Row Labels A JYOTI ANAND REETI SHIPA PRIYA B ADITYA KUMAR KUNAL YASHRAJ MUKUL KUMAR NANDAN KUMAR

NIKHIL JAISWAL PANKAJ KUMAR RAKESH SINGH RICHA-1 RICHA-2 RUCHI KUMARI BARPITA JUBY CHANDRA PRAKASH PRIYANKA PATHAK SHALINI B+ AMRITA KUMARI AYUSH KUMAR GARGI PRAGYA VACAKNAVI GARIMA RAJ LAXMI RAKESH KUMAR JHA SAURABH KUMAR SHRESTHA SWARNIM LATA KARN SWATI SINGH VIVEK RANJAN C ABHAS AMAR ANIKET KUMAR HARSH VARDHAN MANISH VERMA RAKESH KUMAR SINGH SAURAV NISHANT SHALINI KUMARI SHRAVAN KUMAR GUPTA SUMIT KAPOOR SURBHI PRIYA DERSHANI

Sum of Ranks 7 4 2 34 18 16 6 19 35 20 28 1 23 26 24 14 29 10 5 3 17 15 11 8 12 32 25 9 33 21 22 13 27 31 37 38 36 30

Chandragupt Institute of Management Patna BATCH-III/Academic Year: 2010-2012 General Aptitude Marks 44

S.no 1

Roll no. 30001

Name ABHAS AMAR

Academic Ranks 33

% 78.6%

ADITYA KUMAR 2 30003

34 29 51.8%

AMRITA KUMARI 3 30005

10 29 51.8%

ANIKET KUMAR 4 5 6 30006 30007 30008 ARPITA JUBY AYUSH KUMAR CHANDRA PRAKASH 7 30009 GARGI PRAGYA VACAKNAVI 8 9 30011 30012 GARIMA

21 32 26 5 24 32 3 29 17 18 51.8% 32.1% 57.1% 24 36 57.1% 42.9% 64.3%

HARSH VARDHAN 10 30013 JYOTI ANAND 11 30014 KUNAL YASHRAJ 12 30015

22 53 7 42 18 43 76.8% 75.0% 94.6%

MANISH VERMA 13 30017 MUKUL KUMAR 14 15 30018 30019 NANDAN KUMAR NIKHIL JAISWAL 16 30021 PANKAJ KUMAR 30022 30024 PRIYANKA PATHAK 30025 RAJ LAXMI RAKESH KUMAR JHA 30026 30027 RAKESH KUMAR SINGH RAKESH SINGH 30028 30030 REETI RICHA-1 30031 30032 RICHA-2 30034 RUCHI KUMARI SAURABH KUMAR 27 28 30035 30036 SAURAV NISHANT SHALINI

13 28 16 42 6 19 39 35 14 15 11 27 20 4 28 1 23 8 43 31 29 23 41.1% 42 76.8% 75.0% 36 42 27 64.3% 75.0% 48.2% 44 21 47 49 45 29 37 78.6% 37.5% 83.9% 87.5% 80.4% 51.8% 66.1% 69.6% 35 75.0% 62.5% 50.0%

17 18 19 20 21 22 23

24 25 26

29

30037

SHALINI KUMARI 30 30038 SHIPA PRIYA 31 32 30040 30041 SHRAVAN KUMAR GUPTA

37 37 2 42 38 41 75.0% 73.2% 66.1%

SHRESTHA 33 34 35 36 37 38 30042 30043 SUMIT KAPOOR

12 25 36 30 32 25 9 28 30 24 29 37 44.6% 50.0% 53.6% 42.9% 51.8% 66.1%

SURBHI PRIYA DERSHANI 30044 30045 SWARNIM LATA KARN 30046 SWATI SINGH 30047 VIVEK RANJAN

Faculty Signature

Interview 1 Grade C

Prospective sect/companies Jeevika/Banks/Sales/HR

FMCG

B+

KPO/NDDB

C BB+

Analytics, KPO, Finance Banking, HR FMCG

B-

ANM soft/FMCG/ TAS/NDDB/Marketing research Banks/NDDB

B+ B+

KPO/Banks

TAS/NDDB

Banks/FMCG

Banking/Sales

B B

KPO/Finance/NDDB Finance/KPO

IT/ FMCG / Marketing

B BB+ B+ C B A

FMCG/Banking HR HR KPO/Finance Sales/Airtel/Jeevika Mother dairy TAS/NDDB/KPO

B B B

Banking/Jeevika/Marketing KPO/finance Banking/marketing

B+ C

KPOs/NDDB Airtel/hardcore sales/Jeevika

B-

HR companies / Banking

Banking/Jeevika/Marketing

A C

HR consultants/TAS/HR Airtel/hardcore sales/Jeevika

B+ C C B+ B+ B+

HR companies Airtel/hardcore sales/Jeevika Arranging job on her own HR NDDB/KPO/marketing FMCG

Interview feedback 1 Very difficult to place, not prepared at all, very monotonous, english is not a problem but no content

Interview 2 Grade

Need to improve communication skills, not very clear about career goal, audit profile but want to go in sales

B-

Good energy, good communciaiton

Poor commucation skills, he is placable if he works hard No energy, voice feeble, need to work on content, strong points not getting highlighted Good communication skills and marketing concepts, however not prepared Not prepared well, has 27 month of work exp. In technical at low salary. No content. Could be very difficult to place Not prepared well, need to work hard and talk about her strong points Bubbling with energy, communication is very good, good clarity of thought, need to prepare more on content

C min

B+

Not hard working, voice very feeble, poor communcation

B-

Need to work more on the content Need to work on tell me sth, very strong words, egoistic, ruthless, need to work on content more

B+

Very poor communication, voice feeble, simply throws words without understanding them, very casual, potentaially unplacable candidtate unless he works hard, presentablity is very poor BCouldn't leverage his experience and rich CV, need to work on the content and communciation skill to some extent Need to improve communication skills, not able to leverage his strong points Good communciation, structuruing of answer very bad, average attitude, functional knowledge is good, general awareness is not good. B+ Communciation is slightly better, however need to work hard, voice is good, not able to answer the indepth question when he is grilled. Need to work on content more Need to work hard, communciation skills is good Communcation problem, need to improve on general awareness Meek, no attitude, communication problem, unplacable Need to improve communication skills, need to work on content, too much focussed on mother diary Good, need to work on the content Needs to more assertive, no desire to learn, not dillgent, no functional knowledge and general awareness, however attitude, communication is good Need to work on communciation skills Speaks a lot, not very structured, need to work on content

Good, need to work on the content voice very feeble, poor communciation skills, need to work very hard Poor communciation, lack of knowledge, attitude is good, if she works hard, she is placable, general awareness is really bad Poor communciation, lack of knowledge, attitude is good, if she works hard, she is placable, general awareness is really bad

Good but needs to work harder Poor commucation skills, structuring problem, no professional example, very difficult to place

Need to improve english, good arguments, however she got stuck, could lead the interview, presentability is good, energy is also good. Poor commucation skills, structuring problem, no professional example, very difficult to place Very difficult to place, not prepared at all need to work on general questions, communciation is good, Good but need to work on the content Communciation is good, however need to work on functional content

Interview feedback2

Functional Test (Marketing + Finance + HR) 3/10

Not very clear about marketing and finance..functional knowledge is still very poornot clear about future.. COverall performance good..presentation good..attitude is good..she is pleasing..but lacks confidence in functional knowledge.. Poor performance, function knowledge extremely poor, structuring was very bad..performance worse than last time..need to work very hard.. 5/10 B+ Need to work on tell me sth about yourself, english not proficient.. Not prepared well..need not limit to only MR..opening is good..

B B

lack of enthusiam, trying to improve..functional knowledge to be improved. Poor listening skills.. Need to work a little harder..overall she is very good. C + Tell me something improved..but still need to improve.. C+

communication still not effective, voice still feeble..need to work hard on your concepts C

Interview performance improved..

D 3/10 5/10

C-

C C+ Need to work a lot harder. Need to steer the interviewer towards finance focus.. C-

4/10

C Opening was impressive. She has lot of content..need to focus more on functional preparation 4/10 C

2/10 C B5/10 C+ B-