Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In this paper, we attempt to study the role of the military in modern revolutions. We will use the 2006 Coup Dtat in Thailand as well as the 2011 Jasmine Revolution in Tunisia as a case study to see if the military indeed has any integral role towards the success of the revolutions. In here, we identify the main theme of power using Lukes power dimensions as a guide. We also identify the main actors involved in this phenomenon along with other factors that also contributed to the success of each revolution.
In order to fully comprehend this issue, we have divided the paper into several parts. Firstly, we will provide an overview as well as a brief history of the two revolutions. Next, we will compare and contrast the two revolutions and analyze them to see if any key issues with regards to power and politics arise from them. It must be noted that we are doing a comparison on these two specific incidences as a model to see if it is applicable on a general level. Regardless of its apparent level of involvement in those two revolutions, we feel that the military still has an integral role in the success of any revolutions. The 2006 Thailand Coup Dtat Thailand is a country that has a long history of coups. From 1932 to 1991, there have been a total of 17 coups that took place in the country. Before the coup in 2006, the country had enjoyed 15 years of democratic rule which saw Thaksin Shinawatra being elected into the government as Prime Minister in 2001. It was in fact a landslide victory for him with the rural population of Thailand forming the bulk of his supporters.
1|Page
2|Page
3|Page
4|Page
5|Page
6|Page
Conclusion In this paper, we have attempted to show that the military, as an institution, plays a pivotal role in modern revolutions. Even with the existence of civil societies, the military still has the ability to determine the outcome be it through overt or covert actions. As we have seen in the case of Thailand, it was the militarys overt actions that led to an eventual change of government. Without the help of the military, Thaksin might still remain in power due to his accumulation of wealth as well as the overwhelming electoral support that he has amongst the rural population. As such, the success of the 2006 coup would not be possible without the intervening powers of the military. In Tunisia, the militarys inaction decided the success of the Jasmine revolution. Even though it was the people who decided to go against Ben Ali, the balance of favour was tilted towards them when the military decided to serve the national interest which inadvertently was on the side of the protestors. In conclusion, while there might be several factors that could cause a revolution in a country, the fact remains that power still lie in the military. Hence without their support, any chances of success in any revolutions would be severely limited.
7|Page
8|Page
9|Page