You are on page 1of 2

trends

IntechXication 2007
‘foCus’ing on R&D
This year, a new event, ‘foCus,’ was added to the annual technical fest, ‘IntechXication,’
of MIT, Pune. Envisioned to focus on a particular area of concern—especially one that
affects technology, academia and industry—its theme this time was ‘R&D’.

t
he first edition of foCus R&D–full of
took a closer look at the opportunities, but
R&D scenario in India,
its unpopularity as a career
without glamour!
choice and where it was Dr Kalpana Joshi, reader in
headed, particularly as an outsourced S.P. College, Pune, stressed on
service. The programme featured three looking for global opportunities
groups of panellists face-to-face on the for research. She highlighted the
conference table discussing, debating fields of semiconductor devices, fast
and analysing situations. And some of computing, and parallel processing,
the conclusions and facts that came to as good research areas. She said, “I
the fore were interesting indeed. also suggest that one must look at
the patent database while doing any
sort of research. And now it is even
available on the Internet.”
Dr Sachin Lodha, from the
Tata Research Development &
Design Centre (TRDDC), said that
four primary questions needed to
be answered before any concrete
conclusion could be reached regarding
R&D: “Why R&D?”, “Should
Indians do R&D?”, “What are the
R&D options in India?”, and “What
are the obstacles?” He also stressed the
need to add “glamour” to the field.
“Scientists haven’t tried to glamorise
R&D. Whether we like it or not, an
initial effort to attract people to R&D
IntechXication 2007—the panellists who participated in the symposium needs to be taken up. We need to

32 | May 2007 | www.itmagz.com | i.t.­­­­­­­­

cmyk
create more role models,” Dr Lodha blamed for not getting into R&D, researchers pointed out that

trends
pointed out. when the education system and there was tremendous scope for
teaching faculty failed to generate R&D in Indian markets, and the
Needed–a change of interest in the field, fostering spread of global consultations in
culture! instead a ‘get-the-marks-and get-a- R&D. Naik also explained the
The panellists also cited a lack of an job culture.’ Dr Joshi felt that the difference between off-shoring
‘enquiring culture’ and a ‘credible situation was improving. technical work and R&D. He
eco-system’ that hampered R&D as “Basically, Indian industry is dismissed doubts about US
a career option. Prof V.Y. Kulkarni, using the fruits of efforts by the companies thinking twice before
convener of foCus, added, “Due West. And there is a ‘don’t-risk-it’ off-shoring R&D work to India,
to the current scenario in the IT attitude. So there is a convention, considering there was already
industry, students are interested which is followed and promoted resentment among American
only in degrees that can get them by the system. Nobody is being professions about Indians usurping
fat pay cheques. They don’t think blamed. But of course, knowledge is their jobs, and also their being
of the future or of doing something critical, and learning is a continuous more productive. Talking about
innovative.” TRDDC’s Ravindra process. Nonetheless, teachers productivity, Dr Joshi pointed out
Naik pointed out that, “Big, unusual should make more attempts to that though an Indian can work
innovations are not necessary. encourage R&D,” she said. much harder and productively
Just look out for problems and It was felt that since one could than an average American or
work on them.” On the industry progress faster in terms of money European, Germans worked
front, Vinod Kulkarni, associate and position, in a regular job hardest amongst all, and the
president, Persistent Systems Private as compared to R&D, students Chinese were more persevering
Ltd (PSPL), added, “ In academic were not being attracted to the than the Indians.
research, one should not worry field. Another reason was a lack A number of fascinating
about the fructification of research. of research resources. Dr Lodha statistics were thrown up by the
It must be done sincerely. And I dispelled the myth that one needed discussions. For instance, the
must add that there is research in the a PhD for research, pointing out number of R&D researchers per
corporate world too. Perhaps, the that a PhD was unnecessary and was million people in India is less
amalgamation of the two–academic “…just a formal way to carry out than 200, compared to 400 in
as well as corporate research–for research.” Brazil, over 600 in China, and
mutual benefit is appropriate.” a whopping 5,000 and 4,500 in
Panellists also highlighted the The Indian scene Japan and the US respectively.
use of the Internet in changing the The panellists also discussed Similarly, the number of PhDs
face of research, and the need for the R&D scenario in India. The per million in the US is 89, 75 in
awakening creativity, curiosity and Japan, 52 in South Korea but a
interest in R&D. Dr Lodha stressed paltry 5 in India!
that people needed to “…start Some of the panellists
enjoying frustrations. R&D is not at foCus: At the end of it all…
always about unknown problems,” • Vinod Kulkarni, associate VP, Persistent All of this made the debut
and raised a few eyebrows when Systems Pvt Ltd edition of foCus a fairly lively one.
he bluntly stated: “We don’t need • Dr Sachin Lodha, TRDDC At the end, it was agreed that
more IITs to encourage R&D,” • Gargash, senior faculty member, MIT, Pune there was a lot more to be done
• Ravindra Naik, TRDDC on all fronts by all stakeholders,
and that impetus should instead
• Dr Kalpana Joshi, researcher and faculty at
be given to promoting an R&D S.P. College, Pune
for the maturity of R&D. Now,
culture. • Prof Mucharikar, Cummins College, Pune
if that were to actually happen,
• Prof Udai Raj Bal, PICT, Pune the event would have more than
Putting the • Prof V.Y. Kulkarni, MIT, Pune (convener of served its purpose.
education system in foCus)
the dock • Prof S.D. Sirsikar, MIT, Pune
Maulik Chandarana
• Rohit Prabhavalkar, a current Pune University The author is a freelance writer with interests in varied
The student panel raised the student topper subjects, both technical and non-technical. He may be
question as to why students were contacted at maulik_c@yahoo.com

i.t.­­­­­­­­ | www.itmagz.com | May 2007 | 33

cmyk

You might also like