Professional Documents
Culture Documents
of children's recantation
of sexual abuse
disclosures
Presentation prepared by Olumide Popoola
- Brother and sister aged 8 and 9 made allegations of sexual abuse with
ritualistic elements involving their father and teachers at their school.
- Disclosure first made to mother and her new partner ('Abraham') and then to
the local police.
- Police conducted three Achieving Best Evidence (ABE) interviews with the
children. In the first two interviews the children maintained their
allegations.
- In the third interview the children told a different story and blamed 'Abraham'
for 'making them say' what they had said before.
- The criminal investigation was closed and the case deemed to be an issue for
the Family Courts.
Recantation and retraction in child sexual abuse cases
" Investigating child sexual abuse allegations, Malloy et al. (2007) found that
childrens vulnerability to adult familial influences predicted recantation
(i.e., those who were younger, had made accusations against a parent
figure, and had nonoffending caregivers who reacted unsupportively to
disclosure were more likely to recant). However, recantation was unrelated
to whether childrens allegations were corroborated by external evidence
(e.g., medical evidence, suspect admission) or to whether custody issues
affected the involved parties. In other words, it appears that at least some
children recanted true allegations of sexual abuse, seemingly due to familial
pressures. It is imperative to be attentive to both concerns about the risk of
false allegations as a result of childrens suggestibility, and the potential
external pressures that may exist for children (and adults) to falsely deny or
recant allegations of wrongdoing."
from 'Recantation in Legal Contexts' By Lindsay C. Malloy, Jillian Rivard, MA,
Allison P. Mungo, BA, and Peter Molinaro, MA AP-LS News | March 2014
Hypothesis (1)
Based on Crown Prosecution Service guidelines and and police interview best
practice as recommended in the Achieving Best Evidence guidelines, a bona
fide retraction will
1) contain moves that:
- ask for and give reasons for changing the story
- ask for and give reasons for lying in the first place
- will have a preponderance of open questions
- will not have suggestive or leading questions
Move analysis can assess this. The Swalesian approach to move analysis is
notoriously subjective. However, William Mann's Rhetorical Structure
Theory (RST) and Dialogue Macrogame Theory (RST) have a set of moves
that have been validated across a number of genres and and text types plus
the ability to incorporate (invent) new moves into the framework.
Comparison of section in A and G interviews discussing the disclosure
that Papa kills babies indicates significantly different rhetorical structure.
Interview A Interview G
Elaboration 9 Verify 8
Reason 8 Elaboration 3
Summary 3 Suggested 2
Alternative
Interpretation 2
Concession 2
Sequence 2
Circumstance 2
Purpose 1
Reason 1
Circumstance 1
Consequence 1
Background 1
Restatement 1
Solution 1
Concession 1
Interpretation of Papa kills babies episodes in
Interview A
In Interview A, the police interviewer invites A to give reasons for the original
disclosure that Papa kills babies through open-ended questions that give A the
opportunity to elaborate. A is keen both to explain how Abraham (her mother's new
partner) pressured her to make the disclosure about her father and to tell the story
of 'Mask of Zorro', a film she clearly enjoyed and remembers well. In two
Interpretation moves, A voluntarily makes a comparison between the bad man
from California and her father.
The police interviewer prompts A to talk about the use of a knife in the film since she
had mentioned this before both in relation to the film discussion prior to this
interview and in her original disclosure alleging that her father cuts babies heads.
Eventually A narrates that the 'baddie who looks like her Dad' cuts a man's head
and hands off in the film. The police interviewer makes explicit the implicit that A's
disclosure that Papa kills babies comes from the events of 'Mask of Zorro' with
the Summary move:
Ok, so this is- so that's the man who looks like your Dad in the film who done that.
/OK\.
Interpretation of Papa kills babies episodes in
Interview G
In this interview, G maintains that his father has killed some babies but concedes
that the number killed is not as many as stated in previous disclosures (not
much). G maintain this position despite being pressured by the police interviewer
to change his story through repeated verification moves and a suggested
alternative.
Eventually G does change his story and states that he had lied in his previous
disclosure. Whether this is an admission or a response to the suggestions of the
police interviewer cannot be definitively determined here. However, it is clear that
the police interview deploys moves and a questioning style that is not consistent
with ABE interviews.
Hypothesis #2
For a recantation to be given the legal status of a retraction (and therefore end
an investigation) the statement must be unequivocal and unambiguous,
credible as well as truthful.
The concept of veracity, recently developed as a dimension of information
quality (IQ) for use in big data evaluation for business and for library
information management systems, will be a useful way of assessing the
evidentiary value of a victim (or witness) recantation
Lukioianova and Rubin (2013) provides a comprehensive theoretical framework
for and ways of measuring veracity for big data starting from the position
that veracity goes hand in hand with inherent uncertainty . Veracity exists
on a certainty-uncertainty dimension; deception is the opposite of truth and
is taken as one component of veracity (along with objectivity and
credibility).
Following this, I hypothesized that a bona fide retraction will display high levels
of certainty and low levels of deception.
Examples of Certainty Markers used in Interviews A and G
Low 4 2% 2 2%
Uncertain 10 5% 3 3%
68 Police: Have you been to his house= 112 Police: You don't know, you guess or
1 6 1 17% 1 6 2 3
2 17 5 29% 2 11 5 4
3 32 10 31% 3 12 4 3
4 11 3 27% 4 7 2 2
5 20 5 25% 5 4 1 2
6 13 6 46% 6 6 2 3
7 10 1 10% 7 9 4 4
8 18 11 61% 8 12 4 3
9 12 3 25% 9 15 8 5
10 26 14 54% 10 8 3 3
11 9 6 67% 11 16 5 3
12 20 12 60%
13 7 5 71%
The box plot analysis revealed an outlier episode in Interview G; Episode 9 was where the police
interviewer directly contradicted the assertions of sexual activity made by G by making the
knowledge claim that G's sister had already said that opposite was true. The following language
from G contains an uncharacteristically high level certainty markers
INTERVIEW A INTERVIEW G
Episode 9
Median: 31
Interquartile Median: 33
range: 33
Interquartile
Population size:13 Range: 13
Lower quartile: 25
Upper quartile: 58 Population size:11
Lower quartile: 31
Upper quartile: 44
118 P: OK. Coz I've been told something different. 127 G: NO WE NEVER TOUCHED EACH OTHER.
119 G:................BY[G's sister name]? 128 P: OK. You've been to the doctor's though haven't you.
Hypothesis 2: Contrary to my initial hypothesis, the interviews contain both high certainty
markers and indications of deception. This may be due to the interviewee attempts to sound
convincing. Deception is explicitly shown in the contradictory statements across Interviews A
and G regarding the relationship between Mr Hollings and the children's father. The extent of
language variance in A's interview may suggest that this is the more deceptive interview of
the two, despite it appearing to follow the correct format for a retraction.
Conclusion: The analysis has highlighted the interviews' lack of structural integrity and presence
of uncertainty to the extent that it would be a considerable leap of faith to give them the
status of a retraction and use this to close an investigation. The method has produced some
interesting possibilities for further research into 1) the analysis of deception in non-narrative
witness statements, 2) the correlation between statistically significant language variance
and deception and 3)the investigative power of identifying statistical outliers.
Selected References
Lyon, T. D. (2014). Interviewing children. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 10, 73-89.
Malloy, L. C., Lyon, T. D., & Quas, J. A. (2007). Filial dependency and recantation of child sexual
abuse allegations. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 46(2),
162-170.
Rubin, V. L., & Vashchilko, T. (2012). Extending information quality assessment methodology: A
new veracity/deception dimension and its measures. Proceedings of the American Society
for Information Science and Technology, 49(1), 1-6
Rubin, V. L., & Lukoianova, T. (2015). Truth and deception at the rhetorical structure level.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 905-917.