Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 2
CR Process
Step 1: Read the argument and question in the given order
Deconstruct the argument
• Read through to understand fully the argument. Diagram only the argument
structure or necessary relationship (timeframe, causality, math reasoning)
• The argument may vary: nhiều hơn 1 evidence, không có conclusion, có thêm
intermediate conclusion hoặc counter-point.
Classify the question type
• Note xuống abbr của dạng câu hỏi
• Phải đọc đến cuối câu hỏi để tránh bị miss chữ “Except”
Step 2: Pre-thinking
• Tuỳ theo dạng câu hỏi có strategy pre-thinking khác nhau.
Step 3: POE
• Go from wrong to right (dựa trên common wrong answer). Phải đọc hết 5 câu trả lời
• Loại câu chắc chắn sai trước rồi còn lại mới suy luận.
Page 3
3. INTERMEDIATE CONCLUSION
• Là kết luận trung gian support chứ không phải final conclusion
• Dùng because, therefore để test cái nào là final conclusion
Page 5
CR Question Type
Group Type Abbr
HELP OR HURT Strengthen S
Weaken W
ANSWER STIMULUS Find assumption FA
Resolve the paradox Pdox
PROVE Must Be True True
Main Point M
STIMULUS ANSWER Reasoning – Method of reasoning R
Reasoning – Find the flaw Fl
(Fact Test / Structure Test) Reasoning – Parallel reasoning //R
(Variation Test) Evaluation Ev
Fin in the blank FitB
Except Ex
Page 6
STRENGTHEN - S
Question Samples
If true most strengthen/ most strongly support the claim?
Provide the best basis/ the best reason for the claim?
Prove the hypothesis
Provide justification for /evidence in favor of
If feasible will effectively achieved / successfully accomplished?
Which following, if true, is helpful in establishing that the conclusion ABOVE is properly?
Pre-thinking Correct Answer
• SUPPORT THE CONCLUSION
• Any errors/ gaps/ suspects/ flaw in the stimulus fill-in
• Arguments contain analogies or survey make them sounder
POE Wrong Answers
* New info - Contender if it’s SUPPORTING.
* New info - Loser: RELATED but not AFFECTED the conclusion (ex: bus – pollution)
* OOS – Loser if mainly irrelevant comparison
* Reverse / Switch term
* Shell game: support a SIMILAR conclusion / not the real one
* Variation of supporting levels: little to a lot. Evaluate STRAIGHTFORWARD Impact
Page 7
WEAKEN - W
Question Samples
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weaken / undermines the conclusion?
Which of the following, if true, would cast the most serious doubt on the validity of the argument?
Which of the following, if true, most strongly call into question the author’s conclusion?
Find disadvantages / Find a criticism of the argument
What is damaging to the argument?
A plan is ill-suited if / Otherwise unlikely to succeed
Which of the following, if known, is evidence that contradicts the hypothesis above/ against the
speculation above.
Popular scenarios including
Pre-thinking Correct Answer
• ATTACK THE CONCLUSION. #1 INCOMPLETE INFO: any
• Any errors/ gaps/ suspects/ flaw in the stimulus. other possibilities or data/
POE Wrong Answers survey problems
#2 IMPROPER COMPARISON:
Similar to Strengthen question
compare items essentially
different/ false analog
#3 QUALIFIED CONCLUSION:
limit the conclusion or
overgeneralize it to leave it
to attack
Page 8
FIND ASSUMPTION - FA
Question Samples
If statement true, which of following must be true?
The author assumes which of the following in saying that
The argument can’t be true unless which of following statements are assumed or true?
The conclusion above would be more reasonably drawn if
Which of following is required in order to claim
Pre-thinking Correct Answer [NEW + SUPPORT CONCLUSION + MUST-BE-TRUE]
Assumption => Conclusion => Inference. Both Assumption và Inference đều Must be true
1. Supporter: close gap or link new elements back to the premises. Khác với Strengthen là assumption cannot
contain extraneous information – a minimalist answer nên các answer dạng này thường ít.
2. Defender: eliminate weakeners – có rất nhiều new info để weaken, nên dạng này unlimited answer. Cách duy
nhất là sau khi POE thì dùng Negation technique để xác nhận lại
POE Wrong Answers
1. Các answer có “at least one/ at least some” thường là đúng, nhưng cần phải negate lại để kiểm tra
2. Avoid các answer that claim an idea: the primary purpose, the top priority, the main factor thường sai
3. Negate argument: điều đc đề cập trong argument được cho là đúng, không bao giờ counter lại
4. Restate argument: not wrong, but actually not UNSTATED assumption
Logical opposition (for Negation technique) Many # most # some. Often -> Some, not Many or Most
All (100) # Not all (0-99) | Some (1-100) # None (0) Always # Not always | Sometimes # Never
At least one # None | At least some # None Everywhere # Not everywhere
Page 9
EVALUATION - EV
Question Samples
The answer to which of the following question contribute most to an evaluation of the argument
Clarification of which of the following issues would be most important to an evaluation of the position
Which of the following is important to know in investigating the hypothesis in the passage
Which of the following most useful to know to determine the plan / in order to judge whether
Pre-thinking Correct Answer
• Reveal LOGICAL FLAW of the argument or NEW INFO – either strengthen or weaken the argument
POE Wrong Answers
• VARIATION TEST to Contenders
Page 16
EXCEPT – Ex
Question Samples
Câu hỏi có thể là bất cứ loại nào nhưng có chữ Except ở cuối câu
POE Wrong answers
• ODD ONE OUT – Không cần pre-thinking
• Phổ biến là Strengthen/Weaken. Đi thẳng vào Answer Choice và label S / W / N (N =
neutral). Pick the Odd one
Page 18
CAUSALITY – A cause B
Indicator
Caused by / Because of / Responsible for / Reason for / Leads to / Contribute to / Improve
Induced by / Promoted by / Determined by / Produced by / Product of
Played a role in / Was a factor in / Is an effect of / A put B at risk
This is an encouraging evidence that A improves B
Weaken scenarios (Find a flaw in the assumption)
1. Alternative cause B, not only A
2. Reverse relationship: B cause A
3. Provide error & problem to the data/survey in the causal statement
4. Correlation not causality relationship: A happens before (or simultaneously) B w/o causing
a. C cause A và B – both A, B results of a change
b. Example case A happens -> B not happens
c. Example case B happens -> A not happens
Strengthen scenarios
1. No other causes
2. No reverse relationship: B not cause A
3. Reduce error & give proof to the data/survey in stimulus
4. Example case A happens -> B happens
5. Example case A not happens -> B not happens