Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Table of Contents
Timeline Gantt Chart Problem Statement Background Customer Scope Customer Requirements Deliverables Brainstorming Research Identify Criteria & Constraints Explore Possibilities Pros and Cons Select an Approach CAD Bill of Material Build Process Test Criteria Test Plan Prototype Test Results Lessons Learned Summary
Timeline
Gantt
Problem Statement
Students lack proficiency in Engineering
By creating an RC airplane:
Gain knowledge Gain experience for college environment
Background
Gain knowledge in Aeronautics and Material Sciences Implement calculus and physics for advanced calculations Recognize properties of different materials balsa wood, foam, etc.
Customer
Mr. Pritchard
Mrs. Brandner
Scope
Create RC airplane to takeoff, fly, and land Consist of fuselage, wings, motor, servos Documented in engineering notebook Presented in technical report and Powerpoint presentation
Scope (contd)
Experts
Mr. Pritchard Mrs. Brandner Mr. Cotie
Built of balsa wood and foam Held together with various glues Create lightest prototype as possible
Scope (contd)
Requirements
12-step design process Strength tests Cost estimates CAD drawings Data for 3 diff. materials Calculations for plane (thrust, drag, lift)
Scope (contd)
Expected cost to be $100
Limitations with various clubs and sports
Customer Requirements
Mr. Pritchard
3 tests on 3 different materials Strength test on material/prototype
Mrs. Brandner
Complex calculations using physics and calculus Submit engineering notebook
Additional
Must fit in technology room Must be tested outside school property
Deliverables
Mr. Pritchard
RC Airplane prototype Final Report Design Notebook(s) Powerpoint Presentation
Mrs. Brandner
Calculations
Brainstorming
Construction
What building materials will be used? What bonding materials will be used? What prefabricated materials will be used? What tools will be used?
Brainstorming (contd)
Plane characteristics
How will the airplane be powered? How will the airplane be maneuvered? What weather conditions are required to fly the plane? What wing structure will be used? What aesthetics will we consider? What is the optimal center of gravity?
Brainstorming (contd)
Testing
Where will we fly the airplane? What if the airplane crashes? Will we need permission to fly the airplane? How will we test the airplane?
Research
Looked heavily into materials
Balsa vs. Basswood Foam vs. Metal vs. Fiberglass
Structure of plane
Skeleton build with thin covering Solid build
Research (contd)
Motor types
Electric, nitro engine, jet engine
Servos
Move surfaces of plane Provide turning capabilities
Propeller/Landing gear
Propeller needs to fit with motor Proper size wheels
Research (contd)
Plane channels
Ailerons for roll Elevators for pitch Throttle for speed Rudder for yaw Electronic Speed Controller (ESC) 3-channel system most practical
Research (contd)
Wing position
High, mid, and low-wing High is most stable and easiest to fly
Tail
V-tail and T-tail T-tails better with low speeds for control
Transmitter
Prefabricated at 72 MHz frequency band
Constraints
Must fit inside technology room 3 ft. wingspan for detail, but not too large
Explore Possibilities
Pros
Basswood
Porous Less glue required Lightweight Cheap Widely available Stiff Easy to sand Wont crush Lightweight
Cons
Varying strength
Foam
Plastic
Very lightweight
Strong Rigid Very strong Rigid Very strong Very lightweight
Metal
Fiberglass
Hard to sand Not widely available More expensive Hard to work with Not very strong Rigid Hard to work with Expensive Relatively heavy Very heavy Expensive Hard to work with Not widely available Very expensive No previous experience Not widely available
Pros
Lightweight Less drag Sturdy Keep airflow behind wing Creates clean airflow Better pitch control
Cons
Less aerodynamic
T-Tail
Pros
Cons
Not as acrobatic
Pros
Easiest to use Low cost Light color Quick cooling time Relatively easy to use Low cost Very light Expands while setting Best for wood than other materials Waterproof Expands when dry Less glue required Cheap Water-resistant Strong flexible bond Easy to peel off Not brittle Very strong bond Often used for model aircraft Versatile Water resistant
Cons
Poor heat resistance Poor moisture resistance Bond not very strong Bond not strong Leaves residue Visible on plane Hard to work with Contains air bubbles Somewhat expensive
Pro-bond Glue
Heavy
Flammable Highly toxic Expensive Expensive Can become brittle Long cure times
Pros
Easily available Very efficient Easy to use Fairly cheap
Cons
Larger diameter
Multi Blade
Smaller diameter
Wood Blade
Heavy
Pros
Cheap Easy to run Clean Doesnt require gasoline Lightweight
Cons
Low power / torque
Nitro
Relatively cheap Wide availability High torque and power High torque and power
Gas
Jet
Extreme power
Select an Approach
High I M P A C T Low Low Effort High
Design 1
Design 2
Design 3
CAD
Bill of Material
PART Power 15 Brushless Outrunner Motor 3-channel controller Landing Gear Servos Carbon fiber tube PART DESCRIPTION 950 Kv, 575 Watts COST PER UNIT $79.99 QUANTITY 1 TOTAL COST $79.99
Hitec Neon SS 72 MHz Elite Mini UltraStick HS-311 6.0 Volt 0.210 outer diam. x 0.132 inner diam. x 40
1 1 2 1
EPS Foam
Propeller Pushrods Balsa Wood TOTAL COST
x 14 x 48
Speed 400, 5.25 x 6.25 Fiberglass x 36
$9.49
$2.13 $8.95 $0.89
1
1 2 2
$9.49
$2.13 $17.90 $1.78 $224.20
Build Process
Part A
Layer four sheets of EPS foam on top of each other. Use four very thin dowel rods or four vise grips and stick it through all four layers in each of the four corners of the stack in order to hold it in place. Using a Sharpie, mark a rectangle that is 4 x 23 on the top of the stack. Using a hot wire, carve out the resulting box.
Test Criteria
Test Criteria for Prototype
Safety Functionality (in air/on ground) Ease of use Aerodynamics Velocity Weight/Size Strength
Test Criteria
Test Criteria for Materials
Foam
Strength Safety Compression/Tension Flexibility Weatherability (ability to withstand outdoor conditions)
Test Criteria
Test Criteria for Materials
Adhesive Weatherability Holding strength Drying time Motor/Propeller Thrust Torque Voltage (if necessary) Weatherability Weight/Size Functionality
Test Plan
Test Criteria Overall Plane Aerodynamics How Tested Look at the overall body of the plane and determine if any parts of the plane will decrease aerodynamics. Move all surfaces (rudder, elevators) and check for responsiveness. Check if the plane flies consistently in the air and doesnt wobble. Hang weights on the wings and see if the flex too much or break. Put weights on other critical structures of the plane. While in the air, look at distance/time to determine the speed. Measure the overall planes dimensions. Put the whole plane on a scale. Expected results The plane will have sound aerodynamics and will have minimal drag. All motorized parts of the plan will respond well. The plane will be safe and wont wobble. The plane will be able to support the weight and will not fracture. The velocity will be high enough to sustain flight. Planes weight will be in proportion to its size. Actual Results
Functionality
Safety
Strength
Velocity
Weight/Size
Prototype
Test Results
Lessons Learned
Summary