Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JUL 2006
TOTAL
CUSTOMERS
URBB
% NUMERIC % WEIGHTED
60,300 27,700
37,500 18,900
62% 68%
84% 78%
URBAN
RURAL TOTAL MARKET
57,600
30,400 88,000
40,800
15,600 56,400
71%
51% 64%
87%
67% 82%
TOTAL ROMANIA
OFF
ON
URBAN
total market
URBB
107.8%
117.8% 101.7% 122.8%
105.1%
112.7% 101.5% 106.4%
102.6%
104.5% 100.2% 115.4%
RURAL
JULY
total Hl sales/client Hl no of clients
TOTAL ROMANIA
OFF
ON
URBAN
total market
URBB
136.7%
569.3% 110.2% 534.1%
116.2%
300.0% 102.6% 131.7%
117.6%
189.8% 107.4% 405.5%
RURAL
Market Share Total Market Beer MEMRB Market, 2006 jan-jul MEMRB Market, 2005 jan-jul
Total Romania
Urban
Rural
5,736,168 5,401,015
4,274,920 3,964,424
1,461,248 1,436,591
106.2% Total Tuborg, 2006 jan-jul Total Tuborg, 2005 jan-jul Total Interbrew, 2006 jan-jul 10.1% 9.1% 22.4%
22.0%
22.4% 20.0% 22.9% 24.7% 11.2% 11.8% 7.6% 7.9%
22.9%
21.9% 19.9% 22.2% 24.1% 10.9% 11.0% 8.0% 8.4%
19.7%
24.2% 20.2% 25.0% 26.3% 11.9% 13.8% 6.4% 6.5%
Weighted Handling Total Market Beer MEMRB Market, 2006 jan-jul MEMRB Market, 2005 jan-jul
Total Romania
Urban
Rural
5,736,168 5,401,015
4,274,920 3,964,424
1,461,248 1,436,591
106% Total Tuborg, 2006 jan-jul Total Tuborg, 2005 jan-jul Total Interbrew, 2006 jan-jul 81.7% 80.5% 93.4%
91.6%
89.3% 87.6% 89.3% 91.7% 71.3% 68.7% 56.8% 55.0%
93.4%
90.8% 90.6% 90.5% 93.9% 71.4% 68.1% 60.0% 58.3%
86.5%
85.0% 79.0% 85.6% 85.8% 71.2% 70.4% 47.4% 45.8%
Total Romania
Urban
Rural
741,714 542,960 137% 0.8% 0.2% 0.8% 0.9% 45.4% 49.3% 33.9% 23.9% 13.4%
205,887 186,948 110% 0.2% 0.0% 1.5% 1.3% 37.7% 39.2% 23.8% 15.4% 23.2%
Total Carlsrom, Jul06 Total Carlsrom, Jul05 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul06 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul05 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul06 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul05 CORP.PEPSI COLA, Jul06 CORP.PEPSI COLA, Jul05 TOTAL EURO DRINKS, Jul06
19.9%
17.4%
27.2%
Weighted Handling Total Market SD MEMRB Market, Jul06 MEMRB Market, Jul05
Total Romania
Urban
Rural
741,714 542,960 137% 46% 27% 29% 27% 97% 97% 91% 89%
205,887 186,948 110% 16% 5% 28% 24% 93% 91% 80% 78%
Total Carlsrom, Jul06 Total Carlsrom, Jul05 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul06 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul05 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul06 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul05 CORP.PEPSI COLA, Jul06 CORP.PEPSI COLA, Jul05
80%
86%
79%
85%
82%
89%
UNIVERS OF CUSTOMERS 2006 Off premise outlets = slight increase ( + 2.0%), due to the General Store segment On premise outlets = constant Urban customers = slight increase ( + 2.6%) Rural customers = constant 2007 Off premise outlets = same slight increase, due to the general economic increase On premise outlets = possible slight decrease, due to the European legislation regarding food service industry and decreasing of the black market Urban customers = same trend Rural customers = possible slight increase
2006
25 82 871 71 35 1084
2007
65 117 965 146 39 1332
%
260% 143% 111% 206% 111% 123%
Local & regional chains have the same development trend Romanian regional chains started to expand their business (Pic, Trident, Fidelio, Cip Savin, Mara, Ethos etc.)
ON PREMISE CHANNEL
Market Share On Premise Beer MEMRB Market, 2006 jan-jul MEMRB Market, 2005 jan-jul
Total Romania
Horeca
Bar
Restaurant
Other Horeca
5,736,168 5,401,015
1,712,194 1,780,494
313,453 343,842
260,547 290,141
1,138,194 1,146,511
106.2% Total Tuborg, 2006 jan-jul Total Tuborg, 2005 jan-jul Total Interbrew, 2006 jan-jul 10.1% 9.1% 22.4%
22.0%
22.4% 20.0% 22.9% 24.7% 11.2% 11.8% 7.6% 7.9%
23.6%
35.8% 27.6% 25.8% 29.3% 2.8% 3.1% 1.0% 1.2%
24.8%
33.1% 24.8% 26.2% 29.7% 1.9% 2.0% 0.6% 0.8%
27.4%
32.5% 23.2% 27.2% 32.1% 0.4% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0%
22.3%
37.3% 29.5% 25.4% 28.5% 3.6% 4.2% 1.3% 1.6%
Other Horeca
1,712,194 1,780,494
313,453 343,842
260,547 290,141
1,138,194 1,146,511
96% Total Tuborg, 2006 jan-jul Total Tuborg, 2005 jan-jul Total Interbrew, 2006 jan-jul 77.6% 80.8% 91.5%
90.5%
92.0% 87.0% 86.1% 89.9% 25.2% 26.2% 12.7% 10.2%
91.7%
87.1% 85.9% 89.9% 93.5% 15.5% 18.5% 7.0% 6.4%
96.7%
91.6% 91.8% 94.6% 96.0% 6.7% 5.6% 3.4% 0.8%
88.6%
93.4% 86.2% 83.1% 87.2% 32.2% 33.7% 16.3% 13.8%
Total Romania
Horeca
Fast Food
Bar
Other Horeca
192,771 107,725 179% 0.3% 0.1% 0.4% 0.7% 33.9% 61.7% 59.0%
27,262 8,534 319% 0.7% 0.1% 0.2% 0.4% 28.4% 72.7% 70.1%
87,673 70,139 125% 0.2% 0.1% 0.9% 0.9% 46.6% 58.3% 39.5%
77,836 29,052 268% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 21.5% 66.9% 77.1%
Total Carlsrom, Jul06 Total Carlsrom, Jul05 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul06 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul05 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul06 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul05 CORP.PEPSI COLA, Jul06
21.8%
15.6% 19.9%
23.4%
4.9% 10.2%
21.9%
0.5% 4.4%
21.2%
9.8% 14.0%
29.4%
0.9% 2.9%
Total Romania
Horeca
Fast Food
Bar
Other Horeca
87,673 70,139 125% 10% 10% 8% 11% 91% 93% 77% 71%
Total Carlsrom, Jul06 Total Carlsrom, Jul05 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul06 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul05 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul06 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul05 CORP.PEPSI COLA, Jul06 CORP.PEPSI COLA, Jul05
80%
86%
27%
42%
4%
25%
50%
50%
10%
26%
2006 Outlets 2006 BEER Outlets 2006 SD Volume 2006 BEER Volume 2006 SD = = = = + 0% (URBB = 3%) + 76% 5% (URBB = 11%) + 79%
According MEMRB, for beer market, Other Horeca channel (including BODEGA, BIRT, FAST FOOD, COFFEE SHOPS) are responsible for 71% of the sales volume In this segment, URBB has the lowest market share! According MEMRB, for SD market, the huge increase came mainly from Fast Food channel 320% - and from Other Horeca (including Restaurants, Coffee Shops and Cafeteria) 268% Bar channel increase too with 124%
Market Share Off Premise Beer MEMRB Market, 2006 jan-jul MEMRB Market, 2005 jan-jul
Total Romania
Off Premise
Superma rket
Large Grocery
Small Grocery
Kiosk
General Store
5,736,168 5,401,015
4,023,974 3,620,521
462,819 160,448
521,878 517,907
2,284,230 2,225,815
446,986 460,973
308,062 255,378
106.2% Total Tuborg, 2006 jan-jul Total Tuborg, 2005 jan-jul Total Interbrew, 2006 jan-jul 10.1% 9.1% 22.4%
22.0%
22.4% 20.0% 22.9% 24.7% 11.2% 11.8% 7.6% 7.9%
21.2%
16.8% 16.2% 21.7% 22.4% 14.7% 16.0% 10.4% 11.2%
18.6%
11.2% 11.9% 21.1% 28.6% 20.6% 15.3% 5.3% 5.3%
21.2%
17.5% 15.4% 24.2% 24.1% 12.1% 15.1% 9.8% 11.0%
21.5%
18.3% 17.1% 21.1% 21.7% 13.9% 15.9% 11.1% 11.5%
21.0%
14.4% 15.8% 20.1% 20.6% 16.1% 16.7% 13.4% 12.6%
21.0%
16.0% 14.0% 25.5% 24.5% 15.1% 17.8% 9.4% 10.5%
Weighted Handling Off Premise Beer MEMRB Market, 2006 jan-jul MEMRB Market, 2005 jan-jul
Total Romania
Off Premise
Superma rket
Large Grocery
Small Grocery
Kiosk
General Store
5,736,168 5,401,015
4,023,974 3,620,521
462,819 160,448
521,878 517,907
2,284,230 2,225,815
446,986 460,973
308,062 255,378
106% Total Tuborg, 2006 jan-jul Total Tuborg, 2005 jan-jul Total Interbrew, 2006 jan-jul 81.7% 80.5% 93.4%
91.6%
89.3% 87.6% 89.3% 91.7% 71.3% 68.7% 56.8% 55.0%
92.1%
88.2% 87.8% 90.6% 92.6% 90.9% 89.6% 75.6% 77.0%
99.6%
98.9% 99.4% 97.0% 100.0% 97.3% 73.3% 40.0% 51.6%
95.3%
90.9% 90.8% 96.8% 96.7% 91.6% 94.2% 84.1% 81.8%
91.9%
87.2% 87.4% 88.3% 91.9% 91.6% 90.4% 81.7% 80.4%
93.0%
82.4% 87.8% 90.1% 94.3% 87.5% 89.4% 79.3% 76.2%
80.3%
83.1% 78.1% 88.6% 83.5% 80.4% 83.7% 64.3% 55.3%
Sales Volume Off Premise SD MEMRB Market, Jul06 MEMRB Market, Jul05
Total Romania
Off Premise
Superma rket
Large Grocery
Small Grocery
Kiosk
General Store
754,829 622,183 121% 0.8% 0.2% 1.1% 1.1% 46.2% 44.1% 24.8%
133,411 50,783 263% 1.5% 0.5% 0.8% 1.4% 50.4% 41.6% 22.1%
87,040 94,188 92% 1.0% 0.2% 1.0% 1.0% 43.2% 43.7% 29.2%
369,891 347,275 107% 0.7% 0.1% 1.4% 1.1% 44.5% 43.1% 23.7%
104,113 83,327 125% 0.3% 0.0% 0.7% 0.4% 52.2% 53.0% 29.4%
60,374 46,611 130% 0.9% 0.1% 0.8% 1.7% 41.7% 39.0% 22.5%
Total Carlsrom, Jul06 Total Carlsrom, Jul05 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul06 Total ROMAQUA GROUP, Jul05 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul06 CORPORATE COCA-COLA, Jul05 CORP.PEPSI COLA, Jul06
21.8% 15.6%
19.9%
21.5% 18.3%
21.6%
34.5% 13.1%
7.2%
23.2% 18.0%
20.8%
19.8% 20.6%
24.0%
22.1% 14.0%
17.4%
14.7% 23.2%
28.6%
Weighted Handling Off Premise SD MEMRB Market, Jul06 MEMRB Market, Jul05
Total Romania
Off Premise
Superma rket
Large Grocery
Small Grocery
Kiosk
General Store
40%
21% 29% 26% 96% 96% 89% 86% 80% 86%
43%
23% 35% 29% 96% 96% 91% 89% 93% 94%
97%
77% 86% 73% 97% 100% 100% 100% 99% 98%
51%
40% 32% 37% 99% 99% 93% 96% 95% 99%
32%
16% 26% 24% 97% 96% 89% 90% 93% 93%
11%
7% 13% 12% 90% 95% 85% 80% 88% 86%
33%
7% 20% 29% 91% 92% 86% 81% 86% 98%
2006 Outlets 2006 BEER Outlets 2006 SD Volume 2006 BEER Volume 2006 SD = = = = + 2% (URBB = +13%) + 2% 5% (URBB = 11%) + 21%
According MEMRB, for beer market, Small Grocery channel are responsible for 57% of the sales volume In this segment, URBB has the lowest market share (excepting General Store channel)! According MEMRB, for SD market, the increase came mainly from Kiosk channel 125% - and from General Store channel 130%
PORTER ANALYSIS - BUYERS KA average cost 2006 URBB for national chains = 15.8%
due to the high competition between chains and to the very fragmented
market, the bargaining power of the KA is just slightly increasing although, high competition for additional placements will increase the total expense, in fix amounts decreasing power for Cash & Carry Off premise bargaining power not existing competition for shelf space and POS placement may lead to some additional costs especially in SD business
Top Horeca
OCCASIONS ANALYSIS
TUBORG
BRAND FIT INDEX OVER LESS SALES INDEX OVER LESS
STABLE STRONG POSITION INSTABLE STRONG POSITION LOST OPPORTUNITY LOW IMPORTANCE
Fun Seekers Meal home Supermarket Relaxed Home Convenience stores Upbeat Home
Experimenters
Value Seekers
+/-
+/+
+/+
Trad.grocery stores
-/-
DANGER
Supermarket
Relaxed Outdoor Cash&Carry Relaxed Everyday Fashionable pub.town bar Trendy bar/disco Discotheque /nightclub Meal Out
OPPORTUNITY OPPORTUNITY
Petrol stations
Cash&Carry
Local bar
Upbeat Out
Fast Food
Meal in restaurant
SKOL
BRAND FIT INDEX OVER LESS SALES INDEX OVER LESS
STABLE STRONG POSITION INSTABLE STRONG POSITION LOST OPPORTUNITY LOW IMPORTANCE
Fun Seekers Meal home Supermarket Relaxed Home Convenience stores Upbeat Home
Experimenters
Value Seekers
OPPORTUNITY
+/-
+/+
+/+
Trad.grocery stores
-/-
DANGER
Supermarket Relaxed Outdoor Cash&Carry Relaxed Everyday Fashionable pub.town bar Trendy bar/disco Discotheque /nightclub Meal Out Fast Food
DANGER DANGER DANGER DANGER
Petrol stations
Cash&Carry
OPPORTUNITY
Local bar
Upbeat Out
DANGER
Meal in restaurant
CARLSBERG
BRAND FIT INDEX OVER LESS SALES INDEX OVER LESS
STABLE STRONG POSITION INSTABLE STRONG POSITION LOST OPPORTUNITY LOW IMPORTANCE
Experimenters
Value Seekers
+/-
+/+
+/+
Trad.grocery stores
-/-
Convenience stores Upbeat Home Supermarket Relaxed Outdoor Cash&Carry Relaxed Everyday Fashionable pub.town bar Trendy bar/disco Discotheque /nightclub Meal Out Fast Food
DANGER
Petrol stations
Cash&Carry
Local bar
Upbeat Out
Meal in restaurant
HOLSTEN
BRAND FIT INDEX OVER LESS SALES INDEX OVER LESS
STABLE STRONG POSITION INSTABLE STRONG POSITION LOST OPPORTUNITY LOW IMPORTANCE
Experimenters
Value Seekers
+/-
OPPORTUNITY
+/+
+/+
Supermarket Relaxed Home Convenience stores Upbeat Home Supermarket Relaxed Outdoor Cash&Carry Relaxed Everyday Fashionable pub.town bar Trendy bar/disco Discotheque /nightclub Meal Out Fast Food Meal in restaurant
OPPORTUNITY
Trad.grocery stores
-/-
Petrol stations
Cash&Carry
Local bar
Upbeat Out
OPPORTUNITY
OPPORTUNITY
COMMENTS:
The analysis take in consideration two dimensions: brand fit brand sales index vs market index Strong stable position Instable strong position Lost opportunity = over index sales / over index brand fit = over index sales / under index brand fit = under index sales / over index brand fit
4.
1
There are 3 possible actions: = to evaluate (to understand the benefits) and continue the present activities 2 + 3 = increase availability, develop trade marketing activities, sales aggressive
TUBORG
Stable strong position specialized drink stores cash & carry (relaxed out occasion)
fashionable pub
trendy bar, discotheque Instable strong position + lost opportunities supermarket (for younger consumers)
fast food
restaurant Less important area traditional grocery store
SKOL
Stable strong position local bar (for younger consumers) Instable strong position + lost opportunities supermarket (for middle age consumers) cash & carry convenience store traditional grocery store specialized drink store petrol station local bar (for older consumers) trendy bar, discotheque fast food restaurants Less important area fashionable pub
CARLSBERG
Stable strong position petrol stations specialized drink stores
fast food
Instable strong position + lost opportunities supermarket convenience store
restaurant
Less important area traditional grocery store
HOLSTEN
Stable strong position = Instable strong position + lost opportunities supermarket cash & carry convenience store specialized drink store petrol station local bar trendy bar, discotheque fashionable pub fast food restaurants Less important area traditional grocery store
TUBORG
2 0 2 2 1 2 2
SKOL
2 2 2 2 2 2 2
CARLSBERG
2 0 2 1 1 1 1
HOLSTEN
2 0 2 2 2 2 2
FASHIONABLE PUB/BAR
TRENDY BAR DISCOTHEQUE FAST FOOD RESTAURANT
1
1 1 2 2
0
2 2 2 2
1
1 1 1 2
2
2 2 2 2
1
2 2 0
= STRONG STABLE POSITION = INSTABLE POSITION FIRST PRIORITY = INSTABLE POSITION = LESS IMPORTANT POSITION
S.W.O.T. ANALYSIS
BUCURESTI
S Low distribution cost TOP HORECA Decreasing return Increasing wholesalers volumes Availability Market share Improving collection of debts W Less experienced sales management Fluctuation Less experienced sales force High number customers / sales agent Distribution constraints in some pick periods High cost for HORECA exclusivities (26%) Sales & availability Orangina & Holsten
T Small outlets reduction (financial risk) Low unemployment (low professionalism for new employees) Aggressive competition ON PREMISE Long payment terms used by competitors
KA
S Dedicated sales force (Bucuresti + 4 branches + Brasov) Market share (18% according MEMRB) Availability 100% Placements in the stores Draught exclusivity in gas station Portfolio Relatively low cost (16%) Market share in hypermarket channel W 2 branches without dedicated KA sales agent (Craiova, Ploiesti) Lack of personal in Indirect Shelf share lower than market share local and regional chains Merchandising (especially in week-ends) Package quality for 6 packs Lower market share in local KA Unattractive packages (8+CD) Not enough trade marketing Not enough cold space
O New chains (Real, Spar, Kaufland, Auchan) Increase consumption habit Development of existing chains (+ 23%) Central warehouse (Billa, Metro, Kaufland)
T Aggressive competition (especially SD) Delivery constraints Price war between chains Customers fluctuation Financial risk (bad debts + discounts)
FILIALE
S KA national & local TOP HORECA (Timisoara, Iasi, partial Cluj and Constanta) SV Operations (distribution, fleet) Availability urban (except Craiova & Ploiesti) Distributors in Cluj si Prahova for rural area Stable management New branches (except Constanta) Trade Marketing (Arad, Craiova, Iasi, Seaside) Seaside 2006 (except partial Mamaia) Sales Orangina (except Iasi) O New shopping malls Development of HORECA outlets Increasing consumption in rural areas (Timisoara, Cluj, Constanta, Ploiesti) W Fluctuation High number customers / sales agent Cleaning Logistic operations in the warehouses Not strong enough connection with Central Office High cost for HORECA exclusivities (24%)
T Competition (beer) uses distributors Aggressive competition in On Premise Long payment terms used by competitors
INDIRECT
S - Stable and professional sales force - Low cost for HORECA exclusivities (16%) - Reduced financial risk (warranty letters) - Local festivals W - Not enough sales force (uncovered areas, lack of KA structure) - Low availability (especially in rural area) - Lack of interest or professionalism of some distributors (Z Centrala, Bihor, Bacau, Galati, Arges, Caras) - Logistic problems at some distributors - Merchandising - Not enough trade marketing T - European legislation (transport, logistics) - Distributors fluctuation - Increasing costs (fuel cost increasing)
O - Sibiu European Cultural City - Tourism development (Danube Delta, Prahova Valley, Maramures, Bucovina) - Development of KA local/ regional
TOTAL ROMANIA
S Sales management training program Program DPS Availability & market share national KA Availability & market share Bucharest Good trend in the branches (sales + operations) DSO decreasing Partnership with HORECA chains Trade marketing program Call Center for HORECA & KA customers Draught (image & market share 10.7%) Forward stock higher than market share (11.9% vs 10.1%) Increasing average sales/customer in hl (+11% vs +4% total market) W Not any program for distributors development Manual operating system for indirect orders Lack of data from distributors Availability rural & some urban areas Availability Holsten & Orangina Not enough coolers (especially SD) cold stock decreasing (beer) or much lower than market share (SD) Lack of sales force trust in Orangina Merchandising Wrong launching for Granini Decreasing market share in On Premise channel High cost for exclusivity contracts (22%) Out of Stock higher than competitors (6% URBB vs 4% total market) Bonus system for sales force T Beer On Premise decreasing (95% 2006 vs 2005) Increasing low price PET consumption Unemployment Increasing costs in On Premise channel
O Increasing consumption (beer and SD) KA development (288% sales increase in SMKT, according MEMRB) Increasing rural area consumption (beer & SD)