Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cooling line placement Minimum cycle time Minimum temperature distribution on cavity and/or core Minimum temperature distribution between cavity and core Whether high thermal conductivity inserts should be used
Analysis Type
Objectives determines are cooling analyses are run There are two analysis types
Manual analysis
A cycle time is input into the analysis Best if there is a known cycle time Best if the cooling layout is poor
Automatic analysis
Calculates the cycle time for you Best for minimizing cycle time Automatic analysis should not be run if the cooling layout is poor, because cycle times will be extended.
Automatic Analysis
Average of mold surface temperatures (top and bottom) for all elements is within 1C of the target mold temperature
Mold temperature convergence tolerance Maximum number of mold temperature iterations Geometric influence
Automatic
The software calculates the minimum number of surrounding elements required to produce accurate cooling results for each element, which is faster and requires less computing time.
Automatic
Ideal
The calculation for each element takes into account all other elements in the model
Ideal
How it is used
Ideal should be used if going on to warpage Parameter can be used but not typically recommended for warpage
Automatic ~ GIP 10, so for large models you can set the parameter lower
Reduces memory requirements but may affect accuracy of results
ERROR 702270 Disk Space Free up more disk space for both job manger temp and project directories Change GIP, especially if running Ideal If using a large model, change GIP to 6-10 Upgrade to higher amount of disk space ERROR 700080 Memory (RAM + SWAP) Increase swap size
Swapping to hard drive increases analysis time significantly Watch CPU usage when swapping, normally under 10%
Upgrade to higher amount of RAM Try to lower element count Remesh Convert Fusion > Midplane model
Issue for cooling as solver (Boundary Element Method) relies partially on mesh location Heat flux calculations do use thickness property
This issue affects warp results Most accurate results obtained by making changes in CAD and re-importing Fusion mesh
Warp
Cooling
Determine type (midplane only) Determine magnitude Determine cause Reduce warpage
Flow
Exercise
Run a second cooling analysis with Automatic IPC Compare the results from the two analyses
Results Summary
Target Mold Temperature 40 C
Automatic Analysis
Summary of Cavity Temperature Results ===================================== Cavity temperature - maximum Cavity temperature - minimum Cavity temperature - average Average mold exterior temperature Cycle time = = = = = 54.6 29.4 39.8 26.9 66.0 C C C C s
Specified Analysis
Summary of Cavity Temperature Results ===================================== Cavity temperature - maximum Cavity temperature - minimum Cavity temperature - average Average mold exterior temperature Cycle time
= = = = = 91.2 35.6 59.0 29.2 20.0 C C C C s
Top Temperatures
Automatic analysis Cycle time 66.0 sec. Avg. cavity temp. 39.8C Target mold temp. 40C
Maximum Temperature
Automatic analysis Cycle time 66.0 sec. Avg. cavity temp. 39.8C Target mold temp. 40C
Average Temperature
Max. Value 46.0 Manual analysis Cycle time 20 sec. Automatic analysis Cycle time 66.0 sec. Target mold temp. 40C
Time to Freeze
Coolant Temperature
QUESTIONS?