Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What is the Problem & Solution What is the Phytoremadation Importance of Plant to reduce pollution Technical terms of Phytoremadation Advantage/Disadvantage of Phytoremadation Water pollution and Phytoremadation Plants for Phytoremadation Why Duckweed ? Labortory setup Result Conclusion
PROLEM OF CONTAMINATION
I. Introduction A. Definition of the Problem: Toxic wastes in the form of poisonous organics and pathogens, heavy metals, radioisotopes, and even explosives found in soils impose a serious threat to human health and disrupt existing ecosystems.
Proposed Solution(s)
Remediation through removal (and/or relocation), neutralization, or dilution of toxic substances using industrial or biological systems . a) Industrial collection/extraction/neutralization EXPENSIVE
of plants - PHYTOREMEDIATION
Definition of Phytoremediation:
The use of plants to remediate contamination of soil with organic or inorganic wastes.
PHYTOREMADATION
C. Plants:
Barley (Hordeum
vulgare), Corn (Zea mays), Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium perenne), Swiss chard (Beta vulgaris), Wheat (Triticum aestivum) - for heavy metals and other(s) , DUCKWEED(Lemna)
V. Types of Phytoremediation
METAL
PHYTOEXTRACTION
ORGANIC
PHYTODEGRADATION
METAL RHIZOFILTRATION
METAL RHIZODEGRADATION
PHYTOSTABILIZATION
PHYTOVOLATILISATION
V. Types of Phytoremediation
contaminant from the soil) 1. Phytoextraction: Absorption of the contaminant into the plant tissue and subsequent harvesting for destruction. 2. Phytovolatilization: Plants and their associated microbial activity help to increase the rate of volatilization of a contaminant from the soil. The volatilization occurs from plant shoots or roots, as well as from the soil surface.
3. Phytodegradation: Plants take up the contaminant and metabolize it to an environmentally benign material. 4. Rhizo(sphere)degradation: Plant roots, their associated microflora and/or excretedproducts destroy the contaminant in the root zone.
What is the Problem & Solution What is the Phytoremadation Importance of Plant to reduce pollution Technical terms of Phytoremadation Advantage/Disadvantage of Phytoremadation Water pollution and Phytoremadation Plants for Phytoremadation Why Duckweed ? Labortory setup Result Conclusion
HJDHSGHJ
SCDDS
NMNB
As evident from Table , total suspended solids (TSS) values decreased by increasing treatment periods, reaching minimum concentration of 14 mg L-1 after 8 days (reduced by 96.3%). Data in Table revealed that total dissolved solids (TDS) recorded their minimum values of 545 mg L-1, after two days treatment (TDS reduced by 5.9%) and then values increased gradually to the end of the experiment reaching their maximum values of 637 mg L-1,
The dissolved oxygen values increased as temperatures values decreased, revealing that the more cooler the water the more dissolved oxygen it can hold.
Data recorded in Table showed that, values of pH were always alkaline and ranged between 7.25 as a minimum value recorded at zero days and 7.51 as maximum value obtained after six days treatment period. A 7.5 pH was found to be the most ideal for the successful establishment of a duckweed system and optimum pond performance. Duckweed grew well at pH 6 - 7.5 with outer limits of 4 and 8. it has observed that duckweed growth declines as the pH becomes more alkaline.
rv
The sewage temperature is one of the crucial design parameters of duckweed ponds. In the present experiment temperature ranged between 20.6oC and 29.4oC which was within temperature tolerance limit for duckweed growth the upper temperature tolerance limit for duckweed growth was around 34oC. Duckweed cold tolerance allows it to be used for yearround wastewater treatment in areas where tropical macro phytes, such as water hyacinths, can only grow in summer.
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), showed a gradual removal by prolonged treatment periods
After 8 days. showed that calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na) and chloride (Cl) reached their minimum concentrations of 78, 72, 68.85 and 156.9 mg L-1, respectively after two days, with a reduction percentage of 35%, 42%, 1.2% and 20.7%, respectively and then their values returned to increase gradually till the end of the experiment.