Avid John ChaImers is an AustraIian phiIosopher specializing in the area of philIosophy of mind. He argues that all forms of physicalism fail to account for existence of consciousness itself. His book, %e onscious mind, was described by The Sunday Times as "one of the best science books of the year"
Avid John ChaImers is an AustraIian phiIosopher specializing in the area of philIosophy of mind. He argues that all forms of physicalism fail to account for existence of consciousness itself. His book, %e onscious mind, was described by The Sunday Times as "one of the best science books of the year"
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Avid John ChaImers is an AustraIian phiIosopher specializing in the area of philIosophy of mind. He argues that all forms of physicalism fail to account for existence of consciousness itself. His book, %e onscious mind, was described by The Sunday Times as "one of the best science books of the year"
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Its all about communication!!! Chapter 8 Cognition - Language & Thought N QUESTIN: "Curious bIue ideas sIeep furiousIy." At what IeveI is this statement ambiguous? N QUESTIN: urious blue ideas sleep furiously Famous statement by a Iinguist to argue that sentences can be proper but stiII make no sense. At what IeveI is this sentence ambiguous? SEMANTCALLY AMBGUOUS at is cognition? 'ideo cIip (2:32) avid ChaImers "The Hard ProbIem" avid John ChaImers (born 20 April 1966) is an AustraIian phiIosopher specializing in the area of phiIosophy of mind and phiIosophy of Ianguage, whose recent work concerns verbal disputes. He is Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Centre for Consciousness at the Australian National University. He is also Visiting Professor of Philosophy at New York University. His book, %e onscious Mind (1996), is widely considered (by both advocates and opponents) to be an essential work on consciousness and its relation to the mind-body problem in philosophy of mind. n the book, Chalmers argues that all forms of physicalism (whether reductive or non-reductive) that have dominated modern philosophy and science fail to account for the existence (that is, presence in reality) of consciousness itself. He proposes an alternative dualistic view he calls naturalistic dualism (but which might also be characterized by more traditional formulations such as property dualism, neutral monism, or double-aspect theory). The book was described by The Sunday Times as "one of the best science books of the year". Phonemes n a spoken language, the smallest distinctive sound unit. Chug has three phonemes, ch, u, g. Morphemes n a language, the smallest unit that carries meaning. Can be a word or part of a word (prefix or suffix). LANGUAGE complex communication system that involves the use of abstract symbols to convey unlimited messages. uman language can convey meaning about things that haven't happened yet, things that happened in the past, and things that may never happen. Because we can transcend time and space with language, we have unlimited ability to communicate ideas. Structure of Language. ulti-layered process. Phonemes: smallest unit of sound in a language. All the letters of the alphabet are phonemes. n English we produce all the unique sounds that we are able to make by combining about 40-50 unique phonemes. Other languages make due with less. Hawaiian = 30 phonemes. Morphemes: smallest unit of meaning in a language. Small words, such as cat or walk, are morphemes. f we add the letter s to cat, we now have two morphemes (cat(s)), and if we add-ing to walk, we have two morphemes (walk(ing)). "Unbreakable" comprises 3 morphemes: un- (a bound morpheme signifying "not"), -break- (the root, a free morpheme), and -able (a bound morpheme signifying "doable"). Grammar: system of rules used in a language. One of those rules is semantics, which is the way we understand meaning from words by their morphemes and from their context. We know that adding an -s to the end of a word means that we are referring to more than one, or we know that words can have different meanings depending on the placement in a sentence or on the context. I'm dying! has a very different meaning when said by a person who is bleeding on the ground versus an adolescent preparing for her first middle school dance. Syntax: rules that refers to the way we order words to create meaning. our new please away soes put makes us confused, whereas 'Please put away your new soes is quite clear. Learning Language. Behaviorists believe being "exposed" to things in the environment, reinforcement, and repetition is correct. Nativists, however argue that we are "hardwired" to learn language & that humans are unique in that respect. Both sides have supporters, evidence isn't clear which is correct. ACQUISITIN. Noam Chomsky, MIT (Father of Modern Linguistics) believed that language is learned by exposure to language, but the ability to speak is hardwired. He believed there is a critical period of language acquisition, and if we do not learn language during that time, we will not learn language well. There is overwhelming evidence to support this theory. Chomsky Inborn UniversaI Grammar We acquire language too quickly for it to be learned. 'learning box" inside our heads that enable us to learn any human language. Noam Chomsky's offices at MIT. Boston GIobe architecture coIumnist Robert CampbeII wrote a gIowing appraisaI of the buiIding on ApriI 25, 2004. According to Campbell, the Stata is always going to look unfinished. It also looks as if it's about to collapse. Columns tilt at scary angles. Walls teeter, swerve, and collide in random curves and angles. aterials change wherever you look: brick, mirror-surface steel, brushed aluminum, brightly colored paint, corrugated metal. Everything looks improvised, as if thrown up at the last moment. That's the point. The Stata's appearance is a metaphor for the freedom, daring, and creativity of the research that's supposed to occur inside it. MiIestones in Language Acquisition Age --> MiIestone Birth to 2 months --> Cooing 2 months to 12 months --> Babbling Approx. 12 months --> First word (typically matching a simple sound: "da") Approx. 16 months --> 2-word utterances (telegraphic speech) 2-6 years --> Add 6-10 new words a day; learn grammar. Overextension. ("doggie" for ever 4-legged animal) Age 5 --> Over-regularization: " goed to the store." From Age 5 on --> Add words to vocabulary; learn subtleties of language. Other languages show the same pattern of acquisition (not just English). A 4-year-old couple emigrate from Jenezuela to the Untied States. 1hey have an 18-year-old son and a 9-year-old daughter. Based on research that has investigated mastery of English as a second language, which child will master English more quickly? yearold daugter will master Englis more quickly tan er parents and er broter According to learning theory, children's vocabularies increase and their pronunciation improves as parents insist on cIoser and cIoser approximations of the correct word before they provide reinforcement Language eveIopment ow many words do you tink you know now? ProbabIy around 80,000. After age 1 you average about 13 words a day. at made tese Super Bowl commercials funny? %e joke was 'language acquisition" - funny/odd to see a baby talk like a trader. LANGUAGE & THUGHT. o our words shape the way we think, or do we have ideas first and then look for ways to articulate them? Linguist Benjamin horf believed in Iinguistic determinism: our words shape & restrict our thinking. orfian ypotesis, proposed that language affects tougt, and the structure of the language itself affects cognition. Not %% orf! oes language influence our tinking? horf's Linguistic ReIativity The idea that language determines te way we tink (not vive versa). The Hopi tribe has no past tense in their Ianguage, so Whorf says they rareIy think of the past. Whorf said: Our language controls or limits what we can know and think. The Sapir-WhorI Hypothesis also stated that language is not merely a way to express ideas, but it also determines the range oI ideas we can have. If there`s no word or term for a concept, it`s hard even to conceive of it. For example, we might discover new things, but iI we don`t have term or word to call or describe it, we cannot proclaim our Iindings. n particular, WhorI announced, ative American languages impose on their speakers a picture of reality that is totally different from ours, so their speakers would simply not be able to understand some of our most basic concepts, like the Ilow oI time or the distinction between objects (like 'stone) and actions (like 'Iall). For decades, WhorI`s theory dazzled both academics and the general public alike. n his shadow, others made a whole range oI imaginative claims about the supposed power oI language. Ranged Irom the assertion that ative American languages instill in their speakers an intuitive understanding of Einstein's concept of time as a fourth dimension to the theory that the nature of the 1ewish religion was determined by the tense system of ancient Hebrew. According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, language determines our experience of reality, and we can see and think only what our language allows us to see and think. For example, the Inuit are said to have many different words for snow, and their sophisticated snow vocabulary make it easy Ior them to communicate and understand each other. ThereIore, they see and experience snow-covered landscapes` quite diIIerently Irom the rest oI us. However, some people are not convinced by the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. Although the nuit have many diIIerent words Ior snow, it does does not show that language determines reality, but instead suggests that reality determines language. The reason the nuit have many words Ior snow is because oI their environment, they live in snow. n contrast with, the reason there are not many words Ior snow` in Australia is that it doesn`t snow very oIten in Australia. o peopIe that speak more than one Ianguage think differentIy depending on their Ianguage at that time? The bilingual person is primed, in a way that monolinguals are not, to seek out and, at times separate, the meaning that a person is trying to convey from the words they are using to do so. The message becomes an abstraction embedded within the words -- their setting. o peopIe that speak more than one Ianguage think differentIy depending on their Ianguage at that time? W ventually, Whorf`s theory crash- landed on hard facts and solid common sense, when it transpired that there had never actually been any evidence to support his Iantastic claims. W The reaction was so severe that Ior decades, any attempts to explore the inIluence oI the mother tongue on our thoughts were relegated to the loony Iringes oI disrepute. W ut 70 years on, it is surely time to put the trauma oI WhorI behind us. And in the last few years, new research has revealed that when we learn our mother tongue, we do after all acquire certain habits of thought that shape our experience in significant and often surprising ways. o peopIe that speak more than one Ianguage think differentIy depending on their Ianguage at that time? f the inventory of ready-made words in your language determined which concepts you were able to understand, how would you ever learn anything new? #oman Jackobson, 'Languages diIIer essentially in what they must convey and not in what they may convey. This maxim oIIers us the key to unlocking the real Iorce oI the mother tongue: if different languages influence our minds in different ways, this is not because of what our language allows us to think but rather because of what it habitually obliges us to think about. o peopIe that speak more than one Ianguage think differentIy depending on their Ianguage at that time? !inker and Bloom (1992) suggest that human language may be a result of evolutionary processes because language allows humans to . acquire information about the world secondhand n 1977, Reggie Jackson hit 3 HR's against the Dodgers. He has stated that before each at bat, he visuaIizes crushing a home run. o you tink visualization elps? We can think in words. ut more often we think in mental pictures. Thinking without Language LINGUISTIC UNI'ERSALS. Arbitrariness: words are not inherently imbued with meaning. They are selected and stand for objects in the world in an arbitrary manner. Dog in English is chien in French. ispIacement: language allows us to talk about events that have already happened, events that will happen, and events that may not happen at all. No other form of communication allows for this. 'ocaI-Auditory ChanneI: All languages in all cultures rely on this as the primary form of communication using language. Honeybees seem to communicate o nimals tink? ohIer's Chimpanzees ohler exhibited that Chimps can problem solve. t has been observed that the manner in which chimpanzees solve problems, such as that of retrieving bananas positioned out of reach, is not through trial-and-error. nstead, they were observed to proceed in a manner that was unwaveringIy purposefuI. Animals of quite a range of species are capabIe of soIving a range of probIems that are argued to involve abstract reasoning; Modern research has tended to show that the performances of Wolfgang hler's chimpanzees, who could achieve spontaneous soIutions to probIems without training, were by no means unique to that species, and that apparently similar behavior can be found in animals usually thought of as much less intelligent, if appropriate training is given. Apes and Signing 4 STRATEGIES T PRBLEM SL'ING 1. ALGRITHMS (step-by-step approach) 2. HEURISTICS (a procedure that has worked in the past and is seen as IikeIy to work in the future.) 3. MEANS-EN ANALYSIS (keeps in mind the finaI goaI when setting sub-goaIs.) 4. RING BACAR (start with the goaI state and work backward untiI you reach the present state.) 4 STRATEGIES T PRBLEM SL'ING ALGRITHMS (step-by- step approach) Some algorithms involve simpIe triaI and error. f X is a possible solution to a problem, the algorithm for a solution might be stated: "Try X; if X works, then X = soIution; if X doesn't work, then try next X." Clearly, this could go on as many times as there is another possible X. AIgorithms guarantee a soIution but can be very time consuming. 4 STRATEGIES T PRBLEM SL'ING HEURISTICS (a procedure that has worked in the past and is seen as IikeIy to work in the future.) Heuristics are "ruIes of thumb" based on past experiences. f the light in your room goes out, you could check the fuse box, change the light bulb, check the wires in the wall or lamp, check the socket, and so on. Because experience suggests that the probability of the light bulb burning out is higher than the other choices, you try that first. euristics take less time tan algoritms, but tey may not result in a solution. 4 STRATEGIES T PRBLEM SL'ING MEANS-EN ANALYSIS (keeps in mind the finaI goaI when setting sub-goaIs.) n planning your study for finals, you might start with math but will set a time limit because you have exams in three other subjects. Will you need to spend the same amount of time on each? What exactly do you need to focus on? 4 STRATEGIES T PRBLEM SL'ING RING BACAR (start with the goaI state and work backward untiI you reach the present state.) When a company wants to know how its competitor's product works, it will "reverse engineer" that product. This means beginning with the product and analyzing its construction to see what each part does. The company can then begin with its own parts and reconstruct a similar product. Mind Magic, Mind Reading, or Mentalism is it real? Video clip 9:50