People of the Philippines v.

Shirley Casio
G.R. No. 211465, December 03, 2014,
(Leonen, J.)
 Facts:
• International Justice Mission (IJM) coordinated with the
police in order to entrap persons engaged in human
trafficking in Cebu City. A team of police operatives were
designated as decoys, pretending to be tour guides looking
for girls to entertain their guests.
• The team went to Queensland Motel and rented Rooms 24
and 25. These rooms were adjacent to each other. Room 24
was designated for the transaction while Room 25 was for
the rest of the police team.
• The team proceeded to D. Jakosalem Street in Barangay
Kamagayan, Cebu City’s red light district. Shirley Casio
noticed them and called their attention by saying “Chicks
mo dong?” (Do you like girls, guys?). The police operatives
told Casio that they have a guests waiting in the hotel.
• After a few minutes, accused returned with AAA and BBB, the
team convinced Casio to come with them to Queensland
Motel and was soon arrested by police operatives.
• The trial court found Casio guilty of violating R.A. 9208,
otherwise known as the “Anti-Trafficking in Persons Act of
2003.”
• Casio argues that there was no valid entrapment. Instead, she
was instigated into committing the crime. The police did not
conduct prior surveillance and did not even know who their
subject was. She denied being a pimp and asserted that she
was a laundrywoman.
• In addition, AAA admitted that she worked as a prostitute and
she was only 17 years old when peddled her. Thus, it was her
decision to display herself to solicit customers.
 Issue/s:
• 1. Is the entrapment of Casio valid?

• 2. Is Casio liable under of R.A. 9208?

 Ruling:
• 1.) There is a valid entrapment

• There is entrapment when law officers employ ruses and schemes

to ensure the apprehension of the criminal while in the actual
commission of the crime. There is instigation when the accused is
induced to commit the crime. The difference in the nature of the
two lies in the origin of the criminal intent. In entrapment, the mens
rea originates from the mind of the criminal. The idea and the
resolve to commit the crime come from him. In instigation, the law
officer conceives the commission of the crime and suggests to the
accused who adopts the idea and carries it into execution.

• As testified by the police operatives, Casio called out their attention

by saying “Chicks mo dong?” If accused had no predisposition to
commit the offense, then she most likely would not have asked the
police operatives if they wanted girls.
• As defined under Section 3(a) of Republic Act No. 9208, trafficking in persons can
still be committed even if the victim gives consent.

• SEC. 3. Definition of Terms. — As used in this Act

a. Trafficking in Persons - refers to the recruitment, transportation, transfer or harboring, or

receipt of persons with or without the victim's consent or knowledge, within or across national
borders by means of threat or use of force, or other forms of coercion, abduction, fraud,
deception, abuse of power or of position, taking advantage of the vulnerability of the persons, or,
the giving or receiving of payments or benefits to achieve the consent of a person having control
over another person for the purpose of exploitation which includes at a minimum, the exploitation
or the prostitution of others or other forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services, slavery,
servitude or the removal or sale of organs.
The recruitment transportation, transfer, harboring or receipt of a child for the purpose of
exploitation shall also be considered as “trafficking in persons” even if it does not involve any of
the means set forth in the preceding paragraph.

• The victim’s consent is rendered meaningless due to the coercive, abusive, or

deceptive means employed by perpetrators of human trafficking. Even without the
use of coercive, abusive, or deceptive means, a minor’s consent is not given out of
his or her own free will.
• 2.) Casio is liable under R.A No. 9208

• Section 4 of Republic Act No. 9208 enumerates the different acts of

trafficking in persons. Accused was charged under Section 4(a),
which states:
SEC. 4. Acts of Trafficking in Persons. — It shall be unlawful for any
person, natural or judicial, to commit any of the following acts.
a. To recruit, transport, transfer, harbor, provide, or receive a person by
any means, including those done under the pretext of domestic or
overseas employment or training or apprenticeship, for the purpose of
prostitution, pornography, sexual exploitation, forced labor, slavery,
involuntary servitude or debt bondage;

• Republic Act No. 9208 further enumerates the instances when the
crime of trafficking in persons is qualified.

SEC. 6. Qualified Trafficking in Persons. — The following are considered

as qualified trafficking:

a. When the trafficked person is a child;