Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Darius Semmens**, Scott N. Miller, David Goodrich, Ryan Miller, Mariano Hernandez
USDA Agricultural Research Service Southwest Watershed Research Center Tucson, AZ (current address for Daruis: EPA, Las Vegas semmens.darius@epa.gov)
Interdisciplinary
Watershed management Landscape ecology Atmospheric modeling Remote sensing GIS USDA ARS US EPA USGS Universities of Arizona & Wyoming US Army NWS 2 Post-Doc 2 Ph.D. 1 Masters 2 Full time
Multi-Agency
Primary Support
USDA-ARS David Goodrich Mariano Hernandez Averill Cate Shea Burns Casey Tifft Soren Scott Lainie Levick US-EPA Bill Kepner Darius Semmens Dan Heggem Bruce Jones Don Ebert University of Arizona Phil Guertin University of Wyoming Scott Miller
Introduction
PC-based GIS tool for watershed modeling KINEROS & SWAT (modular) Investigate the impacts of land cover change on runoff, erosion, water quality Targeted for use by research scientists, management specialists technology transfer widely applicable
After Omernick
71
to next channel
73 71
channel 73 pseudochannel 71
73
+
Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Soil
KINEROS Outputs
Channel Infiltration (m3/km) Plane Infiltration (mm) Runoff (mm or m3) Sediment yield (kg) Peak flow (m3/s or mm/hr) Channel Scour (mm) Sediment discharge (kg/s)
SWAT Outputs
Precipitation (mm) ET (mm) Percolation (mm) Surface runoff (mm) Transmission loss (mm) Water yield (mm) Sediment yield (t/ha)
Land Cover
Results
polygon
KINEROS
look-up tables
external to AGWA
KINEROS output: Runoff (mm,m3) Sediment Yield (kg/ha) Infiltration (mm, in) Transmission losses (m3/km) Peak runoff rate (m3/s) Peak sediment discharge (kg/s)
SWAT Parameter Estimation - Example: Curve Number from MRLC land cover
Higher numbers result in higher runoff
CURVE NUMBER Hydrologic Soil Group A 81 96 B 88 96 55 63 77 80 65 76 C 91 96 75 85 87 84 D 93 96 80 88 93 88 Cover 15 2 50 25 70 80
NLCD Land cover High intensity residential (22) Bare rock/sand/clay (31) Forest (41) Shrubland (51) Grasslands/herbaceous (71) Small grains (83)
AZ061
AZ067
9 inches
Layer 3
Ksat
Can manually change parameters for each channel and plane element
Ksat
Visualization of Results
Multiple simulation runs for a given watershed Calculate and view differences between model runs
ARIZONA
#
Phoenix
SONORA
Tucson
SWAT Results
Results from pre- and post-urbanization simulations using the 10-year, 1-hour design storm event
Mariano Hernandez, William G. Kepner, Darius J. Semmens, Donald W. Ebert, David C. Goodrich, Scott N. Miller
OBJECTIVES
Demonstrate the coordinated application of the Analytical Tools Interface for Landscape Assessments (ATtILA) and the Automated Geospatial Watershed Assessment (AGWA) tool to:
Assess the contribution of different land-cover types to surface runoff and sediment yield for the period 1993 to 1997 Identify subwatersheds with high sediment loadings as a result of land-cover management
BACKGROUND
Land use decisions can exacerbate:
Natural hazards and soil erosion Alter hydrologic balance Pollute surface and ground water Destroy wildlife habitats Increase air pollution Diminish community quality life
STUDY AREA
METHODOLOGY
The general approach used in this study was carried out as follows:
1) Discretization of the San Pedro River Basin into reporting units or subwatersheds using AGWA 2) Computation of landscape metrics with ATtILA a) Land use proportions b) Number of patches c) Patch density d) Largest patch index e) Average patch size 3) Characterization of Hydrologic Response Units (HRUs) based on land use proportions for SWAT
METHODOLOGY
4) Application of the AGWA tool to parameterize the SWAT model 5) Identification of subwatersheds with high sediment yield based on land-cover type, slope steepness, and average patch size
RESULTS
Percentage of agriculture and average patch size on each individual subwatershed
58 67 65 61 60 66 62 64 56 63 54 53 55 50
68
57 59 51 52
Percentage (%)
2.88 - 84.21 1.20 - 2.88 0.55 - 1.20
48
58 67 65 61 60 66 62 64 56 63 54 53 55 50
68
57 59 51 52
49 47
0.00 - 0.55
49 47
48
44 43 1 5 24 7 6 28
40 42 41 39 37 36 35 32 34 33 3130 29 26 27 25 24 22 23 1 5 24 7 6
46
45
44 43
46 45 40 42 41 39 37 36 35 32 34 33 3130 29
8 28
26
27 25 24 22 23
20 21
20 21
19 15 9 11 14
17 18 13 10 12
19 17 18 13 10 12
15 9 11
14
RESULTS
Spatially distributed average surface runoff and average sediment yield for the period 1993 - 1997
RESULTS
Sediment yield and mean annual surface runoff relationship
RESULTS
Watershed Assessment
HRUs were ranked according to high contributing sediment yield areas using the relationship between sediment yield to mean annual surface runoff as a function of four land cover types The average slope (9%) and the average sediment yield (0.8 t/ha) of all HRUs were used as cutoff criteria The selection process yielded eight HRUs; six are classified as agriculture (Ag) and two as desertscrub (Ds)
RESULTS
Areas with high sediment yields for 1993 - 1997
CONCLUSIONS
Highest contributions to sediment yield is produced in areas with agriculture and desertscrub land cover types Average slope steepness, average annual sediment yield, and average patch size were used to identify and rank sensitive subwatersheds
Introduction
To understand how an individual stream reach responds to external stresses it is necessary to study the channel network as a whole Watershed-based models are thus necessary to evaluate geomorphic impacts of landscape change Development of watershed-based geomorphic models is also the first step towards linking landscape and ecological indicators with surficial processes and response Event-based watershed models simulate erosion and deposition based on assumption that channel geometry is static during the course of an event
Prevents simulation of cumulative impacts from multiple events
No event-based watershed models for arid and semi-arid regions that can track cumulative adjustment of the channel network in terms of channel width, depth, and slope.
Approach
Implement channel-geometry adjustments in KINEROS2 based on total stream power minimization Develop a GIS-based interface to facilitate model parameterization, multiple-event simulations, and results visualization
AGWA-G
GIS-based interface for K2G, customized version of AGWA Watershed delineation and discretization Land cover and soils parameterization Coordinates multiple consecutive simulations and tracks cumulative outputs Results visualization Differencing results from two simulations relative assessment
Depth Changes
Width Changes
Results
Simulations based on
Hydraulic-geometry channels 1997 land cover Wet (top), intermediate (middle), and dry (bottom) year simulation results
1964
Decreasing Precipitation
1977
1964
Decreasing Precipitation
1977
Conclusions
Geomorphic response varies with rainfall record able to resolve changing spatial patterns of sediment movement Relative assessment useful for highlighting the relative magnitude of geomorphic impacts associated with landcover change Assessment of channel stability, or vulnerability to degradation will require simulations for a range of rainfall records and durations more research needed Linkages to riparian condition not yet established Arid-region model at present