CM :

Provide
new or
Safety , Site
running Eng.,
Distribute activities Subcont. &
to all competent
member & person:
PM
Identify the Safety staff
hazards

CM, Safety
PM :
& Site
Approve
Risk
engineer : CM
Identify
Assessmen
who is at Project
t
risk
Manager

Safety :
All member
Measure COMPETENT
with PM :
the risk &
Review risk
determined
PERSON
assessment All For Each
control
members : Activity
Record
finding
SITE ENGR

KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment

KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment
 Reviewing Risk Assessment:
• Why is it necessary to Review?
– To check accuracy & effectiveness of risk assessment
– To include the risks associated with new changes in the work location
– To review the hazards identification & their priority level
– Changes in procedures
– Routine review
– New Substances & new standards

KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment

 Steps for Risk Assessment:
• Team for Risk Assessment (Assessors + persons involved in concerned activities)
• Classify work activities (Routine/Non-Routine)
• Identify Hazards for each activity & their effect by risk assessment matrix
– Hazards should be related to:
• Physical/Chemical/Biological hazards
• Electromechanical hazards
• Psycho-social strain (various pressures etc.)
• Unsafe persons/unsafe situations
• Check for acceptable levels of risk, existing control measures & legal concerns of hazard
• Further control measures by following hierarchy to reduce the Risk Priority Number:
– Elimination
– Substitution
– Engineering/Maintenance Control
– Admin Control/ Awareness
– Personal Protective Equipment
KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment
 ------------------------------------------ PROBABILITY [a] -----------
Ha s occurred Ha s Ha s
Unhea rd Ha s occurred
i n the i ndus try occurred occurred
Hi s tori ca l : i n the once or twi ce
but not i n frequentl y i n frequentl y
Indus try i n compa ny
compa ny compa ny i n l oca ti on

Proba bi l i ty 1 in
1 i n 1,000– 1 i n 100 -
: (Si ngl e 100,000 - 1 i n 10 -100 1 i n 10
10,000 1,000
Acti vi ty) 1000,000
1 2 3 4 5
H&S Environment Severity Level Remote Unl i kel y Pos s i bl e Qui te Li kel y Li kel y
Regional Imp act,
M ultip le Large Scale, Long Ca ta s troph
Fatalities/Death Term (decade) 5
ic
5 10 15 20 25
Imp act
------------------- SEVERITY [b] ------------------

M ajor Health District Imp act,

Effect/Injury > 1 M edium Scale,
Fatality (or Permanent M edium Term
4 Severe 4 8 12 16 HIGH 20
Total Disability ) (Years) Imp act
M ajor Injury /Illness, Location Imp act,
Permanent Partial M edium Scale,
Disability or Lost Short Term
3 Cri ti ca l 3 6 9 12 15
Work Case > 5day s (M onths) Imp act
M inor Injury / Illness. Limited Imp act,
Restricted Work Case Localized, Short
or Lost Work Case = < Term (Weeks) 2 Ma rgi na l 2 4 MEDIUM 6 8 10
5day s Imp act
Sight Injury /Illness. M inor Imp act,
First Aid or M edical Localized LOW 2
Treatment Case (Immediate Area) 1 Mi nor 1 3 4 5
Temp orary Imp act
(Day s)

Low Low Ri s k, Th e s e ri s ks ma y n ot n e e d i mme d i a te l y a tte n ti on

Me d i u m Ri s k, Do s ome thi n g a b ou t the s e ri s ks a s s oon a s p os s i b l e , I n corp ora te
Medium Ri s k Re d u cti on Me a s u re s , I n vol ve De p a rtme n t Ma n a ge me n t.
High Hi gh Ri s k, Stop Work, d o s ome thi n g a b ou t the s e ri s ks i mme d i a te l y, I n vol ve GM/CEO

Risk Priority Number = Probability x Severity

KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment

 ------------------------------------------ PROBABILITY [a] -----------
Has occurred Has Has
Unheard Has occurred
i n the i ndustry occurred occurred
Hi stori cal : i n the once or twi ce
but not i n frequentl y i n frequentl y
Industry i n company
company company i n l ocati on

Probabi l i ty 1 in
1 i n 1,000– 1 i n 100 -
: (Si ngl e 100,000 - 1 i n 10 -100 1 i n 10
10,000 1,000
Acti vi ty) 1000,000
1 2 3 4 5
ment Severity Level Remote Unl i kel y Possi bl e Qui te Li kel y Li kel y
p act,
Long Catastroph
e) 5
ic
5 10 15 20 25

act,
KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment
le,
KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment
 Probability: 1 2 3 4 5

Severity Remote Unl i kel y Possi bl e Qui te Li kel y Li kel y

5 Catastrophi c

4 Severe HIGH

3 Cri ti cal

2 Margi nal MEDIUM

LOW
1 Mi nor

KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment

 Probability
1 2 3 4 5

Remote Unlikely Possible Quite Likely Likely

5 Catastrophic 20
Severity

4 Severe

3 Critical 3 9

2 Marginal 10

1 Minor

KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment

 ------------------------------------------ PROBABILITY [a] -----------
Has occurred Has Has
Unheard Has occurred
i n the i ndustry occurred occurred
Hi stori cal : i n the once or twi ce
but not i n frequentl y i n frequentl y
Industry i n company
company company i n l ocati on

Probabi l i ty 1 in
1 i n 1,000– 1 i n 100 -
: (Si ngl e 100,000 - 1 i n 10 -100 1 i n 10
10,000 1,000
Acti vi ty) 1000,000
1 2 3 4 5
H&S Environment Severity Level Remote Unl i kel y Possi bl e Qui te Li kel y Li kel y
Regional Imp act,
M ultip le Large Scale, Long Catastroph
Fatalities/Death Term (decade) 5
ic
5 10 15 20 25
Imp act
------------------- SEVERITY [b] ------------------

M ajor Health District Imp act,

Effect/Injury > 1 M edium Scale,
Fatality (or Permanent M edium Term
4 Severe 4 8 12 16 HIGH 20
Total Disability ) (Years) Imp act
M ajor Injury /Illness, Location Imp act,
Permanent Partial M edium Scale,
Disability or Lost Short Term
3 Cri ti cal 3 6 9 12 15
Work Case > 5day s (M onths) Imp act
M inor Injury / Illness. Limited Imp act,
Restricted Work Case Localized, Short
or Lost Work Case = < Term (Weeks) 2 Margi nal 2 4 MEDIUM 6 8 10
5day s Imp act
Sight Injury /Illness. M inor Imp act,
First Aid or M edical Localized LOW 2
Treatment Case (Immediate Area) 1 Mi nor 1 3 4 5
Temp orary Imp act
(Day s)

Low
KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment Low Ri s k, The s e ri s ks ma y not ne e d i mme di a te l y a tte nti on
 Major Activity:
Work at height
Activity /Description Hazards Existing controls Further controls

• Erection ,Dismantling and 1. Fall of Person from Height 1.Ensure Safe working Platform 1. Using double lanyard to avoid
modifying of Scaffolding 2. Fall of Materials from Height to be used, Single lanyard used fall from height & scaffolding
Structure. 3. Slip ,Trip and Fall Hazards 2.Ensure Area Barricaded Below checklist
3. Ensure temporary working 2. certified scaffolder
Platform are secure Properly 3. Safety Shoes , Safety gloves,
Safety Glass

Use of power drill 1. Damage tool 1. Check Inspection tag 1. Select the right tool for
2. Hand arm Vibration before use of issue from the right job
3. Electrical hazard store 2. face shield need to be
4. Noise 2. rotation used
5. Dust 3. Check inspection tag/ 3. GFCI need to be used for
voltage protection
4. Use ear plug 4. noise level check
5. Use dust mask
 What you are doing during the HSE
Committee Meeting

• All the HSE Committee Member must be focus on the Existing control and further control
• The purpose of the reviewing the Existing control and further control are as follows:
1. To check the Effectiveness of the controls applied before and after
2. Is it really Realistic?
3. Are we used the further control in Existing control or vise-versa?
4. Are the Further controls really reflecting at sites Activity or using regarding their specification?
5. What is the percentage of their Effectiveness ?
6. Is it capable and minimizing the hazards in terms of their usage?
7. Are we focusing the quality of material being used at site and their implementation through Risk
Assessment ?
8. Near Misses have to link with the Risk Assessment Activity and should be check on monthly basis for proper
Coverage of Hazards and their rectification Steps taken at site through Near Misses report
9. After Every review of Risk Assessment if some points are added to make it more Effective it should be
highlighted and marked .
 Points to be remember

• Prior to HSE Committee meeting the safety manager need to prepare the Agenda of the Meeting in which he
is going to discuss the following points:
1. Set the Agenda related to the Highest RPN value in your Risk Assessment, Further controls and Assignment
2. Collect all the Highest “RPN’’ and Accumulated in a sheet with Evidences and bring it in to the Meeting to
discuss among the Member .
3. Assigning the Risk related Activity to those department whose ‘’RPN’’ Value is high.
Let us suppose if the RPN is high for the Electrical Issues then Ask Electrical Personal to control it by
applying different controls and minimize it accordingly.
4. The safety manger responsibility to collect all the discussed points in the meeting and make Minutes of
Meeting then circulate it to the Different HSE committee member for future references .
5. Once in a month All the HSE Committee member need to get together to discuss the Minutes of meeting
points or other issued related to Risk Assessment.
6. So in the followed meeting HSE Committee member should validate that The Highest RPN Value is reduces or
not after applying the Control Measure’s and if it has provide the Evidences among the member of the HSE
Committee.

KDI-QHSE-13 Risk Assessment