Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Margaret Dickey-Kurdziolek
Resources
2
Friday, August 5, 2011
4
Friday, August 5, 2011
How do different approaches to resource use interact with student access to learning in the case of SimCalc? And what does this mean about prospects for classroom change through/with technology?
5
Friday, August 5, 2011
7
Friday, August 5, 2011
Scaling-Up SimCalc is a large, randomized, controlled study investigating the hypothesis that a wide variety of classrooms can benet from the use of SimCalc.
8
Friday, August 5, 2011
SimCalc Example
Friday, August 5, 2011
SimCalc Example
Friday, August 5, 2011
SimCalc Example
Friday, August 5, 2011
Year 2 X Post
Pre
Post Pre
Post
X = Used SimCalc
10
12
Friday, August 5, 2011
Dickey-Kurdziolek, M. A. (2007). Educational Technology and Teacher Perceptions: How does the technology fare in the wild? , Masters Thesis, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA.
Friday, August 5, 2011
13
14
Friday, August 5, 2011
15
Case-Study Data Video of small student group, video of wide classroom focus, and eld notes
time
17
Friday, August 5, 2011
18
Friday, August 5, 2011
Computer Set-Up Laptop Carts Laptop Carts Computer Lab 1 laptop + projector
19
Friday, August 5, 2011
Computer Set-Up Laptop Carts Laptop Carts Computer Lab 1 laptop + projector
19
Friday, August 5, 2011
Computer Set-Up Laptop Carts Laptop Carts Computer Lab 1 laptop + projector
19
Friday, August 5, 2011
Laptop Carts Teachers C & B Round Rock, TX (Austin, TX) Case Study Data Four Teacher Participants
Friday, August 5, 2011
20
Teachers C and B - Laptop Carts Teacher Cs classroom (left) and Teacher Bs classroom (right)
25
Friday, August 5, 2011
Teachers C and B - Laptop Carts Teacher Cs classroom (left) and Teacher Bs classroom (right)
26
Friday, August 5, 2011
27
Friday, August 5, 2011
Code
Denition
Any action taken by a student towards classroom technology, specically Technology computers and overhead projectors. Such actions may include using the technology or pointing at a screen. Also, any comment made by a student to Student direct attention towards classroom technology, such as, Look at how fast Ive Initiated made him run! This does not necessarily include commentary about the technology or something seen on a screen, such as, Wow! Hes fast.
Technology Any action taken by a teacher towards classroom technology or comment made Teacher to draw attention towards classroom technology. Frequently, this involves the Initiated teacher directing students to log on or off, or to open up and run a le.
The moment class instruction or activity is halted due to a technology related Technology issue, such as computers lacking the SimCalc program, or an error or glitch in the Delay Start technology that renders it inoperable. Technology delays can also be concurrently coded as Instruction Interrupted if they, indeed, interrupt ongoing instruction.
28
Friday, August 5, 2011
Teacher M C B G
# Days Obsv. 4 7 7 11
29
Friday, August 5, 2011
Teacher M C B G
# Days Obsv. 4 7 7 11
30
Friday, August 5, 2011
Teacher M C B G
# Days Obsv. 4 7 7 11
31
Friday, August 5, 2011
Teacher M C B G
# Days Obsv. 4 7 7 11
32
Friday, August 5, 2011
Teacher M C B G
# Days Obsv. 4 7 7 11
33
Friday, August 5, 2011
34
Friday, August 5, 2011
From The Literature: Two Constructs For Understanding Resource Use & Management
35
Friday, August 5, 2011
36
socio-physical resource richness the degree of student physical and social access to resources
37
Friday, August 5, 2011
38
Proposed Theoretical Construct For Understanding Individuals Strategies for Resource Management
resource use withitness - effective strategies for managing student access to, attention to, and use of learning resources.
39
Friday, August 5, 2011
40
Friday, August 5, 2011
Classroom SocioPhysical Resource Richness Arranged/Allocated Modied/Moved Attended to Interpreted Assigned Value
41
Friday, August 5, 2011
Classroom SocioPhysical Resource Richness Arranged/Allocated Modied/Moved Attended to Interpreted Assigned Value
42
Friday, August 5, 2011
43
Classroom SocioPhysical Resource Richness Arranged/Allocated Modied/Moved Attended to Interpreted Assigned Value
44
Friday, August 5, 2011
45
48
Friday, August 5, 2011
49
Classroom SocioPhysical Resource Richness Arranged/Allocated Modied/Moved Attended to Interpreted Assigned Value
50
Friday, August 5, 2011
Classroom SocioPhysical Resource Richness Arranged/Allocated Modied/Moved Attended to Interpreted Assigned Value
52
Friday, August 5, 2011
53
Classroom SocioPhysical Resource Richness Arranged/Allocated Modied/Moved Attended to Interpreted Assigned Value
54
Friday, August 5, 2011
55
Friday, August 5, 2011
[00:04:07.06] Teacher: "where should your hands be right now? [00:04:11.18] Multiple Students: "off the computers" [00:04:13.15] Teacher: "off the computers, okay."
56
Friday, August 5, 2011
[00:03:46.28] Female Student: "Can we run the simulation?" [00:03:48.28] Teacher: "Yes, you can go ahead and run the simulation for roadtrip1 and be looking at it."
57
Friday, August 5, 2011
58
Friday, August 5, 2011
Conclusions
59
Friday, August 5, 2011
How do different approaches to resource use interact with student access to learning in the case of SimCalc? And what does this mean about prospects for classroom change through/with technology?
60
Friday, August 5, 2011
Conclusions
Resources are entities that can be arranged, allocated, modied, moved, attended to, interpreted and assigned value. A potential resource becomes part of the classroom learning environment by enactment in one or more of these ways. Important variation in enactment is captured by two proposed constructs: socio-physical resource richness resource-use withitness (by students and teachers) Differences in enactment of resources can all be associated with learning as measured on a (mathematics) test BUT we should also consider how different enactments affect: preparation for being a knowledge worker motivation and personal relationship with learning experience with technological resources experience interacting with peers
Friday, August 5, 2011
61
Design Implications
Design and implement options for classroom arrangement limitations Physical arrangement exposes resource use withitness design for research : design spaces to expose this for study Some specic resource design ideas: support physical aspects of arranging, modifying, and attending to resources Some specic teacher professional development ideas: variated strategies for teachers dealing with different resource arrangements using phenomenal aspects of the technology to provoke student thought
62
Friday, August 5, 2011
Acknowledgements: Committee: Deborah Tatar (chair), Roger Ehrich, Steve Harrison, Manuel Prez Quiones, Jeremy Roschelle
Thank you!
Meg Dickey-Kurdziolek mdickey@vt.edu
SimCalc Interview and Video Data and Analysis Team: Michelle McLeese, Dan Dunlap, Ian Renga, Jessica Watahovich POET and h.lab Members Work funded by: NSF Graduate Research Fellowship NSF Grant Rec # 0437861 (SimCalc)
63
Friday, August 5, 2011
65
Friday, August 5, 2011
66
Friday, August 5, 2011
Year 2 X Post
Pre
Post Pre
Post
68
Friday, August 5, 2011
Student Experience
Teacher Experience
69
Friday, August 5, 2011
69
Friday, August 5, 2011
70
Friday, August 5, 2011
71
Code
Denition
Rearrangement of Whenever resources, such as the student desks or laptops (and sometimes students themselves) are rearranged in the classroom resources.Student space by a student.
This code was used to capture instances in which teachers Teacher discussing discussed the appropriateness or inappropriateness of using certain resources. For instance, a teacher saying, You dont need resource use to use the computer for this.
Student Resource When a student shows another students resources (such as their student workbook) or gives a resource to another student, this show/give code is used.
Friday, August 5, 2011
73