001

4
004
005
006
008
009
01 1
1
016
017
019
020
2
026
028
029
031
032
033
++
040
040

043
045
047
048
052
052
054
055
056
057

062
062
063
065
066
068

074
074
075
077
078
079
080
086
088

090
093
095
096
097
099
099

1 06

1 07
109
1 1 1
1 1 2
1 1 6

1 17
1 1 8
1 1 9
120
121
1 26

126
130
131
1 33



1 42

142
143
145
147
148
1 52

153
1 54
1 55
1 56
1 57
1 64

1 64
1 67
1 68
1 70
171
1 71
172
173
174
177
179
179

2001 4 3 77

(1)

(2)


(3)
(4)
(5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

l$

5% 20%

4g%o

2009 11 30%
7 000
+
+

1848
?

2 1.7
8
1 890 90%o

++

0 2000 101 64
0 2003

4 400 2 000
70%

85%
8

64

90%

o
1() 290

0 07

2008 12
2010
4
1 000

2007 300
15%o

The United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy,

Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Uniono

o
2006
?( Tom Delay)
4
2008 5


(John Edwards)

WTO
2000 1974
421

1974 421

15%
r
17%

'r

007 008

33B
33B

2009

200

r]o Ll

100 89129

1 887
1 960

20 80

 GDP

70%

010

1929
1933 4

40. 94%

1932 o27 1933 4

0. 45 1935 0.67

011

1931
14. 17 1934 5.35 1929 34
1935 24 42 18 94 63
1931 1934
47%

80 i

1
012

2001 4 3 14
1}

2009 9 12
Ll

2004
2008 215% 295%2008
4 600 17
25% 63%
50%o
4 400 2009
2 400

2009 7 17
( ITC)

5% 17%
L1

The basic
facts in this case cannot be denied or erased.

 17%
1/3

( OEM market)
replacement market

2006
19 36 2005
3. 18
2010 3
2008 63. 8%2009
5 42. 8%

17%

( Curtis Schneekloth)

0 07

1974

2008 2004 2008

1974 421

1916

010

(Shara LAranoff)

( Timothy Mills)

011

012

2001 4 3 58

1 7 4

35
2009 1/3 2010
1 1 0.3

0.3

017
2007 20 50

4g%o
1. 95 1.45
0.7 2. 16
1. 95
150

3. 46 3.42
4. 09 3.61 4 856

2009 7 20
2008 5 000
8
80 10 6
5

17
4.5
2.8

9.5 45% 4.27

17 4

018

300

17

5 6

8. 37

50%
1 7

17
019
19 17
4
19 2
8. 37

 150

1 00 3 000
30
3 000 30
3 000
3 000
30

10

10

3%
3%
15

6 000

3%


6
2

021
8 8

10

2001 4 3 72

2009 8 9
7 000

2008 2
195 4 20109 7

4 8

j
i
|
i

2008 8 9

2004 38 2008
0 27
147

FMG 2.48 FMG 17. 4%

FMG

2008 FMG
FMG
2009 8 17 FMG
35. 02%
3%FMG

2009

3-1

3-1

2009 2 11 2 000 2 055 i

2008 12 5 663 3

CEO

JFMG 17. 4%

FMG

 3 -1

80

1981

2009 5
26 2009
32. 95% 2008 II
2009 6 30 2009 {
40% i

15% 8g%
67%o

38

031

40

40

40

12

40

20 60

2003

15%

2002

2002

7 000 2002

50%

1 98 1

2005 2 22
71. 5%
0 2008 2 18 65%

0 34

7 000
2008 33%

33%
F

0 2009 1 1 10
27%

30%

++

2001 4 3 56

2004
2004 3 -4 300 800

ABCDo


5% 10%

2009 5 1 1
l 000 1 015 30. 4%
84.5

80% 90% 2008

90%

2000

1901
20 90
1998
88%

2001

0 2000 101
64


64
1 01

IJ
1/6 2003
10%

1995 2000
1000
10

2003 8

2003 8 540
2004 4 1 060
540
1 060 2003 30
2 300 4 400

70%
2004 3 4 300 800

2008
0 43

2004 3 -4 300 800

5 000

6 000

4 300 800

2003
200
20%25%2003
21. 89 2004
2004
2004

95%
2004 70%

2008

2004 4 3 4 300

50% 95%
0 44
95%
70%

2009 8

10 {
5 000
70%80%

4 300
2 000


70%

ABCD o
ADM(Archer Daniels Midland) A(Bunge) B
B;Cargillc C;

Louis Dreyfus D
ABCD

2004 l

{
70% {
{
{

A
A
A 38

B, 2000

c 20 J34

D
0 2003 16

D
oB
oC

85%
2004

ABCD-ADM
80%

5%10%

ABCD
ABCD

A A

B
0 47

C 400 2 000

D
B A
ABCD - ABCD -

2007

1 998 290
290 2 000

'
j
l

i
{
2009 9 12

1 500
50 7.5
1998
290 290 2 000

1. 61 3.68

0 2004 11%
2008 33% 33%
1.6

10%o
2%

40% 60t70 2009 3

 9 045.4
1944 65

0 54

CPI
34%o

CPIo

2009
20% 25%50
232

2009

2 400
500 ~700 0 2009
2 000 100

1998
290
290

CPI

90%

5 900

5 900

2009 1 026
1/5 463 73
007

007

008
008
0 57

gg%

150

80%

007

008 008

008
- 008
A B
CDE A
A BCDE
008 A
BCDE
BCD
E BCDE

008
BCDE

008

1 026

2001 4 3 20

2009
o
2005 7 8

7
WTO

2009 10 27 2009
18 1075 -1.78%

36t70 37. 5%
87%

2009 9
20092010 12. 4% 700
2000 200

33Bo 2009
9 28

2009
900 200
2005 950 570
40% 30%
2009 9 28


9 27
2009 2009

2009
7 592 2008 1 000 10%
900
800 2009 8
900

9 20%

2009
34% L{

0 100
37%
34%o F
10% 10%
10%

1997 33B
2001 2004
50%60% 25%

20% 42% 2001

2004

|
l WTO
{
{

i
i

9 53
53
9 2004

1
-f- 2
iIJ

ili

Lli

f 33B

33B

2009
10% F 10% 42%
34%
33B

2006

-p.

1 999 8 2003 7

 124 139
8g%o
o89 2001 2002 30

40
1. 29
600 2005
7 8

2005 12 6 i
{
2006 2001 WTO 6 |
250
250
2 000
|

{

33B

0 67

2009
10 19

50%

0 2004
2006 20
2008 3
2009

2003
2001

51%
2003

51% 4g%

51%
J uJ

2008 9 3 12.2
179.2 3
4 10

80%

0 75

28

2009 3 18

80%
18 Jk 1 1
20%
90%_ JJf 28 21

30% 27%
H 4%

0 76

2008 8 31

30

55% 87%
Ik 80%
75% 80% 90%
600h) ~70%
27%
47% 52% 10
7

10%
17% 95%

 CPU 85% 60%

20% 30% 30%
85%
70%800/,

0 77

20 80
1992
WTO
1990 2004
2 506 70% 42%
2008
GDP 40%

70%80%

0 78

38

 38 8 000

80%

1 1
5 000

0 79

19 80
1890

OECD
20 80
20 80

40%

19

50%

20

50% 2%o

J
?
l -

i
!
? 1962
16 7 800
1. 76 1996
13
89 146 138
3 2 35% 102
136 2008
{
13

2009 5 27 148
~
15
1
80
2 100
130 246

0 87

2008 10 100
201 1 2

l
l

10 8

2
3
5
2 5
9 4

2008 9
17
2008 12

5 000
201 1
100 10
25 550
2006 40
2010
2.5% 20%o Great Value
Mainstays Simply Basic 5 250
25 000 5%o
5%20% 30%500702009
80 3
Ol'Roy Equate

2008
20% 40%

14%15%

5 2

1. 3%
8. 75% 5%o

2 8 5
250 18. 625
4. 25

2004 12 11

320

500

500 500 320

140 100
40
100

100
320

1 1 24

8 62
4 0()o

30
1 35 24
200
16

6 000

2006 4
26 600 35

100

500
6 000 500
18 10%
500 600
1.8

 9 000

500
290
10 IT
5 000

2%
10% 20% 30%o
500 100200

200250 2%
2% 10
800
24

3 700 130 2009 1

61 4g%
20%
40

2%

T r
2007 35 T

1 6 000 62
24 qJ

IT
Ik

500
--0 2000

20

r 50

J2004

2007
30

10%
50%

NBA

0 97

OJ-

IT IT

500

}H
6%
2009 ' 11
60 9
0. 8%o 1%

 1 2
8.3 1 2 6% 8.3
62.5 1 2
0. 8% 62.5
10
50

1 00

(1)

(2)
7 (3)
(4)
(5)

2001 4 3 78

70%
2009

2009

2
100 1 000

2009 10 19 25

320 592
980 1 815

2008 12 16
2008 6
1 17

?Mathias Chikaonda

1 07

1.8
30%600

2008 293
1 1 1 2007

1 08
l

1
1213
15

GDP 150
900
320 1/3

19 0 1887
1925
1 960

1 09
20 60

1960 0 1 963 1
1 964 1r
1 978

20 80 8
10
GDP
18

20 80
J

f 1992
1994

o
1 994 0 1 995
_r

T 2006
110

1 887
2008

2006 2006

2006

AK47--

3 300

20 20

111

2005 300


70%

112
E
?

1887
1846

113
%

o
2009 1 1 8

ORANGFIAVISO

assimilation
( association)

nussion civilisatrice
117

20 60
3 6
tL 1 000

20
60 GDP 6.17%70 13. 67%
20 80

118

60% 400
25% 10% 30%
40% 42%

GDP
r

1999

uJ
220
119
10 5%o

4 18 070
1
12%

1SACO BARRY - CALLEBAUT

100 000
2UNICAO ADM
90 000
3
1
3MICAO CARGILL 1
100 000
4CEMOICI CEMOI 1
60 000

5CAPRA/NESTLE 1
J 30 000

2004

o
2004 1 1 6 J
1 20
9 1

F1
o 300
2004 1 1 8

2008 10 6

40 20 90

??

???

??
o

1973 27
9 o 1 981
1986
1986 1992

J
20
121

20 80

1993 1994
1 80
50 100
'1990

2004 8 25
1985 200

1 22

__

2009 1 000 7

2009 1 1 8

2009 11 8

1999
11-1
9?1 1

l
| 15
l 19 70
| 30
i 20

}
i
j
WTO
200()
1 27
ilfN_

o
11-1 1980

11-2

113

r o

fLL o
128

11-2

11-3
i

129

9?11

11-4

1/6
0 2006
2009 1 000
F

11-4

130

1 46

1998
2006 10 I] 13g%
402% 2 126%2000
100 5%2005
100/U 2009 1 000

11-5 -
T
32%
92%

20-/0
11-5

H
131
o

46%
75% 40%

2008 4
?

? 1987
1 32
0 2008 ?

cfij3

JL

0 20

 60
SUAKIN
10

0 1997

1 33

9 1
5.3 1
20

6 000

20 60

2000
GDP 4%
6% 20

1998

1 36

4 20 20 1 0

7
221

9?11

| J

1 43

66
22

2008 3 1 8

-i

1 44

106'

1 870 1920
1 06

52% 48%

0 2008 II 6 8

1 45

?
??

1994
4
2000
4 20

20 10
16

1 929 2009 80
40 40 1
40 30
40 1 773
1929

1 47

20

2008 12 6 {

20 50 250

24 400
250
1 48
250
250

1 49

2009

2009

2 1

2005 2009

1961
?
1 53

1 91 7 1 944 1963

1954 1981

1969 1971
1970 r

480/41%
11% 1970
20

1 54

40

( IPCC) 2007

J-

1 55

2005

IKEA

7 10
KTV
o
Family time
6

80
60

1 56

3
1
3

3
3

Peace
1 57

2006 ?

0 2005
u
9 49

2003 12
2004 2004


158

? 1961

15

1953
4 000

1951

1991

1 59

1992
0 1960 1964

1974

1 990

?1980 1982 1986

1 988 1990

1990

1 60

2001 4 3 97

2009 9 20

2009 1 1

lJ

2009 11 12

2009 4

280 2 000
280

1 65

i

0 2009 {
1 1 2 11

 36

1 66

2009
10 15

2009 9 20 20

2009 10 3

(IMF)

11 3 21

1 67

9 20

o
0 2009 lI 5
99. 14%
1 1 6
2o 2o

0 2009 9 12
[]

2009 1 8
100 17
80 50 9 1 3
1 68
7 16 070 121%o
22 14
10 6 10


9 12
4% 35%30% 25%

10 27

11 5

11 6

9 24
3g% 30%
10 7 16. 5%
1 5

9 12

1 69

CPI
CPI 34%
10% 9%

CPI
CPI

r'1
J

r]

30%
CPI

2009 11
1 026

CPI g%
2009 200
1 70
U?

g% CPI

280 2 000

171

1998 2002 +

MBA

1 72
1 2

12

4 4 30

1 73

0 2009
1 0
2009 GDP 71%

25%o
GDP GDP

GDP

2009 25%
25%
71%
o
2009 7. 37
E

25%

GDP 71%
71% 16

A 100
1 74
10 10 1 0 A
90
T

2009 10 26 IO%

5 10 50 0 100
50 A Fso A
]_

10
A

10 10 10

A
A
10
A
10 10 10

175

2009 21 7 817
7. 7% 0.6
6. 1% 7.9% 8.9u/oo
2009

2008 10

10
A

10

A 40
10
10

10 A

oA 10 40

A 50
A 50
50
1 76
50

A
A

2009
GDP 25%2008 35%o GDP

1 77

26 13
2 lf< 2 nH
2009 10
o4% 70%
6 000
6 000
6 000

 99. 6%
o4%
o4070
12
99.6%
[I?

2008
GDP 95% 2008
2009 7%

2009
7. 37

71% GDP
25%71%

A
1 78
2009
20 A

2009 iLH 7.37

2009
1 1 2010 5 070

25

1 79

0 2009 12

50% CPI

7. 37

1 80