Questions not answered You lent 100 euros with a salary of 100 euros and 500 euros to someone

with a sa lary of 1000 euros. The first owes you 100% of his salary while the second owes you 50% of his salar y. By what logic do you go after the first person who can not pay his debt and lea ve the second you can afford to pay? Why try to get the 100 and not the 500? This is what happens with the IMF. I saw on the Internet the list of the debts of all countries in the world. a few Examples ... -Germany with a 5 trillion deficit is in debt at 155% of GDP. France-again with a 5 trillion in debt at 188% of GDP. The U.S.with a 13 trillion deficit has a debt of 94% of their GDP. So obviously its not really a matter of the size of the debt as the percentage on the gross domestic product. GDP After a few glances at the table some questions arise: Question 1. How is it that while Luxembourg, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Fran ce, Denmark and Austria have a greater proportion of debt from us, they do not n eed backing, but instead they come to save us? Question 2. How is Afghanistan, with nearly half a century of continuous wars have only 23% of GDP in debt, when we know that a war of a few days can cripple a country? Question 3. How can these countries owe: 29% Kuwaiti, 54% Bahrain and the Unit ed Arab Emirates 56%being our global suppliers of oil? Question 4. How is Switzerland with 271% debt, a simple cleaning to a hospital ( about 2000) to be paid a salary of 2000 euros while at the same time in Greece, a (in the dirty-coal plants PPC) a "high-salary" technician, with a higher level of education, integrated in yper-varea/anthygieina with 25 years experience, be paid the same? Question 5. How does Norway with 143% debt not have a problem and you do not ha ve a need for backing or cuts? A real example from there: A person I know Know moved to Norway two years ago. Take a look now what "happened" to him there: a) he got a job in a restaurant kitchen as unskilled and took a 2,500 euros mon thly salary! b) After three months on the job said it reported being "mentally tired" and imm ediately got given him 15 days of leave! c) With tax refunds (something like our own annual gift) he went with his wife i n Tibet on holiday. d) Now he is unemployed (with the excuse he did not like where he worked!) and f or two years will be recieving 1700 euros a month! Question 6. Why the world's lenders are not worried about losing the 13, 5 trill ion they are owed by the U.S., the 2 trillion owed by Luxembourg, and the 9 tr illion owed by England (etc etc) but are concerned about the 500 billion that we owe? Question 7. How is it that the entire population of the earth owes the 98% of their money? Question 8. Who have so much and can lend so much money? Question 9. Where did they get so much money from?

Question 10. Why is their money not involved in the GDP of their country? Eventually perhaps these figures show that the global economy is not only a huge bubble, while the money is fake, printed in the depths of multinational banks o nly to achieve a global control.