Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Objectives
The business objectives of the Integrity Management System maximize the
economic value of the Organization.
Tactical Objectives
The tactical objectives are to adequately define and communicate the
methodology, processes and responsibilities to all members of the
organization to assure that the business objectives are achieved.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Tactical objectives
Ensure that all facilities are design, maintain, operate and decommission to
high and consistent standards.
Ensure that Business and HSE risks are identified and assessed using
appropriate risk assessment tools.
Ensure that relevant performance standards are made available and that
all completed activities are documented and reported.
Identify the different strategies required to ensure that the integrity and
reliability of the assets are effectively managed.
The Asset Integrity Management covers production facilities from the wellbore
to the export terminal including;
The Integrity cycle on the other hand covers the lifetime of the facility from
the initial design until final abandonment.
Asset Integrity Management Process
Design
Decommission Procurement
Replace Construction
Asset Integrity
Management Cycle
Modify &
Commissioning
Upgrade
Maintain Operation
Integrity is never an
Plan accident; it is always
the result of good
intention, sincere
Demings efforts, intelligent
Cycle of
Act
Quality
Do direction and skillful
Management execution;
it represents the wise
choice of many
Check alternatives.
William A. Foster
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
RBI Methodology
Module 3
Data Assessment
Monitoring & Inspection
Remnants Life Assessment
Module 7
Internal Review Independent Audit
Tactical Review & Audit
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Information Management
Risk identification
Implementation
Experience & Lesson
learnt
Integrity Management
Strategy
Asset Integrity
Management System
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
WHY !!!!
The fundamentals of Asset Integrity Management process and its
objectives are not properly explained and communicated.
The AIMS requirements has became extremely complicated to the limit
that makes it difficult to comprehend and rather expensive to implement.
Availability of an integrated business intelligence, that translates the
requirements of the AIMS to a reliable IT business application.
Difficulties to source truly competent project team capable to lead, verify
and challenge the deliverables of the AIMS consultant and,
Most important of all, failure to integrate, the content the process and the
people.
Asset Integrity Management System Phases
Development Phase
Roll-out Phase
Implementation Phase
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Module 1
Information Management
Shortfalls
No suitable data base platform to accommodate Inspection, Monitoring,
Production and operation data.
Fail to fully comprehend what is the full fledge of data requirement.
Data are not properly assessed, processed into information to enable
decision making process.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Module 2
Risk Identification & Assessment
Shortfalls
Risk assessment process not always following a systematic and consistent
routine.
Many important disciplines are not engaged in the risk identification process.
Risk identification, assessment and mitigation consider only the operation
phase of the pipelines and not extended to include the design phase or the
mothballing and decommissioning phases.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Module 3
Monitoring and Inspection
Shortfalls
Inspection protocols in most cases are not risk based, so many unnecessary
inspection and monitoring activities are being performed.
The Inspection & Monitoring data are not effectively assessed to enable
validating of different data source, explain the pipelines operation behavior
and identify new risks.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Module 4
Implementation
Shortfalls
Integrity related tasks (Control measures) are not considered by operating
authority and Maintenance department as part of their core business.
Module 5
Report & Measure performance (KPIs).
Shortfalls
Many completed activities are not reported in appropriate format or not
communicated to the right people.
Module 6
Roles and Responsibilities
Shortfalls
Roles and responsibilities not clearly defined.
Titles were changed to reflect thoughtful organizational improvement but
roles and responsibilities remains the same.
Competencies of relevant officers not routinely assessed to identify gaps
and recommend necessary training.
Absence of accurate Responsibility/Accountability/Consulted/ Informed
(RACI) chart explaining the relationship among different disciplines through
out the pipeline life cycle.
People in the organization are not full engaged
Roles & Responsibilities
Corrosion &
Structure
Project Structure Maintenance Inspection Chemical Operating
Operation
Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer Treatment Authority
Engineer
Engineer
Material
Routine
Selection Plant
Planning Design Codes Inspection Accountability
Modifications Modification
Scheme
&
Repair
Cathodic
Protection
Coatings &
Lining
Spares
Inspection Inspection
contract Design Emergency
Plan Data
Management constrains Chemical Response
Assessment
Treatment
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Module 7
Plan regular Internal and External Audits
Shortfalls
Internal and external audits not routinely completed as identified in the
PIMS process.
Audit terms of references are not adequately crafted so the results does
not truly identify and capture the operational and organizational gaps and
enable bench marking.
No one is held accountable to attend and track the audit
recommendations.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Module 8
Lessons Learnt and validated Experiences
Shortfalls
Absence of appropriate vehicle to capture and communicate lesson learned
and experiences gained.
The Deepwater Horizon Oil Rig that exploded in April 2010 was not outfitted with a safety device
known as an acoustic switch, that might have prevented the massive oil spill. Unfortunately, the
U.S. has no such regulation for oil wells operating off of its shores and is required by regulators in
Norway and Brazil.
Work continues to stop the oil flow at the Deepwater Horizon incident site in the Gulf of Mexico
using ROVs in an attempt to access the BOP.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Crude Oil
Cost of I. P surveys
Water Injection
Gas Injection
Gas Production
Condensate
Flare Lines
Ballast Lines
Intelligent Pigging Compliance Gauge Lines Piggability
All Lines Lines with IP Data
Activity Plant Life Cycle Initiative Source Equipment Line
GroupCategory Category
Piggab Non
le Piggabl
IP Statistics by Service/Duty Main Transmit ion Lines 13 e
Crude Oil 15 7
2 7
Crude Oil Water Injection 13 7
Gas
Gas Injection 12 7
Water
12 7
Other Gas Production
12 7
% Condensate 134 7
54 7
Flare Lines
12 7
Effluent Treatment 13 7
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Loading Lines 16 7
23 7
Ballast Lines
Asset Integrity Management Standards
32
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Thank you
Q&A