correctly on the M/N Z-Plot.
Calculations:
VMN (M50 - 0.11 - M 0.22 * N) / Vmnd
38
Intractiv lction of M clay and N clay:
FIGURE 2
Figure2 shows the clean line that can be repositioned by moving the orange circle positioned at
m50 and N 0.5
The large blue circle represent M clay and N clay
The orange line is the clean line Ior VMN 0.0
Place an imaginary parallel line through the blue circle Ior VMN 100
uality Control:
II both the clay points Ior DT, RHOB and NPHI the blue circle should pass through the green
points at Vclay 100.
39
Check the VMN curve on the Vclay curve display on the right and check that VMN plots closed
to the 100 Vclay opposite shale beds.
Clean intervals with either the presence oI gas or secondary porosity will plot above the Sand,
LS and Dolomite points and the M50 line should be moved upwards to avoid measuring negative
VMN
External 'clay Determination
Input curvs:
O LVCL (v/v)
utput curvs:
O VCL
Input paramtrs:
none
Calculations:
Vclay EVCL
The external EVCL curve, when available and selected as an input curve in the log analysis over
rides all other clay indicators and will be used in preIerence.
MPORTANT: Even iI a user has an externally computed Vclay to be use in the interpretation,
it is important to also careIully select all the clay points Irom all the logs as the clay points like
RT clay, RHOB clay, NPHI clay, DT clay are required in subsequent phases oI the
interpretation.
When to use E'CL
40
All clay indicators are pessimistic and tend to read too high a Vclay when all the clay parameters
have been properly selected.
The GR clay is probably the best clay indicator but is oIten a very poor clay indicator in the
presence oI solution Uranium and in thin shale-sand beds.
Vclay computed Irom an NMR tool can give a much better Vclay in many cases.
The Vclay Irom micro scanner images can also be used eIIectively when all other clay indicator
Iail.
Final 'clay Minimum
Once all clay indicators have been computed the deIault Iinal Vclay is the lowest oI all clay
indicators.
Input curvs
O 'R
O 'S
O 'SP
O 'N
O 'RT
O 'DN
O 'NS
O 'SD
O 'MN
Only the indicators that have been computed and allowed will be used in the averaging.
utput curvs
O 'CL:
Input paramtrs
O 'clay Flag
41
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the zone parameter that selects the Clay Flag options. This parameter is at the
very top oI all clay parameters.
Equation
The Iinal Vclay
Limit all input clay indicators between 0.0 and 1.0 to remove negative Vclay and Vclay ~ 100
Takes the 5 lowest values oI the 9 clay indicators (Say: V1, V2, V3, V4, V5)
II there are less that 5 clay indicators available the number oI average pairs is reduced
accordingly
Create 10 averages pairs oI new Vclays using the 5 Vclay used:
e.g. V6 (V1 V2)/2, V7 V1 V3)/2, V8 (V1 V4)/2 etc
Add the original 5 clay indicators and sort all 15 clay indicators in increasing order.
The Iinal Vclay is the middle value oI the sorted averages.
Example 1:
Only 4 Indicators are available:
VGR 0.10
VS 0.80
VDN 0.20
V4 ( VGR VS) / 2.0 0.45
V5 ( VGR VDN) / 2.0 0.15
V6 ( VS VDN) / 2.0 0.5
42
The sorted values are: 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.45, 0.50, 0.8 and the middle value is between 0.2 and 0.45
(0.2 is used in Petrolog)
Example 2:
VGR 0.0
VSP 1.0
V1 (0.0 1.0)/2.0 0.5 and the middle value will be Vclay 0.5
The ModiIied Hodges-Lehman average or the CDP Weighed average should be used in
preIerence to the Hodges-Lehman Average.
Non-Linear 'clay
The Iinal Vclay deIault is the Minimum oI all Vclay measurements made and limited Irom 0.0 to
1.0 v/v
The Iinal Vclay can also use diIIerent combinations oI Vclay indicators such as Hodges-Lehman,
ModiIied Hodges Lehman or Weighed equations
The Iinal Vclay can be recomputed using any oI the non-linear equations used Ior the GR log.
This option should not be used iI it has already been used on the GR
This option should be used with caution and only over intervals where its use can be iustiIied
Irom core data.
The concept oI this Non-Linear option is made on the assumption that, like Ior the GR, the clay
properties within the sands themselves do not necessarily have the same propertied oI the clays
in the thick shales above and below. The Clean-Clay relationship is thereIore non-linear and can
be corrected using the options described here below.
43
Input curvs:
O 'CL
utput curvs:
O 'CL:
The computed VGR is unlimited and can be either negative or greater than 1.0. This is to allow
users to Iinely adiust the parameters to Iit the results between 0 and 1.0.
Input paramtrs:
O Vclay Type
O Vclay inp1 (Used Ior asymmetric equation only)
O Vclay out1 (Used Ior asymmetric equation only)
O Vclay inp2 (Used Ior asymmetric equation only)
O Vclay out2 (Used Ior asymmetric equation only)
O Vclay 50 (Used Ior the user deIined Steiber equation only)
Tbrsbold or condition for computations:
none
FIGURE 1
llaure 1 shows Lhe nonllnear vclav Lvpes lnpuL parameLers
44
F&RE 2
Figure 2 shows the list oI available non-linear equations.
Calculations:
Vclay F * Vclay
O L|near
F 1.0
O Asymmetr|c
This equation requires 2 sets oI points as listed in the input parameters above.
Vclay is computed as Iollows:
II (Vclay 0.5*Vclay inp1) then Vclay 0.5*Vclay out1*(Vclay)
else iI (Vclay Vclay inp1) then Vclay 0.5Vout1 (Vclay - 0.5*Vclay inp1)/(0.5*Vclay
inp1) * (0.5*Vclay inp1)
else it (Vclay Vclay inp2) then Vclay Vclay out1 ((Vclay- Vclay inp1)/(Vclay inp2-
Vclay inp1)) * (Vclay out2-Vclay out1)
else iI (Vclay (Vclay inp2 0.5*(Vclay - Vclay2))) then
Vclay Vclay out2 ((Vclay-Vclay out2)/(0.5*(Vclay-Vclay out2)) * (0.5*(1.0 - Vclay out2)
else Vclay (0.5 * (1.0-Vclay out2) * Vclay out2) (vclay-0.5*(1.0 - Vclay out2))/(1.0 - 0.5*(1
- Vclay out2))
43
O 5te|ber 1 2 5 and user def|ned equat|ons
F&RE 3
Figure 3 shows the curvature oI the user deIined Steiber equation compared with the linear input
Vclay. The blue circle (Vclay50, 0.5) can be displaced at the user's choice to get the Iinal Vclay
along the new line. Figure 2 would calculate A 2 here above.
The Steiber equation is as Iollows:
Vclay out Vclay/ (Vclay A * (1.0 - Vclay))
Where:
46
A 1 Ior Steiber 1
A 2 Ior Steiber 2
A 3 Ior Steiber 3
A any other value when using the User deIined Steiber equation.
The Steiber 50 is the value oI A which can be interactively and graphically selected using Z-
Plot shown in Figure 4.
O Lar|nov C|d kock
Vclay out (2`(2*Vclay) - 1.0) / 3.0
O Lar|nov 1ert|ary
Vclay out 0.083 * ( 2.0` (3.7058 * Vclay) - 1.0)
O C|av|er
Vclay out 1.7 - SQRT(3.38 - (Vclay 0.7)`2)
Hodges-Lehman 'clay
This averaging is ignored iI EVCL (External Vclay) is used and available in the processed
interval.
Input curvs
O 'R
O 'S
O 'SP
O 'N
O 'RT
47
O 'DN
O 'NS
O 'SD
O 'MN
Only the indicators that have been computed and allowed will be used in the averaging.
utput curvs
O VCL
Input paramtrs
O Vc|ay I|ag
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the zone parameter that selects the Clay Flag options. This parameter is at the
very top oI all clay parameters.
Equation
The Hodges-Lehman average works like this.
O Takes the 5 lowest values oI the 9 clay indicators and calculates 10 average pairs the 5
lowest clay indicator values.:
O (say: V1 VDN, V2VGR, V3VSP, V4VS, V5VRT will give 15 results as Iollows;
V11 (V1V1)/2, V12V1V2)/2 etc ... etc..
O The 15 results are sorted and the middle value is chosen as the Iinal Vclay. (Ior 5
indicators the pair is position 8 is thereIore chosen.)
O Where Iewer than 5 clay indicators are available this method can give pessimistic values
oI Vclay and the modiIied Hodges/Lehman average can give better results.
Example 1:
Only 4 indicators are available:
VGR 0.10
48
VS 0.80
VDN 0.20
V4 ( VGR VS) / 2.0 0.45
V5 ( VGR VDN) / 2.0 0.15
V6 ( VS VDN) / 2.0 0.5
The sorted values are: 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.45, 0.50, 0.8 and the middle value is between 0.2 and 0.45
(0.2 0.45)/2 0.325
Example 2: Only 2 indicators used:
VGR 0.0
VSP 1.0
V1 (0.0 1.0)/2.0 0.5 and the middle value will be Vclay 0.5
Modified Hodges-Lehman 'clay
This averaging is ignored iI EVCL (External Vclay) is used and available in the processed
interval.
Input curvs
O 'R
O 'S
O 'SP
O 'N
O 'RT
O 'DN
O 'NS
O 'SD
O 'MN
Only the indicators that have been computed and allowed will be used in the averaging.
49
utput curvs
O 'CL:
Input paramtrs
O 'clay Flag
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the zone parameter that selects the Clay Flag options. This parameter is at the
very top oI all clay parameters.
Equation
The ModiIied Hodges-Lehman average works like this.
PreIerred when Iewer than 4 clay indicators are available.
It uses the same concept as the Hodges-Lehman average to pick the mid point value aIter sorting
all the clay indicators.
With the mid value X and the minimum indicator Y
The modiIied Hodges/Lehman weighed reduces this value as Iollows:
Vclay X - (X - Y/2)/N
Where N number oI clay indicators (here 3)
It is easy to see that the larger the number oI clay indicators the smaller the second term
becomes.
Example 1:
Only 3 Indicators are available:
VGR 0.10
30
VS 0.80
VDN 0.20
V4 ( VGR VS) / 2.0 0.45
V5 ( VGR VDN) / 2.0 0.15
V6 ( VS VDN) / 2.0 0.5
The sorted values are: 0.1, 0.15, 0.2, 0.45, 0.50, 0.8 and the middle value is between 0.2 and 0.45
X (0.2 0.45) / 2 0.325 Hodges-Lehman
Vclay 0.325 - (0.325 - 0.1)/2) / 3 0.2875
Example 2:
Only 2 indicators used:
VGR 0.0
VSP 1.0
X (0.0 1.0)/2.0 0.5
X - (X - Y/2)/N 0.5 - (0.5 - 0.0)/2 0.25.
In the above example the Vclay would still be too high and the Weighed average would work
better.
Weighed Average 'clay
This averaging is ignored iI EVCL (External Vclay) is used and available in the processed
interval.
31
Input curvs
O 'R
O 'S
O 'SP
O 'N
O 'RT
O 'DN
O 'NS
O 'SD
O 'MN
Only the indicators that have been computed and allowed will be used in the averaging.
utput curvs
O 'CL
Input paramtrs
O 'clay Flag
FIGURE 1
Figure 1 shows the zone parameter that selects the Clay Flag options. This parameter is at the
very top oI all clay parameters.
Equation
O Sort all clay indicators used and take only the three lowest values L ( Low), M (Mid) H
(High) and apply the Iollowing equation:
O Vclay ( 3*L 2*M H)/6 where N Number oI clay indicator used)
Example 1:
VGR 0.10
VS 0.50
32
VDN 0.20
Vclay ( 3* 0.1 2 * 0.2 0.5 ) / 6 0.2
Example 2:
VGR 0.0
VSP 1.0
Vclay ( 2* 0.0 1.0) /4 0.25
This is halI the value that would be calculated using the Hodges-Lehman Average.
33
ulk Density Determination
Introduction / Procedures / Calculations / Data Sheets / Comments / ReIerences
Introduction
Bulk density is a measure oI the weight oI the
soil per unit volume (g/cc), usually given on an
oven-dry (110 C) basis (Iigure 1). Variation in
bulk density is attributable to the relative
proportion and speciIic gravity oI solid organic
and inorganic particles and to the porosity oI
the soil. Most mineral soils have bulk densities
between 1.0 and 2.0. Although bulk densities
are seldom measured, they are important in
quantitative soil studies, and measurement
should be encouraged. Such data are necessary,
Ior example, in calculating soil moisture
movement within a proIile and rates oI clay
Iormation and carbonate accumulation. Even
when two soils are compared qualitatively on
the basis oI their development Ior purposes oI
stratigraphic correlation, more accurate
comparisons can be made on the basis oI total
weight oI clay Iormed Irom 100 g oI parent
material than on percent oI clay alone. To
convert percent to weight per unit volume,
multiply by bulk density (Birkeland, 1984). The
determination usually consists oI drying and
weighing a soil sample, the volume oI which is
known (core method) or must be determined
(clod method and excavation method). These
methods diIIer in the way the soil sample is
obtained and its volume determined.
llaure 1 SkeLch
of soll sample Lo
show solld
parLlcle and vold
space
dlsLrlbuLlon
arLlcles shown ln
whlLe volds ln
black 1he
mlneral aralns ln manv solls are malnlv quarLz and
feldspar so 263 ls an adequaLe averaae mlneral
speclflc aravlLv for Lhe sand fracLlon 8ulk denslLv
and poroslLv are calculaLed as follows
A diIIerent principle is employed with the radiation method. Transmitted or scattered gamma
radiation is measured; and with suitable calibration, the density oI the combined gaseous-liquid-
solid components oI a soil mass is determined. Correction is then necessary to remove the
components oI density attributable to liquid and gas that are present. The radiation method is an
in situ method (Blake and Hartge, 1986). Clod and core methods have been used Ior many years.
Excavation methods were developed in recent years, chieIly by soil engineers Ior bituminous and
gravelly material. More recently the excavation method has Iound use in tillage research where
34
surIace soil is oIten too loose to allow core sampling, or where abundant stones preclude the use
oI core samplers. Radiation methods have been used since the 1950's, especially in soil
engineering (Blake and Hartge, 1986). All the earlier mentioned methods have advantages and
disadvantages according to the samples that are available and the sampling method. This method
oI discussion here is the clod method. The bulk density oI clods, or peds, can be calculated Irom
their mass and volume. The volume may be determined by coating a clod oI known weight with
a water-repellent substance and by weighing it Iirst in air, then agin while immersed in a liquid
oI known density, making use oI Archimedes' principle. The clod or ped must be suIIiciently
stable to cohere during coating, weighing and handling (Blake and Hartge, 1986). The clod
method is applied commonly by pedologists or paleopedologists.
rocdur
1. Separate 3 peds Irom each sample (make the volume oI each ped ~3-5cm3) 2. Tie a string
around each ped with thread so that it can hang Ireely Irom a 2" length oI thread with a loop on
the end. 3. Place each ped in a numbered and weighed beaker, recording the sample and beaker
number on the data sheet. 4. Place the beakers containing the peds in the oven and allow them to
dry over night, remove the beakers, cool in the dessicator, weigh the beakers containing the peds,
and record the data (subtracting the weight oI the beaker Irom the combined weight oI the ped
and beaker). 5. Melt a cup oI paraIIin (wax), stabilizing it between 55 - 60. 6. Dip each ped in
the paraIIin and allow to dry, making sure that the ped is entirely sealed. II there are any holes
noticed, dip a rod in the melted wax and apply a drop oI hot wax to patch the hole. Do not redip
the whole ped, because the wax coating will be too thick. 7. Weigh the coated ped without the
beaker and record its weight. 8. Immerse the ped in water and weigh the beaker and ped on a
triple beam balance using a ring stand to hold the beaker oI water positioned iust above the
balance pan. (note: iI bubbles appear on the surIace oI the coated ped and then break Iree and
rise to the surIace, note this on the data sheet by writing "BBL" next to the "submerged weight".
II the ped Iloats, write "Floater" in the space Ior "submerged weight"). 9. Peel the coating oII
each ped and return it to its beaker. Fill each beaker with water so that the peds will get soggy
and Iall apart. 10. Wet sieve the contents oI each beaker through a ~2mm sieve. Discard all but
the ~2mm Iraction. Return portion to the beaker and place in the oven to dry. 11. Weigh the
~2mm contents oI each beaker and record the weights on the data sheet.
Calculations
1. Adiusted dry weight (dry weight oI the ped) - (dry weight ~2mm Iraction) 2. Weight oI
paraIIin (weight oI dry ped) (paraIIin) - (dry weight oI ped) 3. Adiusted immersed weight
(weight oI ped with paraIIin in water) 0.1 (weight oI paraIIin) - 1.65 (weight oI the ~2mm
material/ 2.65)* 4. SpeciIic gravity (adiusted weight)/ ((adiusted dry weight)-(adiusted
immersed weight))
Record the dry weight oI the ped, ped with paraIIin weight, ped with paraIIin in water weight,
and ~2mm weight.
33
*Note: 0.1(ped with paraIin weight-dry weight ped) ----corrects Ior the buoyant Iorce oI the wax
1.65(~2mm weight/2.65)---- corrects Ior the ~2mm material assuming a density oI 2.65 g/cm3
Ior that material.
Commnts
The clod method typically yields higher bulk-density values than do other methods (Tisdall,
1951), because it does not take the interclod spaces into account. The method mentioned here
tries to reduce this error by removing the coating oI each ped, thereby weighing each oI the
Iractions. Care should be practiced to get naturally occurring peds. Peds on or near the soil
surIace are likely to be unrepresentative, due to tilling/plowing in agriculturally used soils. Peds
should be sampled at other depths or Irom areas that may not be used Ior agricultural purposes.
Should bubbles appear on the paraIIin-covered ped while submerged in water, or iI the weight in
water increases with time, water is penetrating the clod, thereIore the sample must be discarded.
Precision in calculating the bulk density would require a correction Ior the diIIerence oI the
weight oI the wire in air and in water. However, the error is negligible with thread or a 28-gauge
wire. In terms oI overall accuracy, the greater number oI samples used Ior each determination
will signiIicantly reduce the standard deviation. II paraIIin is not available, rubber, saran, wax
mixtures, and oils may be substituted (Blake and Hartge, 1986)
Rfrncs
Birkeland, P.W., 1984, Soils and Geomorphology: OxIord University Press, New York, p. 14-15.
Blake, G.R., and K.H. Hartge, 1986, Bulk Density, in A. Klute, ed., Methods oI Soil Analysis,
Part I. Physical and Mineralogical Methods: Agronomy Monograph no. 9 (2nd ed.), pp. 363-375.
Brasher, B.R., D.P. Franzmeier, V. Valassis, and S.E. Davidson, 1966, Use oI saran resin to coat
natural soil clods Ior bulk density and moisture retention measurements: Soil Science v. 101, p.
108.
Tisdall, A.L., 1951, Comparison oI methods oI determining apparent density oI soils, Australian
Journal oI Agricultural Research, v. 2, pp. 349-354.
36
1.1: NPH vs RHO "Density-Neutron"
Crossplot
See Crossplot options and operations on Ior more inIormation on the crossplot toolbar options.
All crossplots are Iully interactive. Changing a constant on one crossplot automatically changes
the value in other crossplots and in the zone control Iile. Changing the zone parameter in the
zone control Iile automatically changes the corresponding point on the crossplot.
A constant can be interactively changed on the crossplot by grabbing any oI the points marked
with . To move a point click once on it then move it and click on the new location to position
it.
It is recommended to click on to shown only the aIIected zone parameters leIt oI the crossplot.
MPORTANT: There is a threshold value which is the distance between the wet clay point
perpendicular to the clean line. Petrolog will automatically reiect this cross plot iI the threshold is
below a cut oI value Iixed in the program. This is to avoid obtaining noisy Vclay when the
resolution is too small to be representative.
37
FIGURE 1: Density-Neutron-Vclay Crossplot
Figure 1 is the deIault presentation oI the Density-Neutron-Vclay crossplot Ior all models except
Ior the SSS model which has 2 extra points displayed. See SSS below.
The D-N crossplot is the most critical cross plot since it is not only used as a clay indicator but
also to compute PHIT and PHIE. The positioning oI the dry and wet clay points are critical.
There are 5 points that are can be modiIied and Irom leIt to right:
O Point 1: (Phinm. Rhoma). This is the clean matrix line. For Sandstone RHOMA should
be set at 2.65. II a Iixed matrix model is used Ior carbonates use the appropriate
38
RHOMA. It is important to note that the RHOMA is not used to compute porosity when
the CPX or CXP No PEF models are used. See Compute Porosity
O Point 2 (Phin2. 2.2) This point is used to position the clean line when calculating the
Vclay Irom D-N . See Density Neutron
O Point 3 (-. RhoDryCl) This is the dry clay point and only the RHOB dry is needed since
the point must Iall on the line ioining the wet clay point to the 100 point outside the
chart. The Dry clay point is critical in calculating PHIT and since logs do not ever record
dry clay since it does not exist in nature, this point must be determined Irom core
measurements in a laboratory. Most companies take cores in sands with limited clay
content and the clays within a sand do not necessarily have the same properties as the
adiacent shales. Errors in PHIT can be expected in high Vclay iI insuIIicient core results
are available.
O Point 4 (PhinMax. -) This set a PHImax cut oII to limit the porosity calculated See
Compute Porosity The Neutron point value is calculated automatically so that the lines
Iall on the appropriate Neutron chart used. It is diIIerent Ior diIIerent logging companies
and Neutron tools.
O Point 5 (Phinc. Rhobc) This is the wet clay point use both in the determination oI Vclay
Irom D-N, D-S and SN and also in computing PHIE and PHIT see Compute Porosity
When changing the wet clay point the M clay and N clay values are automatically
recomputed see 1.4: MFACT vs. NFACT Phinc is also used in calculating VN. See
Neutron
39
F&RE 2: Density Neutron Crossplot with SSS model on
The 5 points described above are complemented by two new points.
O Point 6 (PhinSilt. RhobSilt) This point is used in the Vsilt calculation see Compute
Lithology and the Porosity determination. See Compute Porosity
O Point 7 (PhinSand. RhobSand) This point is used in the Vsilt calculation see Compute
Lithology and the Porosity determination. See Compute Porosity
60
The SSS model has other applications than only computing the Silt. Regardless oI the position oI
the Silt point, the porosity oI the silt point uses RHOMA Ior determining PHI silt. PhiSilt is
automatically calculated and changed in the zone control Iile shown in Iigure 3. However, the
user can manually change the value oI PhiSilt Ior speciIic applications.
Example: The presence oI heavy minerals like pyrite nodes will aIIect almost exclusively the
density log and the points will Iall downward towards an apparent silt point. Correspondingly,
the calculated porosity will be pessimistic. One solution is to increase the value oI PhiSilt so that
the porosity remains high even iI RHOB increases and Iall to 2.65 or higher.
F&RE 3: D-N crossplot zone parameters
Changing the values in Figure 3 will move the points in Figure 2 and vice versa.
61
The Bad Hole Display Ilag is normally oII and only the D-N points that are in good hole
conditions are plotted when OII.
The PHIN matrix is set so that the clean line Ialls parallel to the sandstone line where porosity is
above 15. This value is negative to compensate Ior the Neutron log non-linear sandstone
response in lower porosity readings and may be diIIerent depending on the Neutron tool used.
PHIN matrix is used only Ior the Density-Neutron clay indicator and it is not used Ior any other
purpose.
IMRTANT NTE about tb nsity-Nutron log
The density-Neutron log is probably the best tool to help the Petrophysicist identiIy the type oI
Iormation or lithologies oI a given zone. The appearance oI this cross plot is very useIul and here
are some useIul indicators:
O Points Iall in a relatively straight line Irom the clean sandstone line to the wed clay
points: This is typical oI a laminated clay sequence.
O Points Ialls downward towards the dry clay point. This is typical oI a dispersed clay
sequence.
O Points Ialls along the sandstone line then towards the wet clay point. This is typical oI a
Silty-Shaly-Sand model.
The distribution pattern or the direction oI the clay points are also aIIected by the clay type and
many clay types are listed by name in Iigure 1. The density value Ior most clay types are
reasonably constant and in the general direction shown in Figure 1. On the other hand, the
Neutron response to a clay type can vary enormously since it is directly dependant on the amount
oI de-watering a clay has been subiected to.