Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TRAVEL MODAL
GROWTH STEAL
FREQUENCY COMPETITIVE
STEAL
Sources: 1 CMD Data, 2 Mintel 2008, 3 National Travel Survey, 4 Transport Statistics Bulletin 2006
3.9m 3m
1.5m 1.2m
By train
More often
Needs/Attitudes
‘Ocean’ Segmentation Profiles enrich all creative briefs, rather than driving selections
Direct
RFV
‘Ocean’ Segmentation
Booking
History
Local
Geography
National/
Regional Lifestage
(Affluence)
How to communicate
Without making
the benefits of VHF
Virgin Trains a
in an exciting,
hostage to fortune
enticing way
ry
Love eve .. The
second So good. best
...
Too didactic
Un-Virgin
Still a promise
From us To you
1 way Interactive
Youthful Intelligent
irreverence wit
Youthful Intelligent
irreverence wit
“Easy. That’s all I want.” “I suppose I’d expect [the “I’d try Google for travel
(Booked on virgintrains.com)
Virgin Trains website] to ideas.”
be quite fancy.” (Booked on thetrainline.com)
(Walk up)
TRAVEL MODAL
GROWTH STEAL
COMPETITIVE
FREQUENCY
STEAL
Points Prizes
PROS Transparent benefits structure
Ability to ‘save’ for significant reward
Immediate consumer gratification
Element of surprise – especially with ‘Wild
CONS Delayed consumer
Balance checking &gratification
redemption are additional
High set-up & management cost
Lack
Card’ofrewards
Less
transparency around benefit structure
control of reward
contact points with consumer Bulk of rewards deliveredredemption
on-board, reinforcing
Slow
Can beto used
deliver businessnon-direct
to capture impact customer benefits of travelling Virgin Trains
Requires
details significant delivery infrastructure Low set-up & management cost
Swift business impact
Bold: Consumer
Italic: Business
Objectives
Everyone who travels on Virgin Trains, but only if you book direct at
virgintrains.com
Applicable to everyone – leisure, business, families, empty nesters,
shoppers, lake district holidaymakers, football fans, everyone!
•
Infrequent More
Low value frequent
High value
•If 25% of our 644k active ‘one trip’ customers make 644,000 journeys
1 journey per year for the next 4 years
Total: 1,525,000
* We use this figure because, on average, 10% of recently lapsed become long-term lapsed customers
Source: CMD Data
•Using station footfall a proxy, we calculate that c. 30% of the Virgin Trains
network is competitively overlapped by London Midland*
•
•Assuming equal distribution of journeys across the network, this represents
6.54m of the total 21.8m journeys generated by Virgin Trains
•
•Applying the dramatic 18ppts share shift achieved in 04/05 on the London –
Manchester route with the introduction of Pendolino trains (but assuming this sort
of steal would take 4 years, not 1, under these circumstances)
* Based on Watford, Milton Keynes, Rugby, Coventry, Birmingham New St, Wolverhampton, Stafford,
Tamworth, Crewe & Stoke on Trent
•Assuming we all devote a similar amount of time to travel, but the trip time improves
to 1997 levels
•There are 98m medium range rail trips (50 – 100 miles) in the UK annually
•98m x 4% = 3.92
* Costs include postage, production and distribution – agency fees and incentives excluded
** ROI is estimated revenue per £1 marketing spend.
Average transaction value calculated from 07/08 data within CMD presentation
(£147m revenue / 2.5m transactions - inc. rounding)
*** Same source shows 4.9m pax from 2.5m transactions – 1.9 pax per booking
Volumes assume 70/50% penetration of emailable/mailable addresses. Actual penetration unknown
© Miles Calcraft Briginshaw Duffy, August 2008
3. Our approach to evaluation
Specific impacts
(Regional Testing)
Customer Perceptions
Direct Response (Advocacy/NPS)
Immediate
Action Immediate Impact
(Response
Tracking/Matchback)
Full launch