Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nazi Germany
This icon indicates the slide contains activities created in Flash. These activities are not editable. For more detailed instructions, see the Getting Started presentation.
1 of 24
2 of 24
3 of 24
4 of 24
A strong Germany?
From its formation in 1871, Germany had been dominated by strong leaders striving for national unity and global importance. The democratic Weimar Republic, with its lack of strong leadership and constant power struggles between political parties, was seen as having failed to deal effectively with Germanys post-war problems. By 1932, the Weimar political system had been discredited. Many Germans felt that the only way to turn this situation around was to have one strong leader, prepared to take personal responsibility for running the country.
5 of 24
Our constitution is the will of the fhrerit was Hitlers regime, Hitlers policy, Hitlers victory and Hitlers defeat nothing else.
6 of 24
Boardworks Ltd 2005
Fhrer power
On the next slides you will see five statements on the role of the fhrer from Ernst Huber, a constitutional theorist of the Third Reich.
Which quote do you think best summarizes what the fhrerprinzip meant to the Nazis?
7 of 24
The fhrerprinzip
The office of fhrer has developed out of the National Socialist movement. In its origins, it is not a state office.
8 of 24
The fhrerprinzip
The position of the fhrer combines in itself all sovereign power of the Reich.
9 of 24
The fhrerprinzip
All public power in the state, as in the movement, is derived from fhrer power.
10 of 24
The fhrerprinzip
This is comprehensive and total and embraces all spheres of national life.
11 of 24
The fhrerprinzip
Fhrer power is not restricted by safeguards and controlsbut rather it is free and independent, exclusive and unlimited.
12 of 24
13 of 24
Analysis
Ian Kershaw, a respected historian of Nazi Germany, has investigated the way in which the Hitler Myth was built up to consolidate the Fhrer Principle.
In his view, the Nazis took power in 1933 because of Hitler, not because of their ideology.
14 of 24
Kershaws view
15 of 24
2. The Reality: How did the Fhrer Principle and the Hitler Myth affect government?
16 of 24
17 of 24
18 of 24
Hitlers staff
19 of 24
Why do you think that this is such an important question for historians to answer?
20 of 24
Boardworks Ltd 2005
BOTH accept that there was a certain degree of chaos in the Nazi state;
BOTH agree that Hitler was a central figure within it; BUT beyond that there are essential differences of interpretation.
21 of 24
Structuralists
Key argument: Political chaos was an unwelcome legacy of the past which shaped Hitlers policies. He was also indecisive and lazy in some ways. Key quote: unwilling to take decisions, frequently uncertain in some respects a weak dictator (Hans Mommsen)
Boardworks Ltd 2005
22 of 24
23 of 24
Discussion point
1. What is the essential difference between the Intentionalists and the Structuralists?
24 of 24