TheGreatHPVVaccineHoaxExposed ANaturalNewsSpecialReportbyMikeAdams

18Dec2007 http://www.naturalnews.com/Report_HPV_Vaccine_0.html

IntrobybloggerDquixote1217(http://curezone.com/forums/am.asp?i=1065546) ANewsTargetinvestigationhasrevealedthattheFDAknewasearlyas2003thatHumanPapilloma Virus(HPV)wasnotlinkedtocervicalcancer.Despitethisknowledge,theFDA,alongwithkey pharmaceuticalcompanies,hascontinuedtopushfortheuseofHPVvaccinationsasadefense againstcervicalcancer,evenwhenitsownresearchshowednolinkexists. Today,NewsTargetpublishes,"TheGreatHPVVaccineHoaxExposed,"aspecialreportthatcites fromnumerousFDAdocumentsandclinicalstudiestoshowthatHPVvaccinesarenotonly ineffective,theymayactuallybedangerous!Asrevealedinthespecialreport,theGardasilvaccine hasbeenlinkedtoa44.6%increaseinprecancerouslesionsinsomewomen,raisingseriousdoubts overthesensibilityofmandatoryvaccinationpolicies. Thespecialreportisavailablenowat:http://www.newstarget.com/Report_HPV_Vaccine_0.html Thisspecialreportreveals: TheFDAstating"HPVisnotassociatedwithcervicalcancer." EvidencethatshowsHPVvaccinesactuallyincreasetheriskofprecancerouslesionsby44.6%in somewomen. TheFDAadmittingthat"most[HPV]infectionsareshortlivedandnotassociatedwith cervicalcancer." Whymandatoryvaccinationpoliciesultimatelyleadtotheharmingofyoungwomen. WhyoneshockingstudypublishedinJAMA(August,2007)concluded,"Nosignificantevidence ofavaccinetherapeuticeffectwasobserved..."andadded,"...ratesofviralclearanceovera12 monthperiodarenotinfluencedbyvaccination." TherealstorybehindtheHPVvaccinationfrenzy:Diseasemongering,corporateprofitsandjunk science. Theserevelations(andmore)arespelledoutindetailinthisnewspecialreportbyMikeAdams,the HealthRanger,aconsumerhealthadvocateandbioethicistwhostronglyopposesmandatory vaccinationpolicies.Thereportisavailablenowatnochargeat: http://www.newstarget.com/Report_HPV_Vaccine_0.html

Part1TheTrailofEvidence ThisstorybeginsatacompanycalledHiFiDNATech,LLC(http://www.hifidna.com)acompany involvedinthemanufactureofportableHPVtestingdevicesbasedonDNAsequencinganalysis. HiFiDNATechhasbeenpushingtogettheFDAtoclassifyitsHPVdetectiontechnologyasa "ClassII"virologytestingdevice.Tounderstandwhythisisabigdeal,youhavetounderstandthe differencesbetween"ClassII"and"ClassIII"virologytestingdevices. BasedonFDArules,aClassIIIvirologytestingdeviceisonethatisconsideredbytheFDAtohave "premarketapproval,"meaningthatitcannotyetbesoldtothepublic.Inorderforsuchadeviceto bemarketedtothepublic,itmustbedowngradedtoClassIIstatus,whichisconsidereda"special controls"status.ClassIIdevicesare,"...thosedevicesforwhichthegeneralcontrolsbythemselves areinsufficienttoprovidereasonableassuranceofsafetyandeffectiveness,butforwhichthereis sufficientinformationtoestablishspecialcontrolstoprovidesuchassurance,includingperformance standards,postmarketsurveillance,patientregistries,developmentanddisseminationofguidelines, recommendations,andanyotherappropriateactionstheagencydeemsnecessary." Inotherwords,aClassIIdevicemayormaynotactuallybesafe,buttheFDAconsidersissafe enoughtoreleasetothepublic. HiFiDNATechhasbeentryingtogetitsHPVdetectiondevicedowngradedtoaClassIIdevice basedonthefollowingarguments: Formorethan20years,theFDAhadregulatedtheHPVtestasa"testforcervicalcancer." Butsinceatleast2003,theFDAhaschangeditspositionontherelationshipbetweenHuman PapillomaVirusandcervicalcancer,statingthattheHPVstrainis"notassociatedwithcervical cancer." Accordingly,HiFiDNATechisarguingthattheHPVtestithasdevelopedisnolongeratestfor cervicalcancer,butismerelyatestforthepresenceofHumanPapillomaVirusesashiftthat makesthetestfarmorereliableinitsprimarypurpose.Inotherwords,thetestismerelydetecting thepresenceofavirus,notmakingadiagnosisofadisease(whichwouldbeamuchhigher standardtomeet). OnOctober12,2007,HiFiDNATechsuedtheFoodandDrugAdministrationinanattempttoforce ittodowngradeitsHPVdetectiontechnologytoClassII(seehttp://www.newsmedical.net/? id=31180).EarlierintheyearonMarch7,2007,HiFiDNATechfiledtheHPVPCRtest reclassificationpetitionwiththeFDA.Itistheinformationinthispetitiondocumentthatledusto theFDA'sknowledgethatHPVisnotlinkedtocervicalcancer. Gotallthat?Thisisasomewhatcomplexstorytofollow,sohereitisagaininsummary: AcompanythatmanufacturersaDNAtestingdevicethatcandetectthepresenceofHPV(Human PapillomaVirus)ispetitioningtheFDA(andsuingtheFDA)togetittoreclassifyitsmedical deviceasa"ClassII"devicebasedontherevelationthattheFDAhasalreadyadoptedtheposition thatHPVinfectionsdonotdirectlycausecervicalcancer. ThiswouldmeanthattheFDAhasbeenawareforyearsthatHPVdoesnotcausecervicalcancer, whichmeansthattheFDA'sapprovaloftheGardasilvaccineaswellasthenationalpushfor Gardasilvaccinationsisbasedonagrandmedicalhoaxthat,notsurprisingly,appearstobe designedtoexploitthefearofcancertosellvaccines.Thevictimsinallthis,ofcourse,arethe

younggirlswhoareapparentlybeingsubjectedtoamedicallyuseless(andpotentiallydangerous) vaccine. Noneofthisinformationwasapparentlyknownduringthemorerecentdebatesoverthesafetyand efficacyofGardasil,theHPVvaccinenowinuse.Thismeansthatthepublicdebateover mandatoryHPVvaccinationslackedkeyelementsthatnowseemessentialtoreachingrational, evidencebasedconclusionsoverthesafetyandefficacyofsuchvaccines.

Part2TheTextofthePetition TheReclassificationPetition,datedMarch7,2007,isstillpostedontheFDA's website:http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/07p0210/07p0210ccp000101vol1.pdf IncasetheFDAremovesthisdocument(asithasbeenknowntodo),we'vepostedabackupcopyof thedocumentonourownservers:http://www.NewsTarget.com/downloads/FDAHPV.pdf Thisdocumentrevealsthefollowingtext: TheFDAnewsreleaseofMarch31,2003acknowledgesthat"mostinfections(byHPV)areshort livedandnotassociatedwithcervicalcancer",inrecognitionoftheadvancesinmedicalscienceand technologysince1988.Inotherwords,since2003thescientificstaffoftheFDAnolonger considersHPVinfectiontobeahighriskdiseasewhenwritingeducationalmaterialsforthegeneral publicwhereastheregulatoryarmoftheagencyisstillboundbytheoldclassificationschemethat hadplacedHPVtestasatesttostratifyriskforcervicalcancerinregulatingtheindustry. NewsTargetsoughttoverifytheexistenceoftheFDAnewsreleasereferencedbythispetition reclassificationdocumentandfoundthat,indeed,theFDAnewsreleaseexists.Infact,it'sstill postedontheFDAwebsiteathttp://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00890.html Init,theFDAsays,"TheHPVDNAtestisnotintendedtosubstituteforregularPapscreening.Nor isitintendedtoscreenwomenunder30whohavenormalPaptests.AlthoughtherateofHPV infectioninthisgroupishigh,Mostinfectionsareshortlivedandnotassociatedwithcervical cancer."(Emphasisadded.) Inotherwords,theFDAknewin2003thatHPVinfectionsarenotassociatedwithcervicalcancer. Furthermore,theFDAstates,inthesamepressrelease,"Mostwomenwhobecomeinfectedwith HPVareabletoeradicatethevirusandsuffernoapparentlongtermconsequencestotheirhealth." Inotherwords,HPVinfectionsdonotcausecervicalcancer!Remember,theentirepushfor mandatoryHPVvaccinationsofyounggirlsacrossthecountryhasbeentheurgentcallto"save" theseyounggirlsfromcervicalcancer.Thevaccinepushhasbeenabout"savingslives."Butas thesedocumentsclearlyreveal,HPVisnothreattothelivesofyounggirls.Infact,asyouwillsee below,HPVinfectionsarenaturallyselflimiting!

HPVInfectionsResolveThemselves,WithoutVaccines Asthereclassificationpetitionreveals,HPVinfectionsarenaturallyselflimitingmeaningthat theyarecontrollednaturally,withoutrequiringinterventionwithdrugsorvaccines.Itisnotthe HPVvirusitselfthatcausescervicalcancerbutratherapersistentstateofillhealthonthepartof thepatientthatmakeshervulnerabletopersistentinfections. Asthepetitionstates: "Basedonnewscientificinformationpublishedinthepast15years,itisnowgenerallyagreedthat identifyingandtypingHPVinfectiondoesnotbearadirectrelationshiptostratificationoftherisk forcervicalcancer.MostacuteinfectionscausedbyHPVareselflimiting[1,47]....Repeated sequentialtransientHPVinfections,evenwhencausedby"highrisk"HPVs,arecharacteristically notassociatedwithhighriskofdevelopingsquamousintraepitheliallesions,aprecursorofcervical cancer. Awomanfoundtobepositiveforthesamestrain(genotype)ofHPVonrepeatedtestingishighly likelysufferingfromapersistentHPVinfectionandisconsideredtobeathighriskofdeveloping precancerousintraepitheliallesionsinthecervix.Itisthepersistentinfection,notthevirus,that determinesthecancerrisk." TheFDAagreeswiththisassessmentoftherelationshipbetweenHPVandcervicalcancer,as evidencedbyits2003newsreleasequotedabove.

Part3DoHPVVaccinesIncreasetheRiskofPrecancerousLesions? ThereclassificationpetitioncitedabovealsorevealsthatGardasilvaccinesmayincreasetheriskof developingprecancerouslesionsby44.6percentinsomegroupsofwomen.Thisisfoundinaquote referencingadocumentmentionedinthepetition,whichstates: "PCRbasedHPVdetectiondevicewithprovisionforaccurateHPVgenotypingismoreurgently needednowbecausevaccinationwithGardasilofthewomenwhoarealreadyseropositiveand PCRpositiveforvaccinerelevantgenotypesofHPVhasbeenfoundtoincreasetheriskof developinghighgradeprecancerouslesionsby44.6%,accordingtoanFDAVRBPAC BackgroundDocument:GardasilHPVQuadrivalentVaccine.May18,2006VRBPAC Meeting.www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/20064222B3.pdf" NewsTargettrackeddownthecorrectURLofthedocumentreferencedaboveandfounditinthe FDAdocketarchives.Wehaveplacedasafebackupcopy at:http://www.NewsTarget.com/downloads/FDAGardasil.pdf Sureenough,thisdocumentrevealsstartlinginformationabouttheextremedangersapparently posedbyGardasilvaccinations.Onpage13,thisdocumentstates:

"ConcernsRegardingPrimaryEndpointAnalysesamongSubgroups ThereweretwoimportantconcernsthatwereidentifiedduringthecourseoftheefficacyreviewofthisBLA. OnewasthepotentialforGardasiltoenhancediseaseamongasubgroupofsubjectswhohadevidenceof persistentinfectionwithvaccinerelevantHPVtypesatbaseline.Theotherconcernwastheobservationsof CIN2/3orworsecasesduetoHPVtypesnotcontainedinthevaccine.Thesecasesofdiseaseduetoother HPVtypeshavethepotentialtocountertheefficacyresultsofGardasilfortheHPVtypescontainedinthe vaccine. 1.EvaluationofthepotentialofGardasiltoenhancecervicaldiseaseinsubjectswhohadevidenceof persistentinfectionwithvaccinerelevantHPVtypespriortovaccination.Theresultsofexploratorysubgroup analysesforstudy013suggestedaconcernthatsubjectswhowereseropositiveandPCRpositiveforthe vaccinerelevantHPVtypeshadagreaternumberofCIN2/3orworsecasesasdemonstratedinthe followingtable: ObservedEfficacy 44.6% Itappearedthatsubjectsinthissubgroupofstudy013whoreceivedGardasilmighthavehadenhanced riskfactorsfordevelopmentofCIN2/3orworsecomparedtoplaceborecipients."'

RevealingtheDangersofGardasil ThisrevelationshouldbequiteshockingtoanyonewhohasbeenfollowingthedebateoverGardasil andmandatoryvaccinationsofteenagegirls.First,itrevealsthatGardasilappears toincreasediseaseby44.6percentincertainpeoplenamely,thosewhowerealreadycarriersof thesameHPVstrainsusedinthevaccine. Inotherwords,itappearsthatifthevaccineisgiventoayoungwomanwhoalreadycarries HPVina"harmless"state,itmay"activate"theinfectionanddirectlycauseprecancerous lesionstoappear.Thevaccine,inotherwords,mayacceleratethedevelopmentofprecancerous lesionsinwomen. ThisisinformationthathassimplynotbeenmadeavailableinthedebateoverGardasilvaccination policies.Theprovaccinationrhetorichasalwaysbeenabout"savinglives"anditcarriedthe impliedstatementthatGardasilisperfectlysafeforallwomen,posingabsolutelynoincreasedrisk ofcancer.Whatthesedocumentsreveal,however,isthatGardasilmay,infact,poseaserious increaseintheriskofcervicalcancerinsomerecipientsofthevaccine.

Part4InterrogatingYoungVirgins
TheFDAdirectlyadmitsthevaccineisutterlyuselessinthesewomen,statinginthesame document,"Finally,thereiscompellingevidencethatthevaccinelackstherapeuticefficacyamong womenwhohavehadpriorexposuretoHPVandhavenotclearedpreviousinfection(PCRpositive andseropositive)." Whatthisessentiallymeansisthatthe"safe"administeringoftheGardasilvaccinerequiresthatit beadministeredonlytovirgins(becausevirtuallyallwomenwhoaresexuallyactivecarryHPV strains).That,ofcourse,wouldrequirethedirectquestioningofthesexualhabitsofallyounggirls beforeadministeringthevaccine.

IsthiswhattheGovernorofTexasreallyhadinmindwhenhemandatedsuchvaccinationsforall younggirlsinTexas?...amaledoctorwithavaccinationneedleinhishandandathirteenyearold girlsittinginaprivateclinicroombehindcloseddoors,withthemaledoctoraskingher,"Haveyou everhadsex?" Clearly,thiskindofpatientquestioningcrossesallkindsofethicalbarrierswhensuchvaccinations aremademandatory(astheyhavebeenmadeinTexas).ItputstheStateinthepositioningof ascertainingthesexualhabitsofveryyoungteenagegirlsandthenpotentiallycausingthemharm. It'snothardtosupposethatmostsexuallyactiveteenagegirlswouldclaimtostillbevirgins (especiallyiftheirparentswerepresent),creatingasituationwherevaccineswouldberoutinely administeredtopreciselytheHPVcarriersubgroupsforwhichithasbeendemonstratedtogreatly increasetheriskofprecancerouslesions. Inotherwords,underamandatoryGardasilvaccinationscenariolikewhatexistsinTexastoday,a sexuallyactiveyoungteenagegirlhastomakeatoughchoice: 1)Shecanlietoherdoctor,claimtobeavirgin,receivethevaccineandtherebypotentiallyincrease herriskofcervicalcancer. 2)Shecantellherdoctorshe'ssexuallyactive,therebysurrenderingherprivacyandpossibly subjectingherselftovariousconsequencesfromhersexualstatusbeinglearnedbyherparentsor guardians.(Onewouldhope,ofcourse,thatsuchsexualhabitswerenotsecrets,butalas,welivein therealworldwheremanyteenagegirlsdoindeedhavesexataveryearlyage...) Furthermore,theyounggirlisunlikelytobegivenaccurateinformationaboutthehealthrisks associatedwiththevaccine,sincevirtuallyallhealthauthoritiesareheavilyinvolvedinpromoting provaccinationpropaganda,routinelyignoringscientificevidencethatmightgivereasonable peoplepause. Naturally,thebetterscenariohereisthattheyounggirlisnotsexuallyactivetobeginwith,butina societywhere8thand9thgradersarealreadyroutinelyengagedinsexualactivitiesalmostalways unbeknownsttotheirparentsitseemsnaivetoexpectthatsuchgirlswouldsuddenlyhonor pledgesofcelibacyinordertoprotectthemselvesfrompossiblefuturedangersposedbyapresent dayvaccine(especiallywhendoctorsblindlyclaimthevaccineisharmless). Therearealsoseriousquestionsaboutthesafetyofthevaccinefornonsexuallyactiveyoung women.Yetevenifthevaccineposesnoincreasedriskofcervicalcancerfornonsexuallyactive younggirls,there'sstillthemoreseriousquestionof:Doesthevaccinework?Doesitreallyprevent cervicalcancerinthefirstplace?AndthatquestionhasalreadybeenclearlyansweredbytheFDA's ownadmissionthatHPVinfectionsarenotthecauseofcervicalcancerinthefirstplace.

Part5TheFourQuadrantsofGarsadilVaccinations
Basedonwhatwe'velearnedfromtheFDA'sowndocuments,herearethelikelyoutcomesofeach ofthefourquadrants: WhenconsideringthesafetyandeffectivenessofGardasilvaccinationsonyoungteens,thereare essentiallyfourquadrantstoconsider,asshowninthetablebelow:
QuadrantI:NonSexuallyActive NoGardasilVaccine QuadrantIII:SexuallyActive NoGardasilVaccine QuadrantII:NonSexuallyActive ReceivesGardasilVaccine QuadrantIV:SexuallyActive ReceivesGardasilVaccine

QuadrantI:NonSexuallyActive,NoGardasilVaccine Outcome:Noriskofcervicalcancer. QuadrantII:NonSexuallyActive,ReceivesGardasilVaccine Outcome:Nomedicalbenefitfromvaccine. QuadrantIII:SexuallyActive,NoGardasilVaccine Outcome:HPVpresenceisselflimitinganddoesnotleadtocervicalcancer. QuadrantIV:SexuallyActive,ReceivesGardasilVaccine Outcome:44.6%Increasedriskofprecancerouslesions.Noreductionincancerrisk. Inotherwords,Gardasiladdsnobenefitstoanyquadrant!Thereisnosubgroupthatactually benefitsfromaGardasilvaccination.ButthereisatleastonequadrantinwhichGardasilachieves anincreasedriskofdisease.Putanotherway,Gardasilhelpsnoone,butitharmssome. Thisishardlyapositionfromwhichtomandatethevaccineforeveryone,especiallysincethe vaccinehasbeenwidelyprescribedas"completelysafe"foreveryone.Itiswidelyclaimedby medicalauthoritiesthatthevaccinehasnodownside:Nohealthrisks,noincreasedriskofdisease andnopotentialtocauseharminwomen.Clearly,theseassumptionshavenobasisinscientificfact. Keepinmind,too,thatMerck,themanufacturerofGardasil,haspubliclysuggestedthatyoung boysshouldreceiveGardasilvaccinations!Why?Becausetheymightengageinoralsexwithgirls whocarrythevirus.Therefore,thestorygoes,youngboysshouldbevaccinatedagainstthisvirus thattheyclaimcausescervicalcancer!(Nevermindthefactthatboysdon'thaveacervix...)Thereis noend,itseems,tothepseudoscientificnonsensethatwillbespoutedinanefforttosellmore Garsasilvaccinestopeoplewhodon'tneedthem.

Part6ResearchShowsGardasiltobeUseless Tofurtherinvestigatethisconclusion,NewsTargettookacloserlookatresearchpublishedin theJournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociation(August,2007),entitled,"EffectofHuman Papillomavirus16/18L1ViruslikeParticleVaccineAmongYoungWomenWithPreexisting Infection" ThisresearchsoughttodeterminetheusefulnessoftheHPVvaccineamongwomenwhoalready carryHPV(whichincludesvirtuallyallwomenwhoaresexuallyactive,regardlessoftheirage). ThisdocumentcancurrentlybefoundataUniversityofLouisvilledocumentarchivereprintedfrom JAMA.ClickheretoreadthePDFyourself. Justincasethatcopydisappears,we'vealsohostedthePDF here:http://www.newstarget.com/downloads/HPVVaccineEffects.pdf ThisdocumentrevealsstartlinginformationabouttheineffectivenessoftheGardasilvaccine.It revealsthattheHPVvaccineoftencausedanincreaseinthepresenceofHPVstrainswhileutterly failingtoclearthevirusesinmostwomen. Theseshockingresultscausedthestudyauthorstopublishthissoberingconclusion,printedin JAMA: "Nosignificantevidenceofavaccinetherapeuticeffectwasobservedinanalysesrestrictedto womenwhoreceivedalldosesofvaccineorthosewithevidenceofsingleHPVinfectionsatentry (Table2).Weobservednoevidenceofvaccineeffectswhenwestratifiedtheanalysisonselected studyentrycharacteristicsreflectiveof[variousparameters](TABLE3).Similarly,noevidenceof vaccineeffectswasobservedinanalysesstratifiedbyotherstudyentryparametersthoughtto potentiallyinfluenceclearanceratesandefficacyofthevaccine,includingtimesincesexual initiation,oralcontraceptiveuse,cigarettesmoking,andconcomitantinfectionwithCtrachomatis orNgonorrhoeae(Table3)." Inotherwords,theauthorsfoundnoevidencethatthevaccineworkedatall.Thisobservationled theauthorstoofferthisdamningconclusionthatappearstorenderGardasilnothingmorethana grandmedicalhoax: "...ratesofviralclearanceovera12monthperiodarenotinfluencedbyvaccination." Thestudygoesontostatewordsthatshouldcauseeverydoctor,Governorandhealthauthority acrosstheUnitedStates(andaroundtheworld)torethinkGardasilvaccinationpolicies: "...giventhatviralclearanceratesdidnotdifferbytreatmentgroupandthatpersistentviralinfection isthebestestablishedpredictorofriskofprogression,itisunlikelythatvaccinationcouldhavea significantbeneficialimpactonrateoflesionprogression.1,17 Resultsfromourcommunitybasedstudyprovidestrongevidencethatthereislittle,ifany, therapeuticbenefitfromthevaccineinthepopulationwestudied.Furthermore,weseenoreasonto believethatthereistherapeuticbenefitofthevaccineelsewherebecausethebiologicaleffectof

vaccinationamongalreadyinfectedwomenisnotexpectedtovarybypopulation. Inotherwords,thevaccinesdidn'tworkonthepopulationstudied,andthereisnoreasontobelieve thatthosesamevaccineswouldmagicallyworkonotherpopulations,sincethebiologyofwomen andHPVissosimilaracrossvariouspopulations.

Part7TheConclusion:HPVVaccinationsaMedicalHoax
ItisdifficulttotakeanhonestlookatthisscientificevidenceandthestatementsmadebytheFDA andnotcometotheconclusionthatmandatoryGardasilvaccinationpoliciesbeingpushedacross U.S.statesrightnowarebasedonsomethingotherthanscience.

Therearemanytheoriesexploringthemotivationforsuchvaccinationpolicies.Possibletheories include: Financialbenefit:BigPharmaispushingmandatoryGardasilvaccinationpoliciessothatitcan profitfromsellingmorevaccinestothestates.Thisideaisatleastpartiallysupportedbythefact thatthefirststateGovernortomandatesuchvaccines(TexasGov.RickPerry)hadundisclosedties toBigPharma.(AtopofficialinPerry'sadministrationworkeddirectlyforMerck,themanufacturer ofGardasil.) Conspiracytopoisonthepeople:Thistheory,whichmaystretchtheboundsofbeliefinsome readers,proposesthatsuchmandatoryvaccinesareputinplaceinordertocreatefuturediseaseby poisoningthepeoplewithdangerouschemicalsandDNAfragmentsthatareknowinglyaddedto vaccines.Thepoisoningofthepeople,itissaid,willpayoffinfutureprofitsforBigPharmawhen thosepeopledevelopotherseriousdiseasesrequiring"treatment"withmedications.Manypeople whosupportthistheorycurrentlybelieve,forexample,thatAIDSwasengineeredbyhuman scientistsandthenadministeredtothegaypopulationinNewYorkinthelate1980'sthrough vaccines. Controlthesheeple:Thistheorysupposesthatthemainpurposeofmandatoryvaccinesistotrain theAmericanpublictogetusedtosubmittingtocompulsorymedicines.Onceacertainsegmentof thepopulationistargetedandeffectivelyinjectedwithmandatorymedicines,thesepoliciescanbe extendedtoothergroupsand,eventually,canencompasstheentirepopulation. ThefirsttheoryFinancialBenefitisthesimplestandeasiesttheorytobelieve.Itrequires nothingmorethansimplegreedonthepartofBigPharma,alongwiththeusuallevelofcorruption attheFDA.NewsTargetbelievesthisisthemostlikelyexplanationforeventssurroundingGardasil vaccinationpolicies,butwedonotruleoutotherpossibleexplanations,either. ProfitsatAnyCost What'sclearinallthisisthatmandatoryHPVvaccinationprogramsarenotbasedonanything resemblinggoodscience.Theyseemtobebasedonacarefullyplantedmemeanideathat, coincidentally,spreadsfromoneperson'smindtothenextmuchlikeavirus,gainingmomentumas themainstreammedia(MSM),healthauthorities,FDAanddrugcompanyrepsrepeatthememeon aregularbasis.Andwhatisthatmeme?ThatHPVcausescervicalcancer,and,therefore,HPV

vaccinationscouldhaltcervicalcancerandsavelives. Thismemeappearstohavenorealscientificbasis.Itismoreofanurbanlegendthananything resemblingscientificfact.Furthermore,itappearstohavebeenconjuredbythoseinapositionto financiallybenefitfromtheadoptionofthatmeme(thedrugcompanieswhomanufacture,sell,and profitfromthesaleofHPVvaccines).Inthiscase,thatdrugcompanyisMerck,apowerful corporationwithadubioushistoryrifewithchargesofpricefixing,largescaletaxavoidance(itset upoffshoreaccountstoavoidbillionsinU.S.taxes),widespreadbiopiracy,conspiringwiththeFDA todiscredititscritics,buryingnegativeevidenceaboutitsdrugs(seethehistoryofVioxx atwww.NewsTarget.com/vioxx.html)andnumerousotheractionsthatmanyconsidertobecriminal innature. ThereisnoquestionthatMerckhasthelackofethics,thewillingnessandthemeanstocommit medicalfraudonanunprecedentedscale.Basedontheinformationrevealedinthisreport,the mandatoryvaccinationofyounggirlswithGardasilappearstobetheboldestmedicalhoaxyet perpetratedbythecompany.YoucanreadthetruehistoryaboutMerckanditscrimes at:http://www.newstarget.com/Merck.html NewsTargetbelievesMerckiscurrentlyengagedinamassivemedicalfraud,andthatithas influenced,corruptedorotherwiserecruitedFDAofficialsandstatehealthauthoritiesinagrand schemetosellvaccinesthatareatbestmedicallyworthless,andatworstmedicallydangerous. HaltingcervicalcancerseemstohavenothingtodowiththemarketingandprescribingofGardasil. TheentirecampaignpushformandatoryHPVvaccinationsseemstobebasedentirelyintherealm ofsalesandmarketing. The"marketing"ofHPVvaccinesinvolvesclassicdiseasemongeringspreadingfearabouta diseaseasawayofcorrallingpatientsintobeggingforthe"solution"thatjusthappenstobereadily availablefromthesamepharmaceuticalcompanythatpromotedthediseaseinthefirstplace.The hypeovercervicalcancerandGardasilseemstobenothingmorethanaclassiccaseoffearbased marketingdesignedtocreatesuchconsumerfearovercervicalcancerthatamassivepublicoutcry wouldresultinlegislationmandatingthevaccines. Pleasesharethisarticlewithothers. Permissionisgrantedtoreprintthisarticleinitsentirety,foranynoncommercialpurpose,aslong asfullcreditisgiventotheauthor(MikeAdams)andaclearlyvisibleclickablelinkisplacedback tothisURLatNewsTarget.com.Youmayalsofreelyquotefromthisarticlewithpropercitation.

Sources: HiFiDNATechfileslawsuitagainstFDA http://www.newsmedical.net/?id=31180 ReclassificationPetitionHumanPapillomavirus(HPV)DNANestedPolymeraseChainReaction (PCR)DetectionDevice(K063649) http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/dockets/07p0210/07p0210ccp000101vol1.pdf FDAApprovesExpandedUseofHPVTest http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2003/NEW00890.html VRBPACBackgroundDocument,GardasilHPVQuadrivalentVaccine,May18,2006VRBPAC Meeting http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/20064222B3.pdf EffectofHumanPapillomavirus16/18L1ViruslikeParticleVaccineAmongYoungWomenWith PreexistingInfection JournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociation,August,2007