Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
o Explain what a Transfer is, its form and content
o Identify who prepares the Transfer and when it is prepared
o State where the prescribed form of Transfer may be obtained from and identify the correct form to use
o Draft a Transfer for No. 7 Jalan Nipah
o Explain who should sign the Transfer, and the accompanying certificates, and how the Transfer may be
signed out of Singapore
Approved forms
51. —(1) The forms from time to time approved by the Registrar shall be used for all instruments intended to
affect registered land.
(2) The Registrar may register any instrument containing departures from an approved form and the instrument
shall be deemed to be in a form approved by the Registrar.
Description of land
54. —(1) Every instrument lodged for registration shall refer to the folio and the lot intended to be dealt with.
(2) Subject to section 54A, where a dealing referred to in an instrument affects part of any land comprised in a
folio and such dealing does not contravene the provisions of the Planning Act (Cap. 232) or require the allocation
of a new survey lot number by the Chief Surveyor for that part of the land, the instrument lodged for registration
shall be accompanied by a plan which will enable the land to be identified with certainty.
Obtaining of lot or strata lot number
54A. —(1) Where a proprietor intends to sell part of a parcel of any land or part of a building, he shall, after he
has obtained the approval of the relevant authority and before he enters into a sale and purchase agreement for
such part, either —
(a) obtain from the Chief Surveyor a lot or strata lot number for the proposed part; or
(b) deposit with the Registrar a schedule and plan of the proposed subdivision of the parcel or building showing
the new property addresses.
[25/2001;30/2003]
(2) Notwithstanding section 165, the Registrar shall refuse to accept any caveat or charge or such other
instrument for lodgment unless the proprietor has complied with subsection (1).
• (B) Transferor
o Transferor should be of full age and capacity.
o Person under legal disability cannot transfer any interest in property unless there is a court order
e.g. empowering a guardian of an infant/committee of the estate of the person of unsound mind to
execute on his behalf.
• (C) Transferee
o If transferee is infant, his DOB should be stated in the instrument. His DOB will then be shown on
the land-register. The registrar will not register in instrument executed by infant.
o Statutory requirement for details on citizenship to be filled in – s19(1) Residential Property Act.
Solicitor for transferee required to certify that the citizenship of his client is correctly filled in –
s19(2) Residential Property Act. Transfer may be refused registration if the required particulars
(citizenship & IC or passport no) are not filled in or if certification required in s19(2) is not
effected.
o Note that when transferee is not Singapore citizen, the transfer should state whether he is or is not
a permanent resident. In the case of companies, place of incorporation/registration and its
registration number must be stated.
Every transfer of land to specify citizenship status of purchaser or place of registration or incorporation of
a body corporate.
19. —(1) In every instrument of transfer of land (other than a mortgage, charge or reconveyance) lodged with the
Registrar on or after 1st July 1977 there shall be specified, after the name of the person acquiring an estate or
interest in land, the name of the country of which he is a citizen, together with the number of the identity card
issued to him under the National Registration Act or other evidence of his citizenship if he is a citizen of
Singapore and, if he is a citizen of any other country, the number of his passport and of his identity card (if he has
been issued with one); and where the purchaser is a body corporate there shall be specified its place of
registration or incorporation.
Cap. 201.
(2) Every such person acquiring a title or interest in land under such instrument shall certify on the instrument
that the particulars specified in accordance with subsection (1) are correct, and if that person employs an
advocate and solicitor to act for him, the advocate and solicitor shall so certify in such form as may be approved
by the Registrar. For the purposes of this subsection, the Registrar may require the production of such document
as he may think fit.
(3) The Registrar has the power to refuse registration of any such transfer wherein the particulars required by
subsection (1) are not specified or wherein the certification required by subsection (2) has not been effected, and
where the Registrar has accepted any such transfer, he has the power to cancel the provisional registration of any
such transfer or require the person lodging the transfer to withdraw it from registration.
(4) Where the Registrar intends to exercise the power conferred on him by subsection (3) to cancel the
provisional registration of any such transfer or to require the person lodging such transfer to withdraw it from
registration, he shall give notice in writing to that effect, and shall not for a period of 6 weeks of the date of the
notice cancel the provisional registration of any such transfer; and where any such notice requires the transfer to
be withdrawn and if during that period subsection (1) or (2) has not been complied with, the Registrar may
cancel the provisional registration of such transfer and shall not be bound to give any further notice before
effecting such cancellation.
(5) This section shall apply to every instrument of transfer of land irrespective of whether the land is residential
property or otherwise.
• Manner of Holding
o Indicate whether Joint Tenancy or Tenancy in Common in equal shares or in _____ shares
o For unequal shares:
As to A: undivided 1/3 share
As to B: undivided 2/3 share
o Where the manner of holding is not stated, the following presumptions will be made pursuant to
s53 LTA
Where there are co-owners claiming under an instrument and no manner of holding is
stated, it shall be presumed that they intent to hold as joint tenants; and
Where the co-owners are described as tenants in common, they shall in the absence of
any intention to the contrary, be presumed to be entitled to equal shares.
• (F) Consideration
o Purchase price
• (I) Certificates Pursuant to the Residential Property Act, Land Titles Rules and Practice Circulars
o Lawyer acting for purchaser has to certify in accordance with the Consolidated Practice Circulars
2003 that the citizenship and other particulars or the company’s place of incorporation and
registration number are correct
o Where Purchaser is a Singapore company or a Singapore society,
photocopy of the CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE issued by the controller of Residential
Property must be attached to the transfer/deed, together with
STATUTORY DECLARATION made by a director/secretary of the Singapore company
or managing trustee of the Singapore society stating in essence that the company is a
Singapore company in the forms shown in Consolidated Practice Circulars 2003.
o Where Purchaser is not a S’pore citizen, S’pore company or S’pore society, lawyer for the
purchaser would have to do the following:
If the property is NOT RESIDENTIAL PROP,
certify that it is not residential property in accordance with the Consolidated
Practice Circulars 2003 –
see p217 manual
If it is RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY which is NOT subject to the prohibitive provisions of
the Residential Property Act,
certify in accordance with Consolidated Practice Circulars 2003 – building not
less than 6 levels, “non-residential property” under Residential Property
Notification and has been zoned for other purposes –
see p217-8 manual
If the property is RESTRICTED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY e.g. bungalow, semi-
detached or terrace house,
the lawyer would have first to satisfy himself that purchaser has been granted
approval by the minister to acquire the property and provide documentary
evidence to the Registrar in the from of a photocopy of the letter of approval
issued by the Controller of Residential Property.
RPA:
Prohibition on transfer to, or purchase or acquisition by, foreign persons of residential property.
3. —(1) Except as provided in this Act —
(a) no person shall, whether for consideration or by way of gift inter vivos or otherwise, transfer any residential
property or any estate or interest therein to any foreign person;
(b) no person shall create any trust for sale in respect of any residential property or any estate or interest therein
in favour of any foreign person; and
(c) no foreign person shall purchase or acquire any residential property or any estate or interest therein except by
way of a mortgage, charge or reconveyance.
Certificate of correctness
59. —(1) The Registrar may reject any application to bring land under the provisions of this Act, or any other
instrument purporting to deal with or to affect land (whether registered or unregistered), unless there is endorsed
thereon a certificate by the parties to the instrument that it is correct for the purposes of this Act.
(2) The certificate by any party to the instrument shall imply representations that to the best of the signatory’s
knowledge and belief and in so far as he has any reasonable means of ascertaining —
(a) the instrument is made in good faith;
(b) the matters set forth therein are substantially correct; and
(c) in the case of —
(i) a person acquiring title, the person acquiring title thereunder accepts proprietorship and (unless otherwise
expressed in the instrument) is of full age and legal capacity; or
(ii) a person divesting title, the person divesting title thereunder is the party entitled to divest the interest under
the instrument and is of full age and legal capacity.
[25/2001]
(3) Where —
(a) a solicitor has been employed by a party to the instrument, the certificate referred to in subsection (2) shall be
signed by the solicitor; or
(b) a solicitor has not been employed by a party to the instrument, the party himself shall sign the certificate
referred to in subsection (2) and if the party is a corporation, a responsible officer of the corporation shall sign
the certificate.
[25/2001]
(3A) Where any instrument is executed by an attorney (within the meaning of Part XVI) for a party to the
instrument, the certificate by the attorney shall imply representations that, to the best of the belief of the attorney
or (as the case may be) the solicitor employed, the attorney has the authority to act as the agent for and on behalf
of the party in respect of that instrument.
[25/2001]
(4) Each certificate shall indicate in legible characters —
(a) the name and capacity of the signatory; and
(b) where it is signed by a solicitor employed by the party to the instrument, the solicitor holds a practising
certificate which is in force as at the date of the instrument.
[25/2001;10/2003]
(5) Where the certificate is signed by any party (including a solicitor who is a party acquiring or divesting title
under the instrument), or by an officer of any corporation, divesting or acquiring title, the Registrar may in order
to satisfy himself as to the identity and capacity of the signatory require such person to appear before him.
(6) Any person who falsely certifies to the correctness of any application, dealing or caveat shall be guilty of an
offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $5,000 and such penalty shall not prevent a
person who may have sustained any damage or loss in consequence of errors or mistakes in any such certified
application, dealing or caveat from recovering damages against the person who has certified the same.
(7) In any instrument which is registered under the provisions of this Act, any reference to “Certificate of
Correctness” shall be construed as a reference to a certificate of correctness given under this section or any
corresponding provision in any repealed enactment.
[25/2001]
(8) In this section, “solicitor” means a solicitor who has in force a practising certificate issued under the Legal
Profession Act (Cap. 161).
Doctrine of Merger
- doctrine of merger
- where parties enter into an executory agreement which is to be carried out by a deed afterwards, the real
completed contract is to be found in the deed
- execution of the deed of conveyance has the effect of extinguishing obligations under the contract only in so
far as the deed is intended to cover the same ground as the contract
- contract then merges in the deed
- depends on the intention of the parties
- ACS Computer Pte Ltd v Rubina Watch Co (Pte) Ltd & Anor [1998] 1 SLR 72, High Court:
• Where parties intend a contractual term to be binding notwithstanding the completion of the sale, it is
quite common to have a condition in the contract which reads as follows –
“notwithstanding the completion of the sale and purchase of the property, the terms and conditions
shall remain in full force and effect as between the vendor and the purchaser in so far as the same
are not fulfilled.”
• Held that doctrine of merger applied to registered land despite s. 66 Land Titles Act which on a literal
reading, excluded the qualification that the doctrine of merger depended on the intention of the parties
Merger of contract in transfer
66. All obligations created by a contract for the sale of registered land shall, upon registration of the
transfer giving effect to the contract, be deemed to have merged in that transfer unless express
provision in writing is made to the contrary.
• S. 66 provides that “all obligations created by a contract for the sale of registered land shall, upon
registration of the transfer giving effect to the contract, be deemed to have merged in that transfer
unless provision in writing is made to the contrary”
• Held that s. 66 can be reconciled with the common law doctrine of merger by confining the operation of
s. 66 to those provisions of the contract of sales which deal with estates and interests in the land
contracted to be sold, and all easements rights and powers belonging or appertaining to the land
• Provisions, in the absence of any express provision in the contract to the contrary, would merge in the
transfer
• Provisions not dealing with or related to would not merge in the transfer
• Held that provision in the contract for sale which imposed liability on the purchaser for payment of
GST, had not merged in the transfer
Facts
The plaintiffs ACS offered to sell units in a Henderson Industrial Estate to the defendants Rubina
under two separate options. The options were subject to the Singapore Law Society’s Conditions of
Sale 1994. Clause 17 of the terms and conditions of the option provided that the purchaser was laible
and must pay the goods and services tax (GST) and stamp duty for and in connection with the sale
and purchase of the property. The sale was in each case completed by an instrument of transfer.
There was no mention of GST by either party before the completion of the sale. There was no
mention of it until some time in May 1996 when ACS’s solicitors raised it with Rubina’s solicitors
and asked that it be paid. Rubina refused, arguing that upon completion of the sale by the execution
and registration of the transfer, the obligation of Rubina in that regard had merged with the transfer,
and that they were no longer under any liability. The main question involved the question of merger
under s 66 of the Land Titles Act (Cap 157) (“the Act”). ACS argued that under the common law, the
conveyance of land extinguished obligations under the contract only in so far as the deed of
conveyance was intended to cover the same ground as the contract. These obligations did not merge
in the conveyance. The assistant registrar held that the doctrine of merger did not disentitle ACS
from claiming GST under cl 17 of the option. Rubina appealed.
Held, dismissing the appeal:
(1) Section 66 of the Act appeared to negate the doctrine of merger as developed by and entrenched
in the common law. Instead of approaching the question whether a contractual provision had merged
in the transfer in the manner of the common law, the terms in which s 66 was cast prescribe that all
obligations in the sale contract merge in the transfer unless express provision in writing was made to
the contrary. It was entirely possible to reconcile the apparently wide wording of s 66 with the
common law doctrine of merger by construing the section in the context of the Act as a whole as well
as the context of the neighbouring provisions in the part of the Act where s 66 was found.
(2) In the context of the part of the act where s 66 was found, particularly s 63(1), s 66 could be
reconciled with the common law rule and full effect could be given to both if one were to confine the
operation of s 66 to those provisions of the contract of sale which dealt with estates and interests in
the land contracted to be sold, and all easements rights and powers belonging or appertaining to the
land. Provisions of the contract relating to such matters, in the absence of any express provisions in
the contract to the contract, would merge in the transfer, since according to s 63(1), the registration
of the transfer would pass and vest the land and such easements, rights and powers to and in the
transferee. Section 66 thus made perfect sense when read as an adjunct to s 63(1).
(3) Construing s 66 this way would lead to the result that the rules of merger applied similarly to
dealings in land subject to the Act and dealings in unregistered land. There was no reason at all why
different rules should apply depending on whether land had or had not been brought under the Act.
As such, notwithstanding the registration of the transfer in both cases, Rubina’s liability for GST had
not been extinguished.
Sample questions
Let’s make it more fun … (non citizen cannot sell residential land to make quick profit – this will not happen in
case but assuming both are Singaporeans)
Suppose Sam Tan and Amanda Smith subsells the property to Lim Koh Pee ID No. 7355456B of No. 3 Lah Tay
Lane, Singapore 578899 at a price of S$1.88m.
• Lim exercises the option on 22nd Aug 2006, and completion is scheduled for 14th Nov 2006
• Lim Ah Chye is stationed in Beijing. How can he sign the transfer?
Note: after 1996, stamp fees paid on contract and not on transfer. (no need to pay stamp fees twice in subsale
situations)
Possible solutions
- 1. Fly back to Singapore just to sign the Transfer?
Expensive solution
- 2. Send the T to him in Beijing for signing (courier). If so, T must be signed before a Notary Public
– sg rules
but in china, must be in chinese
also certain banks want notary public to be authenticated by respective ambassy or high
commission and get them to certify that signature is authentic and notary public is recognised
• fees and time – need leeway for extra time and costs but prudent
- 3. Appoint someone in Singapore by a Power of Attorney to handle the matter on his behalf, including
signing documents like the transfer documents
Assume that Tan (orginal purchaser) has appointed his wife, W as his attorney – his power of
attorney is dated 1 July 2004 and a copy of it has been deposited in the Registry Supreme Court on
2 July 2004 and is registered as No. 123 of 2004.
o W can sign on Tan’s behalf
How the “Execution” portion should read:
o “W on behalf of Tan acting under a Power of Attorney dated 1 July 2004, copy
of which has been deposited in the Registry, Supreme Court on 2 July 2004 and
registered as No. 123 of 2004.
quite cheap now
but power of attorney cannot confer power to –
• make stat declaration
but options/transfesr/sale and purchase agreements/deeds – can be signed
In both transfers, transferee does NOT sign the transfer form since he is acquiring the
interest. Only parties who divest their interests need to sign.