EVALUATION OF ASHRAMSHALAS &

IDEAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS

Presented by:
Rajneesh Kumar Pankaj
Sudha Kant
INTRODUCTION

 ASHRAMSHALA
 IDEAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOLS
Definition of evaluation

"By the term evaluation, we mean

systematic examination of events
occurring in and consequent on a
contemporary – an examination
conducted to assist in improving this
program and other programs having the
same general purpose."
OBJECTIVES

 To understand the quantitative and

qualitative performance of these
schools.
 To understand the factors influencing
the quality of teaching in these schools.
 To suggest possible measures for
improving the quality of education in
these schools.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

 Research design
 Research tools
SCOPE OF STUDY

 Cities studied
SAMPLING PLAN
FINDINGS

 ASHRAMSHALA

 IDEAL RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL

ASHRAMSHALA (FINDINGS)

INFRASTRUCTURE
 School buildings
 Classrooms
 Living rooms
 Sanitation
Findings (contd.)

 STUDENT
 TEACHER
 QUALITY OF EDUCATION
 DROP OUTS
 NEXUS BETWEEN SCHOOL
AUTHORITIES AND GOVERNMENT
OFFICIALS
Findings (contd.)

 Governments criteria of evaluation

 Standards not being followed
 Accountability of voluntary organization
 Governments control over Ashramshala
 Ashramshalas totally dependent on
government funding
 Facilities to students
Infrastructure – Ashram Shala
I.R.S (FINDINGS)

INFRASTRUCTURE

 School buildings
 Classrooms
 Living rooms
 Sanitation
Findings (contd.)

 STUDENT
 TEACHER
 QUALITYOF EDUCATION
 DROP OUTS
 NO GUIDELINES ON DEPLOYMENT
AND TRANSFER OF TEACHERS
 Others
Analyzing The Educational Schemes*

PROGRAMME

OUTPUTS TASK
REQUIREMENTS

NEEDS COMPETENCIE
S

BENEFICIARIES ORGANISATIO
N
DEMAND DECISION PROCESS
EXPRESSION

* Framework given by David C. Korten

Needs Of Beneficiaries

 IMMEDIATE NEEDS

 LONG TERM NEEDS

Outputs - Needs

 CATERS TO IMMEDIATE NEEDS

 LONG TERM NEEDS NOT FULFILLED

Task requirements - Competence
 TASKS REQUIREMENTS (OBJECTIVE)
 PLANNING
 SELECTION OF BENEFICIARIES
 CAPACITY BUILDING
 LOGISTICS
 PROVIDE QUALITY EDUCATION
 MONITORING & EVALUATION
 COMPETENCE
 TECHNICAL
 SOCIAL
 Motivational
Demand Expression – Decision
Process
 MOST DIFFICULT FIT

 MECHANISMOF DEMAND
EXPRESSION

 ENSURING PARTICIPATION FROM

ALL THE STAKE HOLDERS
PROBLEMS (Ashramshala)

 Poor physical infrastructure

 Low technical competency
 Low motivational competency
 Less number of teachers
 No accountability
 Dummy students and teaching & non-
teaching staff
Suggestion
 Short term
 Increased number of classrooms
 Ashram shalas should have photographs of all
students
 At least four teachers per ashramshala
 Teaching Pattern – Period wise
 Minimum qualification of teachers
 PTC with Science at Intermediate
 B. Sc., B. Ed.
 M. Sc./B. Sc.
 Intermediate with Science
 Contd….

 Medium Term
 Appointment of teachers by government
 Increased Government Control

 School management be made accountable

 Issue identity card to teaching and non-teaching

staff of ashram shalas
 Long Term
 Ashram shalas should be closed and school
building should be acquired by government
Problem (IRS)

 Lack of Infrastructure
 Deployment of teachers
 Low pass percentage
 Poor learning
 Lack of proper guideline on transfer of
teachers
Suggestion

 Better Infrastructure need to be provided

 Proper deployment of teachers
 Remedial session for class eight
students
 Policies on transfer of teachers
THANK YOU
Students back

Number of Students

180
160
Sanctioned
140
Strength
120 No. of Students
100 as per record

80 Number of
students present
60
40
20
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Teachers back

Physical Infrastructure
9
8
7
6
5 No. of teachers
4
No. of Class rooms
3
2
1
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Student Teacher Ratio back

Teacher student ratio

70 64.00
60.00
60
51.50
50
42.67
38.50 38.67
40
31.25 32.75 30.00 30.00
32.00
30.00 30.00
30
23.67

20 17.50

10

0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Drop Out(ashram shala) back

2003-04 2002-03

Boys Girls Boys Girls

Average Rate 10.66 16.46 7.66 10.34
Std. I 26.15 27.55 2.08 8.33
Std. II 6.43 10.00 10.11 14.29
Std. III 2.86 11.43 9.56 7.36
Std. IV 8.06 16.85 8.51 10.20
Std. V 6.02 17.50 8.51 4.42
Std. VI 15.13 15.36 8.25 2.08
Std. VII 10.00 16.53 6.58 25.72
Drop Out (IRS) back

Boys Girls

2003-04 2002-03 2003-04 2002-03

8 12.35 5.26 13.35 11.98

9 5.22 12.76 4.65 15.47

10 11.37 10.53 12.04 3.10