Professional Documents
Culture Documents
approach
Under this system the worker who met the
established standards of performance would earn
the basic wage rate set by management.
The worker who produced the maximum output
would be rewarded.
If the worker’s output exceeded the set target his
wages would increase proportionately.
Reorganization of supervision:
The work must be planned by the worker and not by
the foreman .this focused on two things separation
of planning and doing and functional
foremanship.
Scientific recruitment and training: training must be
imparted to bring out the best in a worker.
Intimate friendly co-operation between management
and workers.
Limitations of this approach:
1. It revolve round the operational level problems
and did not focus on the management of an
organization from a manager’s point of view.
2. Over emphasis on economic needs of a worker
did not lay emphasis on the social needs of the
workers.
3. Did not focus on job satisfaction.
He is best remembered for task and bonus system
and the Gantt chart.
Under Gantt’s incentive plan if the worker
completed his work in the less than the
standard time he would receive the bonus.
He also introduced an incentive plan for the
foreman who would be paid a bonus for every
worker who reached the daily standard.
Gantt chart : it is still used by many organizations.
It compares the actual performance with the
planned performance.
It indicates the production in time rather than
quantity.
The horizontal axis in chart shows time work
scheduled, work completed.
The vertical axis identifies the individuals and
machine assigned to the work schedules.
It compares a firm’s scheduled output and
expected completion dates with what actually
produced in a year.
Job Week number
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Work specialization
Abstract rules and regulations
Impersonality of managers
Hierarchy of organization structure.
NOT MUCH POPULAR TODAYSTRICT
DIVISION OF LABOR DESTROYS
INDIVIDUAL CREATIVITY OF WORKERS.
NOT UNIVERSALLY APPLICABLE TO
COMPLEX STRUCTURES.
THEY DID NOT DEAL WITH LEADERSHIP
MOTIVATION ASPECT INFORMAL
RELATIONS THEY EMPHASISED ON
PRODUCTIVITY OVER OTHER ASPECTS OF
MANAGEMENT
MARY PARKER FOLLET 1868-1933
SHE GAVE MUCH MORE IMPORTANCE TO
THE FUNCTIONING OF GROUPS IN THE
WORK PLACE .
ORGANIZATIONAL PARTICIPANTS WERE
INFLUENCED BY THE GROUP IN WHICH
THEY WORK.
FOCUSED ON PRINCIPLE OF ‘POWER WITH
‘ THAN POWER OVER.
ADVOCATED POWER SHARING.
FINDING A SOLUTION ACCEPTIBLE TO ALL
MEMBERS.
BASIS FOR MOTIVATION LEADERSHIP
TEAMWORK POWER AUTHORITY.
ELTON MAYO(1880-1949)
FATHER OF THE HUMAN RELATIONS
APPROACH
STUDY CONDUCTED AT WESTERN
ELECTRIC’S HAWTRHONE PLANT 1927-1933
TO EVALUATE EMPLOYEE’S PSYCHOLOGICAL
REACTIONS IN –ON THE JOB
ILLUMINATION EXPERIMENTS:
1924-1927