Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TECH
PROJECT
Design and Development of 3-DOF
PPR Platform for Micro Fabrication
and
Positioning
Under
the Guidance
Dr. M. Santhakumar
Presented
by
Ramavatar
Meena
Roll No. - 1000316
B.Tech 4th year (ME)
IIT Indore
2/16/16
Sandip Patidar
Roll No. - 1000322
B.Tech 4th year (ME)
IIT Indore
Mechanical Engineering
Jayant Kr.
Mohanta
Roll No. - 1000326
B.Tech 4th year (ME)
IIT Indore
1
Acknowledgement
Wewould like to express our special thanks of gratitude to
our guide Dr. M. Santhakumar who gave us the golden
opportunity to do this wonderful project on the topic
Design and Development of 3-DOF PPR Platform for
Micro Fabrication and Positioning Applicationwhich
also helped us in doing a lot of Research and we came to
know about so many new things. We are really thankful to
them. Secondly we would also like to thank my parents and
friends who helped us a lot in finalizing this project within
the limited time frame.
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
PROJECT OVERVIEW
Performance analysis
PID
EW
I
V
R
E
V
O
Fabrication
SMC
Kinematic
Analysis
Workspace
Analysis
Selection of
actuators and
sensors
Simulation
Dynamic
Analysis
Concept design
2/16/16
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
3
3 3
INTRODUCTION
SKF Linear Actuator Specifications
Voltage
12V
Maximum Load
500N
4 Amp
Stroke length
250mm
MICROSOFT CAMSTUDIO
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
PHYSICAL
MODEL
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF
PROPOSED SYSTEM
2/16/16
Mass of Slider 1
410g
Mass of Slider 2
420g
Mass of Slider 3
420g
285g
Platform
100g
Width of Platform
120mm
245000g*mm^2
Mechanical Engineering
Active
prismatic
joint 3
Passive
joint
Passive
joint
Work
table
Passive
joint
Active
prismatic
joint 2
Rotary
joints
Number of links
=8
Number of joints
=9
Degrees of freedom = 3 (81) 2 (9) = 3
Active
prismatic
joint 1
Mechanical Engineering
Inverse kinematic
r1 x h * sin( z )
model
r2
r3
2/16/16
where,
(sin z)
y a*
2
(sin z )
y a*
2
WORKSPACE
AREA
Mechanical Engineering
are
h
h
x
1
a
a
y 0
1
/
2
1
/
2
z
0 1 /(a * cos( z )) 1 /( a * cos( z ))
r1
r
2
r3
Mechanical Engineering
10
r1
r
2
r3
x
1
y
z
z 90
Maximum allowable yaw angle is
-60 to 60
60 z 60
Square
Trajector
y
2/16/16
Circular
Trajector
y
Mechanical Engineering
11
DYNAMIC
ANALYSIS
It is an energy based
approach.
1
1
1
* ms 2 r2 2 * ms 3 r3 2
2
2
2
Sliders Kinetic
T
.
Energies
T
.
.
x. m p
0 x3
1
x3 ml 3
* y 0
0
.
.
.
m
2
l3 y
y3
0
3
KE
1
*
2
.
* ms1 r12
1 x1
* .
2
y1
0
mp
0
ml1
0
.
.
0 x1
1 x2
* .
ml1
2
y
y
1
2
ml 2
0
.
0 x2
ml 2
y2
0 x
.
0 y
.
I zzp
Mechanical Engineering
12
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
Joint forces CONTINUED
can be derived from the following relation as given
below:
d KE KE
fi
dt ri
ri
M C , dis
Where
M
is inertia matrix
r1 r2
2/16/16
m12
m 22
m32
m13
m 23
m33
r3 T , r1 r2
f1 f 2 f 3 T
Disturbance vector dis idis edis
matrix
m11
M m 21
m31
r3 , r1 r2
n1
C , n 2
n3
Mechanical Engineering
idis
edis
r3 T
Internal Disturbance
(Process and
measurement noise)
External
Disturbance
(payload variation,
vibration..)
13
DYNAMIC ANALYSIS
m11 M
M s1 3 * M l
m12
h
a
m13
(M
h
a
m21
m22
m23
(M
h
a
(M
CONTINUED
2*Ml )
2*Ml )
p
2* Ml )
1
h
4
a
1
h
4
a
m31
h
a
(M
n2
n 3
*M
*M
h
m l *
3
3 I zz
a 3
2/16/16
I zz
* sec z
a2
I zz
* sec z
a2
I zz
* sec z
a2
I zz
* sec z
a2
5
h
a
4
1
h
a
4
M s2
M s2
m l *
3
h
1
M s 2
a
4
5
h
a
4
M s3
1
ml
sec
tan z m l
2a
2a 2
I zz
tan z
tan z
h * tan 2 * h
z
a
a
2 * h
m
l
m
l
2*Ml )
*M
1
h
4
a
n1 0
*M
1
h
m32
4
a
m33
m l 1
2a
tan m
z
l
h
2a 2
sec
tan z 2
tan z
m
l
2*
h * tan 2 * h
z
a
a
.
.
h
3
2
2
m l 2 sec z r2 r3
a
..
.
3
2
2
m l 2 sec z r2 r3
a
Mechanical Engineering
m
l
* r r
3
2
* r r
3
2
14
DYNAMIC
SIMULATION
Mechanical Engineering
15
CONTROLLER
DESIGN
Simulation
Cases
PID Controller
Desired
Trajectory
Task 1t<=15;
Task-2
Y=0.1;
t<=15+31.4
Y
2/16/16
(4 * X 0.1)
3
Mechanical Engineering
16
PID
CONTROLLER
M d K D K P K I C , dis
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
17
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
18
Joint Velocity Vs
time
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
19
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
20
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
21
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
22
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
23
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
24
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
25
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
26
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
27
DESIGN
VALIDATION
Tracking
Using
Camera
PC with
MATLAB
Simulink
Feedback
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
Ardunio
and Motor
Drivers
Actuators
28
DESIGN VALIDATION
t to point openCONT.....
and closed loop Control
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
29
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
30
RESULT SUMMARY
Kinematic Design of mechanism Verified
Dynamic Model of 3PPR verified
Controller Used PID and SMC- Better result are obtained on using
efficient control scheme
Closed controller established using sensor feedback
Final position of end effector tracked using camera
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
31
LIVE DEMO
Video 1 Point to Point trajectory with
Feedback
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
32
LIVE DEMO
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
33
LIVE DEMO
Video 3: Square (Parallel Base)
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
34
k
n
a
h
T
u
o
Y
2/16/16
2/16/16
Mechanical Engineering
35