Advanced Product Quality Planning

Planning Product Design & Development Process Design & Development Product & Process Verification
1

Purchase Agreement
Formal document to define responsibilities and expectation of both customer and supplier.

Manufacturing Process Layout

Matrix detailing ALL the process steps, from sourcing material, through manufacturing, to shipping finished parts.

Design Responsibility
Design responsibility must be clearly defined, agreed within the team, and documented.

DVP and R
When the supplier has design control or is performing design related activities, a DVP and R must be developed and agreed within the team.

Design F.M.E.A.
Conducted cross functionally with customer and supplier.

Design Review.
Scheduled meeting to review design proposals or changes prior to implementation.

Prototype Control Plans.

Control plans focused on ,dimensional, metallurgical, assembly and functional controls.

Drawings and Spec's

All drawings, standards and specifications required to manufacture the product.

Facilities, Equipment and Tools

A detail timing plan identifying any new, refurbished or relocated equipment or resources necessary to manufacture the product.

10

Gauging and Test Equipment.

Establish a Gauge and Test Equipment plan, to be used in conjunction with the manufacturing and testing processes. Including preventive maintenance program.

11

Preliminary Compatibility Matrix.

The supplier must assess the manufacturing process capability for all Major, Critical, and Key Characteristics and show that all minors are within specifications. * Reference the Initial Process Studies section of the AIAG PPAP manual for minimum capability requirements.

12

Sub Contract A.P.Q.P.

The supplier is responsible for ensuring that all their suppliers, comply with all A.P.Q.P. requirements.

13

Team Feasibility Commitment

A formal process by the supplier to determine if the proposed design requirements can be manufactures to the quality and cost expectations defined by Cummins.

14

Logistics / EDI / iSCM

Cummins and the supplier to mutually agree on logistical requirements. -Transportation - Ordering method - Shipping frequency and Quantities etc.. All appropriate functions at the supplier must be registered in iSCM and be able to complete their repsective functions via iSCM.

Packaging Specifications
15 The supplier must ensure that packaging is designed to ensure that the quality of the product is maintained during shipping.

Manufacturing Process Flow Charts.

16 A graphic representation of the current or proposed manufacturing process, from raw material receipt, through to shipment.

Process F.M.E.A.
17 A disciplined analytical technique that looks at the probability and effects of failure, focused on the complete manufacturing process. 18

Manufacturing Quality Verification

A process to identify potential failure modes to design products and processes which prevent them from occurring.

19

Measurement Systems Evaluation

Assessment of the proposed gauges and test equipment to ensure it is capable of performing to the required standards.

20

Pre - Launch Control Plan

A control plan that is specifically for the period between 'Prototypes and Full Production'. Purpose is to contain potential non-conformances prior to production run.

21

Operator Process Instructions

Process instructions that describe in detail, the controls and action operators must perform to produce quality products.

22

Production Trial Run

A trial process validation exercise using production tooling, equipment, environment and cycle times to determine the readiness of the full production process.

23

Production Compatibility Matrix.

Assessment of the manufacturing process capability on the Critical, Major / Key and Minor characteristics.

24

Production Control Plans

A control plan focused on the dimensional, metallurgical, assembly and functional controls that will ensure a quality product.

25

Production Source Approval.

A defined engineering validation plan, for tests conducted throughout the design and development stages of the product.

26

Production Part Approval Process ( P.P.A.P. )

Documented verification that all Cummins engineering and design requirements have been met.

27

Production Readiness
Closed status on all previously addressed 24 elements.

28

Production Capability Certification (PCC)

A process to verify supplier production capability and readiness to meet full production start date for new products, and/or components new to suppliers.

29

IMDS
A repository for storing supply chain components and assembly materials data (weights and chemical structure) for the automotive industry.

Advanced Product Quality Planning - Status Report

Supplier Location Supplier Code Risk Assessment New: Site: Other Risks: Team Members Part Name: Part No. Dwg. No. Dwg. Revision Level Technology Process:

Date:

Company/Title

Phone/Fax

CAPABILITY COMPATIBILITY CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III CLASS IV CLASS V APQP Elements AIAG APQP Element Program Need Date

Supplier Timing Date

Date Closed

Engineer G-Y-R-B Remarks or Resp. Status Assistance Required

RFQ 1 - Purchase Agreement * 2 - Manufacturing Process Layout * 3 - Design Responsibility * 4 - DVP & R * 5 - Design FMEA 2.1 6 - Design Review(s)/sign off with supplier 2.4 7 - Prototype Build Control Plan 2.5 8 - Drawings/Specifications 2.6/7/8 9 - Facilities, Equipment and Tools/sign off with supplier 2.10 10 - Gauging and Test Equipment/comparison with TCL test equipment 2.12 11 - Preliminary C of C, Compatibility Matrix * 12 - Subcontractor Status - APQP * 13 - Team Feasibility Commitment 2.13 14 - Logistics/EDI Capability/iSCM * 15 - Packaging Specifications & sign off 3.1 16 - Manufacturing Process Flow Chart 3.3 17 - Process FMEA 3.6 18 - Manufacturing Quality Verfication * 19 - Measurement Systems Evaluation 4.2 20 - Pre-Launch Control Plan 3.7 21 - Operator Process Instructions 3.8 22 - Production Trial Run (Capacity Verified) 4.1 23 - Production C of C, Compatibility Matrix * 24 - Production Control Plan 4.7 25 - Production Source Approval 4.5 26 - Production Part Approval (PPAP) 4.4 27 - Production Readiness * 28 - Production Capability Certification * 29 - IMDS * * = Cummins Specific Requirement. See Attached Reference Element # G/Y/R/B Status Summary APQP Chg Closed Green Yellow Red Total

Comments:

A.P.Q.P. Audit Check Sheet

Part Numbers Supplier : Team

Address :

Comments 1. Purchase Agreement

* Has a formal document been signed with Cummins? 'Yes' Date Signed: No' Date Signing expected: * Has tooling been started? * Has the supplier documented their agreed capacity with the sourcing mgr for future PCC verification? B R Y G

2. Manufacturing Process Layout

Is there a Matrix detailing, 'THE PROCESS' ? Does it cover: * Material source * Machining location. * Assembly location. * Tooling requirements. * Sub- Contractor details. * Equipment details. Was the Matrix submitted to Cummins prior to initial samples? * Has it been updated during -E- -D- -L- -P- stages?

B R Y G

3. Design Responsibility
* Who has design control, Cummins or the supplier? * How is design control documented? * Will this component be released as a 15-1? * Does Cummins have input into the design? * Is the supplier providing significant input into the design? * Is the supplier performing any design development or validation tasks? * Is a warranty agreement in place?

B R Y G

4. D V P & R
* DVPandR = Design validation planning and report * Has a DVPandR been developed and jointly agreed between Cummins and the supplier? * Has each component and process had expert review? Note: Each component and process shall have expert review and input into DVPandR and DFMEA activities. Note: Design related activities apply when the supplier has design control or in situations where Cummins retains design control but has the supplier complete design development and/or validation activities.

B R Y G

5. Design FMEA
* Has a design F.M.E.A. been developed? * Is there documented evidence? * Was it conducted prior to - D - phase * Continually updated as needs changed? * Are all issues closed out? * If not, note outstanding issues and responsibilities? * Were all actions corrected prior to - L - phase? Note: Design related activities apply when the supplier has

design control or in situations where Cummins retains design control but has the supplier complete design development and/or validation activities.

R Y G

6. Design Review
* Were reviews conducted prior to - D - phase? * Is there documented evidence? * How many changes were deemed necessary? * Are all issues closed out? * Were all actions closed out prior to - L - phase? Is the supplier participating in design reviews? Note: The supplier should participate in design reviews regardless of design responsibility.

B R Y G

7. Prototype Control Plans

* Were control plans formulated, did there cover Dimensional, Metallurgical, Assembly and Functional Test controls? * Were these plans reviewed and approved by the Cummins SQI team, prior to prototype production run? * Were copies of these plans submitted as part of the Interim PPAP submission (if Interim was requested)?

B R Y G

8. Drawing and Specifications

* Does the supplier have fully released, current copies of all the drawing and spec's required to produce the components? * Has a cross functional Drawing Quality Review been held with supplier/engineering? * Have OEM interface/touch points features been identified for supplier?

B R Y G

9. Facilities, Equipment and Tools

* Has the supplier produced a detailed time plan identifying any new, additional equipment, refurbished equipment or relocated resources necessary to manufacture the product at the required volumes and quality levels? * Is the plan on target? * Is a preventive maintenance program in place? * Will all the equipment be in place and implemented by the - L - phase release?

B R Y G

10. Gauging and Test Equipment

* Has the supplier identified all the equipment required to ensure the components meet the specifications? * Have gauge R & R studies been carried out on all the equipment? * Is all equipment traceable to national standards? * Is a preventive maintenance program in place? B R Y G

11. Preliminary Compatibility Matrix

* Has the supplier accessed the manufacturing process capability of Major, Critical, and Key characteristics and shown all minors to be in specification? * Has a capability MATRIX been drawn up? * How many class 4 & 5 issues were identified? * Are action plans in place to resolve all class 4/5 issues? * Has Supplier Assessment of Process Capability Appendix 8.7 of Corp-01-04-00-00 been signed off? * How many are still outstanding? * Have timing plans been set? * If proto supplier was different than productions supplier, does production supplier have access to proto data/flows?

B R Y G

12. Sub Contract A.P.Q.P.

Especially important with suppliers that have subcontractors responsible for a significant portion of the product (e.g. casting supplier).

* Has the supplier established the A.P.Q.P. requirements with their sub contractors? * Are all elements at GREEN? * If not, what actions are still outstanding? * Are all these elements documented for review? * Has / will the supplier, provide P.P.A.P. data? * Has Cummins SQI reviewed the sub-contractor PPAP? * Has Cummins SQI participated in a joint APQP review with sub-contractors? * Is your sub contractor QS9000 or Equivalent approved?

B R Y G B R Y G

13. Team Feasibility Commitment

* Has the supplier conducted a formal review to ensure they can manufacture the components to the technical, quality, quantity and cost expectations defined? * Is there documented evidence of this review?

14. Logistics / EDI Capability / iSCM

* Has the supplier completed a documented agreement with Cummins on the logistical requirements to meet the companies needs? * Does it cover, transportation, ship frequency, quantities and warehousing options? * List outstanding issues if not complete? * Are all the appropriate functions at supplier registered to iSCM (RFQ, NAFTA, NCMRs, etc.)? * Are all the appropriate functions at supplier trained to perform their respective duties via iSCM? Issues should be reviewed with the sourcing manger.

B R Y G

15. Packaging Specifications

* Has the supplier established with Cummins what packaging, labeling, and protections is required? * Has the supplier/plant packaging engineer completed the packaging form found in the packaging standard? * Is the supplier satisfied, the packaging and protection being used will ensure the quality of the product will be maintained during the packaging, shipping / transport and unpacking stages?

B R Y G

16. Manufacturing Process Flow Charts

* Has the supplier developed a GRAPHIC representation of the current or proposed manufacturing process? * Does the chart flow from the raw material stages, through to the shipment of the product? * Was this process approved by SQI group prior to -D phase? * Were all up dates submitted for approval when changes occurred?

B R Y G

17. Process F.M.E.A.

FMEA checklist * Has a process F.M.E.A. been developed? * Was SQIE, or if applicable, corporate mfg engineering involved in process? * Did FMEA include prior defects, customer/OEM interface features, etc? Does supplier understand part function? * Has FMEA on the set-up process been completed for all low volume parts? * Is there documented evidence? * Have all high R.P.N. issues been resolved? * If not, note outstanding issues and responsibilities? * Has the F.M.E.A. been updated as needs change? * Were all actions closed prior to - L - phase?

B R Y G

18. Manufacturing Quality Verification (MQV)

* Has the supplier been trained? * Has SQSW been reviewed for this component?

* Have key learnings from SQSW been applied to the MQV and all other applicable quality documents and processes? * Is there evidence of an active MQV capturing: - OEM Touch Points - Part functionality - Defect history of this type component

B R Y G

19. Measurement Systems Evaluation

* Has all gauge and test equipment been identified? * Have gauge R & R studies been carried on all equipment to be used on CRITICAL, MAJOR and KEY features? * What variations were found during tests? * Were all result and action items documented on the Process F.M.E.A.?

B R Y G

20. Pre- Launch Control Plans

* Was a Pre - Launch control plan developed for the period between prototype and full production? * Did a meeting take place between the supplier and the Cummins SQI quality representative to determine the need for this activity? B R Y G

21. Operator Process Instructions

* Do process instructions exist for all operations? * Do detailed setup instructions define setup quality levels and initial process targeting? * Do instructions cover checking frequencies? * Do instructions identify CRIT, MAJ, & KEY features? * Features to be controlled by SPC with minimum targets identified? * Instruction as to what action to take in the event of a feature going out of control limits? * Do process control sheets clearly show master drawing part numbers and revision levels?

B R Y G

22. Production Trial Run

* Has a production trial run been carried out? * Did the trial run use ALL the identified equipment, for manufacturing, inspection and testing? * What quantities were put through the process? * Were the expected cycle times met? * Were all process capability features controlled within the drawing specifications? * What action item were identified during the trial run? * Have all these action items been closed out?

B R Y G

23. Production Compatibility Matrix

* Has a compatibility matrix been produced? * Was process capability determined from a single large run or from multiple setups over time? * For low volume components, has process been agreed to to capture capabilities from multiple setups over time? * How many class Three, Four and Five items were identified? * Is there documented evidence of the statistical studies carried out for Critical, Major, and key characteristics? * Is there a plan in place to deal with class Four and Five items? * Are all issues closed out?

B R Y G

24. Production Control Plans

* Are production control plans in place to cover all dimensional, metallurgical, assembly, functional testing features and processes? * Have all production control plans been reviewed and agreed with the SQI engineer prior to - L - phase? These plans need to be submitted as part of the

B R Y

P.P.A.P. requirements.

25. Production Source Approval.

Engineering validation for 10012 listed parts. * Are these parts subject to validation tests? * Have all engineering validation tests been conducted? * Were issues raised during test program? * Have all issues been resolved? * Is there documented evidence of the tests carried out? * Have there been signed off as APPROVED by the engineering group?

B R Y G

26 . Production Part Approval Process.

* Was P.P.A.P. FULLY approved or INTERIM approved? * If P.P.A.P. was not signed correct first time, what were the issues raised and what is the timing plan to achieve full compliance? (Attach a copy.) * If P.P.A.P.s have not yet been signed off, what are the planned dates (reference status report)? * Where appropriate, was AIAG truck low volume approach used for process capability determination and if so, will capability be demonstrated over time and multiple setups? * Are these dates prior to production launch?

B R Y G

27. Production Readiness

* Are all elements closed out? * How many elements are still on YELLOW ? RED? * Has the ramp up plan been agreed to with the SM or plant? * Is there a timing plan in place for completion of the A.P.Q.P. process? * Have all responsibilities been assigned? B R Y G

28. Production Capability Certification

* * * * * * Was production tooling/equipment used for all processes? Was evidence of setup controls provided? Was process checked across all shifts? Was an audit conducted as part of the run? Were all appropriate forms completed and filed? Was a hand-off document completed? B R Y G B R Y G

29. IMDS
* Have all materials been entered into IMDS website? www.mdsystem.com is the website to be utilized.

Open Issues Log

Issue No. Date Assigned Action Required Resp. Status Date Closed

94018166.xls.ms_office

9 of 17

Last Updated 4/23/2012

GYR Definitions
Blue: Green: Blue ratings are given when the element is completed and/or considered closed. Green ratings are given prior to the program need date to indicate that the element will meet the program need date and meets all quality expectations. Yellow ratings are given prior to the program need date to indicate an element may not meet the program need date or quality expectations. To be considered yellow, a recovery plan must be in place for the element. Yellow ratings indicate a need for program management attention. A yellow rating can only be given to an element prior to the program need date. Red ratings are given prior to the program need date to indicate an element will not meet the program need date or quality expectations. Red signifies the program is at risk and needs immediate management attention. Any element rated red at its program need date must carry the rating through the remainder of the program. Completion of the element after the program need date does not change the timing status of the element; the element is late and must stay red.

Yellow:

Red:

Supplier Process FMEA: Audit Summary Name of Component, Sub-System or System: Part Number(s) Responsible Supplier: Responsible Supplier Quality Improvement Engineer: Name of Auditor: Date Reviewed: Date of PFMEA (Original or Rev. Level): Overall Rating: "X" Header "Yes" overall and no more than three sections "E" overall = "Green" Neither "Green" nor "Red" criteria met = "Yellow" Six or more non-Header sections "No" overall = "Red"

Header Overall: "Yes"______

"No"______

Number of non-Header sections (2 through 12) not ok:______

Note: If response is N/A, check "Yes" and include "N/A" and reason in "Auditor Comments."
1 1a 1b 1c 1d Does the Header Contain Adequate Information ? Yes E No Auditor Comments Name of Program(s) included? N/A Name of Supplier included? N/A Part Number and Description included? N/A Core Team includes all names with title or area? Note: Phone #'s recommended, but not mandatory for this audit. N/A 1e Key Date Shown is Cummins VPI Program Beta Build Date? N/A 1f FMEA Date (Orig.) is shown? N/A 1g FMEA "(Rev.)" date within past 60 days? Note: "N/A" if "(Orig.)" date is within 60 days. N/A N/A 1h All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." N/A

Note: "E" means only minor "E"xceptions, see comment section..

2 Is the Process Function/Requirements Column Adequate? Yes 2a Each operation is (briefly) described using a verb/noun (bend tube, apply primer, pierce hole, etc.), rather than just numbered? 2b Characteristics of part/process listed (hole diameter, tube length, etc.)? Note: Including specification tolerances (25 mm. +/- 2) are recommended, but not required for this audit. 2c All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" 3 3a 3b 3c Potential Failure Modes Column Adequate? Yes Failure Modes written in terms of a characteristic (hole dia., surf. roughness)? Failure Modes are specific ("hole dia. too small" rather than "hole out of spec.")? All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" E No Auditor Comments

No Auditor Comments

4 Potential Effects of Failure Column Adequate? Yes 4a Effects written in terms of what customer (downstream process or end user) will notice/experience ("unable to assemble" do not use "scrap")? 4b All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" 5 Severity Yes 5a Severity rankings not underrated based on AIAG Manual criteria? Note: Overrating not recommended, but not requirement for this audit. 5b Severity rankings identical for identical Potential Effects? 5c All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" 6 Class Yes 6a Are all Key, Major or Critical characteriustics identified? 6b All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E"

No Auditor Comments

No Auditor Comments

No Auditor Comments

94018166.xls.ms_office

11

Name of Component, Sub-System or System: Part Number(s) Responsible Supplier: Responsible Supplier Quality Improvement Engineer: Name of Auditor: Date Reviewed: Date of PFMEA (Original or Rev. Level): Supplier Process FMEA: Audit Summary-Page 2
7 Potential Causes Column Adequate? Yes 7a Descriptions specific? Note: 1) "Incorrect set-up", "improper cooling", etc. must be replaced by or include specific description of what was "incorrect" (temp. set too high) or "improper" (time too short). 2) Replace "operator error" with "operator installed widget upside down." 7b All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" 8 Occurrence Yes 8a There is one Occurrence ranking for each cause ("worn/broken tool" must have two separate rankings)? 8b All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" 9 Current Controls Column Adequate? Yes 9a Controls correctly identified as either Detection ("D") (Mistake Proof, 100% visual insp., etc.) or Prevention ("P") (visual aids, training, PM, etc.) controls? Note: 1) separate set-up process (P.) from 1st piece inspect. (D.). 2) Error-Proofing is preventive (can't make), but may be listed as "P" or "D" or both. 9b Controls are adequately explained or easily referenced? 9c All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" 10 Detection Yes 10a One Detection ranking for each Occurrence ranking? 10b Detection ranking consistent with AIAG Manual (Visual Inspection=8, etc.)? Note: Detection ranking is no better than the best detection method (SPC + visual inspection + hourly audit=6 [SPC is best]). 10c All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" 11 Recommended Actions & Responsibility Columns Reasonable? Yes 11a Do all Severity rankings of 9 or 10 with a Detection ranking greater than 3 have a Recommended Action which will lower the Detection? Notes: 1) "None" only to be used if Detection ranking is less than 4. 2) Justification for "None" in this column recommended, but not mandatory for this audit. 11b Recommended Actions are assigned to a specific person (not a department)? 11c Target Completion dates are shown and not past due? 11d All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" 12 12a 12b 12c Action Results Effectively Executed? Yes Re-rankings affected Occurrence and/or Detection (not Severity)? Occurrence and/or Detection re-rankings consistent with AIAG Manual? All else ok (no other issues)? If all answers "Yes," check "Yes." If one or more "No," check "No." Otherwise, check "E" E No Auditor Comments

No Auditor Comments

No Auditor Comments

No Auditor Comments

No Auditor Comments

No Auditor Comments

94018166.xls.ms_office

12

P.P.A.P. Check List

Supplier Part Number Description
Steps 1 Design Record have a copy of all the current Released Cummins Does the supplier Prints and Engineering Standards required to manufacture the product? Authorized Engineering Change Documents Do marked prints used by the Supplier include Cummins Engineering signatures and Cummins Engineering Release? Customer Engineering Approval If 10012 is on the print, is Cummins Engineering approval documented in IMS? If changes are associated with PCR, has PCR approval been obtained? Design F.M.E.A If the supplier is responsible; do they have a design F.M.E.A. in accordance with, and compliant to, AIAG Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis reference manual, or, other Cummins requirements? Process Flow Diagrams Does the supplier have a process flow diagram that clearly describes the production process steps and locations? Process F.M.E.A. Does the supplier have a FMEA developed in accordance with and compliant to AIAG FMEA Third Edition requirements and Cummins FMEA checklist? Control Plan Is there a detailed Control Plan(s) that cover the complete manufacturing process steps and locations as outlined in the Cummins Control Plan checklist? Measurement System Analysis Studies Have Gauge R & R studies on equipment used to perform dimensional and statistical evaluation of critical and major characteristics been performed? Is the precision acceptable for the features being checked? Dimensional Results Drawing items to be numbered to match dimensional layout. Full layout of ALL dimensions on a minimum of three parts. Where there are multiple fixture, moulds , or dies 'etc' results are required from each situation. Records of Material/Performance Test Results Does the supplier have records documenting compliance to Cummins Material Specifications? Performance test results specified on the design records or control plans? Initial Process Studies Has the supplier performed process meaurement studies for the product features defined as KEY, MAJOR, and CRITICAL? Have all class IV or V issues been resolved per the Cummins Supplier Handbook and AIAG requirements? Qualified Laboratory Documentation Does the supplier have documentation showing laboratories used for evaluation of measuring equipment? Appearance Approval Report (AAR) If applicabale, did the supplier complete an AAR; including "Paint, Color, Surface Treatment 'etc'? Sample Production Parts The supplier shall provide sample production parts if requested by the customer. Master Sample Has the supplier retained master samples and a complete record of the measurement findings? These samples and records must be kept for the length of time that the parts are current, plus one calender year. Checking Aids Is there a list of gauges, fixtures, templates Mylar's 'etc' specified as part of the checking and testing process? The supplier shall provide for preventive maintenance of the checking aids for the life of the part. Customer - Specific Requirements Does the supplier have a record of compliance to all customer specific requirements, including packaging and labeling? Part Submission Warrant (PSW) Is there a cover sheet for P.P.A.P. general information, with signature, completed by the Supplier indicating reason for submission, to be signed off by S.Q.I. Engineer? S.Q.I. Engineer Date Status Revision Comments

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

2 Manufacturing Process Layout Prelaunch Development -Sample

Cummins Required Date Quantity required Supplier Commitment Material Source

PPAP Run

Casting / Forging Source Tool Details Tool Development Post Casting / Forging activity Heat Treatment

Machining Location

Facility Address

Facility Address

Operation No

Operation No

Shopfloor Layout plan Completed Assembly Location Designated Area Inhouse Operation No

Shopfloor Layout plan Completed Designated Area Inhouse

Operation No

Shopfloor Layout Plan completed Environmental Factors Considered Capacity Adequate SubContractor APQP Item Supplier Name Selection process used

Shopfloor Layout Plan completed Environmental Factors Considered Capacity Adequate Item Supplier Name Selection process used

Tooling List

Tool

Source

Delivery Due Date

Tool

Source

Delivery Due Date

Measuring Equipment Details

Machine

Source

Due Date

Machine

Source

Due Date

Functional Equipment Details

Supplier Name :

Product Name :

Volume considered :

MANUFACTURING FACILITIES PLANNING SHEET.

TAKT TIME@300 MACHINING VOLUME TAKT TIME NO. OF M/C'S VOLUME WORKING DAYS & (NO.'S/ ON 10 % REQD. ON 10 (NO.'S/ / YR., 22.5 HRS. / ASSEMBLY WORKING INCREASE % INCREASE YR.) DAY, 85% EFF., CYCLE DAY) OF VOLUME OF VOLUME 10% REJECTION TIME(MIN.) PLNG. OF MACHINES NO.'S OF MACHINES ALREADY AVAILABLE SET OF MACHINING & ASSEMBLY FIXTURES REQD. PLNG. OF FIXTURES SET OF MACHINING& ASSEMBLY FIXTURES AVAILABLE PLNG. OF CUTTING TOOLS SET OF CUTTING TOOLS ON ORDER

COMP0NENT.

P.NAME

OPN.NO.

OPN.

M/C DETAILS

NO.'S OF MACHINES PLANNED

NO.'S OF MACHINES ON ORDER

SET OF MACHINING SET OF SET OF & ASSEMBLY CUTTING CUTTING FIXTURES UNDER TOOLS TOOLS REQD. MANUFACTURING AVAILABLE

Supplier Name :

Product Line:

EQUIPMENT / FACILITIES PLNG. SHEET

S.NO . OPN.N O

P.NAME.

OPN.NAME

FOR Ist SAMPLE ,PPAP & Mass Production ( Time )- MACHINES ORDER STATUS EXP. DELIVERY DATE FIXTURE DETAIL

FOR Ist SAMPLE ,PPAP & Mass Production ( Time )- FIXTURE ORDER STATUS EXP. DELIVERY DATE

M/C DETAIL

SUPPLIER

STATUS ON

SUPPLIER

STATUS ON

10

20

30

4 5 6 7

40 50 60 70

Supplier Name:

LIST OF GAUGES & INSTRUMENTS

Part Name : Part No. :

DETAILS OF FIRST SET

status as on PLAN FOR SECOND SET TARGET DATE REMARK

AVAILABLE SL NO DESCRIPTION OF GAUGES & INSTRUMENTS L.C. IN MM GAUGE NO. CALIBRATION SATUS YES NO

AVAILABLE

YES

NO

GAUGES

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

INSTRUMENTS

DATE:

PREPARED BY

APPROVED BY