Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What is Law?
Rules that apply to everyone that can be enforced.
Where does our law com from?
Parliament, courts, the constitution and delegated legislation
Why do we need law? Is law necessary?
1. Laws regulate society by telling us what we can do and when.
2. Laws enforce values society deems important.
3. Laws protect members of the community from harm.
4. The law provides a venue for resolution in times of conflict between individuals.
5. Laws enforce rights and gains compensation.
What are the characteristics of law?
1. Laws can be enforced.
2. Laws are accepted by the community.
3. Laws are binding on the community.
4. Laws are discoverable. ( no hidden laws, you can go out and find out about them).
5. Laws are in the public interest.
6. Laws reflect morality.
SOURCES OF LAW
COMMON LAW:
Judge made law based on Doctrine of Precedent. The system of Law used in Britain and its colonies.
Precedent: A binding decision made on a present case based on a previous court case with similar facts.
Judges are bound by the ratio decidendi which is the reason for a judgement
Judges are not bound by the obiter dictum which is a subjective comment, more personal input.
STATUTE LAW:
Also known as Legislation, or Acts of Parliament. Statute Law is made by Parliament. Eg. Native Title act (1993)
DELEGATED LEGISLATION:
Laws made by subordinate authorities (eg: Australian Post- cost of Postage).
Advantages~ more effective, quicker, saves time by allowing persons of bodies with relevant expertise to make
decisions about mundane matters etc.
Disadvantages~ laws are made by unelected officials, possibly without appropriate education or training. Law can
also be invisible and discriminatory.
SOURCES OF LAW
CONSTITUTION:
Describes how the country should be run and outlines how Power is divided and the rights it gives its citizens.
To bring together the 6 colonies in a federation (power sharing): Created a new level of govt, the
Commonwealth and set out rules for the relation between this new level (federal) and the states
(former colonies).
INTERNATIONAL LAW:
Governs the interactions between nations. If a nation breaches international law, it can be dealt with by the
international community through: Trade Embargoes, Denial of Diplomatic Recognition, Trade
Sanctions and Military Action.
THE UNITED NATIONS: acts as a global security and development organisations. The UN maintains global
peace and security. [The General Assembly, Security Council, the Economic & Social Council, the
Secretariat and the Trusteeship Council].
1/ Residual Powers: are the powers that the states retained after federation, eg police, local councils
2/ Concurrent Powers: areas over which both the states and the Commonwealth have legislative power,
eg education and health
3/ Exclusive Powers: federal parliament has exclusive power over immigration and defence.
SECTION 109- THAT WHERE A CONFLICT ARISES, COMMONWEALTH LAW PREVAILS OVER THE
STATE LAW
SEPARATION OF POWERS: Power is distributed between the 3 arms of government; that is between the
legislature, executive and the judiciary.
Executive- government responsible for putting the laws passed by the legislature into effect.
CRIMINAL LAW
Types of Crimes
1. Crimes Against Persons
Homicide
~ Murder
~ Manslaughter
~ Infanticide
~ Death by Reckless Driving
Assault
Sexual Assault
2. Against Property
Larceny
Breaking and Entering
Robbery
3. White Collar Crime
Tax Evasion
Computer Crime
Insider Trading
4. Crimes Against the State
Sedition
Treason
CRIMINAL LAW
Types of Crimes
Parties to a Crime
A principal is directly involved in the commission of the crime
An accessory to the crime is a person who knows about the criminal act and provides some form
of assistance
After the Fact (knows the crime has been committed and provides assistance to the criminal)
ELEMENTS OF CRIME
Mens Rea (guilty Mind)
This is the performance of a guilty act or an omission that breaks the law.
take place
be voluntary In Jiminez v R, the high court held that falling asleep at a wheel is involuntary conduct. Other
examples include; being deprived of free choice and a reflex action.
Causation
The act that was performed must be the cause of the crime. The act must be ultimately responsible for the
offence.
Novus Actus Intervenes. Intervening Act:
In R v Hallet (Act of god),
The victim drowned after the accused assaulted him and left on the beach, whereby an incoming wave drowned
him. The accused argued that the victim died via the drowning (Novus Actus) and not the assault. This was
rejected by SA Supreme court arguing that the conduct of the accused was a substantial and operating cause of
death and that action of the sea would not have broken the chain of causation as it was a natural cause as
distinct from an act of god (tidal wave).
In Royall (Self- preservation),
D was charged with the murder of a woman who fell from the bathroom window of her 6 th story flat as she feared
her attacker. The high court (Mason CJ) held that her conduct was not a Novus because the accused had
induced her into a well-founded apprehension of physical harm such as to make it a natural consequence
(reasonable) that the victim would seek to escape. Therefore not only must Vs apphrehsion of harm be wellfounded, but Vs actions in trying to escape must also have been reasonably foreseeable.
CRIMINAL DEFENCES
Duress
Where the defendant claims that the criminal act committed was due to threats or injury to
themselves by others. The threat can be to the defendant or to another person.
Necessity
The defendant claims that the crime committed was done to stop a more serious crime from
occurring, or to stop a more serious danger. R v Dudley and Stephens, stated that necessity
was no defence to murder.
Mental illness (Insanity)
The onus of proof for insanity lies with the defence. A person does not have the necessary
mens rea (intention).
McNaughten Case, a person is mentally insane when they cant differentiate between right or
wrong
DEFENCES
Automatism
A defence used where a person was unable to control their actions causing a criminal action to occur. A
person who has no control their bodily actions.
Self-defence
Reasonable force can be used in the defence of oneself to protect property or to stop a serious crime from
occurring. The onus of proof lies with the prosecution who must disprove Self defence beyond reasonable
doubt. The main issue with self-defence lies in determining what is reasonable force. The accused does not
have to wait until the initial assault has commenced. In some circumstances they may act pre-emptively
where the attack is believed to be imminent. (Conlon)
DEFENCES
Consent
The defendant claims that they acted with the victims consent. The defence can either be complete, absolute
or partial. It is often used in sexual offences.
Involved sado-masochistic homosexuals who consented to acts of violence towards each other. The House of
Lords found that consent was no defence, public morality and their disapproval of such conduct swayed
them. (Lord Templeman) however Lord Mustill and Slynn (in dissent) were of the opinion that criminal law
should not interfere with private personal morality.
Case 2: R v WILSON
Husband branding his initials on his wifes bum with her consent. English Court of Appeal, quashed conviction of
assault occasioning actual bodily harm, because of no aggressive intent by husband and not in public
interest to interfere in private martial affairs
Defences
Partial Defences: The defendant does not completely get off
Provocation
A defence where the accused was provoked by the victims into committing a crime. The offender looses self
control and acts out of rage. In NSW provocation is only used for murder to manslaughter.
Diminished Responsibility
The defendant acted while mentally ill or disabled and so is not entirely responsible for his or her actions.
The defendant is not mentally ill to the extent required in the defence of mental illness.
R V Desouza, a man on steroids failed in his attempt to use this defence due to roid rage.
Defences
Intoxication
A normally sane person is so affected by alcohol or other drugs that he or she did not know what he or she
was doing. Self-induced intoxication will generally not be taken into account when determining criminal
liability for murder or manslaughter but intoxication by accident or because of a prescribed drug may be
considered by the court as a defence to other crimes.
Homosexual Advance Defence
R v Thomas Green
Lots of crimes but not all reported or investigated. Police use discretion (take action according to own judgement) to decide which
cases to investigate resource efficient. Judiciary, Judges, defence lawyers and Prosecutors also have discretion.
Detain and question people who they suspect has committed a crime
Arrest Crimes Act allows police to arrest person they reasonably suspect of committing a crime.
People under arrest have certain rights:
To be released from custody if charge has not been made within reasonable time.
Charge If police are satisfied that suspect has committed crime, can be taken to police station and charged.
Bail The guarantee given by suspects that they will appear at court later date or forfeit money. Bail Act 1978 (NSW).
-some cases, bail is granted automatically unless the person:
Was drunk or injured
Already has a conviction
Is in danger of reprisal and needs protection
Is a danger to public
The offence is too serious
Plea Guilty sentencing hearing character witnesses (to mitigate)
-Non-guilty accused held on remand (unless bail) case is defended in court verdict.
-plea bargaining: accuse agrees to plead guilty to a lesser charge.
Hearing Committal hearing evidence is presented before a magistrate to determine prima facie.
- If enough evidence trial proceeds in appropriate court.
IN COURT:
Rules of Evidence hearsay, character, opinion, leading/double Qs.
Trial Procedure prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt. Adversary system 2 adversaries opposing each other.
Exam in chief, Cross examination
Role of juries. Jury Act 1977 (NSW). 12 jurers chosen from a larger group those liable for discrimination removed etc, must come
to unanimous decision (if not hung jury process begins again), decide guilt.
Appeals heard in court above. Only can be based on a point of law - not discontent with outcome e.g. wrongful procedure,
misdirection of jury.
Informal things like family, school, work, religion and media also help create social order.
When these things fail criminal law provides the inducement to comply. There are other formal ways
to create social order before imprisonment:
Education people must be educated about law. Civics has been introduced as a compulsory
subject in junior levels of school. HSC Legal Studies also provides education. Govt depts issue
pamphlets etc to educate the nation on the law.
Regulation some laws exist to ensure people and environmental safety e.g. health regulations,
OH&S.
Penalties.
Types of Penalties:
Fines keep offender out of prison, but to some it may be a small price to pay and reoffend.
Bond keeps accused out of prison if person promises to behave or face a fine or imprisonment.
Probation Order form of bond where accused not imprisoned but has to regularly report to probation officer
may be conditions e.g. counselling.
Community service order offender works for a specified amount of time for the community.
Home detention Offenders stay in home electronically monitored.
Periodic Detention Periodic Detention of Prisoners Act 1981 (NSW) allows for accused to be detained over
weekends in prison.
Imprisonment most severe of all for serious crimes. The Sentencing Act 1989 (NSW) allows for truth in
sentencing, requiring convicted offenders to serve a minimum amount of time in jail without any reduction.
Imprisonment aims to deter.
Penalties no Longer Available
1.Capital Punishment abolished in NSW in 1955.
2.Corporal Punishment physical punishment such as whipping, beating etc.
3.Penalties that infringe Human Rights
4.Cruel and unusual punishment declared illegal under International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
(ICCPR)