Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management
Adaptive Management
Slight action
Moderate action
Extreme action
Sewing Together a
Functional Landscape:
Active
Management:
Intermediary
Approaches
Passive
Management:
Intensive landscape
manipulation
Combines elements of
both
Conservation through an
orchestrated shifting
mosaic of patches over
time
Conservation focused on
fully protected core
reserves
Provides resource
managers with maximum
flexibility but carries high
risk
Different allocations
managed actively or
passively or somewhere in
between
Category VI.
Large
Core
Reserve
Small
Core
Reserve
An area of land and/or sea especially dedicated to the protection of biological diversity
and natural and associated cultural resources, and managed through legal or other
effective means (IUCN 1996).
Core Reserves
SLOSS = single large or several small
Minimum Critical Area: The minimum size needed to support
viable populations of constituent species
Redundancy
Representativeness
Gap Analysis
1.
2.
3.
5.
build institutional cooperation in the application of this
information to state and regional management activities.
Vegetation/landcover:
picture is Lake Champlain
lowlands from VT Gap Project
Overlaid on
Vertebrate species
distributions: picture
is bat diversity in
Washington state from
WA Gap Project
Overlaid on
maps of
protected areas
Protected Areas
as Population
Sources for
entire
commercial
fisheries
Buffer
Buffer
Buffers
Standards and guidelines prescribe management actions and policies that maintain habitat features
and connectivity around core.
Human uses are accommodated if they dont compromise the primary objective of the core.
Can include several layers or concentric circles of buffering, with decreasing levels of protection
moving away from the core
Buffers often exist on paper but mean little in reality due to lack enforcement or conflicts with local
communities, land tenure, etc.
Examples
Integrated Conservation and Development Programs (ICDP) internationally sponsored projects, including
indigenous extractive reserves, in developing nations
Te
Co rre
rri stri
do al
r
Terrestrial Corridors
Pros
Species for which the corridors provide effective dispersal habitat
can use them
Helps maintain demographic (and thus genetic) interaction
between populations
Provide landscape features with other, indirect benefits, such as
wind breaking, run-off reduction, soil stabilization, etc.
Cons
Source: Bo Wilmer
Riparian Corridor
Riparian Corridors
Pros
dendritic networks form an extensive system of potential
corridors
Many species prefer to move along riparian corridors
Links together aquatic ecosystems
Corridors act as riparian buffers, so they provide other ecological
functions, such as bank stabilization, in-stream shade, habitat for
riparian dependent species, etc.
Cons
Some terrestrial species wont use them.
They dont entirely link together headwater areas or provide lateral
linkages in lowland areas they dont always connect the core
area you need connected!
Late-Successional
Reserves Designated by
the Northwest Forest
Plan
Demonstration of Ecosystem
Management Options
Te
rre
Wetland
Restoration
str
ial
R
es
to
ra
ti
on
Riparian
Restoration
Restoration Areas
Restoration is the return of a degraded ecosystem to a close approximation of its
remaining natural potential.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agencies principles of good restoration:
Preserve and protect aquatic resources
Restore ecological integrity
Restore natural structure
Restore natural function
Work within the watershed and broader landscape context
Understand the natural potential of the watershed
Address ongoing causes of degradation
Develop clear, achievable, and measurable goals
Focus on feasibility
Use a reference site
Anticipate future changes
Involve the skills and insights of a multi-disciplinary team
Design for self-sustainability
Use passive restoration, when appropriate
Restore native species and avoid non-native species
Use natural fixes and bioengineering techniques, where possible
Monitor and adapt where changes are necessary
Matrix
Matrix
Matrix
Matrix provides the primary area for intensive resource use, including
extractive uses and more intensive recreational development.
Matrix is very important ecologically. Why?
Matrix
Large
Core
Reserve
Buffer
Matrix
Riparian Corridor
Te
rre
str
ial
R
Te
Co rre
rri stri
do al
r
es
to
ra
ti
on
Riparian
Restoration
Wetland
Restoration
Matrix
Large
Core
Reserve
Intensively modified
areas/urban/low potential
Buffer
Small
Core
Reserve
Tax incentives
Property tax reform
Conservation easements
Information sharing
Watershed
groups/coordination
Community-based forestry
and tourism
Wildland, wetland, or forest
mitigation banks
Fostering sense of
place
Green certification
Planning and land-use
zoning
Subsidies: some like
them, some dont
Public lands acquisition
Regulation through
environmental statutes
Tax-Based Approaches
Tax incentives
Property tax reform
Easements
Conservation
easements
Transfer of
development rights
Information Sharing
Information transfer
Community/watershed groups
White River
Partnership:
Local
governments/towns
State agencies
Federal agencies
Conservation
groups
Conservation Banks
Wildlands, wetlands, and forests
http://nature.org/aboutus/projects/forestbank/
Regulation, Subsidies, or
Acquisition?
Land and Water Conservation Fund, est. 1965
-Authorized to spend $900 million annually
- Only met twice in 42 years
-FY 2007: Enacted Allocation: $143,000,000
- to Forest Service, Park Service, BLM,
Fish and Wildlife Service, and State grants