Professional Documents
Culture Documents
27 October 2009
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Project Background
MWSSP III, Laiban Dam, Other Water Sources
YIELD (MLD)
1,909 1,280 3,170 777
Remarks
Most economic source (1987) Socially unacceptable (1987) Only after Kaliwa (transbasin) Implemented 1998, to undergo rehab, additional source (190 MLD) Pollution control measures before exploitation for water supply Requires 1.95 m dike in the bay (1992) Pumping cost energy relatively high Not recommended due volcanic hazard For local supply only For local supply only
Stage 1
1,803 (550)/0 1,500 1,830 (550)/290
Stage 2
3,310 3,000 1,500 1,500 3,310
Total
5,110 3,000 3,000 3,330 3,600
Stage 1 Cost and Commissioning Dates, Water Sources for Metro MANILA
No Source Combination Stage 1 Cost US $M
804 529 1,071 807 529
1 2 3 4 5
Laiban Dam+Kanan No. 2 Dam Kaliwa Low Dam + Agos Dam Agos Dam Alone Laiban Dam + Agos Kaliwa Low Dam + Kanan No. 2 Dam
MLD
KANAN (3200)
1990
1995
2000
2005
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
Year
2035
MWSS
Covers the NCR (17 towns and cities); cities); 5 in Rizal and 6 in Cavite Total Service Area of 1,940 sq km
1,400-MWCI 400 540-MWSI 540-
Population in the Service Area, 14 Million Served Population of about 9 Million Angat River Umiray Sum-ag SumGroundwater 3,200 MLD 800 MLD 190 MLD 90 MLD
UMIRAY RIVER
ANGAT RESERVOIR
9 CMS 70 CMS
IPO DAM
46 CMS NIA
)
5 Aqueducts
BIGTI SETTLING BASIN
TO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
TO DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
6 aqueducts
IPO DAM
of
flo
7,000
5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 Year 2015 2020 2025 2030
SumSum-ag River Source
ADD Ratio
Time
Population
Water Production (MLD) 20071 NRW 1,513.04 354.16 1,867.20 Total 2,293.37 1,377.97 3,671.34
Served (M) Billed Volume 8.1 5.3 13.4 780.33 1,023.81 1,804.14
service Quarterly Service Performance Information (QSPI). Figures based on plant production and do not reflect conveyance losses through Angat, Ipo and eventually to the WTPs.
Ipo Dam
Based on the USBRs SEED Criteria, both the Angat Dam and Main Dike are rated CONDITIONALLY POOR*
* A potentially dam safety deficiency is recognized for unusual loading conditions, which may realistically occur during the expected life of the structure. CONDITIONALLY POOR may also structure. be used when uncertainties exist as to critical analysis parameters, which identify a potential dam safety deficiency; further investigations and studies are necessary. deficiency; necessary.
Treatment works
3 phase development (800 MLD), 2 CWRs 50 ML
Cost (Php M)
13,060.00 3,254.00 9,951.00 90.00 7,417.00 2,651.00 64.00 5,560.00 47,928.00
MWSS Total Expenditures To Date for LAIBAN DAM Description Before MWSS Privatization: (FS, Detailed Engg., Diversion tunnels, partial land acquisition, and other pre-construction activities) After MWSS Privatization: a) (Review/Updating of documents including preliminary resettlement planning), year 2001 -------------------------------------------------- 36.00M b) Technical review & assess tender docs for construction, year 2006-2007 ---------- 24.00M c) Further geological investigation at damsite (on-going) -------------------------------------5.00M TOTAL Amt
(Php M)
690.00
65.00
755.00
Pipeline 1, 4.0 km, 3.2 m dia. Tunnel 2, 1.8 km, 2.7 m dia., steel-lined
With headrace and surge tank
PROJECT FACILTIES
LAIBAN DAM PROJECT
PANTAY POWER HOUSE 25 MW Francis Turbines PANTAY WTP 2400 MLD Cap. ANTIPOLO 20 MLD RESERVOIR & 111 MLD cap. PUMPING STATION TAYTAY120 MLD RESERVOIR
P
HEP
metering point
TAYTAY PRESSURE CONTROL STATION INTAKE STRUCTURES
PASIG
Derived and/or updated unit costs are to be compared with existing, valid and actual construction costs in various on-going jobs in the Philippines as well as in similar, overseas projects
PHASE 4 Construction
LARP, ROW, entry permits EPC mobilization construction activities commissioning
PHASE 5 Operations
post construction operational and occupancy permits operations treated bulk water supply; power supply
MADILAY-DILAY
DAM
KALIWA RIVER
Diversion Tunnel
FLOW
MAMUYAO
LIMUTAN RIVER
LENATIN RIVER
LAIBAN STO.NIO
CAYABU
INTAKE
PROJECT IMPACT
BGY. STA. INES AF=474
BGY. STO. NINO AF=318 BGY. TINUKAN AF=290 BGY. CAYABU AF=175 BGY. LAIBAN AF=720
Source: DENR
Parcel 1
Proposed Resettlement Site in San Ysiro, Antipolo City as proclaimed under Proclamation No. 2480 Issued on Jan 26, 1986 Area (hectares) MWSS Property 1,507
Parcel 4
MWSS Titled Property Lot 1 = 232 hectares Lot 2 = 1,275 hectares Total = 1,507 hectares
Parcel 2
Parcel 3
Sta. Inez
Will not be included for relocation Will not be included for relocation
Provide access to San Ysiro, the relocation site Installation of early warning mechanism and monitoring system to monitor status of dam during inclement weather
Daraitan
Lumutan
within the Kaliwa Watershed will not be submerged, but will be indirectly affected Lack of access to resources/market) Existing road link is only through Brgy. Sta. Inez No existing road network to Gen. Nakar ( proposed for relocation)
Improve existing access to Sta Inez and then access to San Ysiro, the relocation site
Barangay Pantay
San Ysiro
Minimal movement of existing structures/properties Identify sites that are not occupied by current settlers within the 4,440 hectares to be used for resettlement and facilities to be established based on the physical development plan that will be prepared.
ECC Amendment Environmental Performance Report and Management Plan Environmental Impact Statement
Environmental Impact Sampling & Study ECC Application & DENR Review EIS Consultancy Cost (other related studies, etc.)