Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Week 1
I) Accident (2)
II) Occupational accident (2)
III) Incident (2)
IV) Dangerous occurrence (2)
Examiners’ Report
Some candidates missed marks by listing factors related to the term such as
welfare facilities, rather than the term itself (Welfare).
(a) Free from illness or diseases , A state of well being mentally, physical &
socially
(b) Workplace free from uncontrolled hazards & risks
(c) Looking after people’s basic needs e.g. provision of drinking water, food,
accommodation and bathrooms
(d) Protecting the environment in which the workplace operates e.g. The land,
air & water
Dec 2012 Q7, Jun 2014 Q 9 & Mar 2015 Q2
Risk assessments of the activities involving using hands and could lead to
upper limb disorders such as manual handling
The results of job safety analysis & the identification of repetitive actions and
safe system of work to ensure workers are following it
The organisation’s employees & safety representatives and The observation
of supervisors & the complaints that may have been made to them by
members of their teams
Accidents & Ill-health reports & the analysis of absence records to check if
the workers have any previous medical problem
Trade unions & insurance companies
Enforcers & Local safety authorities and professional bodies like IOSH
Manufacturers’ information like manuals, catalogues and MSDS
Ergonomists or occupational health practitioners
The social activities co-ordinator on out-of-work activities such as tennis,
squash, etc
Better answers were structured under the TWO headings of internal &
external sources of information
Oct 2010 Q9, Apr 2011 Q9, Mar 2011 Q3,
Oct 2013 Q11, Feb 2014 Q3
- Duty of care and The need to reduce the injuries, pain & suffering caused to
employees by accidents & ill-health
- The need to provide a reasonable standard of care as a moral obligation
While Legal arguments are concerned with the need to comply with the
law and the desire to avoid enforcement action & civil claims
Financial / economic benefits include
- A more motivated workforce resulting in increased production rates
- The avoidance of costs associated with accidents (e.g. downtime,
administrative, investigation & first-aid costs, repair of plant & equipment,
employing & training of staff, etc)
- Possibly cheaper insurance premiums
- The avoidance of costs associated with legal action
- & maintaining the image & reputation of the organisation with its various
stakeholders
Oct 2013 Q3
(b)
FINANCIAL / ECONOMIC
Part of MLF
(b) (4)
By the formation of enforcement authorities who will enforce the
legislation in all sectors of industry and commerce and help improve
levels of health and safety
These authorities will also give useful advice concerning health and
safety and help pass on best practice from other countries
This will ensure consistency of safety performance between
workplaces
Finally, the threat of prosecution and subsequent loss of reputation
of organisations who have not complied with the laws is also a
governing factor
Dec 2005, May, Aug 2006 Q5, Nov 2005 Q7, Nov
2006 Q5, Mar 2007 Q5 & Dec 2014 Q11
Although the question asked for an ‘outline’, some provided only a list and
could not be awarded maximum marks.
Sep 2011 Q1, Mar 2012 Q9, Jun 2013
Q3 & Jun 2014 Q 11
A serious accident has occurred to a worker and there
will be costs to the organisation as a result.
THE 4 Points
March 2007 Q 4, Sept 2011 Q9, & Dec
2013 Q6
THE 4 points
Mar 2011 Q4, Dec 2011 Q2, Jun 2012 Q11,
Jan 2013 Q7 & Feb 2014 Q5
(8)
Examiners’ Report
This was one of the better answered questions on the paper though
some candidates failed to gain maximum marks for the first part by
providing a list rather than an outline.
1. Taking reasonable care of their own H&S & those who may be
affected by their actions such as their fellow workers
2. Cooperating with their employer by following safe systems of work,
wearing PPE
3. Reporting accidents & unsafe conditions to their supervisor or other
nominated member of management
4. They also have an important role to play in taking an active part in
any consultation exercise set up by their employer
(d) (4)
EXTERNAL
INTERNAL
1. Interviewing the staff & Consultation with the workers themselves or other
organisations doing similar work
2. Manual handling risk assessments
Nov 2007 Q11, Dec 2007 Q11 & May 2008
Q7
Few candidates were able to outline more than one or two ways that
employees’ perceptions of hazards might be improved
Without the required outine; such answers were not adequate to gain
marks.
Suggested Answer
- Firstly that there was a need to identify, perhaps by the use of
surveys, the reasons for employees’ misperceptions in order to show
how improvements might be achieved & how currently held views may
be challenged
- Changing the nature of hazards from hidden to obvious, for example
adding smells to odourless gases or putting warning signs such as
“caution sharp edge”
- Addressing environmental factors, such as improve lighting &
reducing noise, that might cause distraction or otherwise hinder the
perceptual process
- Providing (it is) suitable information about the different hazards in the
workplace, proper training on hazard identification and risk
assessment, with clear instructions and adequate supervision.
- Carrying out medical checkup for the workers and provide medical
treatment for any sensory defects such as uncorrected poor eyesight
or hearing loss
- Ban drugs & alcohol in the workplace and carryout random testing for
the employees during the work time
- Avoid fatigue and exhaustion of the workers by providing frequent
breaks and adequate rest or recover time
Nov 2007 Q11
Motivation is the driving force behind the way in which a person acts in order to
achieve a goal
In this case, Examiners were looking for suggestions of how employees might
be motivated to work safely
Answers should have outlined such ways as
Improving, by training & the provision of of information, employee’s knowledge
of the consequences of not working safely
Showing the commitment of the organisation to safety by providing resources &
a safe working environment
Involving employees in H&S decisions by consultation & team meetings
Recognising & rewarding achievement
More able candidates recognised that positive motivation, i.e. employees
working safely because that was how they wanted to work, tends to be more
effective than negative motivation, employees working safely for fear of
disciplinary action
With the right balance between them, however, both have their place
The question was generally well answered with many candidates
demonstrating a good understanding of this facet of human factors
Although, in some cases, responses were somewhat limited,
concentrating solely on the reward & discipline effects
Mar 2012 Q2
1. Their past work experience in the task they are carrying out, so the
are fully aware of the inherent hazards & risks involved
2. Their appropriate level of relevant training & qualifications for the
task being carried out
3. Their ability to know when they are not competent to do a certain
aspect of a task & to ask for the appropriate advice from a
supervisor etc
4. There general attitude towards H&S being of a high standard & well
motivated to work safely
5. Their ability / aptitude to learn new skills quickly, perceive risks
correctly, & to report near misses as soon as possible
Dec 2005 Q 11, May, Aug, Nov 2006 Q11 & Jan
2014
a) Explain the meaning of the term
‘competent person’. (2)
Posters are commonly used as a medium for passing on health & safety
messages to the workforce & most candidates will have used them or seen
them in use.
The question was generally well answered but excellence was achieved only
by the candidates who thought practically about the issues involved,
structured their responses under the separate headings of advantages &
disadvantages, & provided a reasonable outline as required.
Advantages of posters include:
their relatively low cost, (allowing them to be displayed in the lost apposite
positions)
their brevity (allowing messages to be easily understood),
their use in reinforcing verbal instructions or information,
& in providing a constant reminder of important health & safety issues,
& their potential to allow employees to become involved in their selection &
hence in the message being conveyed.
Disadvantages include:
the need to change posters on a regular basis if they are to be noticed,
the fact that they may become soiled, defaced & out-of-date,
& the possibility that they might be seen to trivialise serious matters.
additionally they might actually alienate people if inappropriate stereotypes
(e.g. of the ‘stupid worker) are used,
they provide no direct way of assessing whether the message has been
understood,
& they may be perceived by unscrupulous employers as an easy, if not
particularly effective, way of discharging their responsibility to provide health
& safety information,
& even of shifting the responsibility onto the workforce for any accidents that
may occur.
Oct 2013 Q10
LIMITATIONS
1. Limitations include language barriers for people who have not been
accommodated by different languages of the host country
2. The communication may be too complicated or ambiguous or
full of technical jargon
(b) (4)
MERITS
LIMITATIONS
There are a number of ways of reducing the likelihood of human error in the
workplace that should have been outlined in the answer to part (a) of the
question
These include
The use of skilled, trained & competent staff (including pre-employment
screening issues)
Motivation of the workforce
Task variety to prevent monotony & the provision of frequent breaks to avoid
work overload
Addressing workplace environmental issues such as noise, light & heat
Mechanisation & automation
Ensuring that controls on machinery are clearly marked
Implementation of a drug & alcohol policy
& providing competent supervision of employees
Most candidates mentioned the need for competency & training but
few were able to provide the range of methods necessary to obtain all
the marks available
A few candidates, possibly because they misread the question,
produced answers based on the causes of human error rather than the
ways of reducing its likelihood
There were some good answers to part (b), with many candidates gaining
full marks by referring to reasons such as
Over familiarity & complacency
Lack of instruction, information & training
Lack of experience, particularly where young persons are involved
The fact that some hazards (e.g. airborne contaminants or radiation) may be
invisible &/or intangible
Sensory impairment
& involvement in routine, repetitive tasks that can lead to lack of attention
In answering part (c), Examiners were looking for an outline of methods to
encourage the motivation of employees to work safely
The overt recognition of good health & safety performance (e.g. by giving
praise &/or offering financial incentives) is important in this respect
Conversely, disciplining employees who choose to ignore safe working
procedures has its place but tends to be less effective
Other measures might include
Involving employees, for instance, in carrying out risk assessments &
drawing up safe systems of work
Improving the company’s health & safety culture & demonstrating a high
level of management commitment
Ensuring a good working environment
& providing training & ensuring good communication
Some candidates seemed to perceive little difference in the
requirements of parts (a) & (c) & were content to repeat the answer that
they had already given to the first part of the question
Part (c) was, in fact, intended to look in more depth at one aspect of the
answer to part (a)
March 2007 Question 6
This question was designed to examine the issues involved in the training of
new staff
Those who did well concentrated on the matters to be included in an
induction training programme as was required & did not fall into the trap of
discussing wider training issues
Most candidates were able to outline the main topics as
The organisation’s H&S policy
Emergency procedures
Hazards specific to the workplace & the need to comply with H&S
requirements
Health & safety responsibilities & lines of communication
Accident & first-aid arrangements
& welfare provision
More able candidates referred to health surveillance & consultation
procedures
Aug 2006 Q9 & Nov 2006 Q9
This was a question that allowed candidates to imagine scenarios that would
lead to interference with verbal communication
They were thus able to take a “common sense” approach & most were able
to provide good answers
Indeed, many were excellent
The reasons why someone might misunderstand an instruction may be due
to
The way that verbal information is given (e.g. complex, jargonistic,
ambiguous, not in the usual language of the receiver, in a heavy dialect
Distorted by the means of communication such as telephone or tannoy
Inconsistent with body language
Due to the environment (e.g noisy) or due to some limitation on the part of
the receiver (e.g. mental or physical difficulty)
Inattention
Lack of knowledge or experience
Restricted by PPE
Dec 2005 Q5, May 2006 Q5, Nov 2006 Q5, June
2007 Q5 & May 2008 Q5
1. A reduced accident rate which would mean less lost time & injuries
to workers
2. Less chance of prosecution on the criminal side or claims for
compensation on the civil side
(ii) (2)
A number of factors can determine the initial level of supervision that should
be given to someone starting work in an organisation
These include
The age of the employee, as well as his/her experience of work in general &
of the task to be performed in particular
The nature & complexity of the task & its inherent risks
The person’s skills & qualifications for the work
His/her attitude & aptitude
The systems of work & any specific safety requirements applying to the task
& the employee’s communication skills & any special needs that he/she may
have
Few candidates touched on the above range of factors in their answers
& most concentrated solely on age, experience & training
Some seemed to have misinterpreted the question &, instead of
considering levels of supervision, wrote about factors that might
determine the nature of the induction training
Nov 2006 Q9 & May 2012 Q5
(a)
Answers were not to the same standard as those provided for the
first part of the question. Many described the evacuation process
rather giving reasons why it should be practised. Those who did
understand what was required tended to produce lists rather than
explanations.
March 2007 Question 5
For part (a) consideration of the meaning of the two key words should
have enabled candidates to explain that “informing” is a one way
process involving the provision of relevant information by
management to workers whereas “consulting” is a two way process
where account is taken of the views of workers before any decision
is taken.
Most candidates were able to gain the two marks available for this
part of the question.
The response to part (ii) was a little disappointing despite the
Regulations being quite specific on matters for consultation
These include
The introduction of any measures at the workplace that may substantially
affect the employees’ H&S
The arrangements for appointing &/or nomination competent persons
The H&S implications of introducing new technology
The planning & organisation of H&S training
& the information that the employer is required to provide under other
Regulations, such as that relating to
Risk assessments
Preventative measures
& emergency procedures
Hence employers are not only obliged to provide information but must
consult their employees on the appropriateness of the information before it is
given
Dec 2011 Q4, Nov 2103 Q2
1. Identify all significant hazards & risks arising from or connected with the
activity to be carried out
2. Identify all the persons at risk including employees, other workers &
members of the public
3. Evaluate the adequacy & effectiveness of existing control measures &
identify other protective measures that may be required
4. Enable priorities to be set, be appropriate to the nature of the work & be
valid over a reasonable period of time
(b) (6)
(2)
(c) Outline THREE types of work situation that might
require a PTW system, giving reasons in EACH
case
(6)
Examiners’ Report
For part (a) When work has to be carried out involving hazardous or
high risk activities, a permit to work is normally used.
This is a formal document, signed by an authorised person and
intended to control the activities by ensuring set procedures are
followed and by recording the control measures that should be
taken.
In other words : Permit To Work is a documented control system
requiring written conformation that certain actions have been carried
out to eliminate or control risks before high risk activities or non
routine activity is carried our.
For part (b), most candidates were able to identify three types of work
activity choosing from work such as entry into confined spaces, hot
work for example welding and cutting, working at height, and work
on high voltage electrical equipment.
In answering part (c) of the question, candidates were expected to
outline the details that should be included in a permit to work. The
first would be a description and assessment of the work to be
performed including the plant involved, its location and the possible
hazards associated with the task. This will determine the need for,
and nature of, other relevant contents of the permit such as for
example, the isolation of sources of energy and product inlets, and
the additional precautions required such as atmospheric monitoring,
the provision and use of personal protective equipment, the
emergency procedures to be followed and the duration of the permit
An essential element of a permit to work system is, of course, the
operation of the permit itself. By means of signatures, the permit
should be issued by an authorised person, and accepted by the
competent person responsible for the work. On completion of the
work, the competent person would need to indicate on the permit
that the area had been made safe in order for the permit to be
cancelled by the authorised person, after which isolations could be
removed. Answers to this part of the question were generally to a
reasonable standard with many candidates giving the impression
that they had experience of the operation of a permit to work system
at their places of employment.
For part (d), one of the prime factors which might influence the
effectiveness of a permit to work system is the information provided
on the permit which should be based on a full recognition of the
hazards associated with the work that is to be carried out. Even
though the information given is comprehensive, the system will not
be effective if there is a failure by those carrying out the work to
comply with the terms of the permit, for example by failing to isolate
plant or drain lines containing hazardous substances or controlling
ignition sources in a flameproof area.
Examples of other influencing factors include the competency of staff
performing the task, the standard of the management and
monitoring of the system, the complexity of the system that has
been introduced, environmental considerations and human factors
such as stress or fatigue and the acceptance of the system by those
involved.
The last part of the question seemed to cause candidates some
difficulty and there were not too many who were able to identify
many relevant factors. Some merely repeated what they had written
in answer to part (c) and gave no reasons why a permit to work
system might be ineffective.
Dec 2012 Q 1 & Jan 2015 Q1
For part (a) of the question, an acceptable meaning of the term “hierarchy of
control” would have been either a list of measures designed to control risks
which are considered in order of importance, effectiveness or priority or
measures designed to control risk that normally begin with an extreme
measure of control and end with personal protective equipment as a last
resort.
In other words it’s “arranging the control measures in order, so that the
most effective control measures are at the top (ERIC) and the leasr effective
control measures are at the bottom (PD) “
There were few candidates who appeared to be familiar with the term with
some associating ‘hierarchy’ with the management structure.
In answering part (b) on the application of the general hierarchy,
candidates should have begun with the possibility of eliminating the
risks either by designing them out or changing the process. The next
step would be the reduction of the risks by, for example, the
substitution of hazardous substances with others which were less
hazardous or covering cables with durable material to avoid
damage. If this were not possible, then isolation would have to be
considered, using enclosures, barriers or worker segregation. The
application of engineering controls such as guarding, the provision
of local exhaust ventilation systems, the use of reduced voltage
systems or residual current devices would follow as would
management controls such as safe systems of work, training, job
rotation and supervision with the final control measure being the
provision of personal protective equipment such as ear defenders or
respiratory protective equipment.
Many candidates were able to refer correctly to the
elements of a hierarchy of control but then found it
difficult to provide relevant examples to obtain all the
marks available.
Jun 2013 Q11
ERIC PD
Answers to this question were generally very
limited and, although the topic of the question is
within the ICG1 syllabus, it appeared to be one
that was not well understood by many of the
candidates. This question gained the lowest
average mark on this question paper.
As is the common pattern with this question paper
candidates failed to answer the question set and
instead provided information that may be relevant
to the topic but irrelevant to this question and
could not therefore be awarded marks.
The answer could have mention principles of prevention
such as:
Avoiding risks / hazards
Evaluating unavoidable risks
Combating risks as source
Adapting work to the individuals
Adapting to technical progress
Replacing the dangerous with non-dangerous/less
dangerous
Developing an overall coherent prevention policy
Giving priority to collective protective measures over
indivdual protective measure
Providing suitable training/information/instructions to
workers
Jun 2013 Q10 & Jun 2014 Q9
For Part (a), most candidates identified that accidents should be reported &
recorded in order to
Comply with legislative requirements
To enable an accident investigation to take place (with the aim of preventing
accidents of a similar type)
& to identify accident trends from later statistical analysis
identifying that accident reporting & recording can also lead to a useful
review of risk assessments
can assist in the consideration of any civil claims that may arise
In answering part (b), Examiners were looking to candidates to outline such
factors as
Ignorance of the reporting procedures
The possibility of retribution (particularly within a “blame culture”)
Peer pressure
A previous lack of management response
& an aversion to form filling
Other factors include
A reluctance to lose time from the job in hand
The trivial nature of any injury sustained
& a desire to preserve the company’s, the department’s or the individual’s
personal safety record, particularly where bonus payments are affected by it
Dec 2011 Q11 & Feb 2014 Q9
For part (i), nearly all candidates recognised that the primary purposes of
investigating an accident is to identify the immediate & root causes in order
to prevent similar accidents occurring in the future
In this respect, the main reasons for investigation relate to the possible
weaknesses in risk assessment processes & other aspects of safety
management systems
Other reasons relate to
Facilitating compliance with legal obligations
Collecting evidence to defend a civil claim
Determining economic loss
& demonstrating management commitment to occupational health & safety
Part (ii) required an outline of a sufficient range of information to gain the
eight marks available
This should have included reference to information such as
The personal details of the injured party, time & location of the accident
Environmental conditions, the work activity at the time of the accident
The control measures in place
The precise circumstances of the accident
The type & extent of injury sustained
Details of witnesses & copies of their statements where taken
Drawings & photographs
Immediate & root causes identified
Possible breaches of the law
& the recommendations of the investigation team in relation to remedial
action required
As is often the case, some candidates provided a list rather than an
outline
Other answers lacked the breadth required by concentrating on a
limited number of items of information
Sometimes providing rather more detail than was necessary
For part (a) Possible immediate causes of the accident described
include the lack of attention paid by both the visitor and the driver of
the vehicle; a breach of site rules such asspeeding, the driver using
a mobile phone and a failure of the visitor to wear high visibility
clothing; a mechanical failure of the vehicle and environmental
conditions such as the absence of or a poor standard of lighting.
For part (b), candidates were expected to explain possible root
causes of the accident such as the absence of procedures to control
visitors; the lack of adequate arrangements for separating
pedestrians and vehicles; either the absence of site rules for
controlling vehicle direction such as a one way system, for warning
pedestrians of the approach of a vehicle or for restricting speed or
the failure to enforce the rules should they exist; a failure to carry out
regular maintenance of the vehicle; the existence of ‘blind spots’ on
vehicle routes; a poor standard of driver training and a failure to
provide personal protective equipment such as high visibility
clothing.
Another suggested ancer for part (iii)
IMMEDIATE CAUSES
1. Failure of the brakes, so even though the driver did see the pedestrian he
could not stop
2. Human error or failure to comply with procedures by reversing too fast &
not looking out for pedestrians
3. Restricted view for the driver because he was reversing & not using a
banks person
4. Environmental conditions such as high noise levels which may have
caused the pedestrian not to hear the vehicle
UNDERLYING CAUSE
In answering part (a), many candidates explained how accident data can be
used to identify trends & problem areas in order that resources can be
allocated & appropriate remedial actions taken
Good answers also explained how accident data enable comparisons to be
made with others (“benchmarking”), & how they can be used to provide
information to employees & to focus & stimulate discussion at safety
committee meetings
Answers to part (b) tended to be limited in content
Most candidates chose “inspection” & “auditing” as their two proactive
monitoring methods but many provided little way of an outline
Some candidates became confused between proactive & reactive
methods & referred inappropriately to accident data analysis & similar
reactive methods
Other proactive methods that could have been outlined are
Safety surveys (which generally focus on a particular procedure, such as the
introduction of new equipment)
Safety tours (which are unscheduled, less formal inspections to check on
general workplace standards)
Safety sampling (which is an organised system of checking defined areas of
the workplace, & often particular health & safety issues, on a regular basis)
Benchmarking (where performance is compared with that of similar
organisations)
The various means of environmental monitoring (e.g. air monitoring, noise
assessments)
& the results of health surveillance
“Another suggested Answer” (a)
1. Accident data can be used to identify trends & problem areas in order that
resources can be allocated & appropriate remedial actions taken
2. If accident rates are increasing, this is a good indication that the proactive
monitoring methods are not effective
3. Enables comparisons to be made with others benchmarking within an
organisation or external & how they can be used to provide information to
employees & to focus & stimulate discussion at safety committee meetings
4. It also shows management commitment towards H&S, which can help
motivate employees to improve
(B)
Identify the:
(a) active (proactive); (4)
(b) reactive measures (4)
Answers to the second part (b) were not to the same standard with
many candidates unable to identify reactive measures available to an
organisation and showing obvious confusion between the two types of
monitoring measure. Reactive measures that might be used include the
number of reported accidents and the frequency rate; sickness
absence rates particularly those relating to occupational ill-health;
incidents of reported near misses and dangerous occurrences; property
damage; the number of actions such as the issue of notices or
prosecutions taken by the enforcement authorities; the number of civil
claims; the number of complaints from workers and the costs involved
in all the above.
Jun 2013 Q8
Others who were on the right track were only able to offer factors
such as accidents or incidents and the introduction of something
new, whether process or equipment.
September 2010 Q8
For part (a), a ‘health and safety audit’ could have been explained as a
systematic critical examination of a health and safety management
system, involving a structured process for the collection of
independent information with the aim of assessing the effectiveness
and reliability of the system, identifying its strength and weaknesses
and suggesting corrective action when this was thought to be
necessary.
Answers to this part of the question were generally vague with few
candidates able to give an acceptable meaning for the term ’health
and safety audit’.
For part (b) i) The possible advantages of using an internal auditor for
a safety audit would include familiarity with the workplace, its tasks
and processes and an awareness of what might be practicable for
the industry; ability to see improvements or a deterioration from the
last audit; familiarity with the workforce and an individual’s qualities
and attitude; the fact that the workforce might be more at ease with
someone who was part of the organisation; and an audit which was
relatively less costly and easier to arrange.
For part (b) ii) An external auditor on the other hand is more likely to
possess the necessary auditing skills and credibility; will not be
inhibited from criticising members of management or the workforce;
is more likely to be up to date with legal requirements and best
practice in other companies and will view the organisation’s
performance through a fresh pair of eyes.
Candidates appeared to have difficulty in identifying the advantages of
using each type of auditor and some wrote of the disadvantages
rather than the advantages.
For part (c), candidates should have outlined that there a number of
reasons why the audit findings should be submitted to the senior
management of the organisation such as they have the authority
both to require appropriate action to be taken and to authorise the
resources that might be necessary; to enable them to demonstrate
leadership and commitment from the top; to enable them to give
praise or reward where this has been earned but also to take
disciplinary action against workers in cases where this is thought to
be necessary; to enable them to consider and reset their goals and
objectives for the future and to comply with their personal
responsibilities either under legislation or under international
standards and best practice.
1. Environmental monitoring
2. Health surveillance
3. Safety observation tours
4. Benchmarking against the performance of other like organisations
(ii) (4)
- Type of audit, its scope such as management system elements and terms of
reference
- audit protocols and consider issues such as scoring or the use of suitable software.
- Size of the organisation and number of employees
- Activities taking place, risks, tools & equipment used
- Auditing team (competence, number and duties in the audit)
- Management system needs and content
- Local legislations and selected performance standards
- Duration of the audit & frequency of auditing
- Cooperation needed from management and their commitment
- Available resources to complete the audit
- Identification of the key elements of the audit process such as the
planning, interviews and verification, feedback routes and the preparation and
presentation of the final report.
(c) (2)
1. By interviewing members of staff
2. By reviewing health and safety documentation
3. Carrying out physical observation for the workplace (inspection)
Nov 2012 Q1, Mar 2013 Q1