You are on page 1of 110

Operations

Management
Chapter 4 Forecasting
PowerPoint presentation to accompany
Heizer/Render
Principles of Operations Management, 6e
Operations Management, 8e
2006
Prentice
Hall, Inc. Hall, Inc.

2006
Prentice

41

Outline
Global Company Profile:
Tupperware Corporation
What Is Forecasting?
Forecasting Time Horizons
The Influence of Product Life Cycle

Types Of Forecasts

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

42

Outline Continued
The Strategic Importance Of
Forecasting
Human Resources
Capacity
Supply-Chain Management

Seven Steps In The Forecasting


System

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

43

Outline Continued
Forecasting Approaches
Overview of Qualitative Methods
Overview of Quantitative Methods

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

44

Outline Continued
Time-series Forecasting
Decomposition of a Time Series
Nave Approach
Moving Averages
Exponential Smoothing
Exponential Smoothing with Trend
Adjustment
Trend Projections
Seasonal Variations in Data
Cyclical Variations in Data

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

45

Outline Continued
Associative Forecasting Methods:
Regression And Correlation
Analysis
Using Regression Analysis to
Forecast
Standard Error of the Estimate
Correlation Coefficients for
Regression Lines
Multiple-Regression Analysis
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

46

Outline Continued
Monitoring And Controlling
Forecasts
Adaptive Smoothing
Focus Forecasting

Forecasting In The Service Sector

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

47

Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter, you
should be able to :
Identify or Define:
Forecasting
Types of forecasts
Time horizons
Approaches to forecasts

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

48

Learning Objectives
When you complete this chapter, you
should be able to :
Describe or Explain:
Moving averages
Exponential smoothing
Trend projections
Regression and correlation analysis
Measures of forecast accuracy
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

49

Forecasting at Tupperware
Each of 50 profit centers around the
world is responsible for
computerized monthly, quarterly,
and 12-month sales projections
These projections are aggregated by
region, then globally, at
Tupperwares World Headquarters
Tupperware uses all techniques
discussed in text
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 10

Tupperwares
Process

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 11

Three Key Factors for


Tupperware
The number of registered
consultants or sales
representatives
The percentage of currently active
dealers (this number changes each
week and month)
Sales per active dealer, on a weekly
basis
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 12

Forecast by Consensus
Although inputs come from sales,
marketing, finance, and production,
final forecasts are the consensus of
all participating managers
The final step is Tupperwares
version of the jury of executive
opinion

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 13

What is Forecasting?
Process of
predicting a future
event
Underlying basis of
all business
decisions

??

Production
Inventory
Personnel
Facilities
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 14

Forecasting Time Horizons


Short-range forecast
Up to 1 year, generally less than 3 months
Purchasing, job scheduling, workforce levels,
job assignments, production levels

Medium-range forecast
3 months to 3 years
Sales and production planning, budgeting

Long-range forecast
3+ years
New product planning, facility location,
research and development
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 15

Distinguishing Differences
Medium/long range forecasts deal with
more comprehensive issues and support
management decisions regarding
planning and products, plants and
processes
Short-term forecasting usually employs
different methodologies than longer-term
forecasting
Short-term forecasts tend to be more
accurate than longer-term forecasts
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 16

Influence of Product Life


Cycle
Introduction Growth Maturity Decline
Introduction and growth require longer
forecasts than maturity and decline
As product passes through life cycle,
forecasts are useful in projecting
Staffing levels
Inventory levels
Factory capacity
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 17

Product Life Cycle


Company Strategy/Issues

Introduction

Growth

Maturity

Best period to
increase market
share

Practical to change
price or quality
image

Poor time to
change image,
price, or quality

R&D engineering is
critical

Strengthen niche

Competitive costs
become critical
Defend market
position

CD-ROM
Internet
Sales

Decline
Cost control
critical

Fax machines

Drive-through
restaurants

Color printers

Flat-screen
monitors

DVD

3 1/2
Floppy
disks
Figure 2.5

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 18

OM Strategy/Issues

Product Life Cycle


Introduction

Growth

Maturity

Decline

Product design
and
development
critical
Frequent
product and
process design
changes
Short production
runs
High production
costs
Limited models

Forecasting
critical
Product and
process
reliability
Competitive
product
improvements
and options
Increase capacity

Standardization
Less rapid
product changes
more minor
changes
Optimum
capacity
Increasing
stability of
process
Long production
runs
Product
improvement and
cost cutting

Little product
differentiation
Cost
minimization
Overcapacity
in the
industry
Prune line to
eliminate
items not
returning
good margin
Reduce
capacity

Attention to
quality

Shift toward
product focus
Enhance
distribution

Figure 2.5
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 19

Types of Forecasts
Economic forecasts
Address business cycle inflation rate,
money supply, housing starts, etc.

Technological forecasts
Predict rate of technological progress
Impacts development of new products

Demand forecasts
Predict sales of existing product

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 20

Strategic Importance of
Forecasting
Human Resources Hiring, training,
laying off workers
Capacity Capacity shortages can
result in undependable delivery, loss
of customers, loss of market share
Supply-Chain Management Good
supplier relations and price advance

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 21

Seven Steps in Forecasting


Determine the use of the forecast
Select the items to be forecasted
Determine the time horizon of the
forecast
Select the forecasting model(s)
Gather the data
Make the forecast
Validate and implement results
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 22

The Realities!
Forecasts are seldom perfect
Most techniques assume an
underlying stability in the system
Product family and aggregated
forecasts are more accurate than
individual product forecasts

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 23

Forecasting Approaches
Qualitative Methods
Used when situation is vague
and little data exist
New products
New technology

Involves intuition, experience


e.g., forecasting sales on Internet
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 24

Forecasting Approaches
Quantitative Methods
Used when situation is stable and
historical data exist
Existing products
Current technology

Involves mathematical techniques


e.g., forecasting sales of color
televisions
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 25

Overview of Qualitative
Methods
Jury of executive opinion
Pool opinions of high-level
executives, sometimes augment by
statistical models

Delphi method
Panel of experts, queried iteratively

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 26

Overview of Qualitative
Methods
Sales force composite
Estimates from individual
salespersons are reviewed for
reasonableness, then aggregated

Consumer Market Survey


Ask the customer

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 27

Jury of Executive Opinion


Involves small group of high-level
managers
Group estimates demand by working
together
Combines managerial experience with
statistical models
Relatively quick
Group-think
disadvantage
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 28

Sales Force Composite


Each salesperson projects his or
her sales
Combined at district and national
levels
Sales reps know customers wants
Tends to be overly optimistic

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 29

Delphi Method
Iterative group
process,
continues until
consensus is
reached
Staff
(Administering
3 types of
survey)
participants
Decision makers
Staff
Respondents
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Decision Makers
(Evaluate
responses and
make decisions)

Respondents
(People who can
make valuable
judgments)
4 30

Consumer Market Survey


Ask customers about purchasing
plans
What consumers say, and what
they actually do are often different
Sometimes difficult to answer

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 31

Overview of Quantitative
Approaches
1. Naive approach
2. Moving averages
3. Exponential
smoothing

Time-Series
Models

4. Trend projection
5. Linear regression
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Associative
Model
4 32

Time Series Forecasting


Set of evenly spaced numerical
data
Obtained by observing response
variable at regular time periods

Forecast based only on past


values
Assumes that factors influencing
past and present will continue
influence in future
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 33

Time Series Components


Trend

Cyclical

Seasonal

Random

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 34

Demand for product or service

Components of Demand
Trend
component
Seasonal peaks

Actual
demand

Random
variation
|
1

|
2

|
3
Year

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Average
demand over
four years
|
4
Figure 4.1
4 35

Trend Component
Persistent, overall upward or
downward pattern
Changes due to population,
technology, age, culture, etc.
Typically several years
duration

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 36

Seasonal Component
Regular pattern of up and
down fluctuations
Due to weather, customs, etc.
Occurs within a single year

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Period

Length

Number of
Seasons

Week
Month
Month
Year
Year
Year

Day
Week
Day
Quarter
Month
Week

7
4-4.5
28-31
4
12
52
4 37

Cyclical Component
Repeating up and down movements
Affected by business cycle,
political, and economic factors
Multiple years duration
Often causal or
associative
relationships
0
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

10

15

20
4 38

Random Component
Erratic, unsystematic, residual
fluctuations
Due to random variation or
unforeseen events
Short duration and
nonrepeating

M
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

F
4 39

Naive Approach
Assumes demand in next period is
the same as demand in most
recent period
e.g., If May sales were 48, then June
sales will be 48

Sometimes cost effective and


efficient

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 40

Moving Average Method


MA is a series of arithmetic means
Used if little or no trend
Used often for smoothing
Provides overall impression of data
over time
demand in previous n periods
Moving average =
n
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 41

Moving Average Example


Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Actual
Shed Sales
10
12
13
16
19
23
26

3-Month
Moving Average

(10 + 12 + 13)/3 = 11 2/3


(12 + 13 + 16)/3 = 13 2/3
(13 + 16 + 19)/3 = 16
(16 + 19 + 23)/3 = 19 1/3

4 42

Shed Sales

Graph of Moving Average


30
28
26
24
22
20
18
16
14
12
10

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Moving
Average
Forecast

Actual
Sales

|
J

|
F

|
M

|
A

|
M

|
J

|
J

|
A

|
S

|
O

|
N

|
D
4 43

Weighted Moving Average


Used when trend is present
Older data usually less important

Weights based on experience and


intuition
Weighted
=
moving average

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

(weight for period n)


x (demand in period n)
weights

4 44

Weights Applied

Period

3
Last
month
Weighted Moving
Average
2
1
6

Month

Actual
Shed Sales

January
February
March
April
May
June
July

10
12
13
16
19
23
26

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Two months ago


Three months ago
Sum of weights

3-Month Weighted
Moving Average

[(3 x 13) + (2 x 12) + (10)]/6 = 121/6


[(3 x 16) + (2 x 13) + (12)]/6 = 141/3
[(3 x 19) + (2 x 16) + (13)]/6 = 17
[(3 x 23) + (2 x 19) + (16)]/6 = 201/2
4 45

Potential Problems With


Moving Average
Increasing n smooths the forecast
but makes it less sensitive to
changes
Do not forecast trends well
Require extensive historical data

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 46

Moving Average And


Weighted Moving Average
Weighted
moving
average

30
Sales demand

25
20

Actual
sales

15

Moving
average

10
5
|

Figure 4.2
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

|
F

|
M

|
A

|
M

|
J

|
J

|
A

|
S

|
O

|
N

|
D
4 47

Exponential Smoothing
Form of weighted moving average
Weights decline exponentially
Most recent data weighted most

Requires smoothing constant ( )


Ranges from 0 to 1
Subjectively chosen

Involves little record keeping of past


data
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 48

Exponential Smoothing
New forecast = last periods forecast
+ (last periods actual demand
last periods forecast)
Ft = Ft 1 + (At 1 - Ft 1)
where

Ft = new forecast
Ft 1 = previous forecast
= smoothing (or weighting)
constant (0 1)

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 49

Exponential Smoothing
Example
Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 50

Exponential Smoothing
Example
Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20
New forecast = 142 + .2(153 142)

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 51

Exponential Smoothing
Example
Predicted demand = 142 Ford Mustangs
Actual demand = 153
Smoothing constant = .20
New forecast = 142 + .2(153 142)
= 142 + 2.2
= 144.2 144 cars

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 52

Effect of
Smoothing Constants
Weight Assigned to
Smoothing
Constant

Most
Recent
Period
( )

2nd Most 3rd Most 4th Most 5th Most


Recent
Recent
Recent
Recent
Period
Period
Period
Period
2
3
(1 - ) (1 - )
(1 - )
(1 - )4

= .1

.1

.09

.081

.073

.066

= .5

.5

.25

.125

.063

.031

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 53

Impact of Different
225

Demand

= .5

Actual
demand

200
175
150
|
1

|
2

|
3

|
4

|
5

|
6

= .1

|
7

|
8

|
9

Quarter
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 54

Choosing
The objective is to obtain the most
accurate forecast no matter the
technique
We generally do this by selecting the
model that gives us the lowest forecast
error
Forecast error = Actual demand - Forecast value
= At - Ft
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 55

Common Measures of Error


Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)
|actual - forecast|
MAD =
n

Mean Squared Error (MSE)


(forecast errors)2
MSE =
n
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 56

Common Measures of Error


Mean Absolute Percent Error (MAPE)
n

100 |actuali - forecasti|/actuali


MAPE =

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

i=1

4 57

Comparison of Forecast
Error
Quarter

Actual
Tonnage
Unloaded

Rounded
Forecast
with
= .10

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .10

Rounded
Forecast
with
= .50

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

180
168
159
175
190
205
180
182

175
176
175
173
173
175
178
178

5
8
16
2
17
30
2
4
84

175
178
173
166
170
180
193
186

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .50

5
10
14
9
20
25
13
4
100

4 58

Comparison of Forecast
Error
|deviations|

MADActual
=
Quarter

Tonage
Unloaded

Rounded
Forecast
n
with
= .10

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .10

For

=
.10
1
180
175
2
168 = 84/8
176
= 10.50
3
4 For
5
6
7
8

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

159
175
175
= .50 173
190
173
205 = 100/8
175 =
180
178
182
178

5
8
16
2
17
12.5030
2
4
84

Rounded
Forecast
with
= .50

175
178
173
166
170
180
193
186

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .50

5
10
14
9
20
25
13
4
100

4 59

Comparison of Forecast
Error
(forecast errors)
2

MSE = Actual
Quarter

Tonage
Unloaded

Rounded
Forecast
n
with
= .10

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .10

For

=
.10
1
180
175
5
2
168
176
= 1,558/8
= 194.758
3
4 For
5
6
7
8

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

159
175
175
= .50 173
190
173
= 1,612/8
=
205
175
180
178
182
178

16
2
17
201.50
30
2
4
84
MAD
10.50

Rounded
Forecast
with
= .50

175
178
173
166
170
180
193
186

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .50

5
10
14
9
20
25
13
4
100
12.50

4 60

Comparison of Forecast
n
Error|/actual
100 |deviation
i

i =Rounded
1
Absolute
MAPE =Actual
Forecast n Deviation
Tonage
with
for
Quarter Unloaded
= .10
= .10

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

For 180
= .10 175
5
168
176
8
= 45.62/8
= 5.70%
159
For 175
=
190
205
180
182

175
.50 173
173
= 54.8/8
175
178
178
MAD
MSE

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

16
2
17
= 6.85%
30
2
4
84
10.50
194.75

Rounded
Forecast
with
= .50

175
178
173
166
170
180
193
186

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .50

5
10
14
9
20
25
13
4
100
12.50
201.50
4 61

Comparison of Forecast
Error
Quarter

Actual
Tonnage
Unloaded

Rounded
Forecast
with
= .10

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

180
168
159
175
190
205
180
182

175
176
175
173
173
175
178
178
MAD
MSE
MAPE

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .10

5
8
16
2
17
30
2
4
84
10.50
194.75
5.70%

Rounded
Forecast
with
= .50

175
178
173
166
170
180
193
186

Absolute
Deviation
for
= .50

5
10
14
9
20
25
13
4
100
12.50
201.50
6.85%
4 62

Exponential Smoothing with


Trend Adjustment
When a trend is present, exponential
smoothing must be modified
Forecast
including (FITt) =
trend

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

exponentially
smoothed (Ft) + (Tt)
forecast

exponentially
smoothed
trend

4 63

Exponential Smoothing with


Trend Adjustment
Ft = (At - 1) + (1 - )(Ft - 1 + Tt - 1)
Tt = (Ft - Ft - 1) + (1 - )Tt - 1
Step 1: Compute Ft
Step 2: Compute Tt
Step 3: Calculate the forecast FITt = Ft + Tt
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 64

Exponential Smoothing with


Trend Adjustment Example
Month(t)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Actual
Demand (At)

Smoothed
Forecast, Ft

Smoothed
Trend, Tt

Forecast
Including
Trend, FITt

12
17
20
19
24
21
31
28
36

11

13.00

Table 4.1
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 65

Exponential Smoothing with


Trend Adjustment Example
Month(t)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Actual
Demand (At)

Smoothed
Forecast, Ft

Smoothed
Trend, Tt

Forecast
Including
Trend, FITt

12
17
20
19
24
21
31
28
36

11

13.00

Step 1: Forecast for Month 2


F2 = A1 + (1 - )(F1 + T1)
F2 = (.2)(12) + (1 - .2)(11 + 2)
= 2.4 + 10.4 = 12.8 units

Table 4.1
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 66

Exponential Smoothing with


Trend Adjustment Example
Month(t)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Actual
Demand (At)

Smoothed
Forecast, Ft

Smoothed
Trend, Tt

Forecast
Including
Trend, FITt

12
17
20
19
24
21
31
28
36

11
12.80

13.00

Step 2: Trend for Month 2


T2 = (F2 - F1) + (1 - )T1
T2 = (.4)(12.8 - 11) + (1 - .4)(2)
= .72 + 1.2 = 1.92 units

Table 4.1
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 67

Exponential Smoothing with


Trend Adjustment Example
Month(t)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Actual
Demand (At)

Smoothed
Forecast, Ft

Smoothed
Trend, Tt

12
17
20
19
24
21
31
28
36

11
12.80

2
1.92

Forecast
Including
Trend, FITt
13.00

Step 3: Calculate FIT for Month 2


FIT2 = F2 + T1
FIT2 = 12.8 + 1.92
= 14.72 units

Table 4.1
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 68

Exponential Smoothing with


Trend Adjustment Example
Month(t)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Actual
Demand (At)

Smoothed
Forecast, Ft

Smoothed
Trend, Tt

Forecast
Including
Trend, FITt

12
17
20
19
24
21
31
28
36

11
12.80
15.18
17.82
19.91
22.51
24.11
27.14
29.28
32.48

2
1.92
2.10
2.32
2.23
2.38
2.07
2.45
2.32
2.68

13.00
14.72
17.28
20.14
22.14
24.89
26.18
29.59
31.60
35.16

Table 4.1
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 69

Exponential Smoothing with


Trend Adjustment Example
35

Product demand

30

Actual demand (At)

25
20
15
10

Forecast including trend (FITt)

5
0

|
1

|
2

|
3

|
4

|
5

|
6

Time (month)
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

|
7

|
8

|
9

Figure 4.3
4 70

Trend Projections
Fitting a trend line to historical data points
to project into the medium-to-long-range
Linear trends can be found using the least
squares technique
y^ = a + bx
^

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

where y
= computed value of
the variable to be predicted
(dependent variable)
a
= y-axis intercept
b
= slope of the regression line
x
= the independent variable

4 71

Values of Dependent Variable

Least Squares Method


Actual observation
(y value)

Deviation7

Deviation5
Deviation3
Deviation4
Deviation1
Deviation2

Trend line, y^ = a + bx

Time period
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Deviation6

Figure 4.4
4 72

Values of Dependent Variable

Least Squares Method


Actual observation
(y value)

Deviation7

Deviation5
Deviation3

Least squares method


minimizes the sum of the
Deviation
squared errors (deviations)
4

Deviation1
Deviation2

Trend line, y^ = a + bx

Time period
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Deviation6

Figure 4.4
4 73

Least Squares Method


Equations to calculate the regression variables
y^ = a + bx
xy - nxy
b=
x2 - nx2
a = y - bx

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 74

Least Squares Example


Year
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005

Time
Period (x)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
x = 28
x=4

Electrical Power
Demand
74
79
80
90
105
142
122
y = 692
y = 98.86

x2

xy

1
4
9
16
25
36
49
x2 = 140

74
158
240
360
525
852
854
xy = 3,063

3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)
xy - nxy
b=
=
= 10.54
140 - (7)(42)
x2 - nx2
a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 75

Least Squares Example


Year

Time
Period (x)

Electrical Power
Demand

x2

xy

1999
1
74
1
2000
2
79
4
line is 80
2001The trend
3
9
2002
4
90
16
2003
105
25
y^ 5= 56.70 + 10.54x
2004
6
142
36
2005
7
122
49
x = 28
y = 692
x2 = 140
x=4
y = 98.86

74
158
240
360
525
852
854
xy = 3,063

3,063 - (7)(4)(98.86)
xy - nxy
b = x2 - nx2 =
= 10.54
140 - (7)(42)
a = y - bx = 98.86 - 10.54(4) = 56.70
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 76

Power demand

Least Squares Example


160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50

Trend line,
y^ = 56.70 + 10.54x

|
1999

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

|
2000

|
2001

|
2002

|
2003
Year

|
2004

|
2005

|
2006

|
2007
4 77

Seasonal Variations In Data


The multiplicative seasonal model can
modify trend data to accommodate
seasonal variations in demand
1. Find average historical demand for each season
2. Compute the average demand over all seasons
3. Compute a seasonal index for each season
4. Estimate next years total demand
5. Divide this estimate of total demand by the
number of seasons, then multiply it by the
seasonal index for that season
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 79

Seasonal Index Example


Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Demand
2003 2004 2005
80
70
80
90
113
110
100
88
85
77
75
82

85
85
93
95
125
115
102
102
90
78
72
78

105
85
82
115
131
120
113
110
95
85
83
80

Average
2003-2005

Average
Monthly

90
80
85
100
123
115
105
100
90
80
80
80

94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94

Seasonal
Index

4 80

Seasonal Index Example


Month

Demand
2003 2004 2005

Average
2003-2005

Average
Monthly

Jan
80
85 105
90
94
Feb
70
85
85
80
94
2003-2005
Mar
80
93 average
82
85 monthly demand
94
Seasonal index =
demand
Apr
90
95 115 average monthly
100
94
May
113 125= 90/94
131 = .957 123
94
Jun
110 115 120
115
94
Jul
100 102 113
105
94
Aug
88 102 110
100
94
Sept
85
90
95
90
94
Oct
77
78
85
80
94
Nov
75
72
83
80
94
Dec
82
78
80
80
94
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Seasonal
Index
0.957

4 81

Seasonal Index Example


Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Demand
2003 2004 2005
80
70
80
90
113
110
100
88
85
77
75
82

85
85
93
95
125
115
102
102
90
78
72
78

105
85
82
115
131
120
113
110
95
85
83
80

Average
2003-2005

Average
Monthly

Seasonal
Index

90
80
85
100
123
115
105
100
90
80
80
80

94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94
94

0.957
0.851
0.904
1.064
1.309
1.223
1.117
1.064
0.957
0.851
0.851
0.851
4 82

Seasonal Index Example


Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Demand
2003 2004 2005

Average
2003-2005

Average
Monthly

80
85 105
90
94
for802006
70
85 Forecast
85
94
80
93
82
85
94
annual demand
= 1,200
90Expected
95 115
100
94
113 125 131
123
94
110 115 120 1,200 115
94
Jan
x .957 = 96
100 102 113 12
105
94
88 102 110 1,200 100
94
85
90
Feb 95
x90
.851 = 85 94
12
77
78
85
80
94
75
72
83
80
94
82
78
80
80
94

Seasonal
Index
0.957
0.851
0.904
1.064
1.309
1.223
1.117
1.064
0.957
0.851
0.851
0.851
4 83

Seasonal Index Example


2006 Forecast
2005 Demand
2004 Demand
2003 Demand

140
130

Demand

120
110
100
90
80
70
|
J

|
F

|
M

|
A

|
M

|
J

|
J

|
A

|
S

|
O

|
N

|
D

Time
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 84

San Diego Hospital


Trend Data
10,200

Inpatient Days

10,000
9,800
9,600
9,400

9573

9530
9551

9659

9616
9594

9637

9745

9702
9680

9723

9766

9,200
9,000

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
Figure 4.6

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 85

San Diego Hospital


Seasonal Indices
Index for Inpatient Days

1.06
1.04 1.04
1.02

1.02
1.00

0.94
0.92

1.01

1.00

0.99

0.98
0.96

1.03

1.04

0.98

0.99
0.97

0.97

0.96

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
Figure 4.7

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 86

San Diego Hospital


Combined Trend and Seasonal Forecast
10,200

Inpatient Days

10,000
9,800

10068
9949

9911
9764

9,600

9572

9,400
9,200
9,000

9724

9691
9520 9542

9265

9411

9355

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78
Month
Figure 4.8

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 87

Associative Forecasting
Used when changes in one or more
independent variables can be used to predict
the changes in the dependent variable
Most common technique is linear
regression analysis
We apply this technique just as we did
in the time series example

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 88

Associative Forecasting
Forecasting an outcome based on predictor
variables using the least squares technique
y^ = a + bx
^

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

where y
= computed value of
the variable to be predicted
(dependent variable)
a
= y-axis intercept
b
= slope of the regression line
x
= the independent variable
though to predict the value of the
dependent variable

4 89

Associative Forecasting
Example
Local Payroll
($000,000,000), x
1
3
4
4.0
2
3.0
1
7
2.0
Sales

Sales
($000,000), y
2.0
3.0
2.5
2.0
2.0
3.5

1.0

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

|
1

|
2

|
|
|
|
3 4
5 6
Area payroll

|
7

4 90

Associative Forecasting
Example
Sales, y
2.0
3.0
2.5
2.0
2.0
3.5
y = 15.0

Payroll, x
x2
1
1
3
9
4
16
2
4
1
1
7
49
x = 18
x2 = 80

x = x/6 = 18/6 = 3
y = y/6 = 15/6 = 2.5
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

b=

xy - nxy
x2 - nx2

xy
2.0
9.0
10.0
4.0
2.0
24.5
xy = 51.5
51.5 - (6)(3)(2.5)
80 - (6)(32)

= .25

a = y - bx = 2.5 - (.25)(3) = 1.75


4 91

Associative Forecasting
Example

If payroll next year


is estimated to be
$600 million, then:
Sales = 1.75 + .25(6)
Sales = $325,000

Sales = 1.75 + .25(payroll)


4.0
3.25
3.0

Sales

y^ = 1.75 + .25x

2.0
1.0

0
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

|
1

|
2

|
|
|
|
3 4
5 6
Area payroll

|
7
4 92

Standard Error of the


Estimate

Sales

A forecast is just a point estimate of a


future value
This point is
4.0
actually the
3.25
3.0
mean of a
2.0
probability
1.0
distribution
0
Figure 4.9
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

|
1

|
2

|
|
|
|
3 4
5 6
Area payroll

|
7

4 93

Standard Error of the


Estimate
Sy,x =
where

y
=
point

(y - yc)2
n-2
y-value of each data

yc
=
computed value of
the dependent variable, from the
regression equation
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

n
=
points

number of data
4 94

Standard Error of the


Estimate
Computationally, this equation is
considerably easier to use
Sy,x =

y2 - ay - bxy
n-2

We use the standard error to set up


prediction intervals around the
point estimate
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 95

Standard Error of the


Estimate
Sy,x =

39.5 - 1.75(15) - .25(51.5)


6-2

y2 - ay - bxy
=
n-2

Sy,x = .306

4.0

The standard error


of the estimate is
$30,600 in sales

Sales

3.25
3.0
2.0
1.0

0
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

|
1

|
2

|
|
|
|
3 4
5 6
Area payroll

|
7
4 96

Correlation
How strong is the linear
relationship between the
variables?
Correlation does not necessarily
imply causality!
Coefficient of correlation, r,
measures degree of association
Values range from -1 to +1
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 97

Correlation Coefficient
r=

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

n xy - x y
[n x2 - ( x)2][n y2 - ( y)2]

4 98

Correlation Coefficient
y

r=

nxy - xy
[nx2 - (x)2][ny2 - (y)2]

(a) Perfect positive x


correlation:
r = +1

(b) Positive
correlation:
0<r<1

(c) No correlation:
r=0
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

(d) Perfect negative x


correlation:
r = -1
4 99

Correlation
Coefficient of Determination, r2,
measures the percent of change in
y predicted by the change in x
Values range from 0 to 1
Easy to interpret

For the Nodel Construction example:


r = .901
r2 = .81
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 100

Multiple Regression
Analysis
If more than one independent variable is to be
used in the model, linear regression can be
extended to multiple regression to
accommodate several independent variables

y^ = a + b1x1 + b2x2

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Computationally, this is quite


complex and generally done on the
computer

4 101

Multiple Regression
Analysis
In the Nodel example, including interest rates in
the model gives the new equation:

y^ = 1.80 + .30x1 - 5.0x2


An improved correlation coefficient of r = .96
means this model does a better job of predicting
the change in construction sales
Sales = 1.80 + .30(6) - 5.0(.12) = 3.00
Sales = $300,000
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 102

Monitoring and Controlling


Forecasts
Tracking Signal
Measures how well the forecast is
predicting actual values
Ratio of running sum of forecast errors
(RSFE) to mean absolute deviation (MAD)
Good tracking signal has low values
If forecasts are continually high or low, the
forecast has a bias error
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 103

Monitoring and Controlling


Forecasts
Tracking = RSFE
signal
MAD
(actual demand in
period i forecast demand
in period i)
Tracking =
signal
|actual - forecast|/n)
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 104

Tracking Signal
Signal exceeding limit
Tracking signal
+

Upper control limit

0 MADs

Acceptable
range

Lower control limit


Time

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 105

Tracking Signal Example


Actual
Qtr Demand

1
2
3
4
5
6

90
95
115
100
125
140

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

Forecast
Demand

Error

RSFE

Absolute
Forecast
Error

100
100
100
110
110
110

-10
-5
+15
-10
+15
+30

-10
-15
0
-10
+5
+35

10
5
15
10
15
30

Cumulative
Absolute
Forecast
Error
MAD

10
15
30
40
55
85

10.0
7.5
10.0
10.0
11.0
14.2

4 106

Tracking Signal Example


Qtr

1
2
3
4
5
6

Tracking
Actual Signal
Forecast
Demand
Demand Error
(RSFE/MAD)

RSFE

Absolute
Forecast
Error

90-10/10
100= -1 -10
95
-15/7.5
100= -2 -5
115 0/10
100
= 0 +15
100-10/10
110= -1 -10
125
+5/11110
= +0.5+15
140
+35/14.2
110= +2.5
+30

-10
-15
0
-10
+5
+35

10
5
15
10
15
30

Cumulative
Absolute
Forecast
Error
MAD

10
15
30
40
55
85

10.0
7.5
10.0
10.0
11.0
14.2

The variation of the tracking signal


between -2.0 and +2.5 is within acceptable
limits
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 107

Adaptive Forecasting
Its possible to use the computer to
continually monitor forecast error and
adjust the values of the and
coefficients used in exponential
smoothing to continually minimize
forecast error
This technique is called adaptive
smoothing
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 108

Focus Forecasting
Developed at American Hardware Supply,
focus forecasting is based on two principles:
1. Sophisticated forecasting models are not
always better than simple models
2. There is no single techniques that should
be used for all products or services
This approach uses historical data to test
multiple forecasting models for individual items
The forecasting model with the lowest error is
then used to forecast the next demand
2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 109

Forecasting in the Service


Sector
Presents unusual challenges
Special need for short term records
Needs differ greatly as function of
industry and product
Holidays and other calendar events
Unusual events

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

4 110

Fast Food Restaurant


Forecast
Percentage of sales

20%
15%
10%
5%

11-12

1-2

12-1
(Lunchtime)

2006 Prentice Hall, Inc.

2-3

3-4

4-5

5-6

7-8

6-7
(Dinnertime)
Hour of day

8-9

9-10

10-11

Figure 4.12
4 111

You might also like