Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Filed08/22/11 Page1 of 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 8/22/2011 v. DOES 1-138,
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. C 10-04381 CW IO GROUP, INC., Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AND CLOSING CASE
Defendants. /
Plaintiff IO Group, Inc., has discovered that non-party S.P. is the Internet service subscriber connected to the IP address associated with Doe Defendant 10. On August 11, 2011, the Court
directed Plaintiff to decide whether to name S.P. as a Defendant and that, if it chose to do so, to amend its complaint within seven days of August 11, 2011. The Court warned Plaintiff that, if it
failed to respond, its claims against Doe 10 would be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff did not respond. Accordingly, Plaintiffs claims
against Doe 10 are dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. No other claims remain in this action. The Clerk shall