Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5/4/12
EIA Stages
I.
Screening
II. Scoping III. EIA Study & Report Preparation IV. EIA Review & Evaluation V.
5/4/12
EIA Stages
Stages 1, 2,3 and 6 are proponent-driven while Stages
4, 5 and also 6 are DENR-EMB driven stages group/type being applied for.
5/4/12
5/4/12
I. Project Screening
Allows the proponent to determine if the project will
undertakings established after 1982, which is covered by any or both of the following: Declared through Presidential Proclamations 2146 (1979) and 803 (1999) and technically defined by the EMB-DENR as project types that may pose significant environmental impact at certain thresholds of operations (also known as Environmentally Critical Projects or ECPs) regardless of location. 5/4/12
1.
I. Project Screening
2. Located in Environmentally Critical Area (ECA)
declared through Presidential Proclamation 2146 wherein significant impacts are expected for certain types and thresholds of proposed projects. what document type the project should prepare to secure the needed approval, and what the rest of the requirements are in terms of EMB office of application, endorsing and decision authorities, duration of processing.
5/4/12
5/4/12
proposed project, and then delimits the baseline information to those necessary to evaluate and mitigate the impacts.
with involvement from the EMB, affected community and representatives from the EIA Review Committee.
The public and concerned agencies are asked to
comment on the purpose and need of the project, issues and impacts, and ways to minimize and mitigate impacts.
5/4/12
different modes of information, education and communication (IEC) materials about the proposed project. Checklist by the review team, with final approval by the EMB Chief.
5/4/12
5/4/12
project & its alternatives, characterization of the project environment, impact identification and prediction, evaluation of impact significance, impact mitigation, formulation of Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan, with corresponding cost estimates and institutional support commitment. outline is prescribed by EMB for every major document type.
5/4/12
land, water, air and people), focused on the sectors and resources most significantly affected by the proposed action 5/4/12
Report is proponent-driven and includes a description of the proposed project and its alternatives and along with the Environmental Management and Monitoring Plan (EMoP). includes participation of local stakeholders as resource persons in primary data collection to optimize access to indigenous knowledge of the environment.
drafting of the Social Development Plan (SDP) 5/4/12 Framework, IEC Plan, and Monitoring Plan; all
5/4/12
and made possible depending on application type as determined under the screening stage through:
A waiver of the Public Hearing as requested by the Proponent may be granted by EMB in the absence of mounting opposition or as requested in written form with valid basis.
5/4/12
municipalities;
Copies of the Executive Summary to host barangays Project Fact Sheets, (written in the local dialect or
mixed with the popularly known language of the host communities) to other stakeholders.
5/4/12
5/4/12
V. Decision-Making
Decisions made by the EMB-DENR are based on the following:
Striking balance between socio-economic growth and
environmental protection
Utilizing environmental and socio-economic criteria Considering that the primacy of jurisdiction of other
5/4/12
V. Decision-Making
If the decision document is positive, or merits the
issuance of an ECC/CNC(Cert. of Non-Coverage), it is endorsed to concerned authorities like LGUs and other GAs to help them decide whether to issue the necessary permits/clearances or not. the President of the Philippines and the DENR / EMB.
5/4/12
prevention or mitigation of actual project impacts visa-vis predicted impacts used as basis for the EMP design responsiveness to project operations and project impacts.
5/4/12
prepares and submits a standardized Semi-annual ECC Compliance Monitoring Report (CMR) to the designated monitoring EMB office on a semi-annual basis. over-all evaluation/audit of the Proponents monitoring and the MMTs validation.
5/4/12
LGUs are represented in MMTs and generally form the pillar for local vigilance to environmental performance of the project. Major features of the MMT are:
Provides appropriate checks and balances in monitoring of project implementation Validates the Proponents environmental performance Recommends courses of action to EMB through the Complaints Management and Verification Report (CMVR).
5/4/12
5/4/12