You are on page 1of 34

2nd Indonesia Oil & Gas Asset Integrity Management Conference

10th -11th August, 2017


Jakarta, Indonesia

Challenges in implementing Integrity


Management System
Who has successful implementation of AIMS "

Prof. Abdel Aziz. M. Salah Eldin


Integrity & Quality Management Consultant
Hudson Technology & Strategic Studies
Ottawa-Canada
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Do we have a common understanding of AIMS process ?

Transforming the mindsets of leaders and employees ?

Transforming from fragmented asset inspection/monitoring/measurement to


holistic Integrity Management Model

Why AIMS transformation efforts fail?


Asset Integrity Management

Asset Integrity Management

A System that maintains asset operation profitable and productive. It


Continuously assesses the HSE risks and implements mitigation measures to
minimize those risks throughout the Asset life cycle from design to
decommissioning.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Asset Integrity Management System Objectives

Business Objectives
The business objectives of the Integrity Management System maximize the
economic value of the Organization.
Tactical Objectives
The tactical objectives are to adequately define and communicate the
methodology, processes and responsibilities to all members of the
organization to assure that the business objectives are achieved.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Tactical objectives

Ensure that all facilities are design, maintain, operate and decommission to
high and consistent standards.

Ensure that Business and HSE risks are identified and assessed using
appropriate risk assessment tools.

Ensure that relevant performance standards are made available and that
all completed activities are documented and reported.

Identify the different strategies required to ensure that the integrity and
reliability of the assets are effectively managed.

Define the roles and responsibilities of the relevant technical personnel


engaged in the development, implementation of the CMS requirements.
Asset Integrity Management

Tactical objectives, cont.


Establish and track system performance against identified Key Performance
Indicators (KPIs).
Provide comprehensive and integrated audit mechanisms to examine the
effectiveness of the corrosion control techniques and risk reduction
activities.
Consolidate accumulated wisdom and lesson learned and ensure that they
are appropriately captured and effectively utilized.
Encourage introducing new technology and experiences with novel
materials.
Asset Integrity Management

Asset Integrity Management, Is one of the essential elements of operational


excellence that many companies have embraced to maintain the competitive edge in
their line of business.
Good
Reach reasonable level of maturity in definition and explanation
High buy-in by decision makers
Some success stories to tell
Industry leaders has developed sound templates to follow
Not Good
Has become unnecessary complicated to be understood and implemented.
Extremely expensive to be fully applied with the increased requirement.
Unavailability of experienced individuals and Consultants to assist development,
roll-out and implementation.
Many operators became more hang-up in the process rather than doing
necessary activities
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

The Asset Integrity Management covers production facilities from the wellbore
to the export terminal including;

Downhole facilities and Well Head equipment. WIMS

Offshore structure including topside facilities. SIMS

Subsea Pipelines, including subsea equipment and risers. PIMS

Offshore and Onshore process equipment. PEIMS

Other including; LIMS, CSIMS, EIMS, CIMS, RIMS

The Integrity cycle on the other hand covers the lifetime of the facility from
the initial design until final abandonment.
Asset Integrity Management Process

Transfer lesson learned


& Experiences Concept

Design

Decommission Procurement

Replace Construction

Asset Integrity
Management Cycle

Modify &
Commissioning
Upgrade

Maintain Operation

Inspection & Monitoring


Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Integrity is never an
Plan accident; it is always
the result of good
intention, sincere
Demings efforts, intelligent
Cycle of
Act
Quality
Do direction and skillful
Management execution;
it represents the wise
choice of many
Check alternatives.
William A. Foster
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Think for a 100 years ahead


Say what you do
Vision
Mission
Strategy
Do what you say
Process & Procedures
Implementation Plan
Record what you did
Documentation & Reporting
Prove it
Performance Records
Internal & External Audit
Key Performance Indicators KPIs
Improve it
Innovations
Knowledge Transfer
Training
Do it better next time
Asset Integrity Management Cycle
Failure Mechanisms
Module 1 Production,
Information Management Monitoring &
Incident Inspection Data
Investigations
Emergency Response
Module 2
Risk Identification & Assessment
Management of Changes

RBI Methodology
Module 3
Data Assessment
Monitoring & Inspection
Remnants Life Assessment

Fitness For Service Performance Standards


Assessment FFS Module 4
Implementation
Control Procedures

Module 5 Key Performance


Performance Management & Reporting Indicators

Skills & Competency


New Technology Pipeline Integrity Assurance
Management
Cycle
Module 8 Module 6
Experiences Gained & Lessons Learnt Roles & Responsibilities

Module 7
Internal Review Independent Audit
Tactical Review & Audit
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Information Management

Risk identification

Monitoring & Inspection

Performance Management &


Reporting

Roles & Responsibilities

Implementation
Experience & Lesson
learnt

Audit & Review


Asset Integrity Management

Corporate Vision, Mission & Values

Integrity Management Policy

Integrity Management
Strategy

Asset Integrity
Management System
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Many organizations are facing challenges to develop a successful AIMS


solution.

WHY !!!!
The fundamentals of Asset Integrity Management process and its
objectives are not properly explained and communicated.
The AIMS requirements has became extremely complicated to the limit
that makes it difficult to comprehend and rather expensive to implement.
Availability of an integrated business intelligence, that translates the
requirements of the AIMS to a reliable IT business application.
Difficulties to source truly competent project team capable to lead, verify
and challenge the deliverables of the AIMS consultant and,
Most important of all, failure to integrate, the content the process and the
people.
Asset Integrity Management System Phases

Development Phase

Roll-out Phase

Implementation Phase
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Module 1
Information Management

Shortfalls
No suitable data base platform to accommodate Inspection, Monitoring,
Production and operation data.
Fail to fully comprehend what is the full fledge of data requirement.
Data are not properly assessed, processed into information to enable
decision making process.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Module 2
Risk Identification & Assessment

Shortfalls
Risk assessment process not always following a systematic and consistent
routine.
Many important disciplines are not engaged in the risk identification process.
Risk identification, assessment and mitigation consider only the operation
phase of the pipelines and not extended to include the design phase or the
mothballing and decommissioning phases.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Module 3
Monitoring and Inspection

Shortfalls
Inspection protocols in most cases are not risk based, so many unnecessary
inspection and monitoring activities are being performed.
The Inspection & Monitoring data are not effectively assessed to enable
validating of different data source, explain the pipelines operation behavior
and identify new risks.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Module 4
Implementation

Shortfalls
Integrity related tasks (Control measures) are not considered by operating
authority and Maintenance department as part of their core business.

Fail to integrate the Integrity related tasks within the master


operation/production plan.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Module 5
Report & Measure performance (KPIs).

Shortfalls
Many completed activities are not reported in appropriate format or not
communicated to the right people.

Absence of a structured and transparent process to identify, measure,


weight and report the integrity KPIs.

Unnecessary information doesn't help or improve the quality of the report

Reports shall be adjusted to the targeted recipients.


Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Module 6
Roles and Responsibilities

Shortfalls
Roles and responsibilities not clearly defined.
Titles were changed to reflect thoughtful organizational improvement but
roles and responsibilities remains the same.
Competencies of relevant officers not routinely assessed to identify gaps
and recommend necessary training.
Absence of accurate Responsibility/Accountability/Consulted/ Informed
(RACI) chart explaining the relationship among different disciplines through
out the pipeline life cycle.
People in the organization are not full engaged
Roles & Responsibilities

Corrosion &
Structure
Project Structure Maintenance Inspection Chemical Operating
Operation
Engineer Engineer Engineer Engineer Treatment Authority
Engineer
Engineer

Material
Routine
Selection Plant
Planning Design Codes Inspection Accountability
Modifications Modification
Scheme
&
Repair

Cathodic
Protection

Special Pumping RPI, FFS &


Budgeting Failure Modes Inspection Pressure RLA

Coatings &
Lining

Spares
Inspection Inspection
contract Design Emergency
Plan Data
Management constrains Chemical Response
Assessment
Treatment
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Module 7
Plan regular Internal and External Audits

Shortfalls
Internal and external audits not routinely completed as identified in the
PIMS process.
Audit terms of references are not adequately crafted so the results does
not truly identify and capture the operational and organizational gaps and
enable bench marking.
No one is held accountable to attend and track the audit
recommendations.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Module 8
Lessons Learnt and validated Experiences

Shortfalls
Absence of appropriate vehicle to capture and communicate lesson learned
and experiences gained.

Problems and failures accoutered in the past keep reoccurring.

Peers experiences not adequately communicated.

The process of capturing, qualifying and effectively applying new


technology is very slow.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Introducing Asset Integrity Management guiding standards

BS EN ISO 9004:2009 Managing for the sustained success of an


organization A quality management approach
ISO/TS 29001 Petroleum, Petrochemical and natural gas industries quality
management system requirement
PAS 55-Part 1:2008 Specification for the optimized management of physical
assets
PAS 55-Part 2 Guidelines for the application of PAS 55-1
API Standard 1160 Managing System Integrity for Hazardous liquid
pipelines.
ISO 55000
Wells Integrity Management System WIMS

The Deepwater Horizon Oil Rig that exploded in April 2010 was not outfitted with a safety device
known as an acoustic switch, that might have prevented the massive oil spill. Unfortunately, the
U.S. has no such regulation for oil wells operating off of its shores and is required by regulators in
Norway and Brazil.

Work continues to stop the oil flow at the Deepwater Horizon incident site in the Gulf of Mexico
using ROVs in an attempt to access the BOP.
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Who has a Business Solution which truly satisfy


the AIMS Tactical Objectives
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

AIM Business Solutions claimed in the International Market


Meridium (PIMS and SIMS)
GL Noble Delton, Galium , SIMS, PIMS,WIMS
Bureau Veritas, RBI
Intertek APTECH , WIMS,RBI
Petrofac, Plant Asset Management (PAM)
Antea Software House, Italy, Inspection Manager
Velosi Asset Integrity Ltd , Velosi Asset Integrity Management
J.P Kenney, Wood Group Integrity Management, WGIM
Kheapera Technology, HTSS, Ookanica, Kommunica & Intrgrenica
Emerson Process Management, Roxar Fieldwatch 3.0 (WIMS)
Bayer Technology Services ,Asset Life Cycle Management
SGS Industrial Services, PipeWrx.
Force, Asset Integrity Management
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System
Intelligent Pigging Center
Kommunica Board

Intelligent Pigging data availability Intelligent Pigging Inspection Profile

ain Transmit ion Lines

Crude Oil

Number of I.P surveys

Cost of I. P surveys
Water Injection

Gas Injection

Gas Production

Condensate

Flare Lines

Effluent Treatment 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Loading Lines Number of IP surveys Cost of IP surveys

Ballast Lines
Intelligent Pigging Compliance Gauge Lines Piggability
All Lines Lines with IP Data
Activity Plant Life Cycle Initiative Source Equipment Line
GroupCategory Category
Piggab Non
le Piggabl
IP Statistics by Service/Duty Main Transmit ion Lines 13 e
Crude Oil 15 7
2 7
Crude Oil Water Injection 13 7
Gas
Gas Injection 12 7
Water
12 7
Other Gas Production
12 7
% Condensate 134 7
54 7
Flare Lines
12 7
Effluent Treatment 13 7
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Loading Lines 16 7
23 7
Ballast Lines
Asset Integrity Management Standards

High level Recommendations

Create the wake-up call

Act to transform the organization culture to embrace, value and


appreciate the need for the thoughtful change.
Develop the Integrity management implementation plan, walk the plan
and take advantage of opportunities.

Use one of the internationally recognized standard as a template to guide


the process of developing your own in-house AIM document.
Only trust IM business solution with a proven track record. Chose a proven
Integrity Management System that satisfy the requirement of ISO 9004 &
complemented by PAS 55-1:2008 Asset Management documents and ISO
55000.

32
Challenges in implementing Integrity Management System

Ensure that necessary competences are integrated into the development


team.
Understand that changes to AIMS environment is a journey not an event
and ensure that people are fully engaged, motivated and integrated into
that journey.
Act on the mind as well as the heart of your employees and make the
changes from inside out. Use all there senses to make the thoughtful
changes through engagement, learning, coaching and leadership.
Roll- out AIMS through out the organization. Everyone should know WHY
we are doing WHAT we are doing.

Change the misconception that nothing better can be done.


Asset Integrity Management Standards

Thank you
Q&A

Prof. Abdelaziz M. Salah Eldin


Quality and Integrity Management Consultant
Hudson Technology & Strategic Studies
Ottawa-Canada

You might also like