Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21 October 2011
Lead Research
Macquarie Group Limited, (MQG A$22.53), Neutral................... 5 1H12E Result Preview - 28 October 2011
Australian REITs
Rating Changes
Company Upgrades SGT New Rating OW Old Rating N
Estimate Changes
Company Upgrades WPL (USD) Downgrades BLD MQG PRY
* EPS Changes > +/- 1% See page 2 for a complete summary of key rating, target price, EPS changes and analysts' comments
Global
Macy's, Inc. ........................................................................................ 75 Winning at Its Own Game; Core Long Term Holding; Initiating with Overweight. Relevant for Australian stocks: DJS, MYR
Economics and Commodities Forecasts ................ 101 Company Forecasts .................................................. 102
See page 107 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
1
www.morganmarkets.com
Estimate Changes
Company Upgrades WPL (USD) Downgrades BLD MQG PRY
* EPS Changes > +/- 1%
Analyst comments
Company BLD MMX MQG PRY WPL Comment We revise our earnings estimates for BLD's building products division following a series of profit warnings from BLD's peers. Our average downgrade to group NPAT over the next three years is 3.7%. Market update. Change in valuation methodology. Ahead of 1H12 results, we downgrade our FY12E/FY13E earnings by ~5% to reflect weaker market activity. PRY debt refinancing. Upgrade production and EPS estimates on strong 3Q11 results.
Summary
Macquarie Group Limited, (MQG A$22.53), Neutral ........................................................................................ 5 1H12E Result Preview - 28 October 2011 Ahead of the 1H12 result, we are downgrading our FY12E/FY13E earnings by ~5%, to reflect weaker markets activity. We are forecasting 1H12E earnings of A$327m (1H10: A$403m) and an interim dividend of 86cps (flat on 1H10). We remain cautious, given the outlook for global IB remains challenging and, although MQG is trading at a ~20% discount to our valuation of A$28.63, it is no more attractive than that on offer across our coverage universe. Neutral retained. Australasian Economic Weekly ......................................................................................................................... 13 Aussie 3Q CPI this week key for near-term policy outlook RBA minutes gave no hint that board members are close to cutting cash rate Aussie inflation data critical next week; PPI data also scheduled for release Next week should see a slight slowing in inflation in New Zealand, and the RBNZ on hold Woodside Petroleum, (WPL A$33.38), Underweight .................................................................................... 19 3Q11 top line beat; third party gas for Pluto-2 looking increasingly necessary WPL delivered a solid 3Q top line result, but the truncated Pluto-2 gas exploration program highlights the risk WPL may have to rely on 3rd party gas. Our view has not materially changed as a result of the 3Q11 report. We think (a) WPL represents reasonable value on an absolute basis, with essentially free exposure to its growth projects, but (b) on a relative basis in the large cap Australian energy space we think there are better risk/reward propositions. Accordingly we hold an Underweight recommendation. Building Materials ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Backs Against the Wall...Boral now in the spotlight The building materials sector, in particular building products, has been beset by a litany of profit warnings over the past three months. A marked deterioration in residential activity is the common theme running through the downgrades. With this wall of evidence in hand, we now no longer expect BLD to grow its Building Products earnings this year and have cut our group FY12 forecasts as a result. While our BLD recommendation is OW, our preference in the sector remains ABC. Murchison Metals Ltd, (MMX A$0.26), Underweight ..................................................................................... 43 MMX's value is likely to be in its intellectual property MMX provided an update today in which they indicated that discussions with stakeholders are ongoing with respect to a restructure of the ownership of OPR. We believe the value of MMX is in the intellectual property that has been developed since OPR was appointed as the preferred proponent to build the infrastructure. We have changed our valuation methodology to 50% of the MMXs share of the IPs book value but maintain an Underweight rating.
Singapore Telecom, (STEL S$3.16), Overweight ........................................................................................... 47 Downside hedged benefits from NBN, regional asset contributions to improve; upgrade to OW We upgrade SingTel to Overweight with a Mar-13 price target of S$3.60 with a total return expectation of 20% (+14% capital appreciation based on our target FY13 P/E of 13x + 5% expected cash dividends during the next 12 months). Our price target is driven by two factors: 1) our EPS forecasts vs. street: we are 6% ahead for FY13; 2) the target FY13 earnings multiple currently at 11.9x and below the top of its normal trading range; we use 13.0x for our price target. Primary Health Care Limited, (PRY A$3.30), Neutral..................................................................................... 71 Suring up its funding Considering the uncertainty surrounding funding from a global perspective, PRYs announcement that it had refinanced its syndicated debt facility at ~225 bps above BBSY is an impressive outcome. Attention now squarely shifts to its operational performance with Medical Centres remaining a key value driver. To date, we have not noticed an obvious improvement in PRY's Medical Centre division despite managements apparent success in recruiting additional GPs. Maintain Neutral recommendation. Macy's, Inc. ........................................................................................................................................................... 75 Winning at Its Own Game; Core Long Term Holding; Initiating with Overweight Summary: Matthew Boss initiated coverage of Macys with an Overweight rating and December 2012 $36 price target. Macys represents a core long term holding and strong multi-year investment opportunity given among the strongest arsenals of top-line (My Macys, Omni-Channel) and margin drivers (price optimization) in retail today, best-in-class management, and more than reasonable valuation (9.4x P/E & 5.0x EBITDA). Relevance for Australian stocks (Shaun CousinsAC): Matthew Boss has initiated on the department store retailers in the United States. The Macy's and Nordstrom initiation have greatest relevance for DJS and MYR, specifically the top-line drivers given the difficulty for DJS and MYR to generate revenue growth over recent years. The top-line drivers for Macy's are My Macys (tailoring merchandise assortments to specific demographics and demand at the local market or store level), Omni-channel (integrating inventory management across all channels [stores, online, mobile] to allow customers a seamless shopping experience) and Magic selling (enhanced associate training program aimed at accelerating sales through focus on increased conversion). The top line drivers for Nordstrom have included omni-channel integration (which is ahead of its competition having been launched in 2005 and provides a seamless shopping experience across channels [online, full-line, Rack]) and a store-level merchandising localisation program. We remain Underweight on DJS and Neutral on MYR and highlight the challenges for top-line growth and the risk of EBIT margin compression due to potential deflation, cost inflation and required service investment.
Neutral
MQG.AX, MQG AU Price: A$22.53
Ahead of the 1H12 result, we are downgrading our FY12E/FY13E earnings by ~5%, to reflect weaker markets activity. We are forecasting 1H12E earnings of A$327m (1H10: A$403m) and an interim dividend of 86cps (flat on 1H10). We remain cautious, given the outlook for global IB remains challenging and, although MQG is trading at a ~20% discount to our valuation of A$28.63, it is no more attractive than that on offer across our coverage universe. Neutral retained. Issues to look for with the 1H12E result FY12E Earnings Guidance: MQGs FY12E guidance an improved result for FY12 on FY11 was provided on 7 September. Ongoing weakness in market conditions sees our FY12E earnings forecasts of A$902m falling short of this JPM(f) are currently 6% below FY12E consensus and 15% below FY13E consensus (refer to Table 4). In our view, one of the key swing factors remains the compensation ratio (FY12E: ~48%) and the extent to which it may be reduced as returns continue to be generated below the cost of capital. Dividend: Our forecast 1H12E / 2H12E dividends of 86cps / 100cps represent a consistent outcome with FY10 and FY11 dividend outcomes. However, ongoing levels of depressed earnings sees the resulting FY12E payout ratio of ~72% steadily departing from the dividend policy of 50%-60% annual payout ratio (FY10 div 186cps = 60% payout, FY11 div 186cps = 67% payout). Capital management: Given the release of the APRA Basel 3 discussion paper on 6 September, we will await disclosure from MQG as to what the impact on their current surplus capital position may be. With A$3bn of excess capital relative to current APRA minimum requirements, MQG have stated that there is sufficient capital to meet Basel 3 capital requirements. Further, thoughts on how to manage capital deployment to restore ROEs will be keenly sought. Costs: MQG are planning to execute estimate annualized post-tax cost savings in a range of A$221m to A$335m (i.e. a potential pro-forma FY13E earnings impact of ~20% to 30% refer Table 5). We await further evidence of progress and have not incorporated their full impact into our current forecasts. Funding: We will be looking for commentary on the funding maturity profile for MQG (and its managed funds), and the extent to which ongoing dislocation of global funding markets may impact quantum and pricing.
Macquarie Group Limited (Reuters: MQG.AX, Bloomberg: MQG AU) Year-end Mar (A$) FY10A FY11A FY12E Total Revenue (A$ mn) Net profit after tax (A$ mn) 1,071.0 982.0 927.7 EPS (A$) 3.266 2.902 2.664 P/E (x) 6.9 7.8 8.5 Dividend (A$) 1.860 1.860 1.860 Net Yield (%) 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% Franking (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Normalised* Profit (A$ mn) 1,050.0 956.0 901.7 Normalised* EPS (A$) 3.174 2.759 2.550 Normalised* EPS chg (%) 2.6% -13.1% -7.6% Normalised* P/E (x) 7.1 8.2 8.8
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
James Nicholias
(61-2) 9220-1528 james.nicholias@jpmorgan.com
Bharat Anand
(61-2) 9220-1550 bharat.k.anand@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited
Price Performance
40 A$ 30 20
Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11
Abs Rel
1m 14.0% 3.9%
3m -14.3% -17.4%
FY13E 1,081.7 3.085 7.3 1.920 8.5% 30.0% 1,055.7 2.948 15.6% 7.6
FY14E 1,058.4 3.001 7.5 1.920 8.5% 30.0% 1,032.4 2.870 -2.6% 7.8
Company Data 52-week range (A$) Market capitalisation (A$ bn) Market capitalisation ($ bn) Fiscal Year End Price (A$) Date Of Price Shares outstanding (mn) ASX100 ASX200-Bnk NTA/Sh^ (A$) Tier 1 Ratio
41.95 - 19.94 7.85 8.03 Mar 22.53 21-Oct-11 348.3 3,379.8 5,700.2 26.93 11.0%
See page 9 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
5
www.morganmarkets.com
Earnings Revisions
Market conditions have continued to deteriorate through September and October 2011 and recent global IB 3Q11 trends indicate weak market conditions are expected to persist for some time. Based on these most recent trends, we are downgrading our FY12E / FY13E / FY14E earnings by ~-5% to A$902m / A$1,056m / A$1,032m, respectively (refer Table 1).
Table 1: MQGRevised Forecasts
A$ in millions, year-end March FY12E NPAT ($m) Norm NPAT ($m) EPS (c) Norm EPS (c) Norm Diluted EPS (c) Norm Diluted EPS Growth DPS (c) FY13E NPAT ($m) Norm NPAT ($m) EPS (c) Norm EPS (c) Norm Diluted EPS (c) Norm Diluted EPS Growth DPS (c) FY14E NPAT ($m) Norm NPAT ($m) EPS (c) Norm EPS (c) Norm Diluted EPS (c) Norm Diluted EPS Growth DPS (c)
Source: J. P. Morgan estimates.
Revised 927.7 901.7 266.4 259.0 255.0 -7.6% 186.0 Revised 1,081.7 1,055.7 308.5 301.0 294.8 15.6% 192.0 Revised 1,058.4 1,032.4 300.1 292.8 287.0 -2.6% 192.0
Previous 978.5 952.6 281.0 273.6 268.8 -2.6% 186.0 Previous 1,131.3 1,105.4 322.7 315.3 308.3 14.7% 192.0 Previous 1,113.5 1,087.5 315.9 308.5 301.9 -2.1% 192.0
% Change -5.2% -5.3% -5.2% -5.3% -5.1% 0.0% % Change -4.4% -4.5% -4.4% -4.5% -4.4% 0.0% % Change -4.9% -5.1% -5.0% -5.1% -4.9% 0.0%
As detailed in Table 2, we have downgraded financial markets revenues and increased our effective tax rate. Specifically: Trading income forecasts have been reduced modestly across equities and F/X markets. Our effective tax rate has increased to 28% in 1H12E (2H12E: 26%) reflecting the higher proportion of group earnings derived from annuity sources (compared to trading earnings) in the current environment.
Interest Income Interest Expense Net Interest Income Non Interest Revenues Fee & Commission Income Base Fees Performance Fees M&A, Advisory and U/W Brokerage and Commissions Wrap & Other Admin Fee Income Other Fee & Commission Income Net Fee & Commission Income Trading Income Equities Commodities Foreign Exchange Interest Rate Products Total Trading Income Other Income Gain on Disposal of Investments Provn for Diminution Investments Unrealised Gain on fixed rate sub debt Net Operating Lease Income Equity Accounted Income Dividends Received Specific Provisions General / Collective Provisions Other Total Other Income Total Non Interest Revenues Total Income Expenses Employment Expenses Brokerage and Commission Expenses Occupancy Expenses Non-salary Technology Expenses Professional fees, travel and communication expenses Other Operating Expenses Total Expenses Profit Before Tax Income Tax Expense Minority Interests Net Profit After Tax Less Preference Dividends Normalised Earnings
Source: J. P. Morgan estimates.
Macquarie Securities Macquarie Capital Macquarie Funds FICC CAF Banking & Fin Services Real Estate Corporate 2H11 Reported earnings
Jan-07
Jan-09
Jan-10
Jan-11
Source: Company data, J.P. Morgan estimates. Note: composite includes Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, Credit Suisse, Morgan Stanley, UBS and Macquarie.
Valuation
We value each of MQGs different styles of earnings stream with consideration given to the appropriate multiples for each, as well as placing value on the equity held against balance sheet equity investments which generate minimal direct earnings, and surplus capital. We believe that this is the appropriate way to value MQG as a whole. Specifically, the key part of the process is stripping out the value of surplus capital and the capital held against the equity investments, and value that at par, to get a true sense of the capital deployed to generate a return. It is this ROE on deployed capital which drives our multiple for these businesses, with the par value of the equity investments and surplus capital added to get total value for MQG. On this basis, our new December 2011 price target of A$28.63 (change due to earnings revisions) reflects our current valuation based on FY12E earnings (refer to Table 6). Risks to the share price target (both upside and downside) include activity levels in global financial markets and successful integration of MQGs recently acquired businesses.
Table 6: MQG Valuation JPM
A$ in millions Earnings Macquarie - JPM FY12E Traditional Banking Funds Management Investment Banking Core Earnings Capital - Equity Investments Capital - Surplus
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Bloomberg.
Share count (m) 368 368 368 368 368 368 368 368
per share 4.46 8.46 3.24 16.15 7.61 23.76 4.87 28.63
Table 7: Australian Major Bank Consensus Valuation Metrics - 'ex Div' P/Es and Yields
Price ANZ CBA NAB WBC MQG 21.21 47.55 24.32 21.50 22.53 Div PV 0.69 0.54 0.78 0.77 0.79 Ex-Div Price 20.52 47.01 23.54 20.73 21.74 1 Yr Fwd EPS 2.24 4.56 2.68 2.15 2.55 1 Yr Fwd P/E 9.2x 10.3x 8.8x 9.7x 8.8x 1 Yr Fwd Div Yield 7.3% 7.3% 8.0% 7.8% 8.6% Payout 66% 73% 70% 74% 72%
10
921 234 1,229 1,037 134 490 4,045 409 583 132 85 1,209 441 -1,287 -265 -61 274 197 0 74 49 -411 -90 413 -666 4,588 5,526 -2,359 -685 -393 -263 -325 -512 -4,537 989 -15 -70 904 -33 871
926 57 1,085 1,077 135 441 3,721 590 665 145 144 1,544 840 -470 0 0 -200 127 138 -230 22 -218 2 282 293 5,558 6,638 -3,101 -645 -482 -283 -287 -546 -5,344 1,294 -201 -22 1,071 -21 1,050
496 15 402 582 66 434 1,995 178 156 83 183 600 261 -53 0 0 6 0 76 85 66 -86 9 97 461 3,056 3,661 -1,896 -441 -237 -159 -133 -299 -3,165 496 -85 5 416 -13 403
454 21 529 555 80 258 1,896 214 397 109 39 759 226 -77 0 0 3 0 167 94 60 -47 -4 236 658 3,313 3,983 -1,994 -344 -246 -157 -163 -304 -3,208 775 -197 -12 566 -13 553
950 36 931 1,137 146 692 3,891 392 553 192 222 1,359 487 -130 0 0 9 0 243 179 126 -133 5 333 1,119 6,369 7,644 -3,890 -785 -483 -316 -296 -603 -6,373 1,271 -282 -7 982 -26 956
471 15 423 500 83 193 1,686 182 298 93 39 611 100 0 0 0 0 0 180 94 63 -54 -3 100 480 2,777 3,434 -1,806 -304 -249 -159 -133 -308 -2,958 476 -129 -7 340 -13 327
499 20 466 549 88 212 1,834 196 374 107 41 717 100 0 0 0 0 0 180 94 358 -52 -3 150 827 3,379 4,035 -2,056 -323 -252 -161 -135 -303 -3,228 806 -206 -12 588 -13 575
970 35 889 1,049 171 406 3,520 377 671 200 80 1,328 200 0 0 0 0 0 360 188 421 -107 -5 250 1,307 6,155 7,468 -3,861 -626 -501 -320 -268 -611 -6,186 1,282 -335 -20 928 -26 902
1,078 15 1,002 1,183 189 457 3,924 421 804 230 88 1,544 200 0 0 0 0 0 360 188 126 -106 -6 300 1,062 6,530 7,805 -3,936 -694 -513 -327 -274 -617 -6,361 1,443 -339 -22 1,082 -26 1,056
1,139 11 1,081 1,276 204 493 4,204 454 868 248 95 1,665 0 0 0 0 0 0 360 188 126 -99 -6 300 869 6,738 7,870 -3,936 -749 -525 -335 -281 -632 -6,458 1,412 -332 -22 1,058 -26 1,032
11
FY10 145,940 11,769 73,754 91,712 150,301 93,032 139,348 10,953 -1,320 -2.15 12.4 8.06
1H11 158,060 11,593 81,530 94,508 153,983 97,339 142,579 11,404 -2,832 8.30 13.6 7.33
2H11 157,568 11,932 84,550 97,170 157,665 101,647 145,809 11,856 -4,476 -0.31 13.2 7.57
2011 157,568 11,932 84,550 95,839 155,824 99,493 144,194 11,630 -3,654 7.97 13.2 7.57
1H12E 159,416 11,960 85,541 99,114 159,514 103,405 147,568 11,946 -4,292 1.17 13.3 7.50
2H12E 161,297 12,266 86,551 101,096 161,396 105,120 149,283 12,113 -4,024 1.18 13.2 7.60
2012E 161,297 12,266 86,551 100,105 160,455 104,263 148,425 12,029 -4,158 2.37 13.2 7.60
FY13E 165,145 12,726 88,616 104,149 164,274 107,635 151,797 12,477 -3,486 2.39 13.0 7.71
FY14E 169,145 13,150 90,762 108,357 168,239 111,147 155,310 12,929 -2,791 2.42 12.9 7.77
149,144 9,560 70,221 101,664 171,771 99,287 161,836 9,935 2,377 -10.83 15.6 6.41
0.55 2.67 2.64 0.58 1.6 82.10 0.51 9.96 310.4 309.4 185 0 3,057 2,372 7.3 7.3 8.2 70 30 59.8 17.6 283.4 280.6 281.5 100%
0.72 3.70 3.56 0.86 15.8 80.51 0.70 10.16 320.2 317.4 186 0 3,263 2,582 7.0 7.1 8.3 0 30 60.0 21.7 344.2 327.9 340.8 100%
0.79 3.97 4.11 0.64 17.6 86.45 0.52 7.62 119.2 117.1 86 0 3,201 2,521 9.4 9.6 3.8 0 30 73.8 10.1 345.6 338.0 357.7 100%
0.85 4.20 4.07 0.98 25.9 80.54 0.70 10.23 159.7 156.1 100 0 3,288 2,616 7.1 7.2 4.4 0 30 62.7 14.0 346.8 346.2 366.5 100%
0.82 4.09 4.09 0.82 22.7 83.37 0.61 8.94 282.5 275.9 186 0 3,288 2,616 8.0 8.2 8.3 0 30 67.4 12.2 346.8 338.4 359.2 100%
0.82 3.48 3.71 0.60 28.0 86.13 0.41 5.77 94.0 94.0 86 0 3,283 2,623 12.0 12.0 3.8 0 30 91.7 10.0 348.2 347.5 367.8 100%
0.81 4.19 4.00 1.00 26.0 80.02 0.71 10.02 164.8 160.9 100 0 3,358 2,693 6.8 7.0 4.4 0 30 60.8 10.0 349.6 348.9 369.2 100%
0.82 3.84 3.86 0.80 26.7 82.83 0.56 7.91 259.0 255.0 186 0 3,358 2,693 8.7 8.8 8.3 0 30 72.0 10.0 349.6 348.2 368.5 100%
0.78 3.98 3.87 0.88 24.0 81.51 0.64 8.91 301.0 294.8 192 0 3,469 2,793 7.5 7.6 8.5 30 30 63.9 10.0 351.6 350.7 371.0 100%
0.67 4.01 3.84 0.84 24.0 82.06 0.61 8.40 292.8 287.0 192 0 3,570 2,882 7.7 7.8 8.5 30 30 65.7 10.0 353.6 352.6 372.9 100%
12
The past week was quiet for top-tier data in Australia, while there were no major data to speak of at all for New Zealand. What did become available in Australia hinted that domestic economic conditions had improved slightly, with leading indicators lifting, and the terms of trade rising again. For policy, the RBAs Board minutes hinted that the futures market probably read overly dovish sentiments into the RBAs policy announcement two weeks ago. The minutes made clear that RBA officials implicit nod toward possible official rate cuts is highly conditional, first on whether cuts are necessary at all, and, second, on the scenario that next weeks inflation print is very benign, which looks unlikely. Indeed, next weeks quarterly Aussie inflation data will have an important bearing on what the RBA does from here. We anticipate elevated prints on both the headline and core measures, with both accelerating in annual terms. These outcomes will make it very difficult for RBA Board members to contemplate rate cuts any time soon, unless something dramatic changes, most likely offshore, to significantly improve Australias medium-term inflation outlook. It would take an event of considerable importance for RBA officials to capitulate on their well-worn mantra that the terms of trade and investment booms are continuing. Our forecast remains that the RBA will be on hold from here, partly on the basis that global recession will be avoided, and growth in Australias major export markets, therefore, will remain robust. This implies that the terms of trade, which slipped in 3Q, will stay elevated, and that the mining investment boom will continue. Essentially, the price and wage pressures being triggered by the boom, which admittedly seem less alarming than they did a few weeks back, will broadly offset the disinflationary pulse triggered by weakness in the domestic-focused sectors of the economy, like retailing, manufacturing, and finance.
13
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Stephen Walters (612) 9220 1599 stephen.b.walters@jpmorgan.com Ben Jarman (612) 9220 1669 ben.k.jarman@jpmorgan.com Tom Kennedy (612) 9220 3250 tom.kennedy@jpmorgan.com
95
97
99
01
03
05
07
09
11
This will be the first CPI release since the statistics bureau dropped the previously volatile financial services component from the CPI. The weights of other categories have risen as a result. Also, the ABS will release more seasonally adjusted data in the headline and core measures. Both changes should contribute to less volatility in quarterly price outcomes (the financial services component, in particular, has been unexpectedly volatile), but could make interpretation more problematic, particularly the first time the new series are released.
2
14
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Stephen Walters (612) 9220 1599 stephen.b.walters@jpmorgan.com Ben Jarman (612) 9220 1669 ben.k.jarman@jpmorgan.com Tom Kennedy (612) 9220 3250 tom.kennedy@jpmorgan.com
Neither of these catalysts will be particularly satisfying for those hoping to win officials over to the view that current terms of trade-driven policy settings are too much for the non-mining economy to bear. In fact, while the language says that the starting point for inflation is lower, it does not say the path has changed, and judging by the (still) upbeat capex discussion, and the extent to which the rise in the unemployment rate is downplayed, we would guess that path remains upward sloping. In the discussion of global issues, the European saga looms large, with officials emphasizing the transmission to share prices for financial institutions, which had fallen significantly, and then to business and consumer confidence in the North Atlantic economies, which had showed a sharp drop. Sentiment clearly is the key transmission mechanism about which officials are worried in terms of private demand domestically as well.
The downward revisions to the CPI data were the other factor granting officials more scope to keep policy steady for now. The revisions take underlying inflation in the year to June down from 2.7% to 2.5%, but if the new CPI weights were applied, the number goes down by about 25bp over the year. This reflects the substitution bias from the shift to items that have become more affordable in recent years, like AV and computing equipment. All up, these influences meant that inflation would be more consistent with the 2%3% target than previously.
3
15
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Stephen Walters (612) 9220 1599 stephen.b.walters@jpmorgan.com Ben Jarman (612) 9220 1669 ben.k.jarman@jpmorgan.com Tom Kennedy (612) 9220 3250 tom.kennedy@jpmorgan.com
4
16
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Stephen Walters (612) 9220 1599 stephen.b.walters@jpmorgan.com Ben Jarman (612) 9220 1669 ben.k.jarman@jpmorgan.com Tom Kennedy (612) 9220 3250 tom.kennedy@jpmorgan.com
The improvement in coal, though, was more of a puzzle. While contrary to other data on global coal prices through the third quarter, we remain confident that the discrepancy is a timing issue, and that prices for Australias two most significant commodities, coal and iron ore, will come back to earth somewhat as global growth slows, and with earlier supply shocks being unwound. The iron ore decline seems already to have landed in 3Q, with prices in the metalliferous ores group dragging the index lower. On the imports side, the flat-line result was significantly softer than expected, but came with a breakdown that had less definitive implications for next weeks CPI. The decline in WTI over the third quarter was widely appreciated, and certainly played a role, though the pass-through was broader and stronger than we had penciled in. The petroleum and related products group was down 3.8%q/q, and had the largest single lineitem impact. But on the flipside, the footprint of AUD depreciation was evident in several CPI-relevant groups, like apparel, footwear, and imported food groups.
5
17
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC Stephen Walters (612) 9220 1599 stephen.b.walters@jpmorgan.com Ben Jarman (612) 9220 1669 ben.k.jarman@jpmorgan.com Tom Kennedy (612) 9220 3250 tom.kennedy@jpmorgan.com
Bollard to give a fairly downbeat assessment of global growth prospects. Any sense that the Governor is getting more comfortable with the OCR at 2.50% against this backdrop obviously would force us to push back the start of the hiking cycle. On the CPI result, %oya inflation likely cooled from 5.3% in Q2 to 4.9% in the third quarter. This translates to a 0.8%q/q rise in the headline measure, slighlty below the previous quarters 1.0%q/q. Slightly slower growth in food prices, energy, and the transport group will have driven the slowdown. With last years rise in GST to drop out of the annual measures inflation from next quarter, inflation is scheduled to keep falling for a few quarters yet.
6
18
Woodside Petroleum
3Q11 top line beat; third party gas for Pluto-2 looking increasingly necessary
WPL delivered a solid 3Q top line result, but the truncated Pluto-2 gas exploration program highlights the risk WPL may have to rely on 3rd party gas. Our view has not materially changed as a result of the 3Q11 report. We think (a) WPL represents reasonable value on an absolute basis, with essentially free exposure to its growth projects, but (b) on a relative basis in the large cap Australian energy space we think there are better risk/reward propositions. Accordingly we hold an Underweight recommendation.
Solid 3Q11 top line results above our forecasts, upgrade CY11 EPS 5%. WPL reported production of 16.1mmboe (+3% vs JPMe). NWS LNG production was 5% above our expectations, as the planned T5 shutdown was well executed. Sales volume was 16.7mmboe (+8% vs JPMe) leading to sales revenue of US$1,313m (+10% vs JPMe). The 10% revenue beat was ~50% attributable to the over-lift at Laminaria (0.5mmbbls) and NWS. CY11 production guidance of 62-64mmboe maintained; with risk to the upside (JPMe 64.2mmboe). At the current run rate WPL is on track to produce 64.1mmboe for CY11 (48mmboe YTD). We think the lower end of guidance is now conservative. Perhaps it allows generously for potential weather and NR2 issues, or perhaps the new-ish CEO Peter Coleman wants to over-deliver. We are comfortable our 64.2mmboe full year forecast, which roughly maintains the 3Q run rate, given that over the past 5 years, the 4Q has averaged the strongest production levels. Pluto2 exploration program looks modest to us. WPL will release the Maersk Discoverer rig in early 2012 rather than late 2012, implying a truncated exploration program. WPL intends to drill six Pluto-2 exploration wells in 4Q11/1H12. The 4Q11 drilling program includes 3 wells in the Ragnar and Claudius Hubs, which are areas we think are either (a) less prospective as they are being targeted late in the program, or (b) could be less economic to tie-back given their distances from other facilities. The Xeres appraisal well is not being re-attempted in 4Q11, and this was important for WPLs confidence to order Long Lead Items (at least when Don Voelte was CEO). We see Pluto-2 as unlikely to reach FID before late 2012. A third party gas deal may be a more likely option now, although on our numbers the economic outcome is likely to be significantly lower than a WPL equity gas development (perhaps 55-60% of the NPV).
Woodside Petroleum Limited (Reuters: WPL.AX, Bloomberg: WPL AU) Year-end Dec (US$) FY09A FY10A FY11E FY12E Total Revenue ($ mn) 3,759.2 4,246.0 4,931.4 5,911.2 EBITDA ($ mn) 2,597.4 2,907.0 3,473.4 4,442.0 Net profit after tax ($ mn) 1,530.6 1,564.0 1,759.4 1,892.2 EPS ($) 2.176 2.023 2.218 2.318 P/E (x) 15.7 16.9 15.4 14.7 Cash flow per share ($) 1.982 2.722 3.463 3.694 Dividend ($) 0.950 1.050 1.130 1.160 Net Yield (%) 2.9% 3.2% 3.4% 3.5% Normalised* EPS ($) 1.588 1.820 2.226 2.318 Normalised* EPS chg (%) -29.2% 14.6% 22.3% 4.2% Normalised* P/E (x) 21.5 18.8 15.3 14.7
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
Underweight
WPL.AX, WPL AU Price: A$33.38
Daniel Butcher
(61-2) 9220-1405 daniel.butcher@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited
Price Performance
45 A$ 35 25
Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11
Abs Rel
1m 0.7% -2.1%
3m -15.3% -6.5%
FY13E 6,738.9 5,106.5 2,228.6 2.690 12.7 4.463 1.350 4.0% 2.690 16.1% 12.7
Company Data 52-week range (A$) Market capitalisation (A$ bn) Market capitalisation ($ bn) Fiscal Year End Price (A$) Date Of Price Shares outstanding (mn) ASX100 ASX200-Res NTA/Sh^ ($) Net Debt^ ($ bn)
50.85 - 29.76 26.89 27.52 Dec 33.38 21 Oct 11 805.7 3,378.1 4,611.7 17.43 5.29
See page 6 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. 19 www.morganmarkets.com
20
Previous 1673 1679 202.4 108.0 2671 336.6 94.1 1.046 63.3 1856 1856 210.7 114.0 2936 360.1 97.5 1.078 78.9 2199 2199 254.2 114.0 3657 442.2 113.0 1.046 93.6 44.73
% change 5.2% 5.2% 5.1% 4.6% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 2.0% 2.0% 1.8% 1.8% 2.7% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 1.4% 1.4% 1.2% 1.8% 1.1% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.4%
$ change 87 87 10.3 5.0 76 9.6 0.0 0.000 0.9 36 36 3.9 2.0 80 9.3 0.0 0.000 0.8 30 30 3.0 2.0 41 4.2 0.0 0.000 0.6 0.16
1759 1766 212.6 113.0 2747 346.3 94.1 1.046 64.2 1892 1892 214.6 116.0 3016 369.4 97.5 1.078 79.6 2229 2229 257.1 116.0 3698 446.3 113.0 1.046 94.2 44.89
Price Target
We employ a WACC of 9.0% for WPL. Our Jun-12 price target for WPL is A$44.89/share (changed due to earnings revision) based on applying a 50% risk weighting to a theoretical Laverda oil development, 55% risk weighting to Pluto-2 assuming 90% WPL equity gas and future Hess milestone payments, a 70% risk weighting for a Browse tie-back to NWS option (comparable to a 35% risk weighting on a standalone James Price Point development), and a 20% risk weighting to Sunrise. The main upside risks are the oil price, and progress toward key milestones for its LNG projects. In the near term, one of the most relevant upside risks is further exploration/appraisal success for WPLs planned Pluto-2 project, or to a lesser extent an agreement for third party gas supply into the project.
21
BPT
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates. Note: * J.P.Morgan is under restriction on ESG and cannot offer a valuation at this time
22
23
24
Building Materials
Backs Against the Wall...Boral now in the spotlight
The building materials sector, in particular building products, has been beset by a litany of profit warnings over the past three months. A marked deterioration in residential activity is the common theme running through the downgrades. With this wall of evidence in hand, we now no longer expect BLD to grow its Building Products earnings this year and have cut our group FY12 forecasts as a result. While our BLD recommendation is OW, our preference in the sector remains ABC. Four profit warnings in three months Since August, the drumbeat of bad news has been monotonously consistent in the Building Materials sector. ALS (26/08) was the first to go, highlighting a sharper than expected deterioration in 'Building Products markets'. CSR (01/09) followed soon after in early September, with FBU (12/10) and GWA (20/10) both warning this month. With BLD's AGM less than two weeks away, it looks increasingly likely, in our view, that management will highlight the impact of difficult trading conditions over the first three months of FY12. Reining in our BLD Building Products (BBP) estimates In light of the clear challenges facing building products markets, we have revisited our BBP estimates. We had previously been forecasting an improvement in EBIT margin to 7.7% from FY11s 7.3%. Our revised expectation is for a contraction to 7.0%, which in turn leads to a 3.9% downgrade to our FY12 NPAT from $194m to $186m. We have also lowered our estimates for FY13 and FY14 primarily on lower margin expectations. Considerable room for improvementbut the cycle needs to turn As our detailed analysis of the industry in this report shows, BLD has been the perennial underperformer in the building products space. Its average 6-year EBIT margin, for instance, is 2.8% below the sector. While the mix of BLD's businesses timber for instance partially explains the difference, we see room for improvement on the cost management front. Divestment catalyst should help BLD in the short-term, but ABC remains our preferred name The sale of the Asia Construction Materials (ACM) business should act as a positive near-term catalyst. While we are still positive on BLD from a valuation perspective, ABC remains our sector preference for its stronger industry positioning and clearer near-term prospects.
Equity Ratings and Price Targets Company Adelaide Brighton Limited Boral Limited CSR Limited James Hardie Industries SE Symbol ABC.AX BLD.AX CSR.AX JHX.AX Mkt Cap (A$ mn) 1,819.76 2,569.32 1,249.82 2,562.72 Rating Price (A$) 2.86 3.45 2.47 5.85 Cur OW OW N UW Prev n/c n/c n/c n/c Price Target Cur Prev 3.30 n/c 4.40 4.50 2.90 n/c 5.80 n/c
Keith Chau
(61-2) 9220-1582 keith.chau@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P.Morgan estimates. n/c = no change. All prices as of 20 Oct 11.
See page 18 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
25
www.morganmarkets.com
Over the past three months, a number of the Australian Building Materials and Building Products companies have issued profit warnings, including ALS, CSR, FBU and GWA. These warnings have primarily been driven by softer than expected conditions in the Australasian residential sector. As a result, top line performance has deteriorated. In order to mitigate the weakness flowing through from the broader economy, all companies have set out a plan to cut costs in an effort to defend margin. Implications for BLD With its AGM less than two weeks away (03/11), the focus has turned squarely on what BLD's management will say about operating conditions and performance in the first three months of FY12. In broad terms, our expectations for each of the principal divisions, with the exception of BBP, is as follows: Boral Construction Materials (BCM): Set to see an improvement in EBIT to $238m in FY12 driven by acquisitions (Wagners and Sunshine) and flow through of price increases. We do, however, expect volumes in particular concrete to fall on an underlying basis. Cement: We expect EBIT from the Cement division to be flat at $95m for FY12, with a 7% decline in volumes offset by higher prices and some cost control. USA: As set out in our recent report American Drag (11/10/11), we have lowered our expectations for US housing starts, which led to sharp downgrades in our EBIT expectations for the division. In FY12, we expect the US business to register a similar loss to FY11. LBGA: our current projections assume that BLD has outright ownership of LBGA from 01/01/12, which equates to EBIT for FY12 of $34m.
At this point in time, we see little reason to adjust the divisional forecasts set out above. However, the same cannot be said for BBP, where the relentless pressure of a weak and wary consumer looks set to weigh on FY12 performance. In re-assessing the prospects for the business in FY12, we have undertaken a detailed analysis of BBP's performance relative to the various companies that operate in the broadly defined Building Products market 1 . As shown in Figure 1, BLDs Building Products business has consistently underperformed the peer group.
Figure 1: Historical EBIT Margins: Australian Building Products vs. BLD
12% 10% EBIT Margin 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% T-6 T-5 T-4 Group
Source: Capital IQ, Company reports, J.P. Morgan estimates.
T-3 BLD
T-2
T-1
See following section entitled: An analysis of the Australian Building Products Sector for the composition of the group that makes up this Building Products market.
26
While the difference in margins can partly be attributed to BLD's mix of business e.g. very low margin for timber the division's equally underwhelming Return on Assets (ROA) suggests some scope for improvement. Over the past six years, BLDs ROA has on average been 4.0% below the peer group. Figure 2 sets out the profile of BBPs returns vs. the sector.
Figure 2: Historical Return on Assets: Australian Building Products vs. BLD
14% 12% Return on Assets 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% T-6 T-5 T-4 Group
Source: Capital IQ, Company reports, J.P. Morgan estimates.
T-3 BLD
T-2
T-1
In our view, the wide disparity between BLDs margins and returns against the sector suggests strong prospects for growth in the medium-term. For instance, on an FY12 basis, our EBIT estimates would be as follows even if BLD was able to only recover half of the difference: EBIT margin at 8.4% $93m vs. current estimate of $78m ROA at 7.7% $114m vs. current estimate of $78m
Very little has been enumerated on the cost saving front
While BLD's sub-optimal history raises the prospect of a stronger recovery in the coming years, there remains a distinct lack of detail on the cost management front. Management continues to espouse the virtues of the LEAN programme, but with no commitment as to what financial benefits might accrue. At the FY11 results in August, management indicated that until the cycle turns, the tangible benefits of LEAN are unlikely to manifest themselves. This challenge around cost management appears to be less of an issue for the peer group, all of which to an extent appear to be taking action around cost to diminish the effects of the weak operating environment. When BLDs Strategic Review was announced in Jul-10, the following was indicated around prospective cost savings: a restructuring charge of circa $14 million to reorganise Boral to a simpler, leaner business expected to result in cost savings from 2011. However, since then, there has been little said about the extent of those cost savings and the period over which they might be achieved. At the FY11 result, there was reference to the following actions being taken to address the cost base in NSW and QLD: The deteriorating housing and commercial construction market environment in New South Wales, and particularly in Queensland, have fully exposed the need to address the high fixed costs and low utilisation of our brick and masonry operations in these states. As a result, the Group has announced plans to close a brick plant in Queensland and New South Wales, and to rationalise masonry operations on the east coast. Improved efficiency within the balance of operations is expected to provide the capacity and geographic cover to service market needs and improve returns.
27
With the exception of the indications around masonry cost savings above, there has been little to show in terms of explicit cost savings on the building products side of the business.
11.2% 10.9%
Our key observations on this aggregation and history are as follows: With the exception of 2009/10, revenues have held up reasonably well; although this is likely to be tested in 2011/12. Despite a drawn out period of weak and volatile conditions, EBIT margins on average have been reasonably steady. Companies in the sector have continued to invest, with asset growth running at over 3% for the period. Interestingly, the worst year for earnings performance (2008/09) was the year in which the sectors asset growth was highest this may have been partially attributed to a short-term increase in costs related to investment. As set out in the following sections, the areas of weakest return appear to be bricks and masonry. In the following section, we outline the historical earnings and return profiles of the various companies that make up our Building Products market. In particular, given this report's focus on BLD, we assess the relevance of each of the company's to the various businesses that make up BBP.
The aggregation excludes FBU due to the heavy skew in its Building Products segment to NZ.
28
Alesco Corporation (ALS.AU) Relevant exposure: Broad exposure to the Australian residential market. Comments: On 26/08, ALS indicated that, trading conditions in the Australian and New Zealand building products markets have deteriorated faster than anticipated. More specifically, Management pointed to a sharp fall in consumer confidence and an increase in household savings driving lower demand for its products. As a result, 1H12 revenue is now expected to decline 6% vs. the pcp of $289m, and NPAT is forecast to be between $6.2-7.5m, down 33% or $3.4m at the mid-point of the guidance range.
Table 2: ALS Earnings & Return History
ALS Revenue EBIT Total Assets Revenue growth EBIT growth Asset growth EBIT Margin ROA UNITS $m $m $m % % % % % FY06 502 61 527 FY07 589 68 643 17.3% 11.2% 22.0% 11.6% 10.6% FY08 719 74 457 22.1% 8.8% -28.9% 10.3% 16.2% FY09 661 39 636 -8.1% -48.2% 39.1% 5.8% 6.1% FY10 550 38 592 -16.9% -0.8% -6.9% 7.0% 6.5% FY11 534 39 578 -2.8% 3.1% -2.3% 7.4% 6.8%
12.2% 11.6%
CSR (CSR.AU) Relevant exposure: Plasterboard Comments: On 01/09, CSR announced that it expects 1H12 Group EBIT to be between $90-100m, a decline of c. 19% vs. the pcp of $118m. CSR attributed the decline in earnings to a deterioration of business confidence and activity. Also impacting 1H12 earnings is a restructure of its Viridian business, which will result in a further $10m impact at the EBIT level.
Table 3: CSR Earnings & Return History
CSR Revenue EBIT Total Assets Revenue growth EBIT growth Asset growth EBIT Margin ROA UNITS $m $m $m % % % % % FY06 978 81 826 FY07 1,004 85 852 2.6% 4.4% 3.1% 8.4% 9.9% FY08 1,044 98 852 4.0% 16.3% 9.4% 11.5% FY09 1,086 85 916 4.0% -14.0% 7.5% 7.8% 9.2% FY10 1,046 106 979 -3.7% 25.7% 7.0% 10.2% 10.8% FY11 1,049 104 927 0.4% -2.3% -5.3% 9.9% 11.2%
8.3% 9.8%
29
GWA Group (GWA) Relevant exposure: Broad exposure to the Australian residential market. Comments: Over the past 4 years, GWA has increased both its margins and returns. However, on 20/10, the company announced it expects 1H12 EBIT to be down 5-10% for continuing operations. Should this eventuate, it would mark an end to a period of steady growth.
Table 4: GWA Earnings & Return History
GWA Revenue EBIT Total Assets Revenue growth EBIT growth Asset growth EBIT Margin ROA UNITS $m $m $m % % % % % FY06 620 89 821 FY07 636 91 795 2.6% 2.5% -3.2% 14.4% 11.5% FY08 649 83 775 2.0% -9.7% -2.4% 12.7% 10.6% FY09 613 83 782 -5.5% 0.4% 0.9% 13.5% 10.6% FY10 657 95 813 7.1% 14.0% 4.0% 14.4% 11.6% FY11 726 107 814 10.6% 13.3% 0.0% 14.8% 13.2%
14.4% 10.9%
Adelaide Brighton (ABC.AU) Relevant exposure: Masonry/concrete products Comments: Over recent years, ABCs Concrete Products earnings have been anemic at best. As a result of, soft housing and retail activity the division registered a loss of $1.2m at the EBIT level in 1H11 compared to a modest profit of $0.8m in the pcp.
Table 5: ABC Earnings & Return History
ABC Revenue EBIT Total Assets Revenue growth EBIT growth Asset growth EBIT Margin ROA UNITS $m $m $m % % % % % FY05 92 3 105 FY06 88 9 112 -3.8% 193.3% 7.2% 10.0% 7.8% FY07 83 2 110 -6.4% -79.5% -2.5% 2.2% 1.6% FY08 122 9 210 47.8% 372.2% 91.5% 7.0% 4.1% FY09 133 4 210 8.7% -48.2% 3.3% 2.1% FY10 132 4 210 -1.0% -13.6% 2.9% 1.8%
3.3% 2.9%
Reece Australia (REH.AU) Relevant exposure: Broad exposure to the Australian residential market. Comments: Since FY06, REH has consistently grown revenues. However, margins deteriorated significantly in FY09 as a result of tight trading conditions and costs associated with the roll-out of new stores. Since then, margins have recovered to c.11%. Despite this strong performance, management remain cautious on the outlook, with the Board anticipating, 2012 to be another challenging year.
Table 6: REH Earnings & Return History
REH Revenue EBIT Total Assets Revenue growth EBIT growth Asset growth EBIT Margin ROA UNITS $m $m $m % % % % % FY06 1,116 125 605 FY07 1,310 151 668 17.4% 20.8% 10.3% 11.5% 22.6% FY08 1,439 165 781 9.8% 9.7% 17.0% 11.5% 21.1% FY09 1,508 144 839 4.8% -13.1% 7.3% 9.5% 17.1% FY10 1,508 164 887 -0.0% 13.9% 5.8% 10.8% 18.4% FY11 1,570 174 958 4.1% 6.1% 8.0% 11.1% 18.1%
11.2% 20.6%
30
Brickworks (BKW.AU) Relevant exposure: Bricks Comments: The returns generated by BKWs Building Products business are low relative to the rest of the Building Products sector. In an environment where demand is soft and input costs are rising, both returns and margins have deteriorated. Regarding outlook, management remained cautious at its recent FY11 results:The forecast decline in housing activity will result in another challenging year for the Building Products Group. This challenge is being met head on with an aggressive cost reduction programme.
Table 7: BKW Earnings & Return History
BKW Revenue EBIT Total Assets Revenue growth EBIT growth Asset growth EBIT Margin ROA UNITS $m $m $m % % % % % FY06 483 66 1,006 FY07 517 62 1,048 7.0% -4.7% 4.2% 12.1% 6.0% FY08 520 54 1,014 0.6% -14.1% -3.3% 10.3% 5.3% FY09 489 37 918 -5.9% -30.9% -9.4% 7.6% 4.0% FY10 580 53 999 18.6% 44.2% 8.8% 9.2% 5.3% FY11 605 42 1,017 4.2% -21.3% 1.8% 6.9% 4.1%
13.6% 6.5%
Fletcher Building (FBU.NZ) Given its large exposure to the New Zealand market, we have excluded FBUs Building Products earnings from our analysis of the Australian Building Products market. However, the commentary in its recent profit warning provides further evidence of a weakening Australian residential market. On 12/10, FBU announced that 1H12 NPAT is expected to decline 10% on 1H11 NPAT of $166m. The expected reduction in earnings is driven by continued low levels of activity in the residential and commercial construction sectors in New Zealand and the significant downturn in residential consents and continued weak approval levels in commercial construction in Australia.
Table 8: FBU Earnings & Return History
FBU Revenue EBIT Total Assets Revenue growth EBIT growth Asset growth EBIT Margin ROA UNITS $m $m $m % % % % % FY06 629 142 646 FY07 697 141 687 10.8% -0.7% 6.3% 20.2% 20.5% FY08 739 148 786 6.0% 5.0% 14.4% 20.0% 18.8% FY09 771 106 783 4.3% -28.4% -0.4% 13.7% 13.5% FY10 798 114 792 3.5% 7.5% 1.1% 14.3% 14.4% FY11 692 111 711 -13.3% -2.6% -10.2% 16.0% 15.6%
22.6% 22.0%
31
Unit $m $m % $m $m % $m $m % $m $m %
FY12 5,172 5,189 -0.3% 333 342 -2.7% 186 194 -3.9% 25.6 26.6 -3.9% 15.5 16.0 -3.1%
FY13 5,858 5,876 -0.3% 427 439 -2.8% 246 257 -4.0% 33.4 34.8 -4.0% 20.0 21.0 -4.8%
FY14 6,338 6,357 -0.3% 549 563 -2.4% 331 341 -3.2% 44.1 45.5 -3.2% 26.5 27.5 -3.6%
3yr AVG
-0.3%
-2.6%
-3.7%
-3.7%
-3.8%
Our $4.40 Target Price is based on our Jun-13 Sum-of-Parts (SoP) valuation discounted back to Jun-12 at the cost of equity and adjusted for the grossed up dividend where applicable. We calculate our SoP based on the individual cash flow streams of each of the discrete business segments. In BLD's case for the SoP valuation, we strip out capex at the segmental level, not at a group level. We separately value corporate costs, working capital and provisions. We discount the segment cash flows at a group discount rate, or where relevant at a segment specific rate. Our current post-tax WACC applied to our SoP is 9.6%.
Table 10: BLD DCF-based SoP valuation
Segment Boral Construction Materials Boral Cement Boral Building Products Boral USA Other Businesses LBGA Less: Carbon Cost Less: Corp, WC, Corp Capex Enterprise Value Less: Net Debt Less: Provisions Equity Value
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
Valuation methodology / Comment DCF-based valuation (ex. Changes in working capital and provisions) DCF-based valuation (ex. Changes in working capital and provisions) DCF-based valuation (ex. Changes in working capital and provisions) DCF-based valuation (ex. Changes in working capital and provisions) DCF-based valuation (ex. Changes in working capital and provisions) DCF-based valuation (ex. Changes in working capital and provisions) DCF of annual costs to 2020 plus an adjusted TV DCF-based valuation of unallocated Corp O-heads, WC, Corp Capex Group net debt as at year-end: 2013E Group provisions as at year-end: 2013E Group SoP valuation
A$m 2,468 1,148 924 833 69 778 -209 -595 5,417 -1,510 -325 3,581
A$/share 3.31 1.54 1.24 1.12 0.09 1.05 -0.28 -0.80 7.27 -2.03 -0.44 4.81
Our Target Price date is Jun-12. The downside risks to our Target Price include: a sustained depressed level of building activity in the US; a prolonged decline in Australian housing commencements; not realising announced price increases; and weakening of the A$.
8
32
FY13E 1,356.9 337.4 192.3 0.303 9.4 5.9 0.225 7.9% 0.303 14.9% 9.4
Boral Limited
Company Data 52-week range (A$) Market capitalisation (A$ bn) Market capitalisation ($ bn) Fiscal Year End Price (A$) Date Of Price Shares outstanding (mn) ASX100 ASX200-Ind NTA/Sh (A$) Net Debt^ (A$ bn) 5.73 - 3.13 2.57 2.63 Jun 3.45 20 Oct 11 744.7 3,378.1 5,637.8 4.11 1.49 Boral Limited (Reuters: BLD.AX, Bloomberg: BLD AU) Year-end Jun (A$) FY10A FY11A Total Revenue (A$ mn) 4,599.3 4,710.5 EBITDA (A$ mn) 504.5 522.2 Net profit after tax (A$ mn) -90.5 167.7 EPS (A$) -0.152 0.233 P/E (x) NM 14.8 EV/EBITDA 7.4 5.9 Dividend (A$) 0.135 0.145 Net Yield (%) 3.9% 4.2% Normalised* EPS (A$) 0.221 0.244 Normalised* EPS chg (%) -0.7% 10.5% Normalised* P/E (x) 15.6 14.1
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
FY12E 5,171.6 610.3 186.2 0.256 13.5 6.7 0.155 4.5% 0.256 4.9% 13.5
FY13E 5,858.4 735.1 246.5 0.334 10.3 5.6 0.200 5.8% 0.334 30.6% 10.3
FY14E 6,338.4 865.6 330.6 0.441 7.8 4.7 0.265 7.7% 0.441 31.8% 7.8
CSR Limited
Company Data 52-week range (A$) Market capitalisation (A$ bn) Market capitalisation ($ bn) Fiscal Year End Price (A$) Date Of Price Shares outstanding (mn) ASX100 ASX200-Ind NTA/Sh (A$) Net Debt^ (A$ bn) 3.88 - 2.20 1.25 1.29 Mar 2.47 20 Oct 11 506.0 3,379.8 5,637.8 2.58 -0.17 CSR Limited (Reuters: CSR.AX, Bloomberg: CSR AU) Year-end Mar (A$) FY10A FY11A FY12E Total Revenue (A$ mn) 1,960.5 1,933.5 1,817.0 EBITDA (A$ mn) 311.4 308.0 279.9 Net profit after tax (A$ mn) -111.7 503.4 89.2 EPS (A$) -0.082 0.996 0.176 P/E (x) NM 2.5 14.1 EV/EBITDA 6.5 3.6 3.9 Dividend (A$) 0.085 0.417 0.135 Net Yield (%) 3.4% 16.9% 5.5% Normalised* EPS (A$) 0.175 0.178 0.190 Normalised* EPS chg (%) -52.1% 1.7% 6.4% Normalised* P/E (x) 14.1 13.8 13.0
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
FY13E 1,830.0 289.1 106.6 0.209 11.8 3.4 0.145 5.9% 0.209 10.0% 11.8
FY14E 1,913.3 312.7 127.0 0.248 10.0 2.9 0.175 7.1% 0.248 18.7% 10.0
33
FY14E 1,352.7 307.7 181.2 0.436 13.9 8.0 0.085 1.5% 0.436 18.7% 13.9
10
34
35
11
12
36
37
13
14
38
JPM Q-Profile
Adelaide Brighton Ltd. (AUSTRALIA / Materials)
As Of: 13-Oct-2011 Quant_Strategy@jpmorgan.com
Current:
2.83
Current:
0.25
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
-0.05 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/11
Current:
9%
Current:
6.04%
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
-1.00 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/11
PE (1Yr Forward)
20.0x 18.0x 16.0x 14.0x 12.0x 10.0x 8.0x 6.0x 4.0x 2.0x 0.0x Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07
Current:
11.3x
Price/Book Value
4.0x 3.5x 3.0x 2.5x 2.0x 1.5x 1.0x 0.5x 0.0x
PBV hist PBV Forward
Current:
2.0x
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
-0.5x Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/11
ROE (Trailing)
20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 -5.00 -10.00 -15.00 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07
Current:
15.76
Current:
6.25
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Summary
Adelaide Brighton Ltd. AUSTRALIA Materials 12mth Forward PE P/BV (Trailing) Dividend Yield (Trailing) ROE (Trailing) Implied Value of Growth 1796.11 6.770337 SEDOL 6006886 Construction Materials Latest Min 5.09 11.25x 0.42 1.95x 0.00 6.25 -12.44 15.76 -0.82 6.0% As Of: Local Price: EPS: % to Max % to Med 58% 8% 75% -26% 43% -26% 17% -5% 772% 266% 13-Oct-11 2.83 0.25 % to Avg 6% -22% -28% -45% 162%
Sep/11
Source: Bloomberg, Reuters Global Fundamentals, IBES CONSENSUS, J.P. Morgan Calcs
* Implied Value Of Growth = (1 - EY/Cost of equity) where cost of equity =Bond Yield + 5.0% (ERP)
39
Sep/11
15
JPM Q-Profile
Boral Ltd. (AUSTRALIA / Materials)
As Of: 13-Oct-2011 Quant_Strategy@jpmorgan.com
Current:
3.63
Current:
0.29
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
0.00 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/11
Current:
8%
Current:
15.14%
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
Sep/08
Sep/09
PE (1Yr Forward)
30.0x 25.0x 20.0x
Current:
12.5x
Price/Book Value
2.5x 2.0x 1.5x
PBV hist PBV Forward
Current:
0.9x
15.0x 10.0x 5.0x 0.0x Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/10 Sep/11 1.0x 0.5x 0.0x Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/11
ROE (Trailing)
18.00 16.00 14.00 12.00 10.00 8.00 6.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 -2.00 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07
Current:
5.78
Current:
4.14
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Summary
Boral Ltd. AUSTRALIA Materials 12mth Forward PE P/BV (Trailing) Dividend Yield (Trailing) ROE (Trailing) Implied Value of Growth 2689.25 17.90772 SEDOL 6218670 Construction Materials Latest Min 7.90 12.46x 0.65 0.85x 2.13 4.14 -0.70 5.78 -0.20 15.1% As Of: Local Price: EPS: % to Max % to Med 101% -4% 174% 55% 109% 10% 184% 46% 312% 32% 13-Oct-11 3.63 0.29 % to Avg 3% 59% 15% 57% 47%
Sep/11
Source: Bloomberg, Reuters Global Fundamentals, IBES CONSENSUS, J.P. Morgan Calcs
* Implied Value Of Growth = (1 - EY/Cost of equity) where cost of equity =Bond Yield + 5.0% (ERP)
16
40
Sep/11
Sep/11
JPM Q-Profile
CSR Ltd. (AUSTRALIA / Industrials)
As Of: 13-Oct-2011 Quant_Strategy@jpmorgan.com
Current:
2.46
Current:
0.20
5.00 0.00 0.00 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/10 Sep/11 -0.20 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/11
Current:
8%
Current:
13.50%
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
Sep/08
Sep/09
PE (1Yr Forward)
80.0x 70.0x 60.0x 50.0x 40.0x 30.0x 20.0x 10.0x 0.0x -10.0x -20.0x Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07
Current:
12.2x
Price/Book Value
8.0x 7.0x 6.0x 5.0x 4.0x 3.0x 2.0x 1.0x
PBV hist PBV Forward
Current:
1.0x
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
0.0x Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/11
ROE (Trailing)
80.00 60.00 40.00 20.00 0.00 -20.00 -40.00 -60.00 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07
Current:
-5.35
Current:
6.14
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Summary
CSR Ltd. AUSTRALIA Industrials 12mth Forward PE P/BV (Trailing) Dividend Yield (Trailing) ROE (Trailing) Implied Value of Growth 1274.74 9.760425 SEDOL 6238645 Industrial Conglomerates Latest Min 6.97 12.22x 0.67 1.01x 2.97 6.14 -43.87 -5.35 -0.58 13.5% As Of: Local Price: EPS: % to Max % to Med 451% 12% 309% 50% 365% 5% 1399% 347% 547% 125% 13-Oct-11 2.46 0.20 % to Avg 118% 67% 34% 304% 226%
Sep/11
Source: Bloomberg, Reuters Global Fundamentals, IBES CONSENSUS, J.P. Morgan Calcs
* Implied Value Of Growth = (1 - EY/Cost of equity) where cost of equity =Bond Yield + 5.0% (ERP)
41
Sep/11
Sep/11
17
42
23
Underweight
MMX.AX, MMX AU Price: A$0.26
MMX provided an update today in which they indicated that discussions with stakeholders are ongoing with respect to a restructure of the ownership of OPR. We believe the value of MMX is in the intellectual property that has been developed since OPR was appointed as the preferred proponent to build the infrastructure. We have changed our valuation methodology to 50% of the MMXs share of the IPs book value but maintain an Underweight rating. MMXs value is in its intellectual property: MMX noted that the progress made by OPR to date cannot be easily or quickly replicated and that any commercial outcome that would enable the project to be developed in the shortest possible timeframe would naturally take advantage of this pre-existing body of work and approvals. We believe the most likely outcome is for a third party to acquire MMXs IP: Murchison is currently actively engaging, or seeking to engage, with third parties in an effort to restructure the ownership of OPR. The company indicated that this contemplated involvement of other parties in the project assumed an inclusive, rather than exclusive, approach to project development. However, we believe it will more likely be an acquisitive action rather than co-operative. The Chinese appear to be the most likely candidates: WA Premier Colin Barnett has now become actively involved in the process, including initiatives to facilitate Chinese participation in the Oakajee project. We believe the greatest value of OPRs intellectual property is most likely to the Chinese with both Sinosteel Midwest (with the Weld Range Project) and Angang (with the Karara JV with Gindalbie) active in the area. Our price target is based on our valuation of MMXs IP: The two JV partners have spent ~A$400 million on design and development work for both OPR and Crosslands; however, it is unlikely in our view that they will see full value for that work. We therefore assign a value to MMX of 50c in the dollar or A$100m for its 50% share of the intellectual property at book value. Excluding the debt that is due to RCF of US$25m, we arrive with a June 2012 price target for Murchison of A$0.17 per share.
Murchison Metals Ltd (Reuters: MMX.AX, Bloomberg: MMX AU) Year-end Jun (A$) FY10A FY11A FY12E Total Revenue (A$ mn) 0 0 0 EBITDA (A$ mn) -25.5 -18.3 10.0 Net profit after tax (A$ mn) -21.60 -16.52 10.34 EPS (A$) -0.050 -0.038 0.024 P/E (x) NM NM 10.8 Cash flow per share (A$) -0.020 -0.029 -0.020 Dividend (A$) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Net Yield (%) 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Normalised* EPS (A$) -0.050 -0.038 0.024 Normalised* EPS chg (%) -2797.0% 23.6% 162.4% Normalised* P/E (x) NM NM 10.8
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
Fraser Jamieson
(61-2) 9220-1586 fraser.jamieson@jpmorgan.com
Joseph Kim
(61-2) 9220-7882 joseph.x.kim@jpmorgan.com
Luke Nelson
(61-2) 9220-1629 luke.nelson@jpmorgan.com
Andrew Muir
(61-2) 9220 1579 andrew.x.muir@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited
Price Performance
1.8 1.4 A$ 1.0 0.6 0.2
Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11
Abs Rel
1m -50.5% -53.3%
3m -62.2% -53.4%
FY13E 0 0.6 1.16 0.003 98.1 0.002 0.000 0.0% 0.003 -88.8% 98.1
FY14E 0 0.0 1.18 0.003 94.4 0.003 0.000 0.0% 0.003 2.1% 94.4
Company Data 52-week range (A$) Market capitalisation (A$ bn) Market capitalisation ($ bn) Fiscal Year End Price (A$) Date Of Price Shares outstanding (mn) ASX100 ASX200-Ind NTA/Sh^ (A$) Net Debt^ (A$ bn)
1.76 - 0.24 0.11 0.11 Jun 0.26 21 Oct 11 437.4 3,378.1 5,637.8 0.01 0.02
See page 4 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
43
www.morganmarkets.com
We believe that that OPR signing foundation customers is very unlikely now
We believe there is a value to the intellectual property that OPR has acquired over the years which could lead to an potential acquisition
44
likely greatest to the Chinese with both Sinosteel Midwest (with the Weld Range Project) and Angang (with the Karara JV with Gindalbie) active in the area. OPR loses its rights to develop the project and is not actively involved any further: The sunset date for the implementation agreement is 31 December 2011. Given the inability for Murchison/Mitsubishi to fund the project, it appears highly unlikely that the agreement will be signed before the end of the year, in our view. This means that OPR will likely lose its rights to develop the project and the WA Government can pass those rights on to another party. Given the extent of work that OPR has done to date (and assuming OPR does not pass on its intellectual property), this process could put the project timeline back up to 2-3 years. The WA Government does have an option to acquire OPRs intellectual property for A$78 million but only if implementation agreements are not executed by 31 December 2011 due to a default or breach by OPR of its obligations. As noted by Murchison, failure to execute implementation agreements by the sunset date does not in itself result in a breach of the state development agreement. The development is abandoned: In March 2009, Premier Colin Barnett referred to Oakajee as the single most important project for Western Australias economic development over the next 50 years. While the economic feasibility of the iron ore projects in the region have been questioned following the events over the last 12 months, it seems highly unlikely that the WA Government will abandon its plans to develop Oakajee.
45
46
Overweight
Singapore Telecom
Downside hedged benefits from NBN, regional asset contributions to improve; upgrade to OW
We upgrade SingTel to Overweight with a Mar-13 price target of S$3.60 with a total return expectation of 20% (+14% capital appreciation based on our target FY13 P/E of 13x + 5% expected cash dividends during the next 12 months). Our price target is driven by two factors: 1) our EPS forecasts vs. street: we are 6% ahead for FY13; 2) the target FY13 earnings multiple currently at 11.9x and below the top of its normal trading range; we use 13.0x for our price target. The NBN should ultimately curtail competition and cement SingTel dominance: Many, including ourselves, have made much about the potential for Singapores National Broadband Network (NBN) project to increase competition and drive opportunities for infrastructure-lite competition. The facts, however, do not support this case. We believe the NBN will largely serve to cement SingTels dominance of the local market, potentially force Starhub into a Virgin Media (covered by JPM analyst Carl Murdock-Smith) type strategy, and lock M1 out of the mainstream market. Regional assets contributions to improve: We expect 12% growth in FY12 associate contributions for SingTel; driven by 20% growth at AIS and 15% at Bharti. The decline over FY11 was largely driven by appreciation of the Singapore dollar vs. local currencies. We expect 6% growth in Optuss EBIT contributions to SingTel in FY12. Potential for increased capital management: SingTel has the best balance sheet among Singapore telcos with a net debt/EBITDA (including associates) of 0.6x. Current dividend yield of 6% is more than covered by internal cash flows and we thus see potential for a special dividend as an upside risk. SingTel is trading at a 330bp spread to Singapore govt bonds vs. a historical high of 390bp. Key risks: Key downside risks include worse-than-expected pricing competition and lower-than-expected NBN market share.
Singapore Telecoms Ltd (Reuters: STEL.SI, Bloomberg: ST SP) S$ in mn, year-end Mar FY09A FY10A FY11A Revenue (S$ mn) 14,934 16,871 18,070 EBITDA (S$ mn) 4,432 4,846 5,116 EBITDA growth (%) -2.2% 9.3% 5.6% Recurring profit (S$ mn) 3,455 3,910 3,800 Recurring EPS (S$) 0.22 0.25 0.24 EPS growth (%) (6.2%) 13.2% (2.9%) DPS (S$) 0.12 0.14 0.16 EV/EBITDA (x) 12.8 11.5 10.8 P/E 14.6 12.9 13.2 Dividend Yield 4.0% 4.5% 5.2% FCF to mkt cap (%) 6.4% 6.8% 8.0%
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
Vishesh Gupta
(65) 6882 2367 vishesh.x.gupta@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private Limited
Laurent Horrut
(61-2) 9220-1593 laurent.j.horrut@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited
Abs Rel
1m -6.5% 1.5%
3m -5.0% 4.7%
FY12E 18,755 5,166 1.0% 3,942 0.25 3.7% 0.17 10.6 12.8 5.4% 6.7%
FY13E 18,287 5,053 -2.2% 4,494 0.28 14.0% 0.19 10.9 11.2 6.1% 6.2%
Company Data 52-wk range (S$) Mkt cap (S$ mn) Mkt cap ($ mn) Shares O/S (mn) Free float (%) 3-mth avg trading volume: Average 3m Daily Turnover ($ mn) FTSTI Exchange Rate Price (S$) Date Of Price
3.30 - 2.75 50,371 39,778 15,940 45.5% 30 71.92 2,720 1.27 3.16 20 Oct 11
See page 25 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
47
www.morganmarkets.com
Company Description SingTel provides Internet, IPTV, mobile and fixed line telephony services domestically and it also owns 100% of the Australian Telco Optus. Other major regional associate investments include Bharti (India), Telkomsel (Indonesia), Advanced (Thailand) and Globe (Philippines).
EBITDA impact (%) 6,501 0.4% 0.78 0.6% 892 0.0% 886 0.0%
Our PT is based on the sum of 1) potential upside/ (downside) to consensus EPS vs. JPM EPS estimates, and 2) our estimated multiple expansion/(contraction) based on peak P/E multiple. Our peak P/E multiple is based on the stocks historical trading range and expected future business changes.
Revenue breakdown (FY12E)
Optus-mobile 42%
Sing-others 16%
JPM vs. consensus EPS (d) Cumulative upside to current price (e+d) JPM Dec-12 price target (S$/sh)
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates
If our price target were achieved, SingTel would be trading at 2010E/11E P/E of 14.5x/12.8x and EV/EBITDA of 11.9x/12.3x and provide a 4.7%/5.3% yield. Less-than-expected NBN and pay TV market share in Singapore is a key downside risk to our price target. Further appreciation of the Singapore dollar is also a risk.
48
Investment Summary
We upgrade SingTel to Overweight with a Mar-13 price target of S$3.60 with a total return expectation of 20% (+14% capital appreciation based on our target FY13 P/E of 13x + 5% expected cash dividends during the next 12 months). Our price target is driven by two factors: 1) our EPS forecasts vs. street: we are 6% ahead for FY13; 2) the target FY13 earnings multiple currently at 11.9x and below the top of its normal trading range; we use 13.0x for our price target. . We have rebuilt our Singapore models, incorporating NBN into our forecasts and have shifted our price target timeframe to Mar-13. The NBN should ultimately curtail competition and cement SingTel dominance: Many, including ourselves, have made much about the potential for Singapores National Broadband Network (NBN) project to increase competition and drive opportunities for infrastructure-lite competition. The facts, however, do not support this case. The NBN will largely serve to cement SingTels dominance of the local market, potentially force Starhub into a Virgin Media (covered by JPM analyst Carl Murdock-Smith) type strategy, and lock M1 out of the mainstream market. Please see our Singapore industry report published today in conjunction with this report for details. Regional assets contributions to improve: We expect 12% growth in FY12 associate contributions for SingTel; driven by 20% growth at AIS and 15% at Bharti. The decline over FY11 was largely driven by appreciation of the Singapore dollar vs. local currencies. We expect 6% growth in Optuss EBIT contributions to SingTel in FY12. Potential for increased capital management: SingTel has the best balance sheet among Singapore Telcos with a net debt/EBITDA (including associates) of 0.6x. Current dividend yield of 6% is more than covered by internal cash flows and we thus see potential for a special dividend as an upside risk. SingTel is trading at a 330bp spread to Singapore govt bonds vs. a historical high of 390bp. Key risks: Key downside risks include worse-than-expected pricing competition and lower-than-expected NBN market share.
49
Forecast competitive dynamics are upended as Starhub pursues an alternative infrastructure approach: We suspect that a Virgin Media type strategy may in fact be the best long-term strategic option for the company, but as of yet see no signs that this will occur. Were this dynamic to change, we would expect a greater potential for a degree of price competition between Starhub and SingTel given StarHubs better economics. This could be somewhat restrained, however, by StarHubs desire to achieve a reasonable return on capex. A foreign operator takes control of M1 and introduces cross market competitive dynamics into the Singapore environment. We would not be shocked to see an operator such as Telstra (in order to have a counter balance to SingTel's Optus) or Axiata (already a 29.23% shareholder in M1, general offer is triggered at ) to eventually make a bid for the firm. This has the potential to introduce another layer of strategy into the Singapore market, which could be de-stabilizing. NIMS project creates unbundles content: The Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA), the Telecom industry regulator, has been actively pushing a program called the NextGen Interactive Multimedia Applications and Services program (NIMS), which provides for a common platform Set Top Box (STB). This could theoretically be used to completely unbundle content and reduce the role of SingTel and Starhub as Pay TV content aggregators. This program is at a very early stage of development, but is something we are watching closely. Worse-than-expected NBN market share: We expect SingTel to capture 60% of the total NBN market. We assume StarHub would account for 30% of the market while the remaining 10% would be M1. SingTels current fixed broadband market share is 42% while pay TV market share is 37% and less-than-expected share of NBN subs is thus a downside risk. Please see the table below for earnings sensitivity to NBN market share assumptions.
Table 1: Singapore Telcos: Earnings sensitivity to market share within NBN subscribers
SingTel NBN market share 5% FY16 Singapore EBITDA (S$ mn) 2,292 Upside to base case -3.3% FY16 group net (S$ mn) Upside to base case StarHub NBN market share 2015 net income (S$ mn) Upside to base case M1 NBN market share 2015 net income (S$ mn) Upside to base case
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
10% 15% 20% 2,300 2,307 2,314 -3.0% -2.7% -2.4% 5,700 5,705 5,711 -0.9% -0.8% -0.8% 10% 15% 20% 351 354 358 -4.0% -3.0% -2.0% Base case 10% 192 0.0% 15% 194 1.0% 20% 196 2.0%
25% 2,321 -2.1% 5,716 -0.7% 25% 361 -1.0% 25% 198 3.1%
30% 35% 2,328 2,336 -1.8% -1.5% 5,721 5,727 -0.6% -0.5% Base case 30% 365 0.0% 30% 200 4.1% 35% 369 1.0% 35% 202 5.1%
40% 45% 2,343 2,350 -1.2% -0.9% 5,732 5,738 -0.4% -0.3% 40% 372 2.0% 40% 204 6.1% 45% 376 3.0% 45% 206 7.1%
50% 55% 2,357 2,364 -0.6% -0.3% 5,743 5,748 -0.2% -0.1% 50% 380 4.0% 50% 208 8.2% 55% 383 4.9% 55% 210 9.2%
Base case 60% 2,371 0.0% 5,754 0.0% 60% 387 5.9% 60% 212 10.2%
65% 2,379 0.3% 5,759 0.1% 65% 390 6.9% 65% 214 11.2%
70% 2,386 0.6% 5,765 0.2% 70% 394 7.9% 70% 216 12.2%
50
Valuation
Our price target of S$3.6 implies a total return of +20% (14% capital appreciation and 5% dividend yield). Our share price target is driven by two aspects: 1) our EPS forecasts vs. the Street; we are 6% above for 2012 EPS; and 2) target earnings multiple; shares are at 11.9x, we use a 13.0x multiple for our PT.
Table 2: Singapore Telcos: Valuation summary
Company SingTel StarHub M1 Stock code ST SP STH SP M1 SP Rating Price (LC) OW 3.2 N 2.9 N 2.5 PT (LC) 3.6 2.7 2.5 % to EV/EBITDA (x) Target 2011E 2012E 14.3% 10.6 10.8 -5.9% 8.3 7.8 0.0% 8.1 8.0 P/E (x) 2011E 2012E 12.7 11.2 15.6 14.8 13.3 13.2 Dividend Yield (%) 2011E 2012E 5.3 6.1 7.0 7.0 6.0 6.0 FCF Yield (%) 2011E 2012E 5.4 4.8 7.9 9.1 9.4 9.3 Total Return 19.6% 1.0% 6.0%
We run a best- and worst-case scenario valuation for our companies where we compare our peak and trough level valuation returns. SingTel looks most attractive on this metric with an equal distribution both sides while StarHub and M1 offer higher losses on the downside than gains on the upside.
Table 3: Singapore Telcos: Best- and worst-case analysis
Current price Current consensus P/E Peak P/E Trough P/E SingTel StarHub M1 3.2 2.9 2.5 11.9 15.3 12.6 13.0 14.0 13.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 JPM vs. consensus Best case price % upside Worst case price % upside Up/Down EPS 6.4% 3.6 15.8% 2.7 -15.9% 1.00 3.0% 2.7 -5.3% 1.9 -34.5% (0.15) -5.1% 2.5 -1.6% 1.9 -25.5% (0.06)
51
As per the J.P. Morgan vs. consensus table below, we see 6% upside to Street's 2012 EPS estimates for SingTel. EPS estimates have been revised down 5% YTD for SingTel, driven to a large extent by appreciation of the Singapore dollar. We expect the trend to reverse given business fundamentals have been strong across Singapore, Australia, India and Thailand.
Table 4: Singapore Telcos: JPM vs. Street estimates
SingTel Revenue EBITDA EBITDA margin-BP diff EPS StarHub Revenue EBITDA EBITDA margin-BP diff EPS M1 Revenue EBITDA EBITDA margin-BP diff EPS
Source: Bloomberg and J.P. Morgan estimates.
FY1E 0.8% NA NA 1.7% -1.0% -0.1% 0.3 3.3% -0.2% -1.1% (0.3) -0.1%
FY2E -3.5% NA NA 6.4% -3.0% 0.8% 1.2 3.0% -1.8% -4.9% (1.0) -5.6%
Source: Bloomberg.
SingTels P/E has expanded by 13% YTD given its increased dividend payout and improving regional asset performance.
52
Source: Bloomberg.
SingTels dividend has been rising since 2009, closing the dividend yield gap to StarHub and M1.
Figure 3: SingTel: Street dividend yield estimates
Source: Bloomberg.
53
Figure 4: SingTel: Street dividend yield spread to Singapore 10-year govt bonds
Source: Bloomberg.
We run full discounted cash flow analysis on all of our companies, but do not use this analysis to specifically set target prices. Our experience has been that the heavy retail participation in most Southeast Asian markets leaves P/E multiples, and the upside to street + upside to multiple approach described above a more effective way of forecasting future share price movements. We instead use DCF analysis as another gauge of market sentiment, by back calculating what discount rate is implied by the current share price. A high discount rate would be indicative of either a) a very risky business / market, or b) an excessively pessimistic sentiment applied by the market. SingTel's share price currently implies a lower discount rate relative to Starhub and M1. This appears fair given both SingTel's greater revenue diversification outside of Singapore and the fact that it is likely a share gainer due to the NBN, but also given its status as a large cap stock (S$50.2B vs. STH at S$4.9B, and M1 at S$2.2B) with a much larger index inclusion then STH or M1 (ST at 10.14% of STI vs. STH at 0.79% and M1 at 0%).
Table 5: Singapore Telcos: DCF summary
SingTel StarHub M1 Current price (LC) 3.15 2.87 2.50 2013 Terminal growth rate 4.0% 4.0% 4.0% 2012 Terminal value as % of EV 92.0% 87.6% 87.8% Implied discount rate at current price 7.9% 10.4% 10.1%
Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. . Priced on 20 Oct 2011
54
Singapore Optus Bharti Telkomsel AIS Globe Warid PBTL SingPost Total
1.5
2.5
SingTel starts bundled plans Wins pay TV license M1 broadband gives 5Gb free usage Bharti Dec07 net up 100% Analyst upgrades China slowdown concern Optus reports 10% decline in earnings
3.5
4.5
Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. . Priced on 20 Oct 2011
55
EV 14,896 18,035 58,461 22,728 18,476 4,974 NA NA 2,060
Acquires 30% Warid stake Commercial pay TV launch
Sells 49% of bharti aquanet Analyst upgrades Optus offers bundled plans Stocks fall on Subprime concerns Optus stops selling Telstra's fixed line product. M1 Cuts prices by 35% ahead of MNP Sells 41% ISAT stake to Qtel Buys 3% Globe stake MNP commences Lehman files bankruptcy Market fall Analyst downgrades Sells 10% of United Business Solutioins Sell Australia fixed line assets Actively involved in Bharti MTN merger talks Bharti MTN extend merger talks Buys 1.5% of Bharti Reduces iPhone price Governmet passes content sharing rule Protest on rising soccer fee in Singapore Lim Chuan: CEO intl. to retire Govt. seeks 3G spectrum bids 1Q11 net down 0.2% YoY Analyst downgrades Dec09 net neats street by 4.5%
Equity Value 11,590 16,786 44,772 23,476 17,066 3,605 3,183 577 1,954 Implied EV/EBITDA (x) 6.9 5.9 7.4 5.5 7.5 4.5 NA NA 8.9 Implied P/E (x) NA NA 15.9 12.0 13.7 11.0 NA NA 12.4 SingTel's Stake 100.0% 100.0% 32.3% 35.0% 21.3% 47.3% 30.0% 45.0% 25.9%
SingTel price
Attributable Equity 11,590 16,786 14,461 8,217 3,635 1,705 955 259 506 58,115 Equity/sh new (S$) 0.73 1.05 0.91 0.52 0.23 0.11 0.06 0.02 0.03 3.6 Contribution to NAV 20% 29% 25% 14% 6% 3% 2% 0% 1% 100%
SG- Malaysia romaing rate cut S$0.1/share special dividend Telstra NBN negotiations closing S&P downgrades US debt rating 1Q12 net down 3% QoQ
Comments
Jan-07 Jan-07 Feb-07 Mar-07 Apr-07 Apr-07 May-07 Jun-07 Jul-07 Aug-07 Aug-07 Sep-07 Oct-07 Nov-07 Nov-07 Dec-07 Jan-08 Feb-08 Mar-08 Mar-08 Apr-08 May-08 Jun-08 Jul-08 Jul-08 Aug-08 Sep-08 Oct-08 Oct-08 Nov-08 Dec-08 Jan-09 Jan-09 Feb-09 Mar-09 Apr-09 May-09 May-09 Jun-09 Jul-09 Aug-09 Sep-09 Sep-09 Oct-09 Nov-09 Dec-09 Dec-09 Jan-10 Feb-10 Mar-10 Apr-10 Apr-10 May-10 Jun-10 Jul-10 Aug-10 Aug-10 Sep-10 Oct-10 Nov-10 Nov-10 Dec-10 Jan-11 Feb-11 Mar-11 Mar-11 Apr-11 May-11 Jun-11 Jun-11 Jul-11 Aug-11 Sep-11 Oct-11
Implied JPM estimated EV/EBITDA JPM TP Rs460 XL Axiata JPM multiple JPM 2012 TP Bt140 JPM 2012 TP Php930 Purchase price Purchase price Market price-20 Oct 2011
1.5
2.5
3.5
4.5
SWOT analysis
Strengths
Strongest balance sheet amongst Singapore Telcos. Diversified business model. A high quality mobile network. Strategically well placed in the NBN business model.
Weaknesses
Risk of heavy competition on all business lines post opening up of NBN infrastructure. Excessive competition in India, Indonesia and Philippines.
Opportunities
Opportunity to gain market in share the pay TV and fixed broadband segment post BPL win and new content sharing law in Singapore. Growth assets in Indonesia, India, Philippines and Thailand. Growing pay TV base providing higher bundling opportunities.
Threats
Risk to SingTels monopoly share in corporate fixed line market due to NBN infrastructure. Threat from new entrants as NBN infrastructure expands and matures. Long-term threat to pay TV market share from the NIMS initiative.
10
56
319 370 9.0% 15.8% 11.0 7.9 -21.3% -28.1% 929 8.2% 977 5.1%
351 -5.1% 8.2 3.9% 1,058 8.3% 28.9 -1.4% 0.0 15.1 7.4%
351 2.4% 8.3 -1.4% 272 5.4% 29.1 1.0% 0.0 17.1 26.0% 160 37.0% 432 13.8% 46.3 9.0% 18.9 -1.1% -4.1% 95 -0.7% -4.8% NM NM NM 95 -4.8%
351 0.9%
356 1.4%
343 0.0%
343 0.0%
8.0 7.9 7.7 7.7 7.6 7.5 -3.0% -1.3% -2.3% -0.7% -1.0% -1.0% 279 2.3% 1,127 2.9% 1,163 3.2% 1,189 2.3% 1,206 1.4% 1,221 1.2%
35.3 29.3 -14.2% -16.8% 0.0 14.9 7.0% 0.0 14.1 -5.5%
27.6 27.3 26.6 26.2 26.0 25.7 -5.2% -3.8% -2.8% -1.2% -1.0% -1.0% 0.0 21.0 5.2% 0.0 21.3 1.1% 0.0 21.5 1.0% 0.0 21.7 1.0%
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.6 19.4 18.6 18.0 19.2 20.0 20.2% 24.4% 16.7% 19.1% 12.2% 11.1%
393 469 552 29.7% 32.4% 34.3% 1,322 15.0% 1,445 1,610 9.3% 11.4% 44.0 1.4% 19.4 0.0% -0.1% 393 0.0% -2.7% NM NM NM 393 -2.7%
166 186 182 694 194 825 921 964 998 1,030 38.0% 40.0% 40.0% 38.8% 41.0% 42.3% 44.2% 44.8% 45.3% 45.8% 437 465 10.9% 10.9% 46.4 7.6% 18.8 -0.5% -4.9% 95 -0.1% -4.5% NM NM NM 95 -4.5% 48.4 8.9% 18.7 -0.8% -5.3% 95 -0.4% -4.1% NM NM NM 95 -4.1% 455 1,789 9.0% 11.1% 46.4 5.0% 46.4 5.4% 472 9.3% 46.8 1.2% 1,952 9.1% 47.3 2.0% 2,084 6.8% 2,153 3.3% 2,204 2.4% 2,251 2.1%
50.2 43.4 -8.9% -13.4% 20.0 0.0% -5.3% 425 0.0% -6.6% NM NM NM 425 -6.6% 19.5 0.0% -2.8% 404 0.0% -4.9% NM NM NM 404 -4.9%
17.8 18.6 -4.5% 0.0% -6.8% -4.5% 90 375 -4.3% 0.0% -5.5% -4.6% 10 NM NM NM 10 NM NM NM
17.8 17.3 16.3 15.9 15.0 14.2 -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -5.9% -6.9% -5.6% -2.8% -5.2% -5.5% 90 351 320 293 247 204 -0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -5.3% -6.4% -8.8% -8.5% -15.7% -17.6% 22 73 202 319 474 631 NM 627.0% 177.4% 58.0% 48.9% 32.9% NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM
90 351 320 293 247 204 -5.3% -6.4% -8.8% -8.5% -15.7% -17.6%
57
11
59.2 -4.7% 360 -0.8% NM NM 360 -0.8% 1,216 3.8% 1,577 2.7% 2,531 4.6%
59.4 -1.1% 92 2.2% 80.0 NM NM 92 2.2% 303 0.5% 395 0.9% 717 26.5%
61.1 3.1% 379 5.2% 80.0 NM 1 NM 380 5.6% 1,233 1.3% 1,613 2.3%
60.2 58.3 51.3 46.5 41.5 36.5 1.4% -4.5% -11.9% -9.5% -10.8% -12.1% 93 368 326 286 240 194 1.3% -2.7% -11.5% -12.4% -16.1% -19.1% 80.0 66.5 65.1 56.3 53.3 51.3 0.0% -16.9% -2.0% -13.6% -5.3% -3.8% 4 33 107 163 254 340 NM 2649% 225.1% 51.6% 56.0% 34.1% 97 5.4% 401 5.6% 433 8.0% 448 493 3.5% 10.0% 534 8.2%
1,053 1,172 7.7% 11.3% 1,385 1,535 10.3% 10.9% 1,771 2,420 53.2% 36.6%
301 1,210 1,156 1,129 1,080 1,032 -0.7% -1.9% -4.5% -2.3% -4.4% -4.4% 398 1,611 1,589 1,577 1,573 1,566 0.8% -0.1% -1.4% -0.7% -0.3% -0.4% 785 9.5% 3,226 6.8% 3,387 5.0% 3,455 2.0% 3,524 2.0% 3,595 2.0%
34.8 25.8 20.5 17.5 17.1 17.2 16.0 16.9 -32.3% -25.8% -20.5% -26.9% -19.0% -11.8% -11.6% -17.4% 1.6 616 3.8% 0 NM 1.4 0.2 1.0 126 -7.6% 1.2 131 -0.7% 1.5 132 3.3% 1.1 1.1
16.2 15.9 15.1 14.8 14.5 14.2 -7.6% -6.4% -5.0% -2.0% -2.0% -2.0% 1.2 127 1.1% 1.1 1.0 1.0 510 0.0% 1.0 510 0.0% 1.0 509 0.0%
181 73 72 72 51 268 47 158 49 10 2 0 NM 421.4% 132.3% 30.9% -37.0% 48.1% -35.6% -40.9% -69.1% -80.0% -80.0% -80.0% 273 6.1% 346 27.5% 66 29.8% 302 4.5% 374 16.9% 75 41.0% 312 1.2% 384 5.7% 85 7.1% 379 -0.7% 430 -7.0% 1,266 2.4% 1,534 8.3% 277 1,238 1.5% -2.2% 1,263 2.0% 1,288 2.0% 1,314 2.0% 1,316 1.4% 401 5.0% 34.5 9.5% 1,340 2.0% 1,341 1.9% 421 5.0% 37.5 8.7%
731 1,072 1,236 17.4% 46.6% 15.4% 731 1,072 1,417 17.4% 46.6% 32.2% 272 15.9% 268 -1.5% 268 0.1%
324 1,397 1,312 1,298 -6.4% -9.0% -6.1% -1.1% 364 5.0% 29.5 6.3% 382 5.0% 31.5 6.9%
36 7.5 10.0 21.9 30.8 27.8 27.3 27.3 25.8 NM -79.0% 32.8% 126.1% 191.5% 178.7% 148.9% 173.3% 17.8%
1 6 16 14 22 21 23 79 23 112 151 188 230 278 NM 1000% 192.7% 419.2% 497.2% 404.8% 300.0% 390.7% 73.3% 42.2% 34.2% 24.4% 22.6% 20.7% 154 194 27.7% 26.5% 4,904 5,547 10.7% 13.1% 195 0.3% 5,995 8.1% 47 -8.6% 1,520 9.9% 51 52 39 189 6.5% 12.0% -20.4% -3.1% 1,586 9.9% 1,634 6.8% 1,661 1.3% 6,400 6.8% 46 220 244 270 305 344 -2.4% 16.6% 10.8% 10.7% 12.8% 12.8% 1,557 2.5% 6,501 1.6% 6,574 1.1% 6,671 1.5% 6,786 1.7% 6,914 1.9%
58
(337) (1,249) 20.3% 19.5% 25.0 NM (0.4) 0.0% 25.0 NM (0.4) 0.0%
(317) (1,362) (1,343) (1,315) (1,293) (1,279) 20.5% 21.2% 20.9% 20.4% 20.1% 19.9% 25.0 0.0% (1.2) 31.3% 23.4 -6.4% (11.6) 35.2% 23.6 0.7% (38.8) 36.2% 23.6 0.0% 23.6 0.0% 23.6 0.0%
(318) (1,374) (1,381) (1,388) (1,405) (1,435) 20.4% 21.1% 21.0% 20.8% 20.7% 20.8%
1,771
2,420
2,531
717
765
767
771
3,020
785
3,226
3,455 5.2 -1.0% (179) 2.8% 5.4 -4.0% (246) 3.8% 2.9 -7.0% (279) 4.3% 14.4 1.0% (45.0) 27.7% (324) 4.9%
3,524 5.1 -1.0% (181) 2.8% 5.3 -3.0% (244) 3.8% 2.7 -5.0% (274) 4.3% 14.6 1.0% (69.3) 27.3% (344) 5.1%
3,595 5.1 -1.0% (183) 2.8% 5.1 -3.0% (242) 3.8% 2.6 -3.0% (274) 4.3% 14.7 1.0% (97.6) 28.7% (372) 5.4%
11.4 9.0 7.7 -31.3% -21.4% -14.5% (202) 4.1% (217) 3.9% (194) 3.2%
6.7 6.7 6.0 5.8 6.3 5.7 5.5 -20.9% -18.4% -18.2% -16.8% -17.9% -14.4% -12.4% (48) 3.2% 6.3 8.8% (58) 3.8% (51) 3.2% 6.1 5.3% (57) 3.6% (46) 2.8% 6.8 6.8% (66) 4.0% (45) 2.7% 5.9 3.7% (58) 3.5% (190) 3.0% 6.2 3.0% (239) 3.7% (45) 2.9% 5.9 -4.8% (60) 3.9% (178) 2.8% 6.0 -2.5% (249) 3.9%
9.4 7.1 6.0 -12.8% -24.7% -15.3% (249) 5.1% 5.0 5.6% (267) 5.4% 0 NM 0 (267) 5.4% 8,590 (236) 4.3% 4.9 -2.0% (303) 5.5% 0 NM 0 (303) 5.5% 12,326 (220) 3.7% 4.7 -4.9% (320) 5.3% 0 NM 0 (320) 5.3% 12,812 0.71 12.2% (91) 1.5% (825) 13.8%
4.3 4.2 3.9 -14.1% -15.0% -15.7% (78) 5.1% 15.0 NM 0.0% (78) 5.1% 3,284 0.76 11.3% (25) 1.6% (209) 13.8% (78) 4.9% 15.0 NM 0.0% (78) 4.9% 3,414 0.79 9.8% (27) 1.7% (213) 13.4% (74) 4.5% 15.0 NM 0.0% (74) 4.5% 3,435 0.82 15.7% (28) 1.7% (214) 13.1%
4.0 4.1 3.5 3.5 3.1 -6.0% -13.1% -19.7% -14.1% -11.9% (79) 4.7% 15.0 NM (0.2) 0.0% (79) 4.8% (309) 4.8% 15.0 NM (0.2) 0.0% (309) 4.8% (70) 4.5% 15.0 0.0% (0.7) 18.8% (71) 4.6% (296) 4.6% 14.0 -6.4% (7.0) 21.1% (303) 4.7% (285) 4.4% 14.3 1.7% (23.5) 21.9% (308) 4.7%
3,437 13,570 0.81 11.4% (28) 1.7% (210) 12.6% 0.80 12.1% (108) 1.7% (846) 13.2%
3,463 14,398 15,114 15,545 15,928 16,284 0.84 10.0% (29) 1.9% (205) 13.2% 0.85 6.7% (122) 1.9% (852) 13.1% 0.87 2.0% (131) 2.0% (864) 13.1% 0.87 1.0% (136) 2.1% (885) 13.3% 0.87 0.0% (139) 2.2% (908) 13.4% 0.87 0.0% (142) 2.2% (939) 13.6%
0.77 0.63 -12.0% -17.6% (66) 1.3% (784) 16.0% (78) 1.4% (834) 15.0%
59
13
12,983 13,205 13,092 12,893 12,660 12,374 456 4.5% 6.0 7.2% (234) 15.1% 468 4.0% 6.2 7.0% 482 3.0% 6.6 5.9% 489 1.5% 6.8 3.5% 494 1.0% 7.1 3.5% 499 1.0% 7.3 3.5%
490 439 16.0% -10.4% 5.9 6.6% (701) 14.3% 12.5 6.1% (665) 13.6% 5.6 -4.9% (805) 14.5% 13.8 10.4%
(985) (1,034) (1,054) (1,071) (1,084) 15.3% 16.1% 16.4% 16.7% 16.8% 10.9 -7.0% 10.3 -5.0% 9.9 -4.0%
15.9 16.8 3.5% -14.2% (305) 18.6% 1.5 -3.5% (29) 1.8% (0.22) NM 4 -0.3%
(850) (1,027) 15.3% 17.1% 1.7 1.4% (114) 1.9% (0.38) NM 26 -0.4%
(331) (1,177) 19.9% 18.4% 1.7 -1.6% (33) 2.0% (0.15) NM 3 -0.2% 1.6 -4.8% (121) 1.9% (0.27) NM 21 -0.3%
(243) (1,127) (1,086) (1,063) (1,045) (1,034) 15.7% 17.5% 16.9% 16.5% 16.3% 16.1% 1.5 -9.7% (30) 1.9% (0.29) NM 6 -0.4% 1.4 -9.1% (122) 1.9% (0.25) NM 21 -0.3% 1.3 -9.9% (120) 1.9% (0.25) NM 24 -0.4% 1.2 -7.0% (118) 1.8% (0.3) 5.0% 26 -0.4% 1.1 -5.0% (116) 1.8% (0.3) 5.0% 28 -0.4% 1.1 -5.0% (113) 1.8% (0.3) 5.0% 31 -0.5%
1.9 1.6 -10.0% -11.8% (99) 2.0% (0.43) NM 23 -0.5% (101) 1.8% (0.45) NM 28 -0.5%
1.6 1.6 0.1% -11.4% (30) 1.9% (0.39) NM 7 -0.5% (29) 1.8% (0.35) NM 7 -0.4%
Total Operating expenses (S$ mn) (2,987) (3,479) (3,814) As % of total revenue 60.9% 62.7% 63.6% BP change YoY 2.68 1.81 0.91
Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates.
(952) (1,092) (1,086) (1,143) (4,272) (1,024) (4,439) (4,462) (4,482) (4,517) (4,575) 62.6% 68.8% 66.5% 68.8% 66.7% 65.8% 68.3% 67.9% 67.2% 66.6% 66.2% 2.34 5.29 2.65 2.42 3.13 3.13 1.54 (0.42) (0.68) (0.63) (0.40)
14
60
(337) (1,249) (45) (190) (58) (239) (79) (309) (28) (108) (235) (901) (331) (1,177) (33) (121) 3 21 (1,143) (4,272) 518 11 529 -6.0% 31.8% (2.45) (147) 382 -11.0% 2,128 54 2,182 -1.8% 34.1% (2.99) (551) 1,631 -4.3%
(318) (1,374) (1,381) (1,388) (1,405) (45) (178) (177) (179) (181) (60) (249) (247) (246) (244) (71) (303) (308) (324) (344) (29) (122) (131) (136) (139) (234) (985) (1,034) (1,054) (1,071) (243) (1,127) (1,086) (1,063) (1,045) (30) (122) (120) (118) (116) 6 21 24 26 28 (1,024) (4,439) (4,462) (4,482) (4,517) 533 8 541 -6.0% 34.8% (3.13) (134) 407 -7.9% 2,062 32 2,094 -4.0% 32.2% (1.88) (530) 1,564 -4.1% 2,112 32 2,144 2.4% 32.6% 0.41 (546) 1,598 2.2% 2,189 32 2,221 3.6% 33.3% 0.67 (556) 1,665 4.2% 2,269 32 2,301 3.6% 33.9% 0.62 (557) 1,743 4.7%
61
15
Australia-Optus
Whats changed in the past 12 months? Telstras (the incumbent operator in Australia) reassertion in the Mobile (+1.1% market share) and Fixed Broadband markets (+1.4%) has undeniably been the main development in the Australian Telecom market over the past year. This was driven by a significant reinvestment by Telstra (c. A$1bn) in customers acquisition and retention costs but also helped by Vodafone network severe congestion issues and subsequent customer dissatisfaction (loss of -400k customers in 2H11) during the year. Optus remained reasonably resilient throughout the year with most of Telstras market share gains coming at the expense of other players (Vodafone in Mobile, Layer 2 ISPs in Fixed).
Figure 6: Subscribers Market share changes
+4.0% +3.0% +2.0% +1.0% +0.0% -1.0% -2.0% -3.0% FY10 1H11 Telstra Optus 2H11 VHA -0.1% -0.6% -0.8% -0.1% -0.6% -1.8% -2.6% FY11 +2.1% +1.4% +3.2% +1.9%
+0.5% +0.1%
-2.0%
What is the driver for the sector / operator for the next 12 months? In mobile, wireless data consumption driven by strong smartphone adoption (c. 30%+ mkt penetration) and continued mobile broadband take-up is likely to continue to drive mid to high single digit mobile in revenue growth. A likely reduction in Mobile Termination rate (60% reduction over next 2 years proposed by the Regulator) is likely to drive a moderation in mobile industry growth (JPMe mobile market growth of +6%) in FY12-13. In Fixed line, the carriers main focus will be on preparing for the migration to NBN and possibly on consolidation ahead of the NBN roll-out (e.g. TPG/IIN ). Key issues that investors need to be aware of for the next 12-24 months Key issues in the Australian Telecom market in the next 12-24 months: NBN: with NBNco expected to launch core wholesale products commercially in 2012, the migration to the new NBN market environment will be the main focus in the Fixed line segment. Mobile termination rate reduction: the Regulator (ACCC) has recently launched a review on a proposed reduction in termination rates (9cpm today going to 6cpm from 3.6cpm. Competitive environment : Following the well publicized network/customer issues in 2011, Vodafone is likely to try to re-assert itself in the market place though price based competition.
16
62
63
17
18
64
1,153 253 840 317 (31) (23) 83 (1) 2,591 803 176 753 209 (32) (38) 60 1 1,932 604 179 0 239 0 0 93 1,115
712 239 871 258 (116) (23) 89 1 2,031 517 179 808 172 (115) (23) 78 1,616 534 169 0 231 0 0 134 1,068
940 215 987 235 (63) (13) 119 2,420 682 148 848 165 (63) (13) 109 (1) 1,875 447 169 18 228 0 0 92 954
221 68 210 45 (14) (5) 26 551 164 48 164 31 (14) (5) 21 409 0 223 0 0 0 0 5 228
230 67 209 49 (14) (4) 31 567 172 46 156 34 (14) (4) 28 (1) 417 265 80 17 74 0 0 47 483
214 68 184 40 (14) (4) 30 518 161 48 156 33 (21) (4) 27 (2) 398 215 164 0 0 0 22 401
190 73 173 59 (12) (4) 35 514 142 49 128 41 (12) (4) 32 376 0 0 58 0 0 25 83
855 276 776 193 (54) (17) 122 2,150 639 191 604 139 (61) (17) 108 (3) 1,600 480 467 17 132 99 1,195
210 77 154 49 (12) (6) 28 (1) 500 157 53 103 34 (12) 2 23 360 353 102 0 0 0 0 9 464
886 331 892 212 (38) (15) 112 (1) 2,379 664 242 629 146 (38) (7) 92 1,728 440 369 141 99 1,049
950 385 1,450 234 (17) (7) 112 3,108 713 296 1,061 159 (17) (7) 92 2,296 445 242 150 99 936
1,102 435 1,981 264 (4) (5) 112 0 3,884 826 334 1,450 179 (4) (5) 92 0 2,871 470 289 159 99 1,017
1,411 492 2,415 327 2 (4) 112 0 4,756 1,059 377 1,681 223 1 (4) 92 0 3,430 530 334 186 99 1,149
1,139 262 2,814 286 7 (2) 112 0 4,617 854 201 1,865 194 4 (2) 92 0 3,209 722 377 230 99 1,429
65
19
0 0 0 (1,952) (1,986) (1,996) 3,101 3,223 3,337 3,108 30 0 (398) 3,884 27 0 (398) 4,756 24 0 (398)
(93) (371) 66 66 1,259 5,249 (342) (1,260) 27% 24% 917 3,989 (1) (4) 916 3,985 -2.8% 4.2% 873 -7.4% 5.8 5.5 3,942 3.7% 25.0 24.7
(368) (371) (374) 0 0 0 5,841 6,736 7,719 (1,343) (1,549) (1,853) 23% 23% 24% 4,497 5,187 5,867 (4) (4) (4) 4,494 5,183 5,863 12.8% 15.3% 13.1% 4,494 14.0% 28.2 28.2 5,183 15.3% 32.5 32.5 5,863 13.1% 36.8 36.8
20
66
67
21
2008 5,130 1,887 (216) 393 (2,559) (52) 4,583 (36) 177 (38) 4,687 1,114 (335) (12) 5,454 52 0 (1,102) (1,879) (3) 184 (2,748) 1,166 (411) (2,545) (891) 32 (63) (2,711) (6) (12) 1,390 1,372 6,171
2009 4,382 1,733 (49) 361 (2,051) 89 4,465 (86) 96 (38) 4,437 1,068 (339) (4) 5,163 35 (185) (255) (1,918) (4) (63) (2,391) (466) (374) (1,098) (891) 12 (201) (3,018) (245) (51) 1,372 1,076 6,419
2010 5,042 1,878 8 326 (2,410) 39 4,883 (456) 357 (37) 4,747 954 (370) (2) 5,329 17 0 (90) (1,923) (123) (60) (2,179) (204) (315) (1,097) (987) 11 (42) (2,634) 515 23 1,076 1,614 5,266
2011 4,991 1,969 (44) 368 (2,141) (5) 5,138 (134) 101 48 5,154 1,194 (301) (4) 6,043 34 0 (670) (2,005) (27) (92) (2,759) 840 (348) (1,274) (1,083) 7 (283) (2,141) 1,143 (18) 1,614 2,738 4,548
2012E 5,249 2,000 (27) 398 (2,387) 0 5,232 (131) 169 0 5,270 1,049 (687) 0 5,633 27 0 0 (2,266) (123) 0 (2,362) 0 (398) (1,529) (1,116) 0 0 (3,043) 227 0 2,738 2,965 4,320
2013E 5,841 1,952 (30) 398 (3,108) 0 5,053 89 (115) 0 5,027 936 (629) 0 5,334 30 0 0 (2,225) (123) 0 (2,318) 0 (398) (1,594) (1,258) 0 0 (3,250) (234) 0 2,965 2,731 4,555
2014E 6,736 1,986 (27) 398 (3,884) 0 5,209 (97) 125 0 5,237 1,017 (656) 0 5,598 27 0 0 (2,184) (123) 0 (2,280) 0 (398) (1,797) (1,451) 0 0 (3,647) (328) 0 2,731 2,403 4,883
2015E 7,719 1,996 (24) 398 (4,756) 0 5,333 (75) 96 0 5,355 1,149 (711) 0 5,792 24 0 0 (2,191) (123) 0 (2,290) 2,500 (398) (2,073) (1,642) 0 0 (1,613) 1,890 0 2,403 4,293 5,493
2016E 7,576 1,982 (43) 534 (4,617) 0 5,433 (67) 87 0 5,452 1,429 (710) 0 6,171 43 0 0 (2,233) (123) 0 (2,314) 0 (534) (2,345) (1,611) 0 0 (4,491) (633) 0 4,293 3,659 6,126
22
68
JPM Q-Profile
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd. (SINGAPORE / Telecommunication Services)
As Of: 13-Oct-2011 Quant_Strategy@jpmorgan.com
Current:
3.21
Current:
0.26
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
0.00 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/10 Sep/11
Current:
8%
Current:
-21.62%
2% 0% Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/10 Sep/11
-0.40 -0.60 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/11
PE (1Yr Forward)
30.0x 25.0x 20.0x 15.0x 10.0x 5.0x 0.0x Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07
Current:
12.4x
Price/Book Value
7.0x 6.0x 5.0x 4.0x 3.0x 2.0x 1.0x
PBV hist PBV Forward
Current:
2.0x
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Sep/11
0.0x Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07 Sep/08 Sep/09 Sep/11
ROE (Trailing)
35.00 30.00 25.00 20.00 15.00 10.00 5.00 0.00 Sep/96 Sep/97 Sep/98 Sep/99 Sep/00 Sep/01 Sep/02 Sep/03 Sep/04 Sep/05 Sep/06 Sep/07
Current:
15.53
Current:
4.97
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/08
Sep/09
Sep/10
Summary
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd. 39378.38 SINGAPORE 71.14382 SEDOL B02PY22 Telecommunication Services Diversified Telecommunication Latest Min Max 12mth Forward PE 8.82 25.95 12.40x P/BV (Trailing) 1.45 6.42 2.03x Dividend Yield (Trailing) 0.00 7.64 4.97 ROE (Trailing) 9.32 30.72 15.53 Implied Value of Growth -0.38 0.63 -21.6% Source: Bloomberg, Reuters Global Fundamentals, IBES CONSENSUS, J.P. Morgan Calcs As Of: Local Price: EPS: % to Max % to Med 109% 14% 216% 15% 54% -33% 98% 19% 391% 140% 13-Oct-11 3.21 0.26 % to Avg 23% 44% -29% 28% 171%
Sep/11
* Implied Value Of Growth = (1 - EY/Cost of equity) where cost of equity =Bond Yield + 5.0% (ERP)
Sep/11
69
23
Ratio Analysis %, year end Mar FY10 FY11 EBITDA margin 28.7% 28.3% FCF margin 20.2% 22.4% ROE 17.8% 15.9% ROC 10.2% 10.2% ROA 11.0% 9.8% Tax rate 22.5% 23.5% Capex to sales (11.4%) (11.1%) Debt/Capital 22.7% 23.1% Net debt or (cash) to equity 22.4% 18.7% Interest cover (x) 16.70 15.72 Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates.
FY12E 27.5% 18.0% 15.8% 9.8% 9.9% 24.0% (12.1%) 22.1% 16.8% 13.94
FY13E 27.6% 17.0% 17.0% 9.2% 10.8% 23.0% (12.2%) 21.1% 16.7% 13.72
FY10 FY11 FY12E 5,329 6,043 5,633 (1,923) (2,005) (2,266) (256) (755) (96) (2,634) (2,141) (3,043) 538 1,076 1,614 1,125 1,614 2,738 227 2,738 2,965
24
70
Neutral
PRY.AX, PRY AU Price: A$3.30
Considering the uncertainty surrounding funding from a global perspective, PRYs announcement that it had refinanced its syndicated debt facility at ~225 bps above BBSY is an impressive outcome. Attention now squarely shifts to its operational performance with Medical Centres remaining a key value driver. To date, we have not noticed an obvious improvement in PRY's Medical Centre division despite managements apparent success in recruiting additional GPs. Maintain Neutral recommendation. PRY announced that it has refinanced its syndicated bank debt facility, which was due to mature in Dec-12. The syndicate lending group reduced to 8 banks refinanced $1.02b, including 1) $770m 3 year 4 month non-amortising facility maturing Feb-15, at 225bps above BBSY, 2) $100m 3 year 4 month revolving working capital facility maturing Feb-15, at 225bps above BBSY, and 3) $150m 5 year non-amortising facility maturing Oct-16, at 250bps above BBSY. This is a ~75bp improvement on the 300bp margin on the previous facility. Increasing future cash flows augmented by a slowdown in capex and reduced dividend payout ratio have no doubt helped PRY secure this reduction. Interest expense for FY12 is expected to be ~$83m ($44m for 1H12, and $39m for 2H12). Amortisation of borrowing costs will be $14.5m for FY12E, bringing the total interest cost to $97.5m. Amortisation of borrowing costs will reduce to ~$4.5m in FY13E. PRYs refinancing was slightly better than we were expecting, however relative to the companys guidance on interest cost we have not had to change our forecasts mainly due to the small increase in the borrowing. The downgrade we process in FY12 relates to the fast tracking of amortised borrowing costs associated with the original facility. Encouragingly borrowing cost fees appear to have fallen demonstrating a willingness of banks to lend to Healthcare companies within Australia.
Primary Health Care Limited (Reuters: PRY.AX, Bloomberg: PRY AU) Year-end Jun (A$) FY09A FY10A FY11A FY12E Total Revenue (A$ mn) 1,329.3 1,296.8 1,312.2 1,413.0 EBITDA (A$ mn) 348.1 331.0 317.8 360.6 Net profit after tax (A$ mn) 116.1 132.0 78.3 125.2 EPS (A$) 0.306 0.277 0.158 0.251 P/E (x) 10.8 11.9 20.9 13.2 EV/EBITDA 8.2 7.9 8.6 7.4 Dividend (A$) 0.140 0.250 0.080 0.135 Net Yield (%) 4.2% 7.6% 2.4% 4.1% Normalised* EPS (A$) 0.302 0.277 0.193 0.251 Normalised* EPS chg (%) 47.1% -8.0% -30.5% 30.0% Normalised* P/E (x) 10.9 11.9 17.1 13.2
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates.
Anasuya Ramesh
(61-2) 9220-7734 anasuya.x.ramesh@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited
Price Performance
4.2 3.8 A$ 3.4 3.0 2.6
Oct-10 Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11
Abs Rel
1m 6.8% 4.0%
3m -8.7% 0.1%
FY13E 1,490.0 380.8 144.9 0.290 11.4 6.9 0.203 6.2% 0.290 15.7% 11.4
Company Data 52-week range (A$) Market capitalisation (A$ bn) Market capitalisation ($ bn) Fiscal Year End Price (A$) Date Of Price Shares outstanding (mn) ASX100 ASX200-Ind NTA/Sh (A$) Net Debt^ (A$ bn)
4.16 - 2.56 1.65 1.69 Jun 3.30 21 Oct 11 500.3 3,378.1 5,631.3 -1.14 1.03
See page 4 for analyst certification and important disclosures, including non-US analyst disclosures.
J.P. Morgan does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
71
www.morganmarkets.com
Debt Refinancing
PRY announced that it has refinanced $1.02b of debt that was due to mature in Dec12. The refinancing was supported by a syndicate lending group reduced to 8 banks. This includes: $770m 3 year 4 month non-amortising facility maturing Feb-15, at 225bps above BBSY $100m 3 year 4 month revolving working capital facility maturing Feb-15, at 225bps above BBSY $150m 5 year non-amortising facility maturing Oct-16, at 250bps above BBSY This is a ~75bp improvement on the 300bp margin on the existing facility. Interest expense for FY12 is expected to be ~$83m ($44m for 1H12, and $39m for 2H12). Amortisation of borrowing costs will be $14.5m for FY12, bringing the total interest expense to $97.5m. Amortisation of borrowing costs will reduce to ~$4.5m in FY13.
Earnings Revisions
We present the key revisions to our forecasts in the table below.
Table 1: Revisions to our forecasts
Profit and Loss Revenue - old Revenue - new Difference (%) EBITDA - old EBITDA - new Difference (%) EBIT - old EBIT - new Difference (%) PBT - old PBT - new Difference (%) NPAT to members - old NPAT to members - new Difference (%) EPS normalised - old EPS normalised - new Difference (%)
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates.
FY11E 1312.2 1312.2 0% 317.8 317.8 0% 235.6 235.6 0% 138.6 138.6 0% 78.3 78.3 0% 19.3 19.3 0%
FY12E 1413.0 1413.0 0% 360.6 360.6 0% 275.2 275.2 0% 185.0 177.7 -4% 130.4 125.2 -4% 26.1 25.1 -4%
FY13E 1490.0 1490.0 0% 380.8 380.8 0% 293.0 293.0 0% 205.1 205.5 0% 144.7 144.9 0% 29.0 29.0 0%
FY14E 1565.0 1565.0 0% 404.6 404.6 0% 313.7 313.7 0% 225.2 225.6 0% 158.9 159.2 0% 31.8 31.9 0%
72
PE "normalised' on 12 month forward basis 12.6x EV/EBITDA on 12 month forward basis 8.2x Note: ROIC = NOPLAT/Inv ested Capital, cummulativ goodwill amortisation is added back to IC e ROIC (operations only) remov goodwill from IC es Cashflow Statement (A$ millions) Net op cash flow Capex & Acquisitions Asset Sales & Property Dev Other investing cash flows Equity Raised Debt Repayment Debt Proceeds Proceeds of securitisation Dividends Paid Share buyback Other financing cash flows Net cashflow GCFPS (cps) Free cashflow ($m) FCF after capex/share (cps) Balance Sheet (A$ millions) Current assets PP&E Equity investments Intangibles Other non current assets Total assets Total liabilities Shareholder funds Total debt Cash Net debt Operating working capital NPV Valuation at discount rate FY11A 207 398 3,164 57 3,826 1,321 2,504 1,118 43 1,074 77 9.7% A$m 822 539 183 85 (29) 1,600 (1,061) 1,271 1,809 A$ 1.64 1.08 0.36 0.17 (0.06) 3.20 (2.12) 2.54 3.62 -5.8% EV/EBITDA 8.7x PE 13.8x FY12E 226 420 3,143 14 3,804 1,228 2,576 1,038 7 1,030 55 FY13E 190 445 3,121 124 3,881 1,243 2,638 1,048 72 975 122 FY14E 263 472 3,100 86 3,921 1,249 2,673 1,048 98 950 150 FY11A 160 (174) 1 (24) 0 (160) 266 (45) (8) 18 32 (19) 12 FY12E 199 (100) 0 0 (80) 0 (55) (36) 40 99 23 FY13E 230 (91) 0 0 10 (84) 65 46 139 28 FY14E 247 (96) 0 0 0 (125) 25 50 151 30
Sales by Division (A$ millions) Medical Centres Pathology Diagnostics Health Technology Other & Inter-segmentals Total EBITDA by Division (A$ millions) Medical Centres Pathology Diagnostics Health Technology Other & Inter-segmentals Total EBITDA Margin by Division (A$ millions) Medical Centres Pathology Diagnostics Health Technology Total 1H11A 2H11A 1H12E 2H12E 54.1% 55.3% 54.9% 55.8% 15.2% 16.8% 17.6% 16.7% 14.5% 15.9% 15.4% 15.5% 39.8% 40.1% 42.0% 42.0% 23.0% 25.4% 25.3% 25.7% FY11A 54.7% 16.0% 15.2% 39.9% 24.2% FY12E 55.4% 17.2% 15.5% 42.0% 25.5% FY13E 56.2% 16.1% 15.5% 42.0% 25.6% FY14E 56.2% 16.1% 15.4% 42.0% 25.9% 1H11A 2H11A 1H12E 2H12E 74 76 81 88 55 63 69 67 21 22 23 23 10 10 11 11 (9) (5) (6) (4) 151 167 177 183 FY11A 150 119 43 20 (14) 318 FY12E 168 136 46 21 (11) 361 FY13E 188 134 48 22 (10) 381 FY14E 203 140 49 22 (9) 405 1H11A 2H11A 1H12E 2H12E 138 137 147 157 364 376 394 401 145 140 150 147 24 24 25 25 (15) (21) (16) (16) 656 657 700 713 FY11A 275 740 285 49 (36) 1,312 FY12E 303 794 297 50 (32) 1,413 FY13E 334 831 307 52 (35) 1,490 FY14E 360 871 317 53 (36) 1,565
Medical Centres Pathology Diagnostics Health Technology Investments & Other Operational NPV (10yr forecast) Net Debt Terminal Value Group NPV Share price prem/(disc) to NPV
73
74
Initiation
Macy's, Inc.
Winning at Its Own Game; Core Long Term Holding; Initiating with Overweight
We are initiating coverage of Macys with an Overweight rating and December 2012 $36 price target. Macys represents a core long term holding and strong multi-year investment opportunity given among the strongest arsenals of top-line (My Macys, Omni-Channel) and margin drivers (price optimization) in retail today, best-in-class management, and more than reasonable valuation (9.4x P/E & 5.0x EBITDA). Multi-year investment with drivers properly aligned: With top-line drivers My Macy's, Direct growth, and Magic selling in early innings and Omni-Channel a 2013 driver (~2% SSS lift for JWN), we see sustainable 3.0%-5.0% comps for 3-5 years. On margins, we see 215bps of expansion through 2013 and view 15% EBITDA (13% today / mgmt goal of 14-15%) as realistic given inventory management, credit, private and exclusive growth, and price optimization drivers. Winning at its own game. Macy's has recently separated itself from moderate peers JCP/KSS, in our view. While the promotional environment continues to heat up, we believe M can and will continue to win by focusing on its own strategy (brand, price, quality trio) via internal initiatives (My Macys, Omni-Channel, Magic Selling). With a best in class management team (in our view) and continued innovation, we believe M can reach former peak productivity levels over time. 2H11 EPS potential upside minimal, but does not derail the story. We see minimal EPS upside over the next two quarters ($0.01 and $0.02 above the Street in 3Q and 4Q11) given free shipping and online/Omni-channel spending. While below the trailing six quarter average $0.06 beat, this does not derail the story as we see 2012 EPS of $3.15 (vs. Street at $3.04) driven by 3.6% SSS, GPM -11bps, SG&A $ up 2.8%, and $250mil in buybacks with additional upside levers, in our view. Balance sheet strength with 9.5% FCF yield provides support. With annual estimated FCF generation of $1.7 bil for the next 3 years and $1.5bil on hand, Macys balance sheet is a far cry from 2008. With debt ratios in line, Ms priority is shareholder returns and we see an increased focus on share buybacks post-holiday as a catalyst.
Overweight
M, M US Price: $29.42 Price Target: $36.00
Anne McCormick
(1-212) 622-4163 anne.e.mccormick@jpmorgan.com J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
Price Performance
27 25 $ 23 21 19
Aug-10 Nov-10 Feb-11 May-11 Aug-11
Abs
YTD -3.1%
1m -7.6%
3m -7.6%
12m 26.5%
$36 PT See upside to the multiple and "E": At 9.4x our 2012E EPS and 5.0x EBITDA Macys trades among the cheapest names in retail today. The disconnect between sustainable EPS growth (mid-teens+) and its current market multiple creates a compelling entry point today, in our view. Our $36 December 2012 price target is based on 11.5x (above the trailing 3-year average) our 2012E EPS of $3.15.
Macy's, Inc. (M;M US) FYE Jan EPS (Operating) ($) Q1 (Apr) Q2 (Jul) Q3 (Oct) Q4 (Jan) FY P/E (Operating) FY
Source: Company data, Bloomberg, J.P. Morgan estimates. EPS presented on an operating basis (excluding integration/restructuring charges).
Company Data Price ($) Date Of Price 52-week Range ($) Mkt Cap ($ mn) Fiscal Year End Shares O/S (mn) Price Target ($) Price Target End Date
www.morganmarkets.com
Investment Thesis
Macys Inc (M)
Overweight
Multi-year story with drivers properly aligned The pace of Macys top-line turnaround has been impressive, in our view, with monthly comps averaging 5.6% year to date and +3.4% over the past 24 months (since August 09), exceeding the trailing two year average of -4.7% (Aug 2007-July 2009) by a delta of 810 basis points. With top-line momentum building and strategic and merchandising drivers in early innings (My Macys, Omni-channel, Magic selling), we believe top-line strength is sustainable for the next few years. 2013 represents the next leg in the margin storyline We believe Macys has among the top lineups of margin drivers over the next several years with price optimization, My Macys, and Omni-Channel all in early innings. We are modeling 215bps of EBIT margin expansion over the next three years to 9.8% in 2013 (from 7.7% in 2010) a level we feel could prove conservative. The company has provided a longer term goal of 14-15% EBITDA margin (we model 13.6% in 2013 from 12.3% today), which we believe is more than realistic over time given inventory management, continued credit benefit, private and exclusive growth, and price optimization (2013) drivers. Winning at its own game Macy's has recently separated itself from the moderate pack, particularly peers JCPenney and Kohl's. While the promotional environment continues to heat up - we believe Macy's can and will continue to win through focusing on its own strategy (brands, price, quality trio) and through internal initiatives (My Macys, OmniChannel, and Magic Selling). With what we view as a best in class management team, we believe Macys will continue to drive innovation that will prove essential on closing the productivity gap from former peak sales per square foot levels. $1.7 billion in free cash flow should provide increased flexibility Over the past three years Macys has transformed the face of its balance sheet, increasing its cash on hand from $583 million at the end of 2007 to $1.5 billion today while at the same time paying down roughly $2.6 billion in long term debt. Placing a priority on the capital structure with a focus on investment grade again, management is actively tracking their credit ratios (leverage ratio and interest coverage in line today). Looking forward, we are modeling free cash flow generation of $1.7 billion per annum over the next three years, which should provide a lot of dry powder to significantly increase shareholder returns through share repurchases and dividends catalysts we see on the horizon post the upcoming holiday. Lease by lease rationalization looks prudent w bloomy outlets NT driver Consistent with the past two years, we expect Macys to continue to prune its store base in a rational manner (a few stores per year) as leases come due. Specifically, the company closed four stores in 2010 and plans to close two incremental stores in 2011. Looking forward, we believe Macy's will review each store from a productivity and profitability standpoint as leases expire and close doors that fall below set thresholds, but do not anticipate a large closing announcement. For the time being, Macys new Bloomingdales outlet concept (4 today) remains the growth vehicle (25K sq ft) with 3-5 openings per year planned.
76
Valuation we see upside to both the multiple and "E" At 9.4x EPS and 5.0x 2012E EBITDA, M trades among the cheapest names in retail, which given the current disconnect between sustainable EPS growth (mid-teens+) and current market multiple creates a compelling entry point today, in our view. While the company has posted industry leading top-line results, cut its expense base by $550 million, and reduced debt on the books by $2.6 billion over the past three years, we believe Macy's valuation metrics are not reflective of a continued turnaround story. Our December 2012 price target is $36, representing 22% upside from here, which is based on 11.5x our 2012 EPS of $3.15. Our target multiple of 11.5x represents a 9.5% premium to the companys 3-year historical average, which we believe is appropriate given the turnaround effort is in early innings with current initiatives (My Macys, Direct) in place, and the next leg up with same-store-sales and margins in 2013 as the impact of price optimization and Omni-Channel begin to show up in the company results .
77
Company Description
Macys, headquartered in Cincinnati, OH, and New York City, is a chain of department stores operating under the Macys and Bloomingdales names. As of 2Q11, the company operated 804 Macys stores, 41 Bloomingdales, and 4 Bloomingdales Outlets. Macys and Bloomingdales stores sell a variety of mens and childrens apparel (23%), womens apparel (26%), accessories, intimates, shoes and cosmetics (36%), and home furnishings (15%). Formerly Federated Department Stores, the company acquired May Company in August 2005 and changed its name to Macys in 2007. Macys Inc., with 2010 revenues of $25.0 billion, also operates two ecommerce sites at www.macys.com, and www.bloomingdales.com.
Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates. (a) Reflects 2011E
78
Ms pace of share gains versus JCP and KSS has accelerated at a rapid pace over the past 12 months
79
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data. Note: 2011 delta is Feb-September
80
Initiative 2: Omni-channel Integration Effort = 1st Inning Launched in 2010, Macy's Omni-Channel initiative is geared toward integrating inventory management across all channels (stores, online, mobile) to allow customers a seamless shopping experience. With internet sales of $1.3 billion as of 2010 (5% of sales), direct growth has become a significant driver of total company same-storesales (modeling 0.75% comp lift in 2012 versus 0.9% in 2010 and 1-1.5% in 2011), raising the importance of this initiative. Specifically, the initiative is three pronged (1) Search & Send, (2) Store to Door, and (3) Site to Store to Door. First, Search & Send (23 stores today with 150 planned by 2012 end) facilitates purchases not available in-store through utilization of online inventory. Secondly, store to door
81
(currently in testing phase) provides sales associates with access to inventory across the store base, which we see not only as a means of satisfying demand, but also an additional tool to manage per store inventory more efficiently. Finally, Macys Site to Store to Door program (2H11 roll-out) allows online buys to be fulfilled using instore inventory, treating the stores more/less as fulfillment centers. Additional mobile technology initiatives include (1) iShop (shopping application for the iPhone), and (2) Shopkick (location based shopping application). Initiative 3: MAGIC Selling Implemented in 2010, Magic selling is an enhanced associate training program aimed at accelerating sales through focus on increased conversion. Sales associates are trained in selling through the following steps: Meet & Make a Connection; Ask Questions and Listen, Give Options, Give Advice; Inspire to Buy and Sell More; and Celebrate the Purchase.
Exclusive Brands Tommy Hilfiger Martha Stewart Collection Ellen Tracy Material Girl Kenneth Cole Reaction Vida for Espana/Eva Mendes Threads & Heirs Kouture by Kimora mstylelab Bar III Rachel Bilson Dinnerware Sean John Collection Rachel by Rachel Roy Karl Lagerfield Capsule Impulse Beauty
82
$188.1 $185.2
M's sales per square foot increased 4.6% to $162.1 in 2010 following 5 years of decline. We are modeling a 5.4% increase in 2011 as Macy's closes the productivity gap.
$171.3
$170.8
As illustrated in Figure 2 below, Macys faces tougher two-year compares in 2H11 of 1.9% and 6.5% through 1H 2012 versus a trailing four quarter average of -6.3%. While we believe the companys top-line initiatives will more than offset tougher compares, we believe it is worth noting steeper comparisons ahead. Looking across the department store spectrum, Macys compares over the next four quarters (+6.5%) fall slightly above its peer average of 6.2% (Table 9 at left).
Figure 2: Macy's 2-year Stacked Comparisons (2009-Present)
5.0% 3.0% 1.0% -1.0% -3.0% -5.0% -7.0% -9.0% -11.0% -13.0% 1Q09 2Q09 3Q09 4Q09 -11.6% -11.6% 1Q10 2Q10 3Q10 4Q10 1Q11 2Q11 3Q11E 4Q11E -2.1% -3.5% -4.7% -6.8% -9.0% -9.6% -7.8% -4.4% Macy's faces 2-year compares of +1.9% over the next two quarters, which stands substantially above its trailing four quarter average of -6.3%. 0.3% 3.5%
10
83
84
11
Martha Stewart, along with strong improvement with INC private brand, we expect continued expansion, although at a controlled pace dictated by customer demand.
Table 10: Private & Exclusive Penetration
M Private Label Exclusive Total
Source: Company reports.
My Macys Localization Initiative: Through localizing product assortments and focusing its buying, the My Macys initiative has resulted in more full-priced selling and improved inventory management through reduced clearance markdowns and higher inventory turns. Importantly, management believes this initiative remains in only the 3rd or 4th inning today and we see gross margin benefits over the next several years. Price Optimization is the Catalyst for Potential 2013 GPM Expansion: While just in early testing phase today, Macys plans to rollout its price optimization initiative in stages over the course of 2012. While not modeling, we expect initial benefits of Macys price optimization initiative to begin to benefit the income statement in 4Q12 (minimal) with more meaningful upside potential in 2013 and beyond. This technology enhancement should allow Macys to manage the timing and level of markdowns on a regional basis. While too early to quantify financial benefits, it is worth pointing out that Kohl's saw several hundred basis points of gross margin improvement since initial rollout of similar technology in 2006. Free Shipping and Rising Product Costs Headwinds For Now: In January 2011 Macys implemented free shipping on orders exceeding $99 online. While the company will fully lap this gross margin headwind in early 2012, the free shipping headwind should moderate, but remain to an extent given a higher growth rate of online sales (30-40%) versus in-store sales (+MSD) today. On rising product costs, Macys (like all retailers) is facing higher costs of goods given rising input costs and labor rates overseas. To offset a portion of this margin pressure, average unit retail (AUR) is planned up 5-7% in 2H11. While this raises the risk profile regarding customer acceptance, demand elasticity remained favorable to initial price increases through wave one in 2Q.
85
advertising. Offsetting a portion of the upside, we are modeling higher pension and workers compensation expenses and have built in spending for the company's direct growth and Omni-Channel initiative. All in, we are modeling an increase in core SG&A expenses of $340 million over the next two years (2011/2012), representing leverage (as a % of sales) of 124 basis points in 2011 and 65 bps in 2012.
Figure 5: SG&A Per Square Foot (2010)
$48.0 $47.5 $47.0 $46.5 $46.0 $45.5 $45.0 M KSS JCP
Source: Company reports. Note: Excludes pension & depreciation expense.
$46.3
$45.2
86
increased spending/investment around the companys online expansion and OmniChannel initiative as a partial offset of fixed cost leverage given mid-single-digit same-store-sales.
Table 12: SG&A Line Item Build-Up (2006-2011E)
"Core" SG&A Expenses $ Change YOY As a % of Sales Basis Point Change YOY Workers Comp/Gen liability $ Change YOY As a % of Sales Basis Point Change YOY Pension $ Change YOY As a % of Sales Basis Point Change YOY Depreciation & Amortization $ Change YOY As a % of Sales Basis Point Change YOY Stock based compensation $ Change YOY As a % of Sales Basis Point Change YOY Advertising Expense $ Change YOY As a % of Sales Basis Point Change YOY Credit Income $ Change YOY As a % of Sales Basis Point Change YOY Total SG&A $ Change YOY YOY % Growth As a % of Sales Basis Point Change YOY 2006 6369.0 23.6% 150.0 0.6% 158.0 0.6% 1265.0 4.7% 91.0 0.3% 1171.0 4.3% 526.0 2.0% 8678.0 32.2% 2007 6164.0 -205.0 23.4% -19.2 150.0 0.0 0.6% 1.4 132.0 -26.0 0.5% -8.4 1304.0 39.0 5.0% 26.5 60.0 -31.0 0.2% -10.9 1194.0 23.0 4.5% 19.5 450.0 -76.0 1.7% 24.0 8554.0 -124.0 -1.4% 32.5% 31.5 2008 5992.0 -172.0 24.1% 64.9 164.0 14.0 0.7% 8.9 114.0 -18.0 0.5% -4.4 1278.0 -26.0 5.1% 17.9 43.0 -17.0 0.2% -5.5 1239.0 45.0 5.0% 44.0 372.0 -78.0 1.5% 21.6 8458.0 -96.0 -1.1% 34.0% 138.5 2009 5879.0 -113.0 24.6% 53.1 124.0 -40.0 0.5% -14.0 110.0 -4.0 0.5% 0.2 1210.0 -68.0 5.1% -7.0 76.0 33.0 0.3% 14.5 1087.0 -152.0 4.5% -42.8 323.0 -49.0 1.4% 14.3 8163.0 -295.0 -3.5% 34.2% 18.3 2010 6012.0 133.0 24.0% -55.8 148.0 24.0 0.6% 7.3 144.0 34.0 0.6% 11.6 1150.0 -60.0 4.6% -46.4 66.0 -10.0 0.3% -5.4 1072.0 -15.0 4.3% -26.2 332.0 9.0 1.3% 2.4 8260.0 97.0 1.2% 33.0% -112.6 2011E 6217.1 205.1 23.6% -43.5 171.2 23.2 0.7% 5.8 158.0 14.0 0.6% 2.4 1110.0 -40.0 4.2% -38.4 68.5 2.5 0.3% -0.4 1106.0 34.0 4.2% -8.7 459.0 127.0 1.7% 41.5 8371.7 111.7 1.4% 31.8% -120.8 2012E 6372.6 155.4 23.1% -54.0 193.4 22.2 0.7% 5.0 207.2 49.2 0.8% 15.0 1080.0 -30.0 3.9% -30.5 71.8 3.4 0.3% 0.0 1146.3 40.4 4.2% -5.0 497.2 38.2 1.8% 5.7 8574.0 202.3 2.4% 31.0% -75.2
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data. Note: Workers comp in 2006 & 2007 is an estimate based on the average of 2008-2010.
We are modeling overall SG&A leverage of 121 basis points in 2011, but have cut the rate of expansion in half looking to 2012 (modeling 75 bps of leverage).
14
87
Over the past three years, Macys has transformed the face of its balance sheet, increasing its cash on hand from $583 million at the end of 2007 to $1.5 billion today while at the same time paying down roughly $2.6 billion in debt. Placing a priority on the capital structure and to achieve investment grade rating again, management is actively tracking their credit ratios (leverage ratio and interest coverage). Looking forward, we are modeling free cash flow generation of $1.7 billion per annum over the next three years, which should provide a lot of dry powder to increase shareholder returns through share repurchases and dividends.
Figure 6: Department Store Free Cash Flow Yield Comparison
14.0% 12.0% 10.0% 8.0% 6.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% DDS M KSS SKS JWN JCP
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data.
13.3%
9.5%
Macy's FCF Yield is impressive at 9.5% second to only Dillard's a nd outpacing moderate peers KSS/JCP at 6.1%.
7.6%
6.8%
6.3% 4.5%
2005 $1,406.0 194.0 943.0 2,543.0 (95.0) (568.0) 1,880.0 (157.0) 1,723.0
2006 $995.0 628.0 1,265.0 2,888.0 (846.0) (1,317.0) 725.0 (274.0) 451.0
2007 $818.0 219.0 1,304.0 2,341.0 (230.0) (994.0) 1,117.0 (230.0) 887.0
2008 $290.4 187.0 1,278.0 1,755.4 (433.0) (761.0) 561.4 (221.0) 340.4
2009 $329.0 391.0 1,210.0 1,930.0 (233.0) (355.0) 1,342.0 (84.0) 1,258.0
2010 $886.6 0.0 1,150.0 2,036.6 (557.0) (339.0) 1,140.6 (84.0) 1,056.6
2011E $1,169.4 0.0 1,110.0 2,279.4 38.0 (800.0) 1,517.4 (173.0) 1,344.4
2012E $1,344.9 0.0 1,085.0 2,429.9 105.8 (800.0) 1,735.7 (171.0) 1,564.7
2013E $1,492.3 0.0 1,060.0 2,552.3 (2.3) (850.0) 1,700.0 (167.9) 1,532.1
Share Repurchases Provide Valuation Support On September 1, 2011, Macy's announced that it had resumed share buybacks for the first time since suspending its authorization in 2008. With an existing authorization of $850 million, we are modeling repurchases of roughly $150 million in 2011 and
We are modeling FCF generation of $1.7 billion over the next three years
88
15
Table 15: Share Buyback Scenario Analysis Buyback EPS Model $250mil $3.15 Scenario 1 $500mil $3.18 Scenario 2 $750mil $3.21 Scenario 3 $1.0bil $3.25
Source: J.P. Morgan estimates, Company data. Note: Scenarios imply all other P&L items held constant
$250 million in 2012, assumptions which we believe likely prove conservative (particularly 2012E). In Table 10 at left, we outline three possible scenarios for 2012 share repurchases. Dividend Is Another Lever to Increase Shareholder Returns In February 2009, Macys board of directors elected to reduce the companys quarterly dividend from 13.25 cents to 5 cents in an effort to conserve cash flow. Given increased confidence in their business and strength of recent financial results, Macy's management doubled the quarterly dividend to 10 cents in conjunction with their 1Q11 EPS release in May 2011. Looking ahead, we believe Macys will further increase its dividend allocation, given sustained free cash flow, over the next several years.
While M's inventory turnover has shown improvement recently, a substantial opportunity remains versus moderate peers Kohl's and JCP
3.6x
3.0x
16
89
90
17
Financial Outlook
3Q EPS: Modeling a Penny Above Street Consensus We estimate 3Q11 EPS for Macys of $0.17, which stands only a penny above Street consensus. We are modeling same store sales of 4.5% - in line with managements revised guidance (September SSS release: High end of 4.0%-4.5%). On margins, we are modeling gross margin compression of 24 basis points to 39.70%, primarily given the free shipping online drag and see SG&A year-over-year dollar growth of 1.85% (versus 2Q up 1.18%). In addition, we have modeled share repurchases of $50 million (10Q: As of Aug 31 had repurchased 930mil shares for $23.8 million). 4Q EPS: See $1.68 Versus Street at $1.66 We estimate 4Q11 EPS of $1.68, which is $0.02 above the Street consensus estimate of $1.66. We model same store sales of 4.4% in line with 2H guidance of 4-4.5%. On margins, we see gross margin contraction of 14bps, which is in line with guidance for down slightly and greater contraction in 3Q than 4Q. SG&A year-overyear dollar growth is modeled up 3.0%, representing leverage of 37 basis points. Finally, we expect an increase in share repurchase activity post-holiday and are modeling $100 million in 4Q. Estimating $3.15 versus the Street at $3.04 for 2012E For 2012E, we model EPS of $3.15, which is $0.11 above the Street consensus of $3.04, and reflects 16.3% EPS growth YOY. We estimate same store sales growth of 3.6% (below 2011E of 5.3% given tougher compares). We estimate EBIT margin expansion of 51 bps, which is comprised of a gross margin contraction of 11 basis points offset by SG&A leverage of 62 basis points (+2.8% growth including extra week). We are also modeling share repurchases of $250 million, which likely proves conservative. Of note, 2012 includes an extra week of sales (53 week year), which we estimate adds roughly $355 million in sales and $113 million in associated SG&A, equating to a $0.07 EPS benefit.
Table 18: Macy's Income Statement
Income Statement ($ in mil, except per share data) Net Revenues Cost of Goods Sold Gross Profit SG&A Operating Income Interest and Debt Expense, net Pretax Income Income tax (benefit) Net income before extra. Net Income GAAP EPS One Time Items Operating EPS Fully Diluted Shares O/S EPS Growth 2009 23,895.0 14,278.0 9,617.0 8,163.0 1,063.0 556.0 507.0 178.0 329.0 329.0 $0.78 $0.58 $1.36 422.0 6.0% 2010 25,003.0 14,824.0 10,179.0 8,260.0 1,894.0 508.0 1,386.0 499.4 886.6 886.6 $2.07 $0.04 $2.11 427.4 54.8% 1Q11 5,889.0 3,586.0 2,303.0 1,973.0 330.0 116.0 214.0 83.0 131.0 131.0 $0.30 $0.00 $0.30 430.0 231.2% 2Q11 5,939.0 3,457.0 2,482.0 1,976.0 506.0 111.0 395.0 154.0 241.0 241.0 $0.55 $0.00 $0.55 434.6 60.9% 3Q11E 5,875.3 3,542.8 2,332.5 2,107.3 225.2 111.3 114.0 41.3 72.6 72.6 $0.17 $0.00 $0.17 433.6 114.5% 4Q11E 8,634.4 5,081.3 3,553.0 2,312.4 1,240.7 103.8 1,136.8 412.1 724.7 724.7 $1.68 $0.00 $1.68 431.9 5.4% 2011E 26,337.6 15,667.1 10,670.5 8,368.6 2,301.9 442.1 1,859.8 690.4 1,169.4 1,169.4 $2.70 $0.00 $2.70 432.5 28.0% 2012E 27,627.8 16,466.2 11,161.6 8,606.8 2,554.8 420.0 2,134.8 789.9 1,344.9 1,344.9 $3.15 $0.00 $3.15 427.6 16.3%
18
91
92
19
Valuation
Macy's is currently trading at 9.4x our 2012 EPS estimate of $3.15, noticeably below moderate peers JCPenney (14.7x) and Kohl's (10.5x), and its more upscale competitors Nordstrom (14.0x) and Saks (19.5x). On an EV/EBITDA basis, the company is trading at 5.0x or 8%, below the department store average of 5.5x. While the company has posted industry leading top-line results, cut its expense base by $550 million, and reduced debt on the books by $2.6 billion over the past three years, Macy's valuation metrics are not reflective of a continued turnaround story, in our view. That said, we believe the turnaround effort not only has legs given current initiatives (My Macys, Direct) in place, but we see the next leg up with same-storesales and margins in 2013 as the impact of Price optimization and Omni-Channel begin to show up in the company results. Our December 2012 price target is $36, representing 22% upside from here, which is based on 11.5x our 2012 EPS estimate of $3.15. Specifically, our P/E multiple stands 100 basis points above the companys trailing three-year average, which we see fit given improving earnings prospects and upside versus Street estimates looking forward. On an EV/EBITDA basis, Macys is trading at 5.0x a 7% discount to its 3-year historical average.
20
93
JPM Rating JPM Price Target Current Price 52-Wk High 52-Wk Low Market Cap EPS 2011E EPS 2012E P/E 2011 P/E 2012 1-Yr Forward Avg P/E 3-Yr Forward Avg P/E EV/EBITDA 2011E EV/EBITDA 2012E 1-Yr Forward Avg EV/EBITDA 3-Yr Forward Avg EV/EBITDA EV/Sales P/Sales Dividend Yield FCF Yield Short Interest % Float
94
21
MI 21 OH 36 KY 7 TN 9 AL 2
CA 138/10
KS 6 OK 4
MO 15
AZ 11
LA 5
FL 61/5
HI 18
Source: Company reports and J.P. Morgan estimates.
22
95
Ronald Klein
Thomas L. Cole
Janet E. Grove
Vice Chair
96
23
24
97
2007 583.00 463.0 5,060.0 0.0 0.0 218.0 6,324.0 10,991.0 9,133.0 831.0 510.0 27,789.0 666.0 4,442.0 344.0 173.0 0.0 0.0 5,625.0 9,087.0 1,496.0 1,674.0 0.0 17,882.0 9,907.0
2008 1,385.0 360.0 4,769.0 0.0 0.0 226.0 6,740.0 10,442.0 3,743.0 719.0 501.0 22,145.0 966.0 3,910.0 28.0 222.0 0.0 0.0 5,126.0 8,733.0 1,119.0 2,521.0 0.0 17,499.0 4,646.0
2009 1,686.0 358.0 4,615.0 0.0 0.0 223.0 6,882.0 9,507.0 3,743.0 678.0 490.0 21,300.0 242.0 3,938.0 68.0 206.0 0.0 0.0 4,454.0 8,456.0 1,068.0 2,621.0 0.0 16,599.0 4,701.0
2010 1,464.0 392.0 4,758.0 0.0 0.0 285.0 6,899.0 8,813.0 3,743.0 637.0 539.0 20,631.0 454.0 4,065.0 182.0 364.0 0.0 0.0 5,065.0 6,971.0 1,245.0 1,820.0 0.0 15,101.0 5,530.0
1Q11 1,152.0 290.0 5,159.0 0.0 0.0 313.0 6,914.0 8,636.0 3,743.0 628.0 496.0 20,417.0 741.0 4,317.0 68.0 353.0 0.0 0.0 5,479.0 6,343.0 1,328.0 1,579.0 0.0 14,729.0 5,688.0
2Q11 1,495.0 369.0 4,948.0 0.0 0.0 310.0 7,122.0 8,506.0 3,743.0 618.0 519.0 20,508.0 914.0 4,069.0 119.0 336.0 0.0 0.0 5,438.0 6,162.0 1,381.0 1,564.0 0.0 14,545.0 5,963.0
$1,211.0 517.0 5,317.0 0.0 126.0 251.0 7,422.0 11,473.0 9,204.0 883.0 568.0 29,550.0 650.0 4,944.0 665.0 52.0 48.0 0.0 6,359.0 7,847.0 1,728.0 1,362.0 0.0 17,296.0 12,254.0
98
25
2006 $1,263.7 $995.0 (7.0) (191.0) 1,265.0 0.0 (49.0) 0.0 628.0 (54.0) 0.0 91.0 1,860.0 0.0 207.0 (51.0) (41.0) 25.0 (841.0) (139.0) (18.0) 12.0 3,692.0 679.0 (75.0) 0.0 (1,141.0) 0.0 0.0 1,323.0 1,787.0 17.0 (1,317.0) 1,273.0 1,146.0 (10.0) (2,680.0) (274.0) (77.0) (2,500.0) 382.0 0.0 ($4,013.0) 952.0 11.0 963.0 2,226.7
2007 $2,226.7 $818.0 16.0 0.0 1,304.0 0.0 (31.0) 0.0 219.0 0.0 0.0 60.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 256.0 33.0 3.0 (553.0) 14.0 (2.0) (9.0) 2,156.0 227.0 (111.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.0 23.0 (994.0) (789.0) 1,950.0 (18.0) (649.0) (230.0) (57.0) (3,322.0) 257.0 0.0 ($2,069.0) (702.0) (1.0) (703.0) 1,523.7
2008 $1,523.7 ($4,803.0) 0.0 0.0 1,278.0 0.0 (27.0) 0.0 187.0 0.0 5,593.0 0.0 43.0 0.0 0.0 (1.0) 291.0 (7.0) 1.0 (318.0) (146.0) (315.0) 62.0 1,838.0 38.0 (136.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 68.0 (761.0) (791.0) 650.0 (18.0) (666.0) (221.0) (116.0) (1.0) 7.0 0.0 ($365.0) 682.0 0.0 682.0 2,205.7
2009 $2,205.7 $329.0 0.0 0.0 1,210.0 0.0 (23.0) 0.0 276.0 0.0 115.0 0.0 76.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 154.0 3.0 (16.0) (172.0) 40.0 123.0 (372.0) 1,750.0 60.0 (105.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 (355.0) (377.0) 0.0 0.0 (966.0) (84.0) (29.0) (1.0) 8.0 0.0 ($1,072.0) 301.0 0.0 301.0 2,506.7
2010 $2,506.7 $886.6 0.0 0.0 1,150.0 0.0 (25.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.0 0.0 0.0 (51.0) (143.0) (10.0) 2.0 46.0 115.0 241.0 (757.0) 1,520.6 74.0 (166.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (34.0) (339.0) (465.0) 0.0 0.0 (1,245.0) (84.0) 24.0 (1.0) 43.0 0.0 ($1,263.0) (207.4) 1.0 (206.4) 2,300.3
1Q11 $2,300.3 $131.0 0.0 0.0 268.0 0.0 (4.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 113.0 (401.0) (28.0) (2.0) 240.0 (114.0) 69.0 (221.0) 67.0 4.0 (33.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 26.0 (61.0) (64.0) 0.0 0.0 (335.0) (21.0) 10.0 (2.0) 33.0 0.0 ($315.0) (312.0) 0.0 (312.0) 1,988.3
2Q11 $1,988.3 $241.0 0.0 0.0 268.0 0.0 (4.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 (77.0) 211.0 4.0 4.0 (225.0) 50.0 27.0 0.0 520.0 2.0 (55.0) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (2.0) (103.0) (158.0) 0.0 (8.0) (2.0) (43.0) (16.0) 0.0 50.0 0.0 ($19.0) 343.0 0.0 343.0 2,331.3
26
99
100
10Q2A
10Q3A
10Q4A
11Q1A
11Q2A
11Q3A
11Q4E
12Q1E
12Q2E
12Q3E
12Q4E
CY10A
CY11E
CY12E
Long Term
GDP CPI Currency A$/US$ (period end) A$/US$ (period average) Commodities
(period average)
0.7 3.1
0.8 2.7
0.3 2.6
0.8 2.3
-0.9 2.3
1.2 2.5
0.5 2.6
0.6 2.8
1.0 2.4
0.8 2.3
1.2 2.6
1.1 2.8
2.7 2.7
1.4 2.5
3.5 2.5
0.92 0.90
0.84 0.88
0.97 0.91
1.02 0.99
1.03 1.01
1.07 1.06
0.97 1.05
1.05 1.01
1.06 1.06
1.08 1.07
1.10 1.09
1.09 1.10
1.02 0.92
1.05 1.03
1.09 1.08
Gold (US$ per ounce) Silver (US$ per ounce) Oil (WTI) (US$/bbl) Aluminium (US$/lb) Copper (US$/lb) Lead (US$/lb) Nickel (US$/lb) Zinc (US$/lb) Iron Ore - Fines (USc/Fe%) Iron Ore - Lump (USc/Fe%) Coking Coal (US$/t) Thermal Coal (US$/t) Uranium (US$/lb)
1,104 16.7 79 0.99 3.29 0.96 9.78 1.01 97 112 129 85 60.0
1,213 18.6 79 0.95 3.16 0.88 10.19 0.91 194 217 200 95 59.0
1,246 19.7 77 1.00 3.44 0.97 9.87 0.95 222 249 225 103 60.3
1,370 26.6 86 1.07 3.91 1.09 10.71 1.06 209 234 209 98 64.0
1,387 31.9 96 1.15 4.37 1.17 12.21 1.10 218 244 235 120 71.5
1,509 38.5 103 1.19 4.16 1.15 10.97 1.03 281 314 330 130 65.0
1,706 38.9 90 1.10 4.08 1.11 10.00 1.02 271 303 315 128 65.0
1,789 35.8 100 1.00 3.29 0.91 8.16 0.86 263 295 285 122 65.4
1,789 35.0 110 1.07 3.74 0.99 9.07 0.91 263 295 280 124 65.8
1,739 34.1 110 1.11 3.86 1.02 9.53 0.95 260 292 260 130 66.2
1,640 33.6 115 1.16 4.20 1.03 9.98 0.98 262 294 260 124 66.6
1,540 33.2 120 1.20 4.08 1.04 9.98 1.00 264 295 250 124 67.0
1,233 20.4 80 1.00 3.45 0.98 10.14 0.98 181 203 191 95 60.8
1,598 36.3 97 1.11 3.97 1.08 10.34 1.00 258 289 291 125 66.7
1,677 34.0 114 1.13 3.97 1.02 9.64 0.96 262 294 263 126 66.4
1,150 17.5 90 1.00 2.49 0.91 8.16 0.91 118.20 132.39 150.00 150.00 65.0
Source: J.P. Morgan This material is provided for information only and is not intended as a recommendation or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument. This material is not a research report, although it may refer to information and data contained in J.P. Morgan published research reports or models from all J.P. Morgan affiliated regions. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all investors. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. The recipient of this publication must make its own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. Please refer to the most recent published research or model for complete information on the specific stocks mentioned in this publication, including important disclosures and analysts' certifications. 2011 JPMorgan Chase & Co.
101
Current Rating
6
2013
2013
2013
2013
7 19 (19) 11 16 6
5 5 37 5 9 4
6 10 9 7 8 6
76 80 88 84 74 79
81 86 71 89 76 85
86 87 73 93 79 89
N N N UW OW N
AAD ALL CWN DMP EGP FLT JET RFG SKC TAH TTS
Jun Dec Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun
1.07 2.16 7.85 6.52 3.70 17.80 0.77 2.40 2.69 2.84 2.35
11.4 10.3 44.3 31.3 28.8 140.0 5.0 25.2 20.4 (8.4) 21.2
18.3 16.4 57.5 37.0 19.2 189.3 7.4 29.2 27.0 47.7 25.4
20.9 24.7 64.1 42.5 26.0 203.1 8.7 31.8 26.9 21.1 16.9
12.6 9.5 39.8 31.0 28.8 171.0 6.4 26.1 22.7 43.8 21.5
15.1 15.7 53.8 36.6 22.6 189.3 7.4 29.2 27.0 47.6 25.5
17.7 24.1 60.4 42.0 25.8 203.1 8.7 31.8 26.9 21.4 16.9
10 4 23 20 (8) 18 2 1 2 (2)
20 65 35 18 (22) 11 17 12 19 9 18
8.5 22.7 19.7 21.0 12.8 10.4 12.1 9.2 15.2 6.5 10.9
7.1 13.7 14.6 17.8 16.4 9.4 10.4 8.2 12.8 6.0 9.2
6.1 8.9 13.0 15.5 14.3 8.8 8.8 7.6 12.8 13.3 13.9
11.5 8.5 37.0 21.9 0.0 84.0 3.0 14.5 16.0 43.0 21.5
12.0 8.0 37.0 26.0 11.3 100.0 4.0 13.0 19.0 23.5 25.8
13.0 18.0 37.0 30.0 13.0 112.0 5.0 14.0 18.0 16.8 17.0
10.8 3.9 4.7 3.4 0.0 4.7 3.9 6.0 6.0 15.1 9.2
11.2 3.7 4.7 4.0 3.1 5.6 5.2 5.4 7.1 8.3 11.0
12.2 8.3 4.7 4.6 3.5 6.3 6.5 5.8 6.7 6.1 7.2
OW OW OW N OW OW OW OW N N N
102
Current Rating
6
2013
2013
2013
2013
9 7 12 5 16 6 20
112 70 72 94 61 99 48
OW OW OW N N N OW
AQA AWE BPT ERA ESG GNM MCE MIO ORG OSH PDN ROC STO WOR WPL
Jun Jun Jun Dec Jun Mar Jun Jun Jun Dec Jun Dec Dec Jun Dec
5.18 1.15 1.11 2.04 0.83 0.25 3.26 1.67 14.05 5.88 1.55 0.33 12.12 27.80 33.38
(64) (118) (97) (102) (10) 35 34 55 186 200 (82) (1) 746 364 1759
(65) (16) 35 (3) (10) 36 34 55 673 200 (82) (14) 478 299 1766
(17.4) (22.5) (8.8) (60.0) (1.1) 3.8 46.0 20.0 19.6 15.1 (11.1) (0.1) 84.6 147.2 221.8
5.7 12.6 6.0 10.4 (1.9) 12.4 43.7 22.0 80.4 14.3 4.7 3.9 60.6 149.4 231.8
(1.8) 11.3 9.7 16.5 22.2 13.9 49.6 25.5 88.8 15.1 8.7 10.7 85.6 190.5 269.0
(17.7) (3.1) 3.2 (8.1) (1.1) 3.9 46.8 20.0 73.3 15.1 (11.1) (2.0) 54.2 120.6 222.6
5.6 12.4 6.6 10.4 (1.9) 12.4 43.7 22.0 80.4 14.3 4.7 3.9 60.6 149.4 231.8
(1.8) 11.3 9.7 16.5 (0.7) 13.9 49.6 25.5 88.8 15.1 8.7 10.7 85.6 190.5 269.0 (133) 218 (7) 10 10 (5) 105
91.7 9.3 16.8 19.6 2.0 7.5 7.9 17.5 42.5 34.0 8.5 20.0 18.6 14.7 10.1 11.4 12.4 1.8 6.6 6.8 15.8 40.3 18.4 3.1 14.2 14.6 12.7
0.0 0.0 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 6.1 50.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 86.0 113.0
0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 5.5 51.5 4.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 107.0 116.0
0.0 11.3 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 6.4 55.4 5.0 0.0 0.0 30.0 136.0 135.0
0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 2.5 3.7 3.6 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.5 3.1 3.4
0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 3.7 3.3 3.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 2.5 3.9 3.5
0.0 9.9 1.8 0.0 0.0 5.5 3.8 3.9 0.9 0.0 0.0 2.5 4.9 4.0
N OW N
51 98 10 37
N UW OW OW N N UW OW N UW
22 3 22
12 24 4
14 10 7 3 (15) 12 8
N OW N OW N UW
ANN BKL COH CSL PRY QRX RHC RMD SHL SIP
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jan
13.60 29.99 57.98 30.00 3.30 1.45 18.85 2.95 10.85 0.69
91.6 162.9 316.1 173.6 15.8 (17.4) 98.0 14.9 75.5 (19.9)
106.7 188.5 118.7 196.9 25.1 11.4 112.9 15.4 81.8 4.2
120.1 211.6 313.2 226.9 29.0 17.5 129.9 18.3 88.3 4.0
91.6 163.2 308.5 173.6 19.3 (17.4) 101.1 15.1 75.5 3.0
105.5 188.5 293.9 196.9 25.1 11.4 112.0 15.6 81.8 4.4
119.8 211.6 313.2 226.9 29.0 17.5 127.6 18.3 88.3 4.0
16 11 13 6 (30) 20 18 0 (55)
15 16 (5) 13 30 11 3 8 47
14 12 7 15 16 54 14 18 8 (8)
13.3 15.9 19.7 15.2 13.2 12.7 16.8 19.6 13.3 15.7
11.7 14.2 18.5 13.2 11.4 8.3 14.8 16.6 12.3 17.1
112 134 166 128 110 107 141 165 111 132
33.4 124.0 225.0 71.1 8.0 0.0 52.0 0.0 59.0 15.0
40.0 151.0 240.2 85.9 14.1 0.0 59.2 0.0 61.0 2.6
44.7 171.0 240.2 159.7 20.3 0.0 67.1 0.0 65.4 2.2
2.9 5.0 4.1 2.9 4.1 0.0 3.1 0.0 5.6 3.8
3.3 5.7 4.1 5.3 6.2 0.0 3.5 0.0 6.0 3.2
OW OW N OW N OW OW N OW N
103
Current Rating
6
2013
2013
2013
2013
11 301 55 17
16 351 66 16
12 309 61 (31)
21 322 67 17
25 368 73 16
(4) 2
2327 4 9
56 14 10 (14)
13.5 15.2
na 102 114 na
0 60 90 100
0 60 90 100
0 60 90 100
OW OW N OW
8 47 6 20 61 41
11 19 8 4 16 8
84 113 80 71 125 69
86 86 84 66 87 54
87 81 87 71 83 56
N OW OW N OW N
357 536 707 500 576 630 112 86 332 113 86 332 21684 24209 29784 23648 24209 29784 168 186 246 175 186 246 (1055) (263) 148 (119) 52 148 87 86 91 77 86 91 381 471 563 381 471 563 1023 1882 2472 1591 1882 2472 14 21 172 14 21 172 (356) 19 29 12 19 29 (14) (4) 30 (14) (4) 30 510 1050 1348 508 1050 1348 533 553 577 485 489 546 (60) (25) 85 (88) (23) 85 (347) 131 153 117 131 153 (59) (40) 461 (53) (40) 461 193 327 451 151 327 451 240 648 714 240 556 714 (17) 10 1 (17) 10 1 908 1338 1310 1058 1343 1310 (49) 113 140 86 100 126 629 745 824 607 721 800 230 351 615 235 351 615 237 267 398 335 267 398 148 280 226 151 280 226 (108) (3) 11 (47) (24) (10) 16525 18413 21531 16719 18413 21531 (27) (48) 301 (27) (48) 301 193 307 307 183 307 307 (4) (2) 14 (4) (2) 14 (3) (3) (12) (3) (3) (12)
43.4 57.4 3.5 13.6 454.7 559.5 25.6 33.4 (14.3) 8.0 23.9 25.1 77.5 92.7 60.5 80.7 1.7 13.8 2.2 3.4 (0.6) 3.8 250.7 321.9 34.0 35.4 (4.5) 13.7 30.2 36.7 (2.4) 26.9 109.0 150.1 60.0 66.2 2.4 0.3 174.9 171.3 43.3 53.3 202.2 224.4 26.3 46.0 85.9 129.0 43.4 42.3 (3.9) (1.6) 987.5 1159.3 (32.2) 201.3 149.7 149.6 (0.8) 3.6 (0.8) (3.2)
104
Current Rating
6
2013
2013
2013
2013
APN AUN CMJ FXJ PRT REA SKT SWM SXL TEN
Dec Dec Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Aug
0.85 1.21 2.50 0.88 0.66 12.37 5.38 3.35 1.02 0.83
(6.7) 1.3 17.8 (17.0) 7.7 53.1 30.9 38.6 11.6 3.5
14.2 4.2 16.4 10.3 7.3 61.6 32.7 43.8 15.0 8.3
15.3 5.2 17.2 11.2 7.9 71.9 33.9 44.3 16.1 9.7
13.5 5.4 16.6 11.6 7.4 52.0 30.8 37.5 12.5 7.9
14.2 6.0 16.4 11.3 7.3 61.6 32.7 41.1 15.0 8.3
15.3 7.4 17.2 11.2 7.9 71.9 33.9 41.6 16.1 9.7
8 23 5 (1) 9 17 4 1 8 17
6.3 22.6 15.1 7.5 8.9 23.8 17.5 8.9 8.1 10.4
6.0 20.0 15.3 7.7 9.0 20.1 16.4 8.1 6.8 9.9
5.6 16.3 14.5 7.8 8.3 17.2 15.8 8.1 6.3 8.5
9.4 0.0 16.5 3.0 4.5 26.0 43.5 45.0 10.0 5.1
9.9 0.0 16.5 4.0 5.5 30.8 17.5 35.0 9.0 6.3
10.7 0.0 16.5 5.6 6.0 36.0 19.0 35.0 9.7 7.3
11.1 0.0 6.6 3.4 6.8 2.1 8.1 13.4 9.9 6.2
11.7 0.0 6.6 4.5 8.3 2.5 3.4 10.5 8.9 7.1
12.6 0.0 6.6 6.4 9.0 2.9 3.5 10.5 9.5 8.3
N UW N N N OW N OW N OW
ABP AJA ALZ BWP CDI CDP CER CFX CHC CPA CQO CQR DXS FKP GMG GPT IOF LEP LLC MGR SGP TSO WDC WRT
Jun Jun Dec Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Dec Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Dec Dec
1.90 2.07 2.48 1.69 0.52 3.91 0.28 1.80 1.84 0.94 3.39 3.24 0.82 0.52 0.60 3.13 0.61 1.97 7.51 1.24 3.16 0.56 7.55 2.56
77 40 131 57 44 20 (4281) 350 60 155 132 66 358 121 392 408 135 31 493 182 755 16 1481 735
71 39 140 70 42 19 226 372 72 178 115 87 367 125 463 408 140 26 470 355 742 18 1436 566
76 40 154 70 47 20 225 386 72 195 90 92 378 139 534 423 148 27 506 376 753 18 1545 587
77 40 131 57 44 20 139 350 60 155 132 88 358 121 384 408 135 31 384 359 752 16 1481 563
71 39 131 70 42 19 145 372 72 178 107 87 367 125 463 408 140 26 457 359 742 18 1488 566
76 40 154 70 47 20 156 386 72 195 82 92 378 139 534 423 148 27 491 376 753 18 1650 587
20.9 72.4 22.7 12.6 4.9 28.2 (187.2) 12.4 20.5 6.3 26.8 21.6 7.4 10.3 5.9 22.2 5.0 32.7 86.9 5.4 31.7 4.7 64.2 24.1
18.2 66.4 24.1 13.4 4.6 26.7 9.9 13.1 24.3 7.2 23.4 29.2 7.6 10.5 6.1 23.0 5.1 16.6 82.4 10.4 31.6 5.4 62.2 18.5
18.8 68.3 26.0 13.5 5.2 27.9 9.8 13.5 23.9 7.9 18.2 30.7 7.8 11.6 6.6 23.8 5.4 17.4 88.6 11.0 32.1 5.3 67.0 19.2
20.9 72.4 22.7 12.6 4.9 28.2 6.1 12.4 20.5 6.9 26.8 28.9 7.4 10.3 5.8 22.2 5.0 19.9 67.7 10.5 31.6 4.7 64.2 18.4
18.2 66.4 24.1 13.4 4.6 26.7 6.3 13.1 24.3 7.2 23.4 29.2 7.6 10.5 6.1 23.0 5.1 16.6 80.1 10.4 31.6 5.4 64.5 18.5
18.8 68.3 26.0 13.5 5.2 27.9 6.8 13.5 23.9 7.9 18.2 30.7 7.8 11.6 6.6 23.8 5.4 17.4 86.0 11.0 32.1 5.3 71.5 19.2
6 (24) 3 4 (7) 3 (13) (1) 28 (3) (12) (18) 1 6 4 7 (12) (21) 4 13 9 (53) (15) 3659
9.1 2.9 10.9 13.4 10.6 13.9 4.5 14.5 9.0 13.7 12.7 11.2 11.0 5.0 10.4 14.1 12.2 9.9 11.1 11.7 10.0 11.8 11.8 13.9
10.4 3.1 10.3 12.6 11.1 14.7 4.3 13.8 7.6 13.0 14.5 11.1 10.8 4.9 9.8 13.6 11.8 11.8 9.4 11.9 10.0 10.5 11.7 13.8
10.1 3.0 9.5 12.5 9.8 14.0 4.0 13.3 7.7 11.9 18.6 10.6 10.4 4.4 9.1 13.2 11.1 11.3 8.7 11.2 9.9 10.6 10.6 13.3
95 28 90 117 92 132 38 125 72 112 175 99 98 42 85 124 105 106 82 106 93 99 99 125
16.5 45.5 21.5 12.0 4.1 27.8 0.0 12.7 16.5 5.5 20.1 24.8 5.2 3.0 3.5 17.3 3.9 19.7 35.0 8.2 23.7 0.0 48.4 16.6
16.5 21.0 21.7 13.0 3.9 27.8 0.0 13.1 20.2 5.8 18.2 25.9 5.3 3.4 3.6 17.9 4.0 16.6 42.0 8.2 23.7 0.0 49.6 16.9
16.8 19.9 22.1 13.5 5.1 27.8 3.0 13.5 23.9 6.3 14.9 27.4 5.5 4.2 3.9 18.6 4.1 17.4 44.0 8.8 24.7 0.0 55.2 17.4
8.7 8.7 7.1 7.9 7.1 0.0 7.1 9.0 5.9 5.9 7.7 6.4 5.8 5.8 5.5 6.5 10.1 4.7 6.6 7.5 0.0 6.4 6.5
8.7 10.1 8.7 8.0 7.8 7.1 0.0 7.3 11.0 6.1 5.4 8.0 6.5 6.4 6.1 5.7 6.7 8.5 5.6 6.6 7.5 0.0 6.6 6.5
8.8 9.6 8.9 8.0 9.8 7.1 10.9 7.5 13.0 6.7 4.4 8.5 6.7 8.1 6.6 5.9 7.1 8.9 5.9 7.1 7.8 0.0 7.3 6.8
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 0 0 0 0 0
UW OW N UW N OW N OW UW OW UW UW OW N OW N OW N OW OW UW N OW
BBG DJS FAN HVN JBH MTS MYR PBG WES WHS WOW WTF
Jun Jul Jun Jun Jun Apr Jul Jun Jun Jul Jun Jun
3.54 3.16 2.09 2.21 14.25 4.15 2.39 0.62 31.00 3.18 24.06 3.58
47.0 32.8 19.0 23.8 100.7 32.3 27.4 (14.2) 165.4 25.0 171.4 24.2
41.1 27.3 24.0 23.0 133.0 32.9 24.5 8.7 198.9 24.9 175.0 29.6
49.4 28.3 28.6 27.1 144.7 34.3 26.0 11.7 217.5 24.2 185.5 36.5
46.5 32.7 19.0 25.0 122.0 33.8 26.9 11.5 163.9 24.5 169.0 24.0
41.1 27.3 24.0 23.7 133.0 34.5 24.4 9.7 200.3 22.7 172.5 29.6
49.4 28.3 28.6 27.1 144.7 36.4 25.9 11.8 218.9 24.2 183.0 36.5
20 4 20 14 9 5 6 21 9 6 6 23
7.6 9.7 11.0 8.8 11.7 12.3 8.9 5.4 18.9 13.0 14.2 14.9
8.6 11.6 8.7 9.3 10.7 12.0 9.8 6.4 15.5 14.0 13.9 12.1
7.2 11.1 7.3 8.2 9.9 11.4 9.2 5.3 14.2 13.2 13.1 9.8
29.0 28.0 11.0 12.0 77.0 27.0 22.5 6.2 150.0 22.0 122.0 22.0
26.0 25.0 14.5 12.0 84.0 27.0 20.0 5.1 158.0 20.5 124.0 25.0
31.0 25.0 17.0 14.0 90.0 29.0 22.0 6.2 179.0 20.5 131.0 29.2
8.2 8.9 5.3 5.4 5.4 6.5 9.4 10.0 4.8 6.9 5.1 6.2
7.3 7.9 6.9 5.4 5.9 6.5 8.4 8.2 5.1 6.5 5.2 7.0
8.8 7.9 8.1 6.3 6.3 7.0 9.2 9.9 5.8 6.5 5.4 8.2
39 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
25 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
25 100 100 100 100 100 74 100 100 100 100 100
UW UW OW N N UW N N OW UW OW OW
Telecommunication Services Hutchison Telecommunications (Austral HTA iiNet IIN Telecom New Zealand (NZD) TEL Telstra Corporation TLS
567 12 2 (20)
79 11 9 9
37 14 10 6
3 76 95 90
2 77 97 93
1 75 98 98
0 100 100 80
N OW N N
105
Current Rating
6
2013
2013
2013
2013
AIA AIO AIX BCS MAP MQA QAN QRN TCL TOL VBA
Jun Jun Jun Jun Dec Dec Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun
2.36 1.48 1.87 0.80 3.30 1.36 1.49 3.16 5.42 4.61 0.36
101 145 212 (143) 174 (314) 249 350 112 281 (68)
134 283 178 (234) 168 (317) 323 424 169 306 36
144 330 193 (93) 188 (85) 420 541 191 345 109
121 189 73 (143) 426 178 402 243 385 278 (47)
144 330 81 (93) 413 250 574 541 422 345 109
7.7 6.0 34.2 (15.3) 9.4 (67.7) 11.0 14.9 7.8 39.8 (3.1)
10.1 9.7 28.7 (20.0) 9.0 (68.2) 14.3 17.4 11.6 42.8 1.6
10.9 11.3 31.1 (6.6) 10.1 (18.3) 18.5 22.2 13.2 47.4 4.9
9.2 7.7 11.7 (16.0) 22.9 38.8 17.7 10.1 26.8 39.4 (2.1)
10.1 9.7 11.6 (21.4) 20.8 47.8 18.6 17.4 28.5 42.8 1.6
10.9 11.3 13.1 (7.1) 22.2 53.9 25.3 22.2 29.1 47.4 4.9
10 26 (1) (9) 23 5 71 6 9
8 17 13 7 13 36 28 2 11 201
23.4 15.3 16.0 15.9 2.8 8.0 18.2 19.0 10.8 21.8
21.7 13.1 14.2 14.9 2.5 5.9 14.3 18.6 9.7 7.2
8.7 2.0 10.0 24.0 101.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 27.0 25.0 0.0
9.0 2.0 10.5 24.0 21.0 0.0 0.0 8.3 29.0 25.0 0.0
9.8 4.0 11.0 34.0 22.0 18.0 0.0 11.0 30.0 25.0 0.0
3.8 1.4 5.6 6.4 0.0 0.0 2.6 5.4 5.4 0.0
4.1 2.7 5.9 6.7 13.2 0.0 3.5 5.5 5.4 0.0
N OW OW UW N OW OW UW OW N N
AGK APA CEN CIF DUE ENV HDF IFN SKI SPN
Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Jun Dec Jun Dec Mar
14.61 4.23 5.70 1.10 1.65 0.65 1.61 0.28 1.21 0.99
16 13 12 4 12 14 (21)
100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0
OW N N N N UW OW N UW N
65 129 159 253 232 254 RPIAG RPIAG RPIAG Reported Profit Growth(%) 2011 2012 2013 4.4 18.3 15.5 5.2 21.0 17.6 3.7 16.6 14.6 4.5 19.1 16.9 16.0 14.8 13.3 17.1 17.4 15.8 9.9 13.2 10.8 5.1 16.0 12.3
159 4.9 9.5 11.5 8.6 9.5 254 9.1 8.0 8.6 9.1 8.0 REPSIAG REPSIAG NEPSG NEPSG NPGREPSIAG Reported EPS Growth(%) 2011 2012 2013 0.7 16.9 14.7 1.6 20.0 16.7 0.2 15.3 13.5 1.0 18.4 15.6 13.5 12.4 12.7 14.6 15.7 15.6 8.3 10.8 10.0 4.7 14.9 12.2
11.5 18 11 21 14.1 12.7 10.5 8.6 16 (12) 8 10.9 12.3 11.4 NEPSGE_REPSIA_REPSIA_REPSIA PE_NEPS PE_NEPSPE_NEPS P/E Reported (x) 2011 2012 2013 15.1 13.3 11.4 15.7 13.9 11.6 14.9 12.9 11.4 15.5 13.4 11.6 13.2 12.4 10.9 14.2 13.7 11.7 13.4 12.6 11.4 15.5 15.0 13.3 P/E Normalised (x) 2011 2012 2013 14.1 12.8 11.1 14.8 13.3 11.3 13.6 12.2 11.1 14.3 12.6 11.3 13.3 11.9 10.6 14.7 12.9 11.3 13.3 11.9 11.0 15.8 13.8 12.5
9.3 9.5 9.7 7.6 7.8 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.2 8.1 8.1 8.3 NYIELD NYIELD NYIELD GYIELD GYIELD GYIELD Net Yield (%) 2011 2012 2013 5.2 5.3 6.3 4.8 4.9 6.0 6.0 6.0 7.0 5.7 5.7 6.9 5.3 5.4 5.9 4.3 4.3 4.8 6.2 6.3 6.9 5.6 5.4 6.0 Gross Yield (%) 2011 2012 6.4 6.6 6.1 6.3 7.4 7.4 7.2 7.3 7.0 7.2 5.7 5.7 8.2 8.3 7.3 7.0
0 0 7 8 FRANK FRANK Franking (%) 2011 2012 52.4 54.2 58.1 60.2 56.4 57.7 65.0 66.6 72.4 72.7 71.4 71.8 70.3 70.1 66.4 65.6
MARKET AVERAGES Arithmetic Average Arithmetic Average (ex Financials) Arithmetic Average (ex Resources) Arithmetic Average (ex Financials) (ex Resources) Weighted Average Weighted Average (ex Financials) Weighted Average (ex Resources) Weighted Average (ex Financials) (ex Resources)
7
Normalised Profit Growth(%) 2011 2012 2013 11.0 15.5 14.1 12.3 17.7 16.0 10.3 13.9 12.6 11.6 16.0 14.5 16.7 11.4 12.6 20.1 12.5 15.2 9.3 11.1 9.7 7.3 12.8 11.0
Normalised EPS Growth(%) 2011 2012 2013 6.7 12.7 13.7 8.3 14.6 15.8 6.1 11.2 12.1 7.8 12.8 14.1 13.4 10.2 12.2 16.7 11.9 15.1 6.9 9.5 9.1 5.7 11.7 11.0
2011
2012
2013
Notes 1. All prices are in Australian dollars. Stocks with a suffix of USD or NZD or SGD are forecast in these currencies. 2. Reported earnings for financial years startingafter 31 Dec 2004 are forecast according to International Accounting Standards (IFRS). The main differences between IFRS forecasts and earlier numbers are that goodwill amortisation is not deducted and staff options are expensed. 3. Normalised earnings exclude goodwill in all periods along with P&L on FX movements, asset disposal and some other non-operational items. 4. Per share figures are calculated on a weighted average capital basis. 5. Normalised P/E relative to the arithmetic average of the market. 6. OW = Overweight, N = Neutral, UW = Underweight 7. Weighted averages are calculated using 100% market capitalisation This material is provided for information only and is not intended as a recommendation or an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any security or financial instrument. This material is not a research report, although it may refer to information and data contained in J.P. Morgan published research reports or models from all J.P. Morgan affiliated regions. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Securities, financial instruments or strategies mentioned herein may not be suitable for all investors. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. The recipient of this publication must make its own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. Please refer to the most recent published research or model for complete information on the specific stocks mentioned in this publication, including important disclosures and analysts' certifications. 2011 JPMorgan Chase & Co.
106
Analyst Certification: The research analyst(s) denoted by an AC on the cover of this report certifies (or, where multiple research analysts are primarily responsible for this report, the research analyst denoted by an AC on the cover or within the document individually certifies, with respect to each security or issuer that the research analyst covers in this research) that: (1) all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about any and all of the subject securities or issuers; and (2) no part of any of the research analyst's compensation was, is, or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed by the research analyst(s) in this report.
Important Disclosures
MSCI: The MSCI sourced information is the exclusive property of Morgan Stanley Capital International Inc. (MSCI). Without prior written permission of MSCI, this information and any other MSCI intellectual property may not be reproduced, redisseminated or used to create any financial products, including any indices. This information is provided on an 'as is' basis. The user assumes the entire risk of any use made of this information. MSCI, its affiliates and any third party involved in, or related to, computing or compiling the information hereby expressly disclaim all warranties of originality, accuracy, completeness, merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose with respect to any of this information. Without limiting any of the foregoing, in no event shall MSCI, any of its affiliates or any third party involved in, or related to, computing or compiling the information have any liability for any damages of any kind. MSCI, Morgan Stanley Capital International and the MSCI indexes are services marks of MSCI and its affiliates.
Important Disclosures for Equity Research Compendium Reports: Important disclosures, including price charts for all companies under coverage for at least one year, are available through the search function on J.P. Morgans website https://mm.jpmorgan.com/disclosures.jsp or by calling this U.S. toll-free number (1-800-477-0406). Explanation of Equity Research Ratings and Analyst(s) Coverage Universe: J.P. Morgan uses the following rating system: Overweight [Over the next six to twelve months, we expect this stock will outperform the average total return of the stocks in the analyst's (or the analyst's team's) coverage universe.] Neutral [Over the next six to twelve months, we expect this stock will perform in line with the average total return of the stocks in the analyst's (or the analyst's team's) coverage universe.] Underweight [Over the next six to twelve months, we expect this stock will underperform the average total return of the stocks in the analyst's (or the analyst's team's) coverage universe.] In our Asia (ex-Australia) and UK small- and mid-cap equity research, each stocks expected total return is compared to the expected total return of a benchmark country market index, not to those analysts coverage universe. If it does not appear in the Important Disclosures section of this report, the certifying analysts coverage universe can be found on J.P. Morgans research website, www.morganmarkets.com. Coverage Universe: Stanton, Rob: ALE Property Group (LEP.AX), CFS Retail Property Trust (CFX.AX), Carindale Property Trust (CDP.AX), Centro Retail Group (CER.AX), Charter Hall Group (CHC.AX), GPT Group (GPT.AX), Westfield Group (WDC.AX) J.P. Morgan Equity Research Ratings Distribution, as of September 30, 2011
J.P. Morgan Global Equity Research Coverage IB clients* JPMS Equity Research Coverage IB clients* Overweight (buy) 47% 51% 45% 70% Neutral (hold) 42% 44% 47% 60% Underweight (sell) 11% 33% 7% 52%
*Percentage of investment banking clients in each rating category. For purposes only of FINRA/NYSE ratings distribution rules, our Overweight rating falls into a buy rating category; our Neutral rating falls into a hold rating category; and our Underweight rating falls into a sell rating category.
Equity Valuation and Risks: For valuation methodology and risks associated with covered companies or price targets for covered companies, please see the most recent company-specific research report at http://www.morganmarkets.com , contact the primary analyst or your J.P. Morgan representative, or email research.disclosure.inquiries@jpmorgan.com . Equity Analysts' Compensation: The equity research analysts responsible for the preparation of this report receive compensation based upon various factors, including the quality and accuracy of research, client feedback, competitive factors, and overall firm revenues, which include revenues from, among other business units, Institutional Equities and Investment Banking. Registration of non-US Analysts: Unless otherwise noted, the non-US analysts listed on the front of this report are employees of non-US affiliates of JPMS, are not registered/qualified as research analysts under NASD/NYSE rules, may not be associated persons of JPMS, and may not be subject to FINRA Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communications with covered companies, public appearances, and trading securities held by a research analyst account.
Other Disclosures
107
6
J.P. Morgan ("JPM") is the global brand name for J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS") and its affiliates worldwide. J.P. Morgan Cazenove is a marketing name for the U.K. investment banking businesses and EMEA cash equities and equity research businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its subsidiaries. Options related research: If the information contained herein regards options related research, such information is available only to persons who have received the proper option risk disclosure documents. For a copy of the Option Clearing Corporation's Characteristics and Risks of Standardized Options, please contact your J.P. Morgan Representative or visit the OCC's website at http://www.optionsclearing.com/publications/risks/riskstoc.pdf Legal Entities Disclosures U.S.: JPMS is a member of NYSE, FINRA, SIPC and the NFA. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. is a member of FDIC and is authorized and regulated in the UK by the Financial Services Authority. U.K.: J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd. (JPMSL) is a member of the London Stock Exchange and is authorized and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Registered in England & Wales No. 2711006. Registered Office 125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AJ. South Africa: J.P. Morgan Equities Limited is a member of the Johannesburg Securities Exchange and is regulated by the FSB. Hong Kong: J.P. Morgan Securities (Asia Pacific) Limited (CE number AAJ321) is regulated by the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong. Korea: J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd, Seoul Branch, is regulated by the Korea Financial Supervisory Service. Australia: J.P. Morgan Australia Limited (ABN 52 002 888 011/AFS Licence No: 238188) is regulated by ASIC and J.P. Morgan Securities Australia Limited (ABN 61 003 245 234/AFS Licence No: 238066) is a Market Participant with the ASX and regulated by ASIC. Taiwan: J.P.Morgan Securities (Taiwan) Limited is a participant of the Taiwan Stock Exchange (company-type) and regulated by the Taiwan Securities and Futures Bureau. India: J.P. Morgan India Private Limited, having its registered office at J.P. Morgan Tower, Off. C.S.T. Road, Kalina, Santacruz East, Mumbai - 400098, is a member of the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (SEBI Registration Number - INB 230675231/INF 230675231/INE 230675231) and Bombay Stock Exchange Limited (SEBI Registration Number - INB 010675237/INF 010675237) and is regulated by Securities and Exchange Board of India. Thailand: JPMorgan Securities (Thailand) Limited is a member of the Stock Exchange of Thailand and is regulated by the Ministry of Finance and the Securities and Exchange Commission. Indonesia: PT J.P. Morgan Securities Indonesia is a member of the Indonesia Stock Exchange and is regulated by the BAPEPAM LK. Philippines: J.P. Morgan Securities Philippines Inc. is a member of the Philippine Stock Exchange and is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Brazil: Banco J.P. Morgan S.A. is regulated by the Comissao de Valores Mobiliarios (CVM) and by the Central Bank of Brazil. Mexico: J.P. Morgan Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., J.P. Morgan Grupo Financiero is a member of the Mexican Stock Exchange and authorized to act as a broker dealer by the National Banking and Securities Exchange Commission. Singapore: This material is issued and distributed in Singapore by J.P. Morgan Securities Singapore Private Limited (JPMSS) [MICA (P) 025/01/2011 and Co. Reg. No.: 199405335R] which is a member of the Singapore Exchange Securities Trading Limited and is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and/or JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Singapore branch (JPMCB Singapore) which is regulated by the MAS. Malaysia: This material is issued and distributed in Malaysia by JPMorgan Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (18146-X) which is a Participating Organization of Bursa Malaysia Berhad and a holder of Capital Markets Services License issued by the Securities Commission in Malaysia. Pakistan: J. P. Morgan Pakistan Broking (Pvt.) Ltd is a member of the Karachi Stock Exchange and regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan. Saudi Arabia: J.P. Morgan Saudi Arabia Ltd. is authorized by the Capital Market Authority of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (CMA) to carry out dealing as an agent, arranging, advising and custody, with respect to securities business under licence number 35-07079 and its registered address is at 8th Floor, Al-Faisaliyah Tower, King Fahad Road, P.O. Box 51907, Riyadh 11553, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Dubai: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Dubai Branch is regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) and its registered address is Dubai International Financial Centre - Building 3, Level 7, PO Box 506551, Dubai, UAE. Country and Region Specific Disclosures U.K. and European Economic Area (EEA): Unless specified to the contrary, issued and approved for distribution in the U.K. and the EEA by JPMSL. Investment research issued by JPMSL has been prepared in accordance with JPMSL's policies for managing conflicts of interest arising as a result of publication and distribution of investment research. Many European regulators require a firm to establish, implement and maintain such a policy. This report has been issued in the U.K. only to persons of a kind described in Article 19 (5), 38, 47 and 49 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (all such persons being referred to as "relevant persons"). This document must not be acted on or relied on by persons who are not relevant persons. Any investment or investment activity to which this document relates is only available to relevant persons and will be engaged in only with relevant persons. In other EEA countries, the report has been issued to persons regarded as professional investors (or equivalent) in their home jurisdiction. Australia: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in Australia to "wholesale clients" only. JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to "retail clients". The recipient of this material must not distribute it to any third party or outside Australia without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. For the purposes of this paragraph the terms "wholesale client" and "retail client" have the meanings given to them in section 761G of the Corporations Act 2001. Germany: This material is distributed in Germany by J.P. Morgan Securities Ltd., Frankfurt Branch and J.P.Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Frankfurt Branch which are regulated by the Bundesanstalt fr Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht. Hong Kong: The 1% ownership disclosure as of the previous month end satisfies the requirements under Paragraph 16.5(a) of the Hong Kong Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the Securities and Futures Commission. (For research published within the first ten days of the month, the disclosure may be based on the month end data from two months prior.) J.P. Morgan Broking (Hong Kong) Limited is the liquidity provider/market maker for derivative warrants, callable bull bear contracts and stock options listed on the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. An updated list can be found on HKEx website: http://www.hkex.com.hk. Japan: There is a risk that a loss may occur due to a change in the price of the shares in the case of share trading, and that a loss may occur due to the exchange rate in the case of foreign share trading. In the case of share trading, JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., will be receiving a brokerage fee and consumption tax (shouhizei) calculated by multiplying the executed price by the commission rate which was individually agreed between JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., and the customer in advance. Financial Instruments Firms: JPMorgan Securities Japan Co., Ltd., Kanto Local Finance Bureau (kinsho) No. 82 Participating Association / Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association and Japan Securities Investment Advisers Association. Korea: This report may have been edited or contributed to from time to time by affiliates of J.P. Morgan Securities (Far East) Ltd, Seoul Branch. Singapore: JPMSS and/or its affiliates may have a holding in any of the securities discussed in this report; for securities where the holding is 1% or greater, the specific holding is disclosed in the Important Disclosures section above. India: For private circulation only, not for sale. Pakistan: For private circulation only, not for sale. New Zealand: This material is issued and distributed by JPMSAL in New Zealand only to persons whose principal business is the investment of money or who, in the course of and for the purposes of their business, habitually invest money. JPMSAL does not issue or distribute this material to members of "the public" as determined in accordance with section 3 of the Securities Act 1978. The recipient of this material must not distribute it to any third party or outside New Zealand without the prior written consent of JPMSAL. Canada: The information contained herein is not, and under no circumstances is to be construed as, a prospectus, an advertisement, a public offering, an offer to sell securities described herein, or solicitation of an offer to buy securities described herein, in Canada or any province or
7
108
territory thereof. Any offer or sale of the securities described herein in Canada will be made only under an exemption from the requirements to file a prospectus with the relevant Canadian securities regulators and only by a dealer properly registered under applicable securities laws or, alternatively, pursuant to an exemption from the dealer registration requirement in the relevant province or territory of Canada in which such offer or sale is made. The information contained herein is under no circumstances to be construed as investment advice in any province or territory of Canada and is not tailored to the needs of the recipient. To the extent that the information contained herein references securities of an issuer incorporated, formed or created under the laws of Canada or a province or territory of Canada, any trades in such securities must be conducted through a dealer registered in Canada. No securities commission or similar regulatory authority in Canada has reviewed or in any way passed judgment upon these materials, the information contained herein or the merits of the securities described herein, and any representation to the contrary is an offence. Dubai: This report has been issued to persons regarded as professional clients as defined under the DFSA rules. General: Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but JPMorgan Chase & Co. or its affiliates and/or subsidiaries (collectively J.P. Morgan) do not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to JPMS and/or its affiliates and the analyst's involvement with the issuer that is the subject of the research. All pricing is as of the close of market for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies to particular clients. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decisions regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. JPMS distributes in the U.S. research published by non-U.S. affiliates and accepts responsibility for its contents. Periodic updates may be provided on companies/industries based on company specific developments or announcements, market conditions or any other publicly available information. Clients should contact analysts and execute transactions through a J.P. Morgan subsidiary or affiliate in their home jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. "Other Disclosures" last revised September 30, 2011.
Copyright 2011 JPMorgan Chase & Co. All rights reserved. This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of J.P. Morgan. #$J&098$#*P
109
Banks
Research Sales
(61-2) 9220 1803 (61-2) 9220 1528 (61-2) 9220 1550 (61-2) 9220 1596 (61-2) 9220 1527 (61-2) 9220 1525 (61-2) 9220 1593 (61-2) 9220 3051 (61-2) 9220 1815 (61-2) 9220 1606 (61-2) 9220 1538 scott.r.manning@jpmorgan.com james.nicholias@jpmorgan.com bharat.k.anand@jpmorgan.com siddharth.x.parameswaran@jpmorgan.com uma.x.joshi@jpmorgan.com russell.j.gill@jpmorgan.com laurent.j.horrut@jpmorgan.com jarrod.mcdonald@jpmorgan.com thomas.g.beadle@jpmorgan.com scott.j.carroll@jpmorgan.com william.en.loh@jpmorgan.com stuart.a.jackson@jpmorgan.com matthew.h.ryan@jpmorgan.com richard.x.szabo@jpmorgan.com megan.a.freeman@jpmorgan.com shaun.r.cousins@jpmorgan.com shen.w.li@jpmorgan.com kirsty.a.mackay-fisher@jpmorgan.com carolyn.j.holmes@jpmorgan.com jason.h.steed@jpmorgan.com christopher.r.laybutt@jpmorgan.com keith.chau@jpmorgan.com anthony.g.passede.silva@jpmorgan.com william.en.loh@jpmorgan.com steven.d.wheen@jpmorgan.com anasuya.x.ramesh@jpmorgan.com richard.b.jones@jpmorgan.com michael.john.scott@jpmorgan.com rob.a.stanton@jpmorgan.com scott.x.molloy@jpmorgan.com russell.j.gill@jpmorgan.com garry.sherriff@jpmorgan.com armina.x.soemino@jpmorgan.com damon.callaghan@jpmorgan.com fraser.jamieson@jpmorgan.com mark.busuttil@jpmorgan.com andrew.x.muir@jpmorgan.com joseph.x.kim@jpmorgan.com luke.nelson@jpmorgan.com benjamin.x.wilson@jpmorgan.com daniel.butcher@jpmorgan.com paul.m.brunker@jpmorgan.com armina.x.soemino@jpmorgan.com stephen.b.walters@jpmorgan.com helen.e.kevans@jpmorgan.com ben.k.jarman@jpmorgan.com berowne.d.hlavaty@jpmorgan.com james.eustace@jpmorgan.com garry.sherriff@jpmorgan.com stephen.j.blagg@jpmorgan.com
SALES AND TRADING (61-2) 9220 1821 (61-2) 9220 3191 (61-2) 9220 1651 (61-2) 9220 1642 (61-2) 9220 1849 (61-2) 9220 1585 (61-3) 9633 4012 (61-3) 9633 4014 (61-2) 9220 1650 (61-2) 9220 1683 (61-2) 9220 7745 (61-2) 9220 3003 (61-2) 9220 1632 (61-2) 9220 3109 (61-2) 9220 1673 (61-2) 9220 1592 (61-2) 9220 1668 (61-2) 9220 1574 (61-2) 9220 1658 (61-2) 9220 1691 (61-2) 9220 1956 (61-2) 9220 3134 (61-2) 9220 3171 (61-2) 9220 1682 (61-2) 9220 3049 (61-2) 9220 3258 (61-2) 9220 1561 (61-2) 9220 1513 (61-2) 9220 3220 (61-2) 9220 1547 (61-2) 9220 3145 (61-2) 9220 3228 (61-2) 9220 1353 (61-2) 9220 1334 (61-2) 9220 7962 (85-2) 2800 8887 (85-2) 2800 8886 (65) 6882 2060 (65) 6882 2306 (44-207) 742 8320 (39-02) 8895 2715 (44-207) 779 2228 (44-207) 779 2400 (1-212) 622 2554 (1-212) 622 2592 (1-212)-622 2550 (61-2) 9220 1387
Insurance
Siddharth Parameswaran Uma Joshi Diversified Financials Russell Gill
Richard Newton Mark Malouf Edward Clegg Amy Krizanovic Andrew Fincher Richard Bailey Alistair Drummond James Casey
Retail
Shaun Cousins Shen Li
Infrastructure
Kirsty Mackay-Fisher Carolyn Holmes Jason Steed Chris Laybutt Keith Chau Anthony Passe-De Silva William Loh Healthcare Steven Wheen Anasuya Ramesh
Stock Lending
Mark Bradley Nicholas Sayers
Corporate Access
Rebecca Thompson Donna Murphy
Property Trusts
Richard Jones Michael Scott Rob Stanton Scott Molloy
Equity Derivatives
Mark Dewar Stuart Cook John Manchee Joanne Comminos Olivia Cartwright Henry Polkinghorne Alex Menzies Grace Chan
Emerging Companies
Russell Gill Garry Sherriff Armina Soemino Damon Callaghan
ASIA
Resources
UK/EUROPE
Fraser Jamieson Mark Busuttil Andrew Muir Joseph Kim Luke Nelson
USA
Derek Kellett Nik Kritikos Alexander Stewart Christine Biggs
Strategy
Paul Brunker Armina Soemino
Economics
Database
Stephen Blagg
110