Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DVB-T and DVB-H Measuring Software for PC Connected with Spectral Analyzer
Karel ULOVEC1, Miroslav VYN2
1
Dept. of Radio Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Technick 2, 166 27 Praha, Czech Republic 2 ROHDE & SCHWARZ - Praha, s.r.o., Hadovka Office Park, Evropsk 33c, 160 00 Praha, Czech Republic karel.ulovec@radio.fel.cvut.cz, miroslav.vysin@rohde-schwarz.com
Abstract. This contribution describes Digital Video Broadcasting-Terrestrial and Digital Video BroadcastingHandheld measuring software for personal computer connected with a spectral analyzer. The free of charge software could upgrade a radio measurement laboratory, where a spectral analyzer is assumed as a one of basic devices, to measure some spectral and signal parameters and characteristics of above-mentioned systems. The main aim is to explain the processing of digital signal received samples and compare software features with a test receiver. Measuring software was developed and created during the diploma project.
Keywords
Digital Video Broadcasting-Terrestrial, Digital Video Broadcasting-Handheld, Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, Demodulation, Measurement, Spectral Analysis, Signal Analysis.
1. Introduction
Digital video broadcasting (DVB) gradually replace analog television transmission. The digital signal quality needs to be monitored at a transmitter. It can be done by a professional test receiver, but it also could be done by a spectral analyzer, which is supplemented with software signal processing of captured signal samples on personal computer (PC). This contribution deals with measuring software DVB-T/H measurement (version 1.0.1) for PC connected with a spectral analyzer (fig. 1), which allows measure some basic spectral and signal parameters and characteristics of the DVB-Terrestrial (DVB-T) and DVB-Handheld (DVB-H) systems. This software was developed and created during the diploma project at the Czech Technical University at the department of Radio engineering. DVB-T/H system uses Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (OFDM) as a multi-carrier modulation format.
Pilot carriers searching Pilot carriers (cells) have defined amplitude and phase values. This pattern is known in a receiver. Minimal difference searching between known pattern and the real placement of the carriers is used to find the right pilot carriers positions. Channel transfer function estimation The known pattern of the pilot cells is used for channel transfer estimation. Transfer function at positions between pilot cells is interpolated. Channel transfer function compensation Simple complex multiplying is used in OFDM systems for compensation of channel transfer function on each carrier, see fig. 2. Signal analysis Modulation error ratio (MER), constellation diagram and transfer functions are subjects of the signal analysis.
attenuations. The continual monitoring of the signal parameters is also possible. Signal analysis As a result of the signal analysis MER is computed and a constellation diagram is displayed. Channel transfer functions are depicted as well. Various dependences on subcarrier or symbol positions can be chosen.
The output power of the signal from FSQ (P_SFQ) is changed from 86 dBm to 6 dBm and the signal power is measured by EFA (P_EFA) and by measuring software (P_SW). The attenuation of the left shoulder (Left sh.) and right shoulder (Right sh.) is also monitored by EFA (sh._EFA) and by measuring software (sh._SW). Further the value of the central carrier fC is measured and the difference (Fr. diff. = fC 810106) is noted down. The results are in tab. 1.
P_SFQ (dBm) P_EFA (dBm) P_SW (dBm) Left sh._EFA (dB) Left sh._SW (dB) Right sh._EFA (dB) Right sh._SW (dB) Fr. diff_EFA (Hz) Fr. diff_SW (Hz) 86 85.4 85.5 39 10.6 41 10.3 183 260 66 66.1 66.8 47.8 24.3 52 27.4 176 232 36 36.2 36.9 52.8 34.5 54.2 37.1 157 217 6 6.8 6.9 53 51.8 54.5 51.9 150 188 6 4.6 5.1 53 48.7 53.5 46.1 141 188
Tab. 1. Signal power, shoulder attenuation and central frequency measurement results.
Measured values of the signal power differ less then 1 dB from values on generator and are very close to these measured by EFA. Measured values of the shoulder attenuation agree with EFA only for optimal signal power (6 dBm). A real channel filter absence could cause error for lower signal power and intermodulation distortion
could decrease measured value for higher signal power. Measured frequency error is high for both EFA and measuring software, but it couldnt be discussed closer, because no GPS synchronization is used. Measuring software can monitor additionally the value of the first and last carriers, bandwidth and frequency distance (Fr. dist.) between subcarriers. Results are in tab. 2 for three cases of the power of test transmitter (P_SFQ). Measured values of first and last carriers, bandwidth and frequency distance are very close to real values in sequence: 806196429 Hz, 813803571 Hz, 7607143 Hz and 1116.071 Hz (central carrier difference is ignored).
P_SFQ (dBm) First carrier (Hz) Last carrier (Hz) Bandwidth (Hz) Fr. dist. (Hz) 66 806196189 813803348 7607159 1116.074 36 806196218 813803348 7607130 1116.070 6 806196247 813803376 7607129 1116.069
MER (dB)
35
30
25
20
15
10
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 C/N (dB) MER_EFA_QPSK (dB) MER_EFA_64-QAM (dB) MER_SW_QPSK (dB) MER_SW_64-QAM (dB)
Tab. 2. First and last carriers, bandwidth and frequency distance measurement results.
Measurement is repeated again, but data carrier modulation is changed to QPSK. So that the measurement is done for lower C/N as well thanks to lower number of QPSK modulation states.
C/N (dB) MER_EFA (dB) MER_SW (dB) noise off 35.1 34.8 35 31.2 31.3 30 27.6 27.8 25 23.1 23.5 20 18.8 19.2 15 13.9 13.5 10 9 7.1 Fig. 5. MER vs. subcarriers position measured by EFA (the best case, noise switched off).
The MER measurement results are depicted in fig. 3 as dependences on C/N for better expression. Differences between MER values measured by measuring software and EFA are lower than 1 dB for C/N between 35 dB and 15 dB and the values differ about 1.8 dB in case of C/N 10 dB. Values of MER vs. subcarriers position are measured in case of switched off noise (the best case) for signal power 36 dBm. Dependence on subcarrier positions measured by measuring software and EFA is shown in fig. 4 and 5 respectively.
Measured values of MER by measuring software for the best case (noise switched off) is about 3 dB lower than measured by EFA. Constellation diagram is offered as a part of signal analysis. See fig. 6 to compare constellation diagrams from measuring software (left) and EFA (right).
Fig. 6. Constellation diagrams acquired by measuring software (left) and by EFA (right).
Tab. 5. Delays and relative attenuations of taps for the channel with fixed reception profile (Ricean channel) and portable reception profile (Rayleigh channel).
Fixed reception measurements results bring figs. 7, 8 and 9. The amplitude transfer function measured by measuring software is in fig. 7 and phase transfer function measured by measuring software is in fig. 8. The both amplitude and phase transfer functions measured by EFA are depicted in fig. 9. Amplitude transfer functions measured by both EFA and measuring software correspond as example the ratio between maximal and minimal value 0.654/0.261 correspond with difference of 8 dB. Values of the phase transfer functions are in compliance as well as example maximal value approx. 0.5 rad. corresponds with 28.7 deg.
4. Conclusion
The DVB-T and DVB-H signal measuring software is an alternative to expensive professional test devices. The software doesnt measure in real time and is a little bit less precise, but is intended to be offered as a free of charge on the web site [3]. It could be used to upgrade radio measurement laboratories, where a modern spectral analyzer is in hand, as example in the school laboratory.
Acknowledgements
Research described in the paper was supported by the research program MSM 6840770014.
References
[1] VYN, M. Automatic measurement of terrestrial digital video broadcasting. Diploma thesis, in Czech language. FEL, CTU in Prague. Prague, 2010, 92 p. [2] ETSI TR 101 290. Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Measurement guidelines for DVB systems. Sophia Antipolis Cedex, ETSI, 2001, 175 p. Fig. 7. Amplitude transfer function from measuring software. [3] Measurement-software [online]. 2010 [cit. Available at: http://measurement-software.mustr.net/. 2010-02-10],