Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To view an official copy of the the Creative Commons Attribution Works 3.0 Unported License we build upon, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. This agreement officially states that:
You are free to:
Share - to copy, distribute and transmit this document
Remix - to adapt this document. We would appreciate receiving a copy of any changes that you have made to improve this
document.
Under the following conditions:
Attribution: You must always give the original authors or publishing agencies credit for the document or picture you are using.
Disclaimer
The contents of the SSWM Toolbox reflect the opinions of the respective authors and not necessarily the official opinion of the funding or
supporting partner organisations.
Depending on the initial situations and respective local circumstances, there is no guarantee that single measures described in the toolbox
will make the local water and sanitation system more sustainable. The main aim of the SSWM Toolbox is to be a reference tool to provide
ideas for improving the local water and sanitation situation in a sustainable manner. Results depend largely on the respective situation
and the implementation and combination of the measures described. An in-depth analysis of respective advantages and disadvantages and
the suitability of the measure is necessary in every single case. We do not assume any responsibility for and make no warranty with
respect to the results that may be obtained from the use of the information provided.
Contents
1. Concept
2. How it can optimize SSWM
3. Design principals
4. Treatment efficiency
5. Operation and maintenance
6. Applicability
7. Advantages and disadvantages
8. References
1. Concept
Background and working principal (adapted from U.S. EPA 2006, SASSE 1998)
1. Concept
Examples
1. Concept
Examples
1. Concept
Examples
The ABR under construction, down pipes and perforated slabs to support filter media in the Anaerobic Filter
(AF) sections, pouring ABRs concrete slab at Pestalozzi School, Zambia
Source: http://www.germantoilet.org/
1. Concept
Examples
ABR (part of DEWATS) at Adarsh Vidyaprasarak Sansthas College of Arts & Commerce, India
Source: N. Zimmermann
1. Concept
Examples
3. Design principals
ABRs start with settling chamber for larger solids and impurities (SASSE 1998)
followed by series of at least 2 (MOREL & DIENER 2006), sometimes up to 5 (SASSE 1998) up-
flow chambers
Hydraulic Retention Time (HRT) is relatively short and varies from only
a few hours up to two or three days (FOXON et al. 2004; MOREL & DIENER 2006; TILLEY et al. 2008)
4. Treatment efficiency
Treatment performance of ABRs is in the range of (SASSE 1998; MOREL & DIENER 2006; BORDA 2008)
inoculate (seed) ABR with active anaerobic sludge from e.g. septic
tank to speed up start-phase
allow bacteria to multiply, by starting with 1/4 of daily flow, and then
increasing loading rates over 3 months
long start-up time do not use ABRs when need for treatment is
immediate
check for water-tightness regularly and monitor scum and sludge
levels
remove sludge every 1 to 3 years (preferably by vacuum truck or
gulper to avoid that humans get in direct contact with sludge)
leave some active sludge in each compartment to maintain stable
treatment process
take care of advanced treatment and/or safe disposal of sludge
Source: adapted from SASSE 1998, TILLEY et al. 2008, EAWAG/SANDEC 2008
Examples
Use of straight handle (left) and Z-handle (right) brushes for cleaning of down-ward pipes
Source: K.P. Pravinjith
Examples
6. Applicability
8. References
BORDA (2009): EmSan - Emergency Sanitation. An innovative & rapidly installable solution to improve hygiene and
health in emergency situations (Concept Note). Bremen: Bremen Overseas Research and Development Association
(BORDA)
EAWAG/SANDEC (2008): Sanitation Systems and Technologies. Lecture Notes. (=Sandec Training Tool 1.0, Module 4).
Duebendorf: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science (EAWAG), Department of Water and Sanitation in Developing
Countries (SANDEC)
FOXON, K.M., PILLAY, S., LALBAHADUR, T., RODDA, N., HOLDER, F., BUCKLEY, C.A. (2004): The anaerobic baffled
reactor (ABR)- An appropriate technology for on-site sanitation. In=Water SA Vol. 30 No. 5 (Special edition)
MOREL A., DIENER S. 2006. Greywater Management in Low and Middle-Income Countries. Review of different treatment
systems for households or neighbourhoods. Duebendorf: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
(Eawag).
SASSE, L. (1998): DEWATS Decentralised Wastewater Treatment in Developing Countries. Bremen: Bremen Overseas
Research and Development Association (BORDA)
8. References
SINGH, S., HABERLA, R., MOOG, O., SHRESTA, R.R., SHRESTA, P., SHRESTA, R. (2009): Performance of an anaerobic
baffled reactor and hybrid constructed wetland treating high-strength wastewater in Nepal- A model for DEWATS. In:
Ecological Engineering 35. 654-660
TILLEY, E., LUETHI, C., MOREL, A., ZURBRUEGG, C., SCHERTENLEIB, R. (2008): Compendium of Sanitation Systems and
Technologies. Duebendorf and Geneva: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science (EAWAG) & Water Supply and
Sanitation Collaborative Council (WSSCC)
U.S. EPA (2006): Emerging Technologies for Biosolids Management. (=EPA 832-R-06-005). United States Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Wastewater Management
SSWM is an initiative
supported by:
Compiled by: