You are on page 1of 32

Part 3 | Training and Development

Chapter 9

Performance Management and Appraisal


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
All rights reserved.

After studying this chapter, you should be able to:


1.Describe the appraisal process.
2.Develop, evaluate, and administer at least four
performance appraisal tools.
3.Explain and illustrate the problems to avoid in
appraising performance.
4.List and discuss the pros and cons of six
appraisal methods.
5.Perform an effective appraisal interview.
6.Discuss the pros and cons of using different
raters to appraise a persons performance.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

92

Performance Appraisal
Evaluating an employees current and/or past
performance relative to his or her performance
standards.
o Setting work standards
o Assessing the employees actual performance

relative to those standards


o Providing feedback

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

93

Defining the Employees Goals


and Work Standards
Guidelines for Effective Goal
Setting

Assign
Specific
Goals

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Assign
Measurable
Goals

Assign
Challenging
but Doable
Goals

Encourage
Participation

94

An Introduction to Appraising
Performance
Why appraise performance?

o Appraisals play an integral role in the employers

performance management process.


o Appraisals help in planning for correcting

deficiencies and reinforce things done correctly.


o Appraisals, in identifying employee strengths and

weaknesses, are useful for career planning


2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

95

Performance Appraisal Roles


Supervisors
o Usually do the actual appraising.
o Must be familiar with basic appraisal techniques.
o Must understand and avoid problems that can

cripple appraisals.
o Must know how to conduct appraisals fairly.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

96

Performance Appraisal Roles (contd)


HR department
o Serves a policy-making and advisory role.
o Provides advice and assistance regarding the

appraisal tool to use.


o Prepares forms and procedures and insists that all

departments use them.


o Responsible for training supervisors to improve

their appraisal skills.


o Responsible for monitoring the system to ensure

that appraisal formats and criteria comply with


relavents laws and are up to date.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

97

Steps in Appraising Performance


Defining the job
o Making sure that you and your subordinate agree

on his or her duties and job standards.

Appraising performance
o Comparing your subordinates actual performance

to the standards that have been set; this usually


involves some type of rating form.

Providing feedback
o Discussing the subordinates performance and

progress, and making plans for any development


required.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

98

Performance Appraisal Methods


Graphic rating scale
o A scale that lists a number of traits and a range of

performance for each that is used to identify the


score that best describes an employees level of
performance for each trait.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

99

Graphic
Rating
Scale with
Space for
Comments

Figure 93
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

910

Portion of an Administrative Secretarys


Sample Performance Appraisal Form

Source: James Buford Jr., Bettye Burkhalter, and Grover Jacobs, Link Job Description
to Performance Appraisals, Personnel Journal, June 1988, pp. 135136.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Figure 94
911

Source: www.cwru.edu.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Figure 95a
912

Source: www.cwru.edu.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Figure 95b
913

Source: www.cwru.edu.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Figure 95c
914

Performance Appraisal Methods (contd)


Alternation ranking method
o Ranking employees from best to worst on a

particular trait, choosing highest, then lowest, until


all are ranked.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

915

Alternation Ranking Scale

Figure 96
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

916

Alternation Ranking Scale (contd.)


Productivity

Quality

Job Knowledge

Overall Ranking = (1 + 6 + 5) /3 = 4
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

917

Performance Appraisal Methods (contd)


Paired comparison method
o Ranking employees by making a chart of all possible

pairs of the employees for each trait and indicating


which is the better employee of the pair.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

918

Ranking Employees by the


Paired Comparison Method

Note: + means better than. means worse than. For each chart, add up
the number of 1s in each column to get the highest-ranked employee.
Figure 97
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

919

Performance Appraisal Methods (contd)


Forced distribution method
o Similar to grading on a curve; predetermined

percentages of ratees are placed in various


performance categories.
40 students in
o Example:

MGT 301

15% high performers

15% * 40 = 6 A

20% high-average performers

20% * 40 = 8 B

30% average performers


20% low-average performers
15% low performers

30% * 40 = 12 C
20% * 40 = 8 D
15% * 40 = 6 F

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

920

Performance Appraisal Methods (contd)


Critical Incident Method
o Keeping record of uncommonly good or undesirable

examples of an employees work-related behavior


and reviewing it with the employee at predetermined
times.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

921

Examples of Critical Incidents for


an Assistant Plant Manager

Table 91
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

922

Narrative
Forms

Source: Reprinted with permission of


the publisher, HRnext.com; copyright
HRnext.com, 2003.

Figure 98
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

923

Performance Appraisal Methods (contd)


Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS)
o An appraisal method that uses quantified scale

with specific narrative examples of good and poor


performance.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

924

Job: Call Centre Agent


Factors can be:

Promptness of service - Includes receiving calls within a


stipulated number of rings
7 Picks up phone in 1 ring.

Picks up phone in 2 rings.

Picks up phone in 3 rings.

Picks up phone in 4 rings.

Picks up phone in 5 rings.

Picks up phone most of the time.

Does not pick up phone.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

925

Factor 2
Customer Complaint Management: The time spent on resolving
customer complaint
7 Resolves issue in under 1 minute.

Resolves issue in under 2 minutes.

Resolves issue in under 3 minutes.

Resolves issue in under 4 minutes.

Resolves issue in over 5 minutes.

Resolve issue most of the time.

Does not resolve any customer complaint.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

926

Factor 3
Ability to sell new features: Is the person persuasive enough to
sell new features of the company to customers.
7 Is able to sell a new feature in every call.

Is able to sell a new feature in every 2/3 calls.

Is able to sell a new feature in every 4/5 calls.

Is able to sell a new feature in every hour.

Is able to sell some new features in a day.

Is able to sell some new features in a week.

Is not able to sell any new features in a week.

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

927

Management By Objectives (MBO)


Involves setting specific measurable goals with
each employee and then periodically reviewing
the progress made.
1.Set the organizations goals. No. 1 in terms of service quality
2.Set departmental goals. All depts. (consumer banking, corporate
banking etc.) to focus on quality customer service

3.Discuss departmental goals.


4.Define expected results (set individual goals).
Attend service seminars, achieve 90% customer satisfaction scores etc.

5.Performance reviews.
6.Provide feedback.
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

928

Advantages and Disadvantages of Appraisal Tools

Table 93
2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

929

Appraising Performance:
Problems and Solutions
Potential Rating Scale
Appraisal Problems

Unclear
Standards

Halo
Effect

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Central
Tendency

Leniency or
Strictness

Bias

930

Appraising Performance:
Problems and Solutions (contd)
How to Avoid Appraisal
Problems

Know
Problems

Use the
Right Tool

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Train
Supervisors

Control
Outside
Influences

Keep
a Diary

931

Who Should Do the Appraising?

Immediate
Supervisor

Peers

Rating
Committee

2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved.

Self-Rating

Potential
Appraisers

Subordinates

360-Degree
Feedback

932

You might also like