Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learn in g O u tcom es
guide the
development of new
practices and
procedures
The
acceptanc
e of a
theory will
depend
on:
How well it
explains and
predicts
reality
Main
objectives
of
accountin
g theory
Explain why
& how
current
accounting
practice
evolved
How well it is
constructed
Suggest
improvement
s
How
acceptable
are the
implications
of the theory
Provide the
basis for
development
of such
practice
4
21800-1955
1
1400-1800
Pre-theory
period
No theory
of
accounting
was
devised
General
Scientific
Period
Observe
what
actually
happened
Based on
empirical
analysis
i.e. relying
on realworld
observatio
ns not
simply on
logic
Pragmati
c
accounti
3
1956-1970
Normative
Period
Prescribe
what
should
happen
2 group
dominated
Limitation
of the
theory
Do not
involve
hypothesis
testing
Based on
value
judgment
4
1970present
Specific
Scientific
theory
Describe,
explain
and predict
accounting
practice
i.e.: bonus
plan
hypothesis
Positive
accounting
5
5. Behavioural Research
Result from the
narrow approach of
positive theorists
Emerged in 1950s
6. Current development
Corporate collapses e.g. Enron & WorldCom
has triggered question on whether a
comprehensive theory of the impact of
accounting on behaviour had been developed
increase in legislative
reporting requirements.
convergence
6
Deductive
G eneralto specifi
c
Inductive
Specifi
c to general
Deductive
Drawing specific conclusion from detailed
observations and measurements
A "top-down" approach.
Deduction
P1 all asset accounts have debit balance.
P2 The plant & machinery account is an asset
account.
Inductive
Induction
P1 the plant and machinery account is an asset account and
has a debit balance.
P2 the motor vehicle account is an asset account and has a
debit balance.
P3 the land is an asset account and has a debit balance.
Conclusion all asset accounts have debit balance.
Syntactic
Pragmatic
Semantic
10
Theory testing
Dogmatic
Scientific
selfevidence
Syntactic
Induction
Falsifi
cation/Popper
Research program /Lakatos
Kuhnian
Feyeraband
11
Testin g a Th eory
Dogmatic
basis
Selfevident
SCIENTIFIC
Syntactic
Induction
Falsificatio
n (Popper)
Research
Programs
(Lakatos)
Kuhnian
paradigms
Feyeraben
ds
approach
12
Pragmati
c
Normativ
e
Syntactic
Semantic
Positive
Naturalis
tic
13
Psychological
Observe users responses to the accountants
pragmatic
outputs i.e. financial reports
THEORIES
EXPLANATION
approach
How to derive the true income for an accounting
Normative
Theories
period
(1950s and
Type of information useful for economic decisions.
1960s)
Positive
Theories
(1970s)
i.e. questionnaires/survey
Alternative
Naturalistic
approaches
Syntactic
Proponents:
Syntactic: Logic in the sense it is the value recorded
on the day transaction is made
Semantic: The cost recorded based on real vouchers
Opponents:
Syntactic: Poor as different monetary measures are
added
Semantic: Do not consider inflation and no
independent empirically observable correspondent to
concepts such as profit or assets.
15
Development of a
theory of auditing
Development of a
theory of
accounting
(lag in 1960s)
Early writers
attempted to
document the
process of auditing
and the duties of
expected of
auditors.
16
S u m m ary: Top ic 2
Accounting theory
Definition:
Logical reasoning in the form of a
set of broad principles to provide
a general framework of reference
by which accounting practice can
be evaluated & guide the
development of new practices
and procedures.
Objective:
Explain current accounting
practice evolved, suggest
improvements & provide the
basis for development of such
practice.
Development of
Accounting Theory
1.Pre-theory period (1400-1800)
2.General Scientific Period (1800
1955)
3.Normative Period (1956 1970)
4.Specific scientific
theory/Positive Era (1970
present)
Formulate:
Deductive:
general to
specific
Inductive:
specific to
general
Parts of
Theory:
1.Syntactic
.
2.Semantic
3.Pragmati
c
Theory Construction:
1.Pragmatic behavior of
accountants & users of
accounting information
2.Syntactic rely on logical
argument based on a set of
premise.
3.Semantic how theories
correspond to real-world events.
4.Normative rely both on
semantic & syntactic approach.
5.Positive test hypothesis against
actual events.
6.Naturalistic consider individual
cases & try not to generalize.
Testing:
1.Dogmatic .
2.Self-evident
3.Scientific:
. Syntactic
. Induction
.
Falsification/Popper
. Research
program /Lakatos
. Kuhnian
.Feyeraband
17
TU TO R IA L 2 (40 M A R K S )
Q1 Useful theories must eventually relate to the real world. Using
examples, please discuss THREE distinct relationships of
theories which are: syntactic, semantic and pragmatic.
[6 marks]
Q2. Accounting theorist attempted to established norms for best
practice during the normative period. While, specific scientific
theory is to explain and predict accounting practice.
i. Explain two groups dominated during the normative period.
[4 marks]
ii. Explain the reasons why the specific scientific theory arises.
[6 marks]
18
TU TO R IA L 2
Q3 Explain TWO (2) limitations of self evidence. Discuss with example.
[4 marks]
Q4 In your opinion, can accounting theory be constructed as a purely
syntactical exercise without involvement by other approaches?
Provide your reasoning.
[4 marks]
Q5 Is it important to account for the effects of inflation on deriving the
true income in normative theory? Provide your reasoning.
[4 marks]
Q6 What role(s) can theory play in relation to accounting? Give an
example.
[4 marks]
Q7 Explain FOUR (4) main differences between normative and positive
theories.
[8 marks]
19